Democracy and the judicial branch: a glimpse of legitimacy and the institutionalization of opinion and willingness
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Iuris (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/41382 |
Resumo: | The Brazilian judicial branch is the only branch of government in which the people do not vote for its members. In this regard, it suffers a severe democratic deficit. Moreover, its control system pertains to the institution, namely from a courts internal controls and the Brazilian National Council of Justice, which is an administrative entity with relative autonomy. Furthermore, its current inspection and supervision system suffers obstacles because of current judiciary members. Additionally, it does not have mechanisms for social control and participatory management, which are essential for implementing an institutional democracy. Apart from that, better governance also generates better credibility for its expert system, allowing it to function properly. From a Habermasian democratic perspective, this study investigates the judiciary's management and control system. Finally, it uses the inductive method and the bibliographic methodology to examine management plans and the institutionalization of opinion and willingness within the Judiciary. |
id |
UEL-6_bc8fb90c31176d19174eff7202669ad0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/41382 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-6 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Democracy and the judicial branch: a glimpse of legitimacy and the institutionalization of opinion and willingnessDemocracia e poder judiciário: estudo sobre legitimidade e institucionalização da opinião e da vontadeJudicial BranchConselho Nacional de JustiçaJürgen Habermasdemocracyparticipative management.Poder JudiciárioConselho Nacional de JustiçaJürgen Habermasdemocraciagestão participativa. The Brazilian judicial branch is the only branch of government in which the people do not vote for its members. In this regard, it suffers a severe democratic deficit. Moreover, its control system pertains to the institution, namely from a courts internal controls and the Brazilian National Council of Justice, which is an administrative entity with relative autonomy. Furthermore, its current inspection and supervision system suffers obstacles because of current judiciary members. Additionally, it does not have mechanisms for social control and participatory management, which are essential for implementing an institutional democracy. Apart from that, better governance also generates better credibility for its expert system, allowing it to function properly. From a Habermasian democratic perspective, this study investigates the judiciary's management and control system. Finally, it uses the inductive method and the bibliographic methodology to examine management plans and the institutionalization of opinion and willingness within the Judiciary. O Poder Judiciário consiste no único poder estatal em que não há a participação da população na escolha de seus membros, sofrendo com um déficit democrático neste sentido. Adicionalmente, apresenta um sistema de controle pautado na própria instituição, seja o controle interno dos tribunais ou do Conselho Nacional de Justiça, órgão de autonomia relativa de natureza administrativa. Tais sistema de fiscalização e supervisão implementados sofrem com entraves pelos próprios membros do Poder Judiciário. O poder em questão não apresenta mecanismos de controle social e de gestão participativa, os quais são essenciais para a implementação de uma democracia institucional. Ademais, o controle gera maior credibilidade para o sistema perito, permitindo o seu funcionamento devido. Diante de tal cenário, analisa-se o sistema de gestão e de controle do Poder Judiciário, a partir de uma perspectiva democrática habermasiana. Deste modo, utiliza-se o método indutivo e a metodologia bibliográfica, com o propósito de examinar os planos de gestão e a institucionalização da opinião e da vontade no âmbito do Judiciário.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2020-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4138210.5433/2178-8189.2020v24n3p50Scientia Iuris; v. 24 n. 3 (2020); 50-722178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/41382/28415Copyright (c) 2020 Scientia Iurishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Paiva, Marcella da Costa MoreiraHansen, Gilvan Luizde Mattos, Simone Brilhante2023-01-26T22:26:47Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/41382Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-01-26T22:26:47Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Democracy and the judicial branch: a glimpse of legitimacy and the institutionalization of opinion and willingness Democracia e poder judiciário: estudo sobre legitimidade e institucionalização da opinião e da vontade |
title |
Democracy and the judicial branch: a glimpse of legitimacy and the institutionalization of opinion and willingness |
spellingShingle |
Democracy and the judicial branch: a glimpse of legitimacy and the institutionalization of opinion and willingness de Paiva, Marcella da Costa Moreira Judicial Branch Conselho Nacional de Justiça Jürgen Habermas democracy participative management. Poder Judiciário Conselho Nacional de Justiça Jürgen Habermas democracia gestão participativa. |
title_short |
Democracy and the judicial branch: a glimpse of legitimacy and the institutionalization of opinion and willingness |
title_full |
Democracy and the judicial branch: a glimpse of legitimacy and the institutionalization of opinion and willingness |
title_fullStr |
Democracy and the judicial branch: a glimpse of legitimacy and the institutionalization of opinion and willingness |
title_full_unstemmed |
Democracy and the judicial branch: a glimpse of legitimacy and the institutionalization of opinion and willingness |
title_sort |
Democracy and the judicial branch: a glimpse of legitimacy and the institutionalization of opinion and willingness |
author |
de Paiva, Marcella da Costa Moreira |
author_facet |
de Paiva, Marcella da Costa Moreira Hansen, Gilvan Luiz de Mattos, Simone Brilhante |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Hansen, Gilvan Luiz de Mattos, Simone Brilhante |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Paiva, Marcella da Costa Moreira Hansen, Gilvan Luiz de Mattos, Simone Brilhante |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Judicial Branch Conselho Nacional de Justiça Jürgen Habermas democracy participative management. Poder Judiciário Conselho Nacional de Justiça Jürgen Habermas democracia gestão participativa. |
topic |
Judicial Branch Conselho Nacional de Justiça Jürgen Habermas democracy participative management. Poder Judiciário Conselho Nacional de Justiça Jürgen Habermas democracia gestão participativa. |
description |
The Brazilian judicial branch is the only branch of government in which the people do not vote for its members. In this regard, it suffers a severe democratic deficit. Moreover, its control system pertains to the institution, namely from a courts internal controls and the Brazilian National Council of Justice, which is an administrative entity with relative autonomy. Furthermore, its current inspection and supervision system suffers obstacles because of current judiciary members. Additionally, it does not have mechanisms for social control and participatory management, which are essential for implementing an institutional democracy. Apart from that, better governance also generates better credibility for its expert system, allowing it to function properly. From a Habermasian democratic perspective, this study investigates the judiciary's management and control system. Finally, it uses the inductive method and the bibliographic methodology to examine management plans and the institutionalization of opinion and willingness within the Judiciary. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-11-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/41382 10.5433/2178-8189.2020v24n3p50 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/41382 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2178-8189.2020v24n3p50 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/41382/28415 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Scientia Iuris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Scientia Iuris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris; v. 24 n. 3 (2020); 50-72 2178-8189 1415-6490 reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistamdireito@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306016130596864 |