The muldi-door court and its applicability in the small claims courts of brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: e Silva, Diego Saboia
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Pontes, David Gomes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/37784
Resumo: This paper’s objective is to verify the use of the Multidoor Court, as well as its possible adoption in Brazilian Small Claims Courts – JECs. Firstly, this study explores this important institution’s origins, from the perspective of Frank Sander, a Harvard University professor. Secondly, this paper discusses its possible use in Brazil’s JECs. Unfortunately, some court practices impair its purpose. Finally, this study investigates how legal professionals handle situations that do not need to immediately involve the judicial process. Finally, in order to verify the acceptance of the proposal in its surrounding reality, this paper examines a specific case that involved the right of neighborliness and the defense of possessions.
id UEL-6_43a7677f2d91ff5e82bd4b7470317042
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/37784
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The muldi-door court and its applicability in the small claims courts of brazilA doutrina do tribunal multiportas e sua aplicabilidade nos juizados especiais cíveis do brasilMultidoors CourtApplicabilitySmall Claims CourtBrazilTribunal MultiportasAplicabilidadeJuizados Especiais CíveisBrasilThis paper’s objective is to verify the use of the Multidoor Court, as well as its possible adoption in Brazilian Small Claims Courts – JECs. Firstly, this study explores this important institution’s origins, from the perspective of Frank Sander, a Harvard University professor. Secondly, this paper discusses its possible use in Brazil’s JECs. Unfortunately, some court practices impair its purpose. Finally, this study investigates how legal professionals handle situations that do not need to immediately involve the judicial process. Finally, in order to verify the acceptance of the proposal in its surrounding reality, this paper examines a specific case that involved the right of neighborliness and the defense of possessions.O presente artigo possui por objetivo geral verificar em que consiste a doutrina do Tribunal Multiportas, assim como sua incidência no âmbito dos Juizados Especiais Cíveis – JEC’s – no Brasil. Como propósitos específicos, intenta-se inicialmente explicar a origem de referida teoria, a partir da perspectiva atribuída por Frank Sander, na Universidade de Harvard, nos Estados Unidos; após, discute-se sua recepção em terras brasileiras, adotando-se como base sua aplicabilidade nos JEC’s à luz da evolução legislativa e possíveis situações que inviabilizam a efetivação de seu propósito, a saber, a pacificação social alcançada pelo meio mais adequado de prevenção ou reparação de conflitos de interesses disponíveis; e, por fim, analisa-se o novel perfil exigido dos profissionais da advocacia nessa conjuntura de desestímulo à judicialização. Por fim, à guisa de verificação da aderência da proposta à realidade circundante, faz-se análise de caso concreto hipotético que envolve o direito de vizinhança e mecanismos de defesa possessórios.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2020-03-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/3778410.5433/2178-8189.2020v24n1p39Scientia Iuris; v. 24 n. 1 (2020); 39-542178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/37784/26945Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesse Silva, Diego SaboiaPontes, David Gomes2023-01-26T22:29:51Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/37784Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-01-26T22:29:51Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The muldi-door court and its applicability in the small claims courts of brazil
A doutrina do tribunal multiportas e sua aplicabilidade nos juizados especiais cíveis do brasil
title The muldi-door court and its applicability in the small claims courts of brazil
spellingShingle The muldi-door court and its applicability in the small claims courts of brazil
e Silva, Diego Saboia
Multidoors Court
Applicability
Small Claims Court
Brazil
Tribunal Multiportas
Aplicabilidade
Juizados Especiais Cíveis
Brasil
title_short The muldi-door court and its applicability in the small claims courts of brazil
title_full The muldi-door court and its applicability in the small claims courts of brazil
title_fullStr The muldi-door court and its applicability in the small claims courts of brazil
title_full_unstemmed The muldi-door court and its applicability in the small claims courts of brazil
title_sort The muldi-door court and its applicability in the small claims courts of brazil
author e Silva, Diego Saboia
author_facet e Silva, Diego Saboia
Pontes, David Gomes
author_role author
author2 Pontes, David Gomes
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv e Silva, Diego Saboia
Pontes, David Gomes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Multidoors Court
Applicability
Small Claims Court
Brazil
Tribunal Multiportas
Aplicabilidade
Juizados Especiais Cíveis
Brasil
topic Multidoors Court
Applicability
Small Claims Court
Brazil
Tribunal Multiportas
Aplicabilidade
Juizados Especiais Cíveis
Brasil
description This paper’s objective is to verify the use of the Multidoor Court, as well as its possible adoption in Brazilian Small Claims Courts – JECs. Firstly, this study explores this important institution’s origins, from the perspective of Frank Sander, a Harvard University professor. Secondly, this paper discusses its possible use in Brazil’s JECs. Unfortunately, some court practices impair its purpose. Finally, this study investigates how legal professionals handle situations that do not need to immediately involve the judicial process. Finally, in order to verify the acceptance of the proposal in its surrounding reality, this paper examines a specific case that involved the right of neighborliness and the defense of possessions.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-03-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/37784
10.5433/2178-8189.2020v24n1p39
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/37784
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2020v24n1p39
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/37784/26945
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 24 n. 1 (2020); 39-54
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306015605260288

Registros relacionados