The “Relativization Of Privaty”: Aspects Of The Mitigation Of The Border Between Parties And Third Parties In Contracts

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Konder, Carlos Nelson
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/34287
Resumo: The article makes a panoramic approach to the processby which the incidence of the principle of privaty of contract hasbeen mitigated, systematizing this process in two central aspects.The first is the opposability of the contract, which recognizes therepercussions of the contract before third parties, exemplified bythe STJ’s summary 308 and by the so-called external protectionof credit. The second is the extension of the concept of part,by virtue of the conjugation of the adoption of the dynamic orevolutionary definition of part with the admission of parts byforce of law, as occurs in the stipulation in benefit of third partyand in linked contracts. This approach reveals the arguments putforward in the various cases of balancing between the principle of privaty in front of other principles of contractual law.
id UEL-6_6e06f4a70e6b42786d68f6eb44817440
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34287
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The “Relativization Of Privaty”: Aspects Of The Mitigation Of The Border Between Parties And Third Parties In ContractsA “relativização da relatividade”: aspectos da mitigação da fronteira entre partes e terceiros nos contratosContractPrivaty of contractPartiesThird parties.ContratoRelatividade dos efeitos do contratoPartesTerceirosThe article makes a panoramic approach to the processby which the incidence of the principle of privaty of contract hasbeen mitigated, systematizing this process in two central aspects.The first is the opposability of the contract, which recognizes therepercussions of the contract before third parties, exemplified bythe STJ’s summary 308 and by the so-called external protectionof credit. The second is the extension of the concept of part,by virtue of the conjugation of the adoption of the dynamic orevolutionary definition of part with the admission of parts byforce of law, as occurs in the stipulation in benefit of third partyand in linked contracts. This approach reveals the arguments putforward in the various cases of balancing between the principle of privaty in front of other principles of contractual law.O artigo traça abordagem panorâmica do processo pelo qual a incidência do princípio da relatividade dos efeitos vem sendo mitigada, sistematizando esse processo em dois aspectos centrais. O primeiro é a oponibilidade dos efeitos do contrato, que reconhece repercussões próprias do contrato perante terceiros, exemplificado pela súmula 308 do STJ e pela chamada tutela externa do crédito. O segundo é a ampliação do conceito de parte, em virtude da conjugação da adoção da definição dinâmica ou evolutiva de parte com a admissão de partes por força de lei, como ocorre na estipulação de terceiro e nas conexões entre contratos. Essa abordagem revela os argumentos indicados nas diversas ponderações que o princípio da relatividade passou a sofrer em virtude do protagonismo de outros princípios de direito contratual.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2019-03-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/3428710.5433/2178-8189.2019v23n1p81Scientia Iuris; v. 23 n. 1 (2019); 81-1002178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/34287/30600Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKonder, Carlos Nelson2022-01-27T14:53:06Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34287Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2022-01-27T14:53:06Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The “Relativization Of Privaty”: Aspects Of The Mitigation Of The Border Between Parties And Third Parties In Contracts
A “relativização da relatividade”: aspectos da mitigação da fronteira entre partes e terceiros nos contratos
title The “Relativization Of Privaty”: Aspects Of The Mitigation Of The Border Between Parties And Third Parties In Contracts
spellingShingle The “Relativization Of Privaty”: Aspects Of The Mitigation Of The Border Between Parties And Third Parties In Contracts
Konder, Carlos Nelson
Contract
Privaty of contract
Parties
Third parties.
Contrato
Relatividade dos efeitos do contrato
Partes
Terceiros
title_short The “Relativization Of Privaty”: Aspects Of The Mitigation Of The Border Between Parties And Third Parties In Contracts
title_full The “Relativization Of Privaty”: Aspects Of The Mitigation Of The Border Between Parties And Third Parties In Contracts
title_fullStr The “Relativization Of Privaty”: Aspects Of The Mitigation Of The Border Between Parties And Third Parties In Contracts
title_full_unstemmed The “Relativization Of Privaty”: Aspects Of The Mitigation Of The Border Between Parties And Third Parties In Contracts
title_sort The “Relativization Of Privaty”: Aspects Of The Mitigation Of The Border Between Parties And Third Parties In Contracts
author Konder, Carlos Nelson
author_facet Konder, Carlos Nelson
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Konder, Carlos Nelson
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Contract
Privaty of contract
Parties
Third parties.
Contrato
Relatividade dos efeitos do contrato
Partes
Terceiros
topic Contract
Privaty of contract
Parties
Third parties.
Contrato
Relatividade dos efeitos do contrato
Partes
Terceiros
description The article makes a panoramic approach to the processby which the incidence of the principle of privaty of contract hasbeen mitigated, systematizing this process in two central aspects.The first is the opposability of the contract, which recognizes therepercussions of the contract before third parties, exemplified bythe STJ’s summary 308 and by the so-called external protectionof credit. The second is the extension of the concept of part,by virtue of the conjugation of the adoption of the dynamic orevolutionary definition of part with the admission of parts byforce of law, as occurs in the stipulation in benefit of third partyand in linked contracts. This approach reveals the arguments putforward in the various cases of balancing between the principle of privaty in front of other principles of contractual law.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-03-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/34287
10.5433/2178-8189.2019v23n1p81
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/34287
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2019v23n1p81
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/34287/30600
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 23 n. 1 (2019); 81-100
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306015533957120

Registros relacionados