Access to justice through extrajudicial notary’s office: obstacle of resolution n° 35/2007 of the National Council of Justice as regards the succession of the partner
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Iuris (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/46289 |
Resumo: | The Federal Constitution of 1988 protected new family nuclei. the art. 226, § 3, recognized the stable union as a family entity. Because of the debates regarding the succession of the partner, differentiating it from the succession of the spouse, there was the judgment of Extraordinary Appeals (RE) No. 1790 of the Civil Code. However, the extrajudicial inventory process, dealt with by Resolution No. 35/2007 of the National Council of Justice (CNJ), provides for differences for the partner's access to justice before the Extrajudicial Services, when he is the only heir. The reasons for maintaining the limitation contained in art.18 of Resolution No. 35/2007 of the CNJ regarding the extrajudicial inventory of the partner when he is the only heir are questioned. It is investigated whether there is a legal or jurisprudential basis that justifies the requirement of filing a lawsuit by the partner in the absence of other successors of the author of the inheritance; or if this is an obstacle to effective access to justice. It was based on the deductive method, on studies by Cappelletti and Garth, on the analysis of Extraordinary Resources and Resolution n° 35. Therefore, there is a need to change art. 18 of Resolution no. 35 of the CNJ. |
id |
UEL-6_95c2fb1b7831470f3cfb722ce3c98a36 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/46289 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-6 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Access to justice through extrajudicial notary’s office: obstacle of resolution n° 35/2007 of the National Council of Justice as regards the succession of the partnerAcesso à justiça pela via da serventia extrajudicial: entrave da resolução n° 35/2007 do Conselho Nacional de Justiça quanto à sucessão do companheiroAcesso à justiça. União estável. Sucessão. Serventias extrajudiciais. Inventário.Access to justice. Stable union. Succession. Extrajudicial services. Inventory.The Federal Constitution of 1988 protected new family nuclei. the art. 226, § 3, recognized the stable union as a family entity. Because of the debates regarding the succession of the partner, differentiating it from the succession of the spouse, there was the judgment of Extraordinary Appeals (RE) No. 1790 of the Civil Code. However, the extrajudicial inventory process, dealt with by Resolution No. 35/2007 of the National Council of Justice (CNJ), provides for differences for the partner's access to justice before the Extrajudicial Services, when he is the only heir. The reasons for maintaining the limitation contained in art.18 of Resolution No. 35/2007 of the CNJ regarding the extrajudicial inventory of the partner when he is the only heir are questioned. It is investigated whether there is a legal or jurisprudential basis that justifies the requirement of filing a lawsuit by the partner in the absence of other successors of the author of the inheritance; or if this is an obstacle to effective access to justice. It was based on the deductive method, on studies by Cappelletti and Garth, on the analysis of Extraordinary Resources and Resolution n° 35. Therefore, there is a need to change art. 18 of Resolution no. 35 of the CNJ.A Constituição Federal de 1988 protegeu novos núcleos familiares. O art. 226, § 3°, reconheceu a união estável como entidade familiar. Por causa dos debates quanto à sucessão do companheiro, diferenciando-a da sucessão do cônjuge, houve o julgamento dos Recursos Extraordinários (RE) nº 646.721 e 878.694 pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF), que decidiu pela inconstitucionalidade do art. 1.790 do Código Civil. Porém, o processo de inventário extrajudicial, tratado pela Resolução n° 35/2007 do Conselho Nacional de Justiça (CNJ), prevê diferenças para o acesso à justiça do companheiro perante as Serventias Extrajudiciais, quando este é o único herdeiro. Questiona-se os motivos de se manter a limitação contida no art.18 da Resolução n° 35/2007 do CNJ quanto ao inventário extrajudicial do companheiro quando este for o único herdeiro. Perquire-se se há fundamento legal ou jurisprudencial que justifique a exigência do ajuizamento de ação judicial pelo companheiro na ausência de outros sucessores do autor da herança; ou se isso é um obstáculo à efetivação do acesso à justiça. Pautou-se no método dedutivo, nos estudos de Cappelletti e Garth, nas análises dos Recursos Extraordinários e da Resolução n° 35. Portanto, vê-se a necessidade de alteração do art. 18 da Resolução no 35 do CNJ. Universidade Estadual de Londrina2022-11-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4628910.5433/2178-8189.2022v26n3p182-198Scientia Iuris; v. 26 n. 3 (2022); 182-1982178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/46289/48348Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurishttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerreira, Rosana de CássiaGoretti, Ricardo2023-01-13T13:55:41Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/46289Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-01-13T13:55:41Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Access to justice through extrajudicial notary’s office: obstacle of resolution n° 35/2007 of the National Council of Justice as regards the succession of the partner Acesso à justiça pela via da serventia extrajudicial: entrave da resolução n° 35/2007 do Conselho Nacional de Justiça quanto à sucessão do companheiro |
title |
Access to justice through extrajudicial notary’s office: obstacle of resolution n° 35/2007 of the National Council of Justice as regards the succession of the partner |
spellingShingle |
Access to justice through extrajudicial notary’s office: obstacle of resolution n° 35/2007 of the National Council of Justice as regards the succession of the partner Ferreira, Rosana de Cássia Acesso à justiça. União estável. Sucessão. Serventias extrajudiciais. Inventário. Access to justice. Stable union. Succession. Extrajudicial services. Inventory. |
title_short |
Access to justice through extrajudicial notary’s office: obstacle of resolution n° 35/2007 of the National Council of Justice as regards the succession of the partner |
title_full |
Access to justice through extrajudicial notary’s office: obstacle of resolution n° 35/2007 of the National Council of Justice as regards the succession of the partner |
title_fullStr |
Access to justice through extrajudicial notary’s office: obstacle of resolution n° 35/2007 of the National Council of Justice as regards the succession of the partner |
title_full_unstemmed |
Access to justice through extrajudicial notary’s office: obstacle of resolution n° 35/2007 of the National Council of Justice as regards the succession of the partner |
title_sort |
Access to justice through extrajudicial notary’s office: obstacle of resolution n° 35/2007 of the National Council of Justice as regards the succession of the partner |
author |
Ferreira, Rosana de Cássia |
author_facet |
Ferreira, Rosana de Cássia Goretti, Ricardo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Goretti, Ricardo |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira, Rosana de Cássia Goretti, Ricardo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Acesso à justiça. União estável. Sucessão. Serventias extrajudiciais. Inventário. Access to justice. Stable union. Succession. Extrajudicial services. Inventory. |
topic |
Acesso à justiça. União estável. Sucessão. Serventias extrajudiciais. Inventário. Access to justice. Stable union. Succession. Extrajudicial services. Inventory. |
description |
The Federal Constitution of 1988 protected new family nuclei. the art. 226, § 3, recognized the stable union as a family entity. Because of the debates regarding the succession of the partner, differentiating it from the succession of the spouse, there was the judgment of Extraordinary Appeals (RE) No. 1790 of the Civil Code. However, the extrajudicial inventory process, dealt with by Resolution No. 35/2007 of the National Council of Justice (CNJ), provides for differences for the partner's access to justice before the Extrajudicial Services, when he is the only heir. The reasons for maintaining the limitation contained in art.18 of Resolution No. 35/2007 of the CNJ regarding the extrajudicial inventory of the partner when he is the only heir are questioned. It is investigated whether there is a legal or jurisprudential basis that justifies the requirement of filing a lawsuit by the partner in the absence of other successors of the author of the inheritance; or if this is an obstacle to effective access to justice. It was based on the deductive method, on studies by Cappelletti and Garth, on the analysis of Extraordinary Resources and Resolution n° 35. Therefore, there is a need to change art. 18 of Resolution no. 35 of the CNJ. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-11-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/46289 10.5433/2178-8189.2022v26n3p182-198 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/46289 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2178-8189.2022v26n3p182-198 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/46289/48348 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris; v. 26 n. 3 (2022); 182-198 2178-8189 1415-6490 reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistamdireito@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306016397983744 |