THE (REALISTIC OR RACIONALISTIC?) POSITION OF BRAZIL IN FACE OF WTO DECISION

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bilacchi Junior, Gilberto Vaciles
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/8465
Resumo: Negotiations between the countries that make up themodern international society have always been marked bydisagreements and conflicts of interests, especially traderelations. From the analysis of the discussion held betweenBrazil and the United States before the World Trade Organization– WTO, and culminated with the authorization of theinternational governing body for our country to take measuresfinancial compensation to the damage caused by agriculturalsubsidies to U.S. producers, will analyze, based on differenttheoretical perspectives of international law, as is the decisionmakingby countries in international relations. Emphasis will beplaced for the School of the Three Traditions, which is based onthe concepts of Hedley Bull and Martin Wight three traditionsof action in the international environment.
id UEL-6_4b87d4ca4c1548fee688e68adc84c96e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/8465
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling THE (REALISTIC OR RACIONALISTIC?) POSITION OF BRAZIL IN FACE OF WTO DECISIONA posição (realista ou racionalista?) do brasil em face da decisão da OMCTheories of international relationsWhere U.S. and Brazil before the WTOSchool of three traditions.Teorias das relações internacionaisCaso Brasil e EUA perante a OMCEscola das três tradições.Negotiations between the countries that make up themodern international society have always been marked bydisagreements and conflicts of interests, especially traderelations. From the analysis of the discussion held betweenBrazil and the United States before the World Trade Organization– WTO, and culminated with the authorization of theinternational governing body for our country to take measuresfinancial compensation to the damage caused by agriculturalsubsidies to U.S. producers, will analyze, based on differenttheoretical perspectives of international law, as is the decisionmakingby countries in international relations. Emphasis will beplaced for the School of the Three Traditions, which is based onthe concepts of Hedley Bull and Martin Wight three traditionsof action in the international environment.As tratativas entre os países que compõem a modernasociedade internacional sempre foram marcadas por divergênciase conflitos de interesses, especialmente âmbito das relaçõescomerciais. A partir da análise da discussão travada entre oBrasil e os Estados Unidos da América perante a OrganizaçãoMundial do Comércio – OMC, e que culminou com a autorizaçãodo órgão internacional para que o nosso país adotasse medidasfinanceiras compensatórias aos prejuízos causados pelossubsídios agrícolas concedidos aos produtores norte-americanos,analisar-se-á, com base nas diferentes correntes teóricas do direitointernacional, como se dá a tomada de decisões pelos países noâmbito das relações internacionais. Será dado destaque para aEscola das Três Tradições, que se baseia nos conceitos de HedleyBull e Martin Wight de três tradições de ação no ambienteinternacional.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2012-10-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/846510.5433/2178-8189.2012v16n1p195Scientia Iuris; v. 16 n. 1 (2012); 195-2102178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/8465/11527Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBilacchi Junior, Gilberto Vaciles2014-04-22T17:51:44Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/8465Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2014-04-22T17:51:44Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE (REALISTIC OR RACIONALISTIC?) POSITION OF BRAZIL IN FACE OF WTO DECISION
A posição (realista ou racionalista?) do brasil em face da decisão da OMC
title THE (REALISTIC OR RACIONALISTIC?) POSITION OF BRAZIL IN FACE OF WTO DECISION
spellingShingle THE (REALISTIC OR RACIONALISTIC?) POSITION OF BRAZIL IN FACE OF WTO DECISION
Bilacchi Junior, Gilberto Vaciles
Theories of international relations
Where U.S. and Brazil before the WTO
School of three traditions.
Teorias das relações internacionais
Caso Brasil e EUA perante a OMC
Escola das três tradições.
title_short THE (REALISTIC OR RACIONALISTIC?) POSITION OF BRAZIL IN FACE OF WTO DECISION
title_full THE (REALISTIC OR RACIONALISTIC?) POSITION OF BRAZIL IN FACE OF WTO DECISION
title_fullStr THE (REALISTIC OR RACIONALISTIC?) POSITION OF BRAZIL IN FACE OF WTO DECISION
title_full_unstemmed THE (REALISTIC OR RACIONALISTIC?) POSITION OF BRAZIL IN FACE OF WTO DECISION
title_sort THE (REALISTIC OR RACIONALISTIC?) POSITION OF BRAZIL IN FACE OF WTO DECISION
author Bilacchi Junior, Gilberto Vaciles
author_facet Bilacchi Junior, Gilberto Vaciles
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bilacchi Junior, Gilberto Vaciles
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Theories of international relations
Where U.S. and Brazil before the WTO
School of three traditions.
Teorias das relações internacionais
Caso Brasil e EUA perante a OMC
Escola das três tradições.
topic Theories of international relations
Where U.S. and Brazil before the WTO
School of three traditions.
Teorias das relações internacionais
Caso Brasil e EUA perante a OMC
Escola das três tradições.
description Negotiations between the countries that make up themodern international society have always been marked bydisagreements and conflicts of interests, especially traderelations. From the analysis of the discussion held betweenBrazil and the United States before the World Trade Organization– WTO, and culminated with the authorization of theinternational governing body for our country to take measuresfinancial compensation to the damage caused by agriculturalsubsidies to U.S. producers, will analyze, based on differenttheoretical perspectives of international law, as is the decisionmakingby countries in international relations. Emphasis will beplaced for the School of the Three Traditions, which is based onthe concepts of Hedley Bull and Martin Wight three traditionsof action in the international environment.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-10-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/8465
10.5433/2178-8189.2012v16n1p195
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/8465
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2012v16n1p195
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/8465/11527
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 16 n. 1 (2012); 195-210
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306013719920640