Legal entities and the practice of transnational corruption: guarantee to ne bis in idem
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Iuris (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/45811 |
Resumo: | Transnational corruption, when practiced by legal entities, causes harmful effects to free competition and sustainable development, making it necessary to prevent and combat it in a cooperative manner between countries. It is questioned, in this research, whether Brazilian jurisprudence would allow legal entities to be sanctioned internally, when the facts have already been judged internationally. In the first topic, notes of the Brazilian legislation on corruption are presented, with emphasis on Law n. 12.846/2013 – Anti-Corruption Law. Afterwards, the international legal instruments on the subject, ratified by Brazil, are analyzed, focusing on the definitions of limitation of jurisdiction of each country. Finally, in the third topic, the position of the Federal Supreme Court is analyzed in the judgment of Habeas Corpus n. 171.118, which deals exactly with the extension of the principle of ne bis in idem in the occurrence of international judgment, and the possible consequences. It is concluded that the principle of ne bis in idem translates into a universal guarantee, and the legal entity cannot be sanctioned for identical facts, however, its duty to fully repair the damage caused to all countries affected by its criminal action remains. |
id |
UEL-6_a5229b99faf70a6e667d848c9d697c5a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/45811 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-6 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Legal entities and the practice of transnational corruption: guarantee to ne bis in idemPessoas jurídicas e a prática de corrupção transnacional: garantia ao ne bis in idemCorrupçãoNe Bis in IdemDireito InternacionalCorruptionNe bis in idemInternational lawTransnational corruption, when practiced by legal entities, causes harmful effects to free competition and sustainable development, making it necessary to prevent and combat it in a cooperative manner between countries. It is questioned, in this research, whether Brazilian jurisprudence would allow legal entities to be sanctioned internally, when the facts have already been judged internationally. In the first topic, notes of the Brazilian legislation on corruption are presented, with emphasis on Law n. 12.846/2013 – Anti-Corruption Law. Afterwards, the international legal instruments on the subject, ratified by Brazil, are analyzed, focusing on the definitions of limitation of jurisdiction of each country. Finally, in the third topic, the position of the Federal Supreme Court is analyzed in the judgment of Habeas Corpus n. 171.118, which deals exactly with the extension of the principle of ne bis in idem in the occurrence of international judgment, and the possible consequences. It is concluded that the principle of ne bis in idem translates into a universal guarantee, and the legal entity cannot be sanctioned for identical facts, however, its duty to fully repair the damage caused to all countries affected by its criminal action remains.A corrupção transnacional, quando praticada por pessoas jurídicas, causa efeitos nocivos à livre concorrência e ao desenvolvimento sustentável, tornando necessários que sua prevenção e combate sejam realizados de forma cooperativa entre os países. Questiona-se, na presente pesquisa, se a jurisprudência brasileira permitiria que as pessoas jurídicas sejam sancionadas internamente, quando os fatos já foram julgados em âmbito internacional. No primeiro tópico, apresentam-se apontamentos da legislação brasileira sobre à corrupção, com ênfase na Lei n. 12.846/2013 – Lei Anticorrupção. Após, analisam-se os instrumentos jurídicos internacionais sobre o tema, ratificados pelo Brasil, com enfoque nas definições de limitação de jurisdição de cada país. Por fim, no terceiro tópico, analisa-se o posicionamento do Supremo Tribunal Federal, no julgamento do Habeas Corpus n. 171.118, que trata exatamente sobre a extensão do princípio do ne bis in idem na ocorrência de julgamento internacional, e as possíveis consequências. Conclui-se que o princípio do ne bis in idem se traduz em uma garantia universal, não podendo a pessoa jurídica ser sancionada por idênticos fatos, contudo, se mantém seu dever de reparação integral dos prejuízos causados a todos os países alcançados por sua ação delituosa.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2023-03-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4581110.5433/2178-8189.2023v27n1p94Scientia Iuris; v. 27 n. 1 (2023); 94-1112178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/45811/48838Copyright (c) 2023 Scientia Iurishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDiz, Jamile Bergamaschine Matada Cunha, Camila Braga2023-04-28T14:12:53Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/45811Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-04-28T14:12:53Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Legal entities and the practice of transnational corruption: guarantee to ne bis in idem Pessoas jurídicas e a prática de corrupção transnacional: garantia ao ne bis in idem |
title |
Legal entities and the practice of transnational corruption: guarantee to ne bis in idem |
spellingShingle |
Legal entities and the practice of transnational corruption: guarantee to ne bis in idem Diz, Jamile Bergamaschine Mata Corrupção Ne Bis in Idem Direito Internacional Corruption Ne bis in idem International law |
title_short |
Legal entities and the practice of transnational corruption: guarantee to ne bis in idem |
title_full |
Legal entities and the practice of transnational corruption: guarantee to ne bis in idem |
title_fullStr |
Legal entities and the practice of transnational corruption: guarantee to ne bis in idem |
title_full_unstemmed |
Legal entities and the practice of transnational corruption: guarantee to ne bis in idem |
title_sort |
Legal entities and the practice of transnational corruption: guarantee to ne bis in idem |
author |
Diz, Jamile Bergamaschine Mata |
author_facet |
Diz, Jamile Bergamaschine Mata da Cunha, Camila Braga |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
da Cunha, Camila Braga |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Diz, Jamile Bergamaschine Mata da Cunha, Camila Braga |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Corrupção Ne Bis in Idem Direito Internacional Corruption Ne bis in idem International law |
topic |
Corrupção Ne Bis in Idem Direito Internacional Corruption Ne bis in idem International law |
description |
Transnational corruption, when practiced by legal entities, causes harmful effects to free competition and sustainable development, making it necessary to prevent and combat it in a cooperative manner between countries. It is questioned, in this research, whether Brazilian jurisprudence would allow legal entities to be sanctioned internally, when the facts have already been judged internationally. In the first topic, notes of the Brazilian legislation on corruption are presented, with emphasis on Law n. 12.846/2013 – Anti-Corruption Law. Afterwards, the international legal instruments on the subject, ratified by Brazil, are analyzed, focusing on the definitions of limitation of jurisdiction of each country. Finally, in the third topic, the position of the Federal Supreme Court is analyzed in the judgment of Habeas Corpus n. 171.118, which deals exactly with the extension of the principle of ne bis in idem in the occurrence of international judgment, and the possible consequences. It is concluded that the principle of ne bis in idem translates into a universal guarantee, and the legal entity cannot be sanctioned for identical facts, however, its duty to fully repair the damage caused to all countries affected by its criminal action remains. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-03-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/45811 10.5433/2178-8189.2023v27n1p94 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/45811 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2178-8189.2023v27n1p94 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/45811/48838 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Scientia Iuris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Scientia Iuris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris; v. 27 n. 1 (2023); 94-111 2178-8189 1415-6490 reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistamdireito@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306016269008896 |