Democracy and the judicial branch: a glimpse of legitimacy and the institutionalization of opinion and willingness

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Paiva, Marcella da Costa Moreira
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Hansen, Gilvan Luiz, de Mattos, Simone Brilhante
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/41382
Resumo:  The Brazilian judicial branch is the only branch of government in which the people do not vote for its members. In this regard, it suffers a severe democratic deficit. Moreover, its control system pertains to the institution, namely from a courts internal controls and the Brazilian National Council of Justice, which is an administrative entity with relative autonomy. Furthermore, its current inspection and supervision system suffers obstacles because of current judiciary members. Additionally, it does not have mechanisms for social control and participatory management, which are essential for implementing an institutional democracy. Apart from that, better governance also generates better credibility for its expert system, allowing it to function properly. From a Habermasian democratic perspective, this study investigates the judiciary's management and control system. Finally, it uses the inductive method and the bibliographic methodology to examine management plans and the institutionalization of opinion and willingness within the Judiciary.  
id UEL-6_bc8fb90c31176d19174eff7202669ad0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/41382
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Democracy and the judicial branch: a glimpse of legitimacy and the institutionalization of opinion and willingnessDemocracia e poder judiciário: estudo sobre legitimidade e institucionalização da opinião e da vontadeJudicial BranchConselho Nacional de JustiçaJürgen Habermasdemocracyparticipative management.Poder JudiciárioConselho Nacional de JustiçaJürgen Habermasdemocraciagestão participativa. The Brazilian judicial branch is the only branch of government in which the people do not vote for its members. In this regard, it suffers a severe democratic deficit. Moreover, its control system pertains to the institution, namely from a courts internal controls and the Brazilian National Council of Justice, which is an administrative entity with relative autonomy. Furthermore, its current inspection and supervision system suffers obstacles because of current judiciary members. Additionally, it does not have mechanisms for social control and participatory management, which are essential for implementing an institutional democracy. Apart from that, better governance also generates better credibility for its expert system, allowing it to function properly. From a Habermasian democratic perspective, this study investigates the judiciary's management and control system. Finally, it uses the inductive method and the bibliographic methodology to examine management plans and the institutionalization of opinion and willingness within the Judiciary.   O Poder Judiciário consiste no único poder estatal em que não há a participação da população na escolha de seus membros, sofrendo com um déficit democrático neste sentido. Adicionalmente, apresenta um sistema de controle pautado na própria instituição, seja o controle interno dos tribunais ou do Conselho Nacional de Justiça, órgão de autonomia relativa de natureza administrativa. Tais sistema de fiscalização e supervisão implementados sofrem com entraves pelos próprios membros do Poder Judiciário. O poder em questão não apresenta mecanismos de controle social e de gestão participativa, os quais são essenciais para a implementação de uma democracia institucional. Ademais, o controle gera maior credibilidade para o sistema perito, permitindo o seu funcionamento devido. Diante de tal cenário, analisa-se o sistema de gestão e de controle do Poder Judiciário, a partir de uma perspectiva democrática habermasiana. Deste modo, utiliza-se o método indutivo e a metodologia bibliográfica, com o propósito de examinar os planos de gestão e a institucionalização da opinião e da vontade no âmbito do Judiciário.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2020-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4138210.5433/2178-8189.2020v24n3p50Scientia Iuris; v. 24 n. 3 (2020); 50-722178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/41382/28415Copyright (c) 2020 Scientia Iurishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Paiva, Marcella da Costa MoreiraHansen, Gilvan Luizde Mattos, Simone Brilhante2023-01-26T22:26:47Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/41382Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-01-26T22:26:47Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Democracy and the judicial branch: a glimpse of legitimacy and the institutionalization of opinion and willingness
Democracia e poder judiciário: estudo sobre legitimidade e institucionalização da opinião e da vontade
title Democracy and the judicial branch: a glimpse of legitimacy and the institutionalization of opinion and willingness
spellingShingle Democracy and the judicial branch: a glimpse of legitimacy and the institutionalization of opinion and willingness
de Paiva, Marcella da Costa Moreira
Judicial Branch
Conselho Nacional de Justiça
Jürgen Habermas
democracy
participative management.
Poder Judiciário
Conselho Nacional de Justiça
Jürgen Habermas
democracia
gestão participativa.
title_short Democracy and the judicial branch: a glimpse of legitimacy and the institutionalization of opinion and willingness
title_full Democracy and the judicial branch: a glimpse of legitimacy and the institutionalization of opinion and willingness
title_fullStr Democracy and the judicial branch: a glimpse of legitimacy and the institutionalization of opinion and willingness
title_full_unstemmed Democracy and the judicial branch: a glimpse of legitimacy and the institutionalization of opinion and willingness
title_sort Democracy and the judicial branch: a glimpse of legitimacy and the institutionalization of opinion and willingness
author de Paiva, Marcella da Costa Moreira
author_facet de Paiva, Marcella da Costa Moreira
Hansen, Gilvan Luiz
de Mattos, Simone Brilhante
author_role author
author2 Hansen, Gilvan Luiz
de Mattos, Simone Brilhante
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Paiva, Marcella da Costa Moreira
Hansen, Gilvan Luiz
de Mattos, Simone Brilhante
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Judicial Branch
Conselho Nacional de Justiça
Jürgen Habermas
democracy
participative management.
Poder Judiciário
Conselho Nacional de Justiça
Jürgen Habermas
democracia
gestão participativa.
topic Judicial Branch
Conselho Nacional de Justiça
Jürgen Habermas
democracy
participative management.
Poder Judiciário
Conselho Nacional de Justiça
Jürgen Habermas
democracia
gestão participativa.
description  The Brazilian judicial branch is the only branch of government in which the people do not vote for its members. In this regard, it suffers a severe democratic deficit. Moreover, its control system pertains to the institution, namely from a courts internal controls and the Brazilian National Council of Justice, which is an administrative entity with relative autonomy. Furthermore, its current inspection and supervision system suffers obstacles because of current judiciary members. Additionally, it does not have mechanisms for social control and participatory management, which are essential for implementing an institutional democracy. Apart from that, better governance also generates better credibility for its expert system, allowing it to function properly. From a Habermasian democratic perspective, this study investigates the judiciary's management and control system. Finally, it uses the inductive method and the bibliographic methodology to examine management plans and the institutionalization of opinion and willingness within the Judiciary.  
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/41382
10.5433/2178-8189.2020v24n3p50
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/41382
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2020v24n3p50
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/41382/28415
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Scientia Iuris
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Scientia Iuris
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 24 n. 3 (2020); 50-72
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306016130596864

Registros relacionados