Diffuse interest questions on the effectiveness of its guardianship

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Nilson Tadeu Reis Campos
Data de Publicação: 2005
Outros Autores: Belinetti, Luiz Fernando
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4051
Resumo: Evaluates and compares the treatment by the legal system of common rights in individual and class action lawsuits which underly the essential conceptual differences based on the re-evaluation of the classic litigious concept and the reasons for these differences. Provides a systemic vision of the Brazilian standards concerning collective tutelage and critique of the jurisdiction regarding common rights, collective and homogeneous individuals. Analyses weak and strong political organizational issues of the society in the and their role in defense of the community interests by not-for-profit organizations. Concludes for the necessity to obtain effective judicial decision through the rupture of the paradigms concerning the neutrality of judges and the participation of the organized community in reformulating the classic legal process concepts linked to the conflict of legal rights and the control by the information dissemination by the media.
id UEL-6_b7a542a778d695eec0a8e0908ab63fad
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4051
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Diffuse interest questions on the effectiveness of its guardianshipInteresses difusos questões sobre a efetividade de sua tutelaCivil processcollective guardianshipjurisdictionclass action lawsuitlitigiousdiffuse interestssentencereturn sentencenot-for-profitsefectivittyProcesso civiltutela coletivajurisdiçãoação civil públicalideinteresses difusossentençacoisa julgadaOrganização não-governamentalefetividadeEvaluates and compares the treatment by the legal system of common rights in individual and class action lawsuits which underly the essential conceptual differences based on the re-evaluation of the classic litigious concept and the reasons for these differences. Provides a systemic vision of the Brazilian standards concerning collective tutelage and critique of the jurisdiction regarding common rights, collective and homogeneous individuals. Analyses weak and strong political organizational issues of the society in the and their role in defense of the community interests by not-for-profit organizations. Concludes for the necessity to obtain effective judicial decision through the rupture of the paradigms concerning the neutrality of judges and the participation of the organized community in reformulating the classic legal process concepts linked to the conflict of legal rights and the control by the information dissemination by the media.Analisa e compara o tratamento dado pelo ordenamento jurídico aos interesses difusos nas ações individuais e nas ações coletivas, sublinhando as diferenças conceituais essenciais a partir do redesenho do conceito clássico de lide e as razões dessas diferenças. Fornece uma visão sistêmica das normas brasileiras sobre tutela coletiva e crítica da jurisdição envolvendo interesses difusos, coletivos e individuais homogêneos. Examina os pontos fortes e fracos da organização política da sociedade no estágio atual sob o prisma das Organizações Não-Governamentais e seu papel na defesa de interesses metaindividuais. Conclui pela necessidade de se obter efetividade às decisões judiciais através da ruptura de paradigmas sobre a neutralidade do juiz e da participação da sociedade organizada a partir da reformulação de conceitos processuais clássicos vinculados à conflituosidade e do controle por meio de divulgação.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2005-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/405110.5433/2178-8189.2005v9n0p229Scientia Iuris; v. 9 (2005); 229-2522178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4051/3590Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Nilson Tadeu Reis CamposBelinetti, Luiz Fernando2009-12-21T17:23:38Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4051Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2009-12-21T17:23:38Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Diffuse interest questions on the effectiveness of its guardianship
Interesses difusos questões sobre a efetividade de sua tutela
title Diffuse interest questions on the effectiveness of its guardianship
spellingShingle Diffuse interest questions on the effectiveness of its guardianship
Silva, Nilson Tadeu Reis Campos
Civil process
collective guardianship
jurisdiction
class action lawsuit
litigious
diffuse interests
sentence
return sentence
not-for-profits
efectivitty
Processo civil
tutela coletiva
jurisdição
ação civil pública
lide
interesses difusos
sentença
coisa julgada
Organização não-governamental
efetividade
title_short Diffuse interest questions on the effectiveness of its guardianship
title_full Diffuse interest questions on the effectiveness of its guardianship
title_fullStr Diffuse interest questions on the effectiveness of its guardianship
title_full_unstemmed Diffuse interest questions on the effectiveness of its guardianship
title_sort Diffuse interest questions on the effectiveness of its guardianship
author Silva, Nilson Tadeu Reis Campos
author_facet Silva, Nilson Tadeu Reis Campos
Belinetti, Luiz Fernando
author_role author
author2 Belinetti, Luiz Fernando
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Nilson Tadeu Reis Campos
Belinetti, Luiz Fernando
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Civil process
collective guardianship
jurisdiction
class action lawsuit
litigious
diffuse interests
sentence
return sentence
not-for-profits
efectivitty
Processo civil
tutela coletiva
jurisdição
ação civil pública
lide
interesses difusos
sentença
coisa julgada
Organização não-governamental
efetividade
topic Civil process
collective guardianship
jurisdiction
class action lawsuit
litigious
diffuse interests
sentence
return sentence
not-for-profits
efectivitty
Processo civil
tutela coletiva
jurisdição
ação civil pública
lide
interesses difusos
sentença
coisa julgada
Organização não-governamental
efetividade
description Evaluates and compares the treatment by the legal system of common rights in individual and class action lawsuits which underly the essential conceptual differences based on the re-evaluation of the classic litigious concept and the reasons for these differences. Provides a systemic vision of the Brazilian standards concerning collective tutelage and critique of the jurisdiction regarding common rights, collective and homogeneous individuals. Analyses weak and strong political organizational issues of the society in the and their role in defense of the community interests by not-for-profit organizations. Concludes for the necessity to obtain effective judicial decision through the rupture of the paradigms concerning the neutrality of judges and the participation of the organized community in reformulating the classic legal process concepts linked to the conflict of legal rights and the control by the information dissemination by the media.
publishDate 2005
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005-12-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4051
10.5433/2178-8189.2005v9n0p229
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4051
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2005v9n0p229
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4051/3590
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 9 (2005); 229-252
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306013270081536

Registros relacionados