Concausas of the crisis in the judiciary and insufficiency of reforms

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Couto, Monica Bonetti
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Rossini, Luiz Felipe
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/31961
Resumo: The purpose of this paper is to analyze the crisis of the Judiciary, as a background to the observation that legislative reforms - especially those carried out in the last decade, including the recent edition of the New Code of Civil Procedure - have proven insufficient for the aimed at concretizing and effecting the principle of efficiency within the scope of the Judiciary. To this end, the present study is divided into two parts or sections. In the first one, the figures related to the Judiciary will be presented (numbers of the cases provided by official bodies), in particular the official surveys of the National Council of Justice, followed, in a second moment, by an attempt to systematize the concauses of the judicialization in Brazil and of the measures adopted so far to confront it, which allowed us to conclude that the reforms that had hitherto been undertaken were insufficient, mainly normative. The research adopts the hypothetico-deductive approach and the inductive methods. It is also useful for the dialectical method, with the aim of seeking possible syntheses for the divergences raised. Therefore, it is diagnostic research, with data on the first part and analysis of concausas of such numbers in the subsequent part, in which we established the distortion of judicialization, driven by culture of litigation, by and  gigantism in reason of the low effectiveness of the guardianship courts as concausas for the so-called judicial crisis. The type of research is the bibliographical one, from books and scientific articles.
id UEL-6_6ec085aea4f8931780fea86112edffc6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/31961
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Concausas of the crisis in the judiciary and insufficiency of reformsConcausas da crise do poder judiciário e insuficiência das reformasJudiciarycrisislegislative reformsJudiciárioCriseReformas legislativas.The purpose of this paper is to analyze the crisis of the Judiciary, as a background to the observation that legislative reforms - especially those carried out in the last decade, including the recent edition of the New Code of Civil Procedure - have proven insufficient for the aimed at concretizing and effecting the principle of efficiency within the scope of the Judiciary. To this end, the present study is divided into two parts or sections. In the first one, the figures related to the Judiciary will be presented (numbers of the cases provided by official bodies), in particular the official surveys of the National Council of Justice, followed, in a second moment, by an attempt to systematize the concauses of the judicialization in Brazil and of the measures adopted so far to confront it, which allowed us to conclude that the reforms that had hitherto been undertaken were insufficient, mainly normative. The research adopts the hypothetico-deductive approach and the inductive methods. It is also useful for the dialectical method, with the aim of seeking possible syntheses for the divergences raised. Therefore, it is diagnostic research, with data on the first part and analysis of concausas of such numbers in the subsequent part, in which we established the distortion of judicialization, driven by culture of litigation, by and  gigantism in reason of the low effectiveness of the guardianship courts as concausas for the so-called judicial crisis. The type of research is the bibliographical one, from books and scientific articles.Este trabalho tem por objetivo analisar a crise do Judiciário, como pano de fundo para a constatação de que as reformas legislativas – sobretudo as realizadas na última década, inclusive com a edição recente do Novo Código de Processo Civil – mostraram-se insuficientes para a almejada concretização e efetivação do princípio da eficiência no âmbito do Poder Judiciário. Para tal mister, o presente estudo está dividido em duas partes ou seções. Na primeira, apresentar-se-ão os números relativos ao Poder Judiciário (números dos processos fornecidos por órgãos oficiais), notadamente as pesquisas oficiais do Conselho Nacional de Justiça, ao que se seguirá, em um segundo momento, uma tentativa de sistematização das concausas da judicialização no Brasil e das medidas adotadas até agora para seu enfrentamento, o que permitiu-nos concluir pela insuficiência das reformas até então empreendidas, de cunho, sobretudo, normativo. A pesquisa adota os métodos hipotético-dedutivo de abordagem e o indutivo. Serve-se, ademais, do método dialético, com o objetivo de buscar possíveis sínteses para as divergências levantadas. Trata-se, portanto, de pesquisa-diagnóstico, com exposição de dados na primeira parte e análise das concausas de tais números na parte subsequente, na qual estabelecemos o desvirtuamento da judicialização, impulsionado pela cultura da litigância, pelo gigantismo judiciário e em razão da baixa efetividade das tutelas jurisdicionais como concausas para a chamada crise do judiciário. O tipo de pesquisa é a bibliográfica, a partir de livros e artigos científicos.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2018-07-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/3196110.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n2p213Scientia Iuris; v. 22 n. 2 (2018); 213-2432178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/31961/23928Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCouto, Monica BonettiRossini, Luiz Felipe2023-01-17T18:08:48Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/31961Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-01-17T18:08:48Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Concausas of the crisis in the judiciary and insufficiency of reforms
Concausas da crise do poder judiciário e insuficiência das reformas
title Concausas of the crisis in the judiciary and insufficiency of reforms
spellingShingle Concausas of the crisis in the judiciary and insufficiency of reforms
Couto, Monica Bonetti
Judiciary
crisis
legislative reforms
Judiciário
Crise
Reformas legislativas.
title_short Concausas of the crisis in the judiciary and insufficiency of reforms
title_full Concausas of the crisis in the judiciary and insufficiency of reforms
title_fullStr Concausas of the crisis in the judiciary and insufficiency of reforms
title_full_unstemmed Concausas of the crisis in the judiciary and insufficiency of reforms
title_sort Concausas of the crisis in the judiciary and insufficiency of reforms
author Couto, Monica Bonetti
author_facet Couto, Monica Bonetti
Rossini, Luiz Felipe
author_role author
author2 Rossini, Luiz Felipe
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Couto, Monica Bonetti
Rossini, Luiz Felipe
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Judiciary
crisis
legislative reforms
Judiciário
Crise
Reformas legislativas.
topic Judiciary
crisis
legislative reforms
Judiciário
Crise
Reformas legislativas.
description The purpose of this paper is to analyze the crisis of the Judiciary, as a background to the observation that legislative reforms - especially those carried out in the last decade, including the recent edition of the New Code of Civil Procedure - have proven insufficient for the aimed at concretizing and effecting the principle of efficiency within the scope of the Judiciary. To this end, the present study is divided into two parts or sections. In the first one, the figures related to the Judiciary will be presented (numbers of the cases provided by official bodies), in particular the official surveys of the National Council of Justice, followed, in a second moment, by an attempt to systematize the concauses of the judicialization in Brazil and of the measures adopted so far to confront it, which allowed us to conclude that the reforms that had hitherto been undertaken were insufficient, mainly normative. The research adopts the hypothetico-deductive approach and the inductive methods. It is also useful for the dialectical method, with the aim of seeking possible syntheses for the divergences raised. Therefore, it is diagnostic research, with data on the first part and analysis of concausas of such numbers in the subsequent part, in which we established the distortion of judicialization, driven by culture of litigation, by and  gigantism in reason of the low effectiveness of the guardianship courts as concausas for the so-called judicial crisis. The type of research is the bibliographical one, from books and scientific articles.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-07-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/31961
10.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n2p213
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/31961
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n2p213
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/31961/23928
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 22 n. 2 (2018); 213-243
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306015235112960

Registros relacionados