PREVALENCE OF VALUE OF WORK IN HUMAN SYSTEMS INTEGRATION PROCEDURE
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Iuris (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/7658 |
Resumo: | In today’s stage of development of Civil Procedure and the need to check the applicability of the constitutional guarantee of a reasonable duration of proceedings, the articles 769 and 889 of the Labor Code, which provides for the subsidiary application of the Common Law Procedure of Work, allow interpretation as the Federal Constitution and especially on the principles, providing the application of procedural rules more suited to the realization of the law. Therefore, this work intends to examine the scope of application as rules of procedure common to the labor process, especially concerning the recent innovations introduced by Law 11232/2005 and Law 11280/2006, limited to specific set of principles of Labor Law and the enhancement of human work. The approach is quite necessary, especially in dealing with ontological and axiological omissions, as well as eligibility and application of the Instrumentality, Speed, Effectiveness, Protection and Non-Social Regression Principles. |
id |
UEL-6_3a73a21cb5e3057bdcca651929b00171 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7658 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-6 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
PREVALENCE OF VALUE OF WORK IN HUMAN SYSTEMS INTEGRATION PROCEDUREDa prevalência do valor do trabalho humano na integração dos sistemas processuaisSubsidiarityPrincipleLabor ProcedureCivil Procedure.SubsidiariedadePrincípioProcesso do TrabalhoProcesso Civil.In today’s stage of development of Civil Procedure and the need to check the applicability of the constitutional guarantee of a reasonable duration of proceedings, the articles 769 and 889 of the Labor Code, which provides for the subsidiary application of the Common Law Procedure of Work, allow interpretation as the Federal Constitution and especially on the principles, providing the application of procedural rules more suited to the realization of the law. Therefore, this work intends to examine the scope of application as rules of procedure common to the labor process, especially concerning the recent innovations introduced by Law 11232/2005 and Law 11280/2006, limited to specific set of principles of Labor Law and the enhancement of human work. The approach is quite necessary, especially in dealing with ontological and axiological omissions, as well as eligibility and application of the Instrumentality, Speed, Effectiveness, Protection and Non-Social Regression Principles.Diante do atual estágio de desenvolvimento do Processo Civil e da necessidade de se conferir aplicação da garantia constitucional da duração razoável do processo, os artigos 769 e 889 da CLT que tratam sobre a aplicação subsidiária do Direito Comum ao Processo do Trabalho, comportam interpretação conforme a Constituição Federal e principalmente diante dos princípios, permitindo a aplicação de normas processuais mais adequadas à efetivação do Direito. Assim sendo, o presente trabalho analisa a aplicação subsidiária de normas do Processo Comum ao Processo do Trabalho, mormente no que tange as recentes inovações trazidas pelas Leis 11.232/2005 e 11.280/2006, tendo como parâmetro a principiologia específica do Direito do Trabalho, bem como a valorização do trabalho humano. A abordagem faz-se de extrema necessidade e valia, principalmente na análise de omissões ontológicas e axiológicas, bem como na admissibilidade e aplicação dos princípios da Instrumentalidade, Celeridade, Efetividade, Proteção e Não-retrocesso social. Universidade Estadual de Londrina2010-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/765810.5433/2178-8189.2010v14n0p221Scientia Iuris; v. 14 (2010); 221-2332178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/7658/6752Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTerrin, Kátia A. PastoriOliveira, Lourival José de2011-05-15T01:36:38Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7658Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2011-05-15T01:36:38Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
PREVALENCE OF VALUE OF WORK IN HUMAN SYSTEMS INTEGRATION PROCEDURE Da prevalência do valor do trabalho humano na integração dos sistemas processuais |
title |
PREVALENCE OF VALUE OF WORK IN HUMAN SYSTEMS INTEGRATION PROCEDURE |
spellingShingle |
PREVALENCE OF VALUE OF WORK IN HUMAN SYSTEMS INTEGRATION PROCEDURE Terrin, Kátia A. Pastori Subsidiarity Principle Labor Procedure Civil Procedure. Subsidiariedade Princípio Processo do Trabalho Processo Civil. |
title_short |
PREVALENCE OF VALUE OF WORK IN HUMAN SYSTEMS INTEGRATION PROCEDURE |
title_full |
PREVALENCE OF VALUE OF WORK IN HUMAN SYSTEMS INTEGRATION PROCEDURE |
title_fullStr |
PREVALENCE OF VALUE OF WORK IN HUMAN SYSTEMS INTEGRATION PROCEDURE |
title_full_unstemmed |
PREVALENCE OF VALUE OF WORK IN HUMAN SYSTEMS INTEGRATION PROCEDURE |
title_sort |
PREVALENCE OF VALUE OF WORK IN HUMAN SYSTEMS INTEGRATION PROCEDURE |
author |
Terrin, Kátia A. Pastori |
author_facet |
Terrin, Kátia A. Pastori Oliveira, Lourival José de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira, Lourival José de |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Terrin, Kátia A. Pastori Oliveira, Lourival José de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Subsidiarity Principle Labor Procedure Civil Procedure. Subsidiariedade Princípio Processo do Trabalho Processo Civil. |
topic |
Subsidiarity Principle Labor Procedure Civil Procedure. Subsidiariedade Princípio Processo do Trabalho Processo Civil. |
description |
In today’s stage of development of Civil Procedure and the need to check the applicability of the constitutional guarantee of a reasonable duration of proceedings, the articles 769 and 889 of the Labor Code, which provides for the subsidiary application of the Common Law Procedure of Work, allow interpretation as the Federal Constitution and especially on the principles, providing the application of procedural rules more suited to the realization of the law. Therefore, this work intends to examine the scope of application as rules of procedure common to the labor process, especially concerning the recent innovations introduced by Law 11232/2005 and Law 11280/2006, limited to specific set of principles of Labor Law and the enhancement of human work. The approach is quite necessary, especially in dealing with ontological and axiological omissions, as well as eligibility and application of the Instrumentality, Speed, Effectiveness, Protection and Non-Social Regression Principles. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-12-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/7658 10.5433/2178-8189.2010v14n0p221 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/7658 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2178-8189.2010v14n0p221 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/7658/6752 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris; v. 14 (2010); 221-233 2178-8189 1415-6490 reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistamdireito@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306013702094848 |