The need for restricted publicity of procedural acts in cases of health insurance: on behalf of protecting consumer intimacy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Beltrão, Silvio Romero
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Oliveira Almeida Menezes, Renata
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
DOI: 10.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n2p272
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/33135
Resumo: Democratic ideals present in the Brazilian Constitution of 1988, should be incorporated into norms and into procedural practice, as it is not particularly appropriate to sacrifice dignity for the literal fulfillment of procedural law norms. As there are cases in which procedural publicity can compromise personality rights, especially the right to intimacy, and as the risks of transgression of these rights are even greater when dealing with healthcare plans, this paper aims to verify if it is necessary to establish restricted publicity of procedural acts in cases of health insurance. For this purpose, the scientific method chosen was qualitative studies, utilizing observation, collection and analysis of bibliographic and documentary data of the principle of procedural publicity and health plan contracts; and this research used inductive-deductive method to confront procedural guarantees in relation to the right to intimacy.
id UEL-6_abd03717611059518f63fb52b869c835
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33135
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
spelling The need for restricted publicity of procedural acts in cases of health insurance: on behalf of protecting consumer intimacyA necessidade de publicidade restrita dos atos processuais nos casos de planos de saúde: em prol da proteção da intimidade dos usuáriosProcedural publicity. Intimacy. Health insurancePublicidade processual. Intimidade. Planos de saúde.Democratic ideals present in the Brazilian Constitution of 1988, should be incorporated into norms and into procedural practice, as it is not particularly appropriate to sacrifice dignity for the literal fulfillment of procedural law norms. As there are cases in which procedural publicity can compromise personality rights, especially the right to intimacy, and as the risks of transgression of these rights are even greater when dealing with healthcare plans, this paper aims to verify if it is necessary to establish restricted publicity of procedural acts in cases of health insurance. For this purpose, the scientific method chosen was qualitative studies, utilizing observation, collection and analysis of bibliographic and documentary data of the principle of procedural publicity and health plan contracts; and this research used inductive-deductive method to confront procedural guarantees in relation to the right to intimacy.Os ideais democráticos presentes na Constituição de 1988 devem ser incorporados nas normas e na prática processual, especialmente não se justifica sacrificar a dignidade para o cumprimento literal das normas de direito processual. Como há casos em que a publicidade processual pode comprometer os direitos da personalidade, especialmente a intimidade, e como os riscos de transgressão a esses direitos são maiores quando se trata de lides envolvendo planos de saúde, o artigo tem como objetivo verificar se é necessário se estabelecer a publicidade restrita dos atos processuais nos casos de plano de saúde. Para esse propósito, se utiliza o método de estudo qualitativo, por meio de observação, colheita e análise de dados bibliográficos e documentais sobre o princípio da publicidade processual e os contratos de plano de saúde; e faz uso do método indutivo-dedutivo para confrontar a garantia processual em enfoque com o direito à intimidade.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2018-07-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/3313510.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n2p272Scientia Iuris; v. 22 n. 2 (2018); 272-3042178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/33135/23931Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBeltrão, Silvio RomeroOliveira Almeida Menezes, Renata2019-07-05T16:34:01Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33135Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2019-07-05T16:34:01Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The need for restricted publicity of procedural acts in cases of health insurance: on behalf of protecting consumer intimacy
A necessidade de publicidade restrita dos atos processuais nos casos de planos de saúde: em prol da proteção da intimidade dos usuários
title The need for restricted publicity of procedural acts in cases of health insurance: on behalf of protecting consumer intimacy
spellingShingle The need for restricted publicity of procedural acts in cases of health insurance: on behalf of protecting consumer intimacy
The need for restricted publicity of procedural acts in cases of health insurance: on behalf of protecting consumer intimacy
Beltrão, Silvio Romero
Procedural publicity. Intimacy. Health insurance
Publicidade processual. Intimidade. Planos de saúde.
Beltrão, Silvio Romero
Procedural publicity. Intimacy. Health insurance
Publicidade processual. Intimidade. Planos de saúde.
title_short The need for restricted publicity of procedural acts in cases of health insurance: on behalf of protecting consumer intimacy
title_full The need for restricted publicity of procedural acts in cases of health insurance: on behalf of protecting consumer intimacy
title_fullStr The need for restricted publicity of procedural acts in cases of health insurance: on behalf of protecting consumer intimacy
The need for restricted publicity of procedural acts in cases of health insurance: on behalf of protecting consumer intimacy
title_full_unstemmed The need for restricted publicity of procedural acts in cases of health insurance: on behalf of protecting consumer intimacy
The need for restricted publicity of procedural acts in cases of health insurance: on behalf of protecting consumer intimacy
title_sort The need for restricted publicity of procedural acts in cases of health insurance: on behalf of protecting consumer intimacy
author Beltrão, Silvio Romero
author_facet Beltrão, Silvio Romero
Beltrão, Silvio Romero
Oliveira Almeida Menezes, Renata
Oliveira Almeida Menezes, Renata
author_role author
author2 Oliveira Almeida Menezes, Renata
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Beltrão, Silvio Romero
Oliveira Almeida Menezes, Renata
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Procedural publicity. Intimacy. Health insurance
Publicidade processual. Intimidade. Planos de saúde.
topic Procedural publicity. Intimacy. Health insurance
Publicidade processual. Intimidade. Planos de saúde.
description Democratic ideals present in the Brazilian Constitution of 1988, should be incorporated into norms and into procedural practice, as it is not particularly appropriate to sacrifice dignity for the literal fulfillment of procedural law norms. As there are cases in which procedural publicity can compromise personality rights, especially the right to intimacy, and as the risks of transgression of these rights are even greater when dealing with healthcare plans, this paper aims to verify if it is necessary to establish restricted publicity of procedural acts in cases of health insurance. For this purpose, the scientific method chosen was qualitative studies, utilizing observation, collection and analysis of bibliographic and documentary data of the principle of procedural publicity and health plan contracts; and this research used inductive-deductive method to confront procedural guarantees in relation to the right to intimacy.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-07-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/33135
10.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n2p272
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/33135
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n2p272
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/33135/23931
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 22 n. 2 (2018); 272-304
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1822182691573858304
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n2p272