Access to justice through extrajudicial notary’s office: obstacle of resolution n° 35/2007 of the National Council of Justice as regards the succession of the partner

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferreira, Rosana de Cássia
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Goretti, Ricardo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/46289
Resumo: The Federal Constitution of 1988 protected new family nuclei. the art. 226, § 3, recognized the stable union as a family entity. Because of the debates regarding the succession of the partner, differentiating it from the succession of the spouse, there was the judgment of Extraordinary Appeals (RE) No. 1790 of the Civil Code. However, the extrajudicial inventory process, dealt with by Resolution No. 35/2007 of the National Council of Justice (CNJ), provides for differences for the partner's access to justice before the Extrajudicial Services, when he is the only heir. The reasons for maintaining the limitation contained in art.18 of Resolution No. 35/2007 of the CNJ regarding the extrajudicial inventory of the partner when he is the only heir are questioned. It is investigated whether there is a legal or jurisprudential basis that justifies the requirement of filing a lawsuit by the partner in the absence of other successors of the author of the inheritance; or if this is an obstacle to effective access to justice. It was based on the deductive method, on studies by Cappelletti and Garth, on the analysis of Extraordinary Resources and Resolution n° 35. Therefore, there is a need to change art. 18 of Resolution no. 35 of the CNJ.
id UEL-6_95c2fb1b7831470f3cfb722ce3c98a36
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/46289
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Access to justice through extrajudicial notary’s office: obstacle of resolution n° 35/2007 of the National Council of Justice as regards the succession of the partnerAcesso à justiça pela via da serventia extrajudicial: entrave da resolução n° 35/2007 do Conselho Nacional de Justiça quanto à sucessão do companheiroAcesso à justiça. União estável. Sucessão. Serventias extrajudiciais. Inventário.Access to justice. Stable union. Succession. Extrajudicial services. Inventory.The Federal Constitution of 1988 protected new family nuclei. the art. 226, § 3, recognized the stable union as a family entity. Because of the debates regarding the succession of the partner, differentiating it from the succession of the spouse, there was the judgment of Extraordinary Appeals (RE) No. 1790 of the Civil Code. However, the extrajudicial inventory process, dealt with by Resolution No. 35/2007 of the National Council of Justice (CNJ), provides for differences for the partner's access to justice before the Extrajudicial Services, when he is the only heir. The reasons for maintaining the limitation contained in art.18 of Resolution No. 35/2007 of the CNJ regarding the extrajudicial inventory of the partner when he is the only heir are questioned. It is investigated whether there is a legal or jurisprudential basis that justifies the requirement of filing a lawsuit by the partner in the absence of other successors of the author of the inheritance; or if this is an obstacle to effective access to justice. It was based on the deductive method, on studies by Cappelletti and Garth, on the analysis of Extraordinary Resources and Resolution n° 35. Therefore, there is a need to change art. 18 of Resolution no. 35 of the CNJ.A Constituição Federal de 1988 protegeu novos núcleos familiares. O art. 226, § 3°, reconheceu a união estável como entidade familiar. Por causa dos debates quanto à sucessão do companheiro, diferenciando-a da sucessão do cônjuge, houve o julgamento dos Recursos Extraordinários (RE) nº 646.721 e 878.694 pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF), que decidiu pela inconstitucionalidade do art. 1.790 do Código Civil. Porém, o processo de inventário extrajudicial, tratado pela Resolução n° 35/2007 do Conselho Nacional de Justiça (CNJ), prevê diferenças para o acesso à justiça do companheiro perante as Serventias Extrajudiciais, quando este é o único herdeiro. Questiona-se os motivos de se manter a limitação contida no art.18 da Resolução n° 35/2007 do CNJ quanto ao inventário extrajudicial do companheiro quando este for o único herdeiro. Perquire-se se há fundamento legal ou jurisprudencial que justifique a exigência do ajuizamento de ação judicial pelo companheiro na ausência de outros sucessores do autor da herança; ou se isso é um obstáculo à efetivação do acesso à justiça. Pautou-se no método dedutivo, nos estudos de Cappelletti e Garth, nas análises dos Recursos Extraordinários e da Resolução n° 35. Portanto, vê-se a necessidade de alteração do art. 18 da Resolução no 35 do CNJ.   Universidade Estadual de Londrina2022-11-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4628910.5433/2178-8189.2022v26n3p182-198Scientia Iuris; v. 26 n. 3 (2022); 182-1982178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/46289/48348Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurishttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerreira, Rosana de CássiaGoretti, Ricardo2023-01-13T13:55:41Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/46289Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-01-13T13:55:41Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Access to justice through extrajudicial notary’s office: obstacle of resolution n° 35/2007 of the National Council of Justice as regards the succession of the partner
Acesso à justiça pela via da serventia extrajudicial: entrave da resolução n° 35/2007 do Conselho Nacional de Justiça quanto à sucessão do companheiro
title Access to justice through extrajudicial notary’s office: obstacle of resolution n° 35/2007 of the National Council of Justice as regards the succession of the partner
spellingShingle Access to justice through extrajudicial notary’s office: obstacle of resolution n° 35/2007 of the National Council of Justice as regards the succession of the partner
Ferreira, Rosana de Cássia
Acesso à justiça. União estável. Sucessão. Serventias extrajudiciais. Inventário.
Access to justice. Stable union. Succession. Extrajudicial services. Inventory.
title_short Access to justice through extrajudicial notary’s office: obstacle of resolution n° 35/2007 of the National Council of Justice as regards the succession of the partner
title_full Access to justice through extrajudicial notary’s office: obstacle of resolution n° 35/2007 of the National Council of Justice as regards the succession of the partner
title_fullStr Access to justice through extrajudicial notary’s office: obstacle of resolution n° 35/2007 of the National Council of Justice as regards the succession of the partner
title_full_unstemmed Access to justice through extrajudicial notary’s office: obstacle of resolution n° 35/2007 of the National Council of Justice as regards the succession of the partner
title_sort Access to justice through extrajudicial notary’s office: obstacle of resolution n° 35/2007 of the National Council of Justice as regards the succession of the partner
author Ferreira, Rosana de Cássia
author_facet Ferreira, Rosana de Cássia
Goretti, Ricardo
author_role author
author2 Goretti, Ricardo
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira, Rosana de Cássia
Goretti, Ricardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Acesso à justiça. União estável. Sucessão. Serventias extrajudiciais. Inventário.
Access to justice. Stable union. Succession. Extrajudicial services. Inventory.
topic Acesso à justiça. União estável. Sucessão. Serventias extrajudiciais. Inventário.
Access to justice. Stable union. Succession. Extrajudicial services. Inventory.
description The Federal Constitution of 1988 protected new family nuclei. the art. 226, § 3, recognized the stable union as a family entity. Because of the debates regarding the succession of the partner, differentiating it from the succession of the spouse, there was the judgment of Extraordinary Appeals (RE) No. 1790 of the Civil Code. However, the extrajudicial inventory process, dealt with by Resolution No. 35/2007 of the National Council of Justice (CNJ), provides for differences for the partner's access to justice before the Extrajudicial Services, when he is the only heir. The reasons for maintaining the limitation contained in art.18 of Resolution No. 35/2007 of the CNJ regarding the extrajudicial inventory of the partner when he is the only heir are questioned. It is investigated whether there is a legal or jurisprudential basis that justifies the requirement of filing a lawsuit by the partner in the absence of other successors of the author of the inheritance; or if this is an obstacle to effective access to justice. It was based on the deductive method, on studies by Cappelletti and Garth, on the analysis of Extraordinary Resources and Resolution n° 35. Therefore, there is a need to change art. 18 of Resolution no. 35 of the CNJ.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-11-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/46289
10.5433/2178-8189.2022v26n3p182-198
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/46289
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2022v26n3p182-198
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/46289/48348
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 26 n. 3 (2022); 182-198
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306016397983744