The social function of business contracts: analysis of the TJRJ jurisprudence from 2014 to 2016

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Soares, Natália de Moura
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Sant'Anna, Leonardo da Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/36547
Resumo: This paper reports on the application of the principleof the social function of the contract to business contracts by thejurisprudence of the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro (TJRJ). The objective was to analyze, in light of the Brazilian legislationand doctrine on the subject, if the principle has been properlyinvoked by the mentioned court. For that, the metodology usedwas the analysis of concrete cases judged by the TJRJ from 2014to 2016 selected in accordance to the Division carried out bythe Research Group on the Social Funcion of the Contract in thePost Graduation Program in Law of the University of The Stateof Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), which were classified according to theuse of the principle in their respective reasonings. As a result,it was found that in only a significant minority of the cases, theprinciple of the social function of the business contract was usedwith na argumentative function. The conclusion of this workis that the definition of the scope of the principle of the socialfunction of the contract and its concret forms of application, andalso with regard specifically to the business contract, still need tobe adequately assimilated by the Judiciary.
id UEL-6_c02a2982211f4fc33f42458b9397c945
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/36547
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The social function of business contracts: analysis of the TJRJ jurisprudence from 2014 to 2016A função social dos contratos empresariais: análise de julgados do tjrj entre 2014 e 2016Função socialContrato empresarialTJRJSocial function. Business contract. TJRJ.This paper reports on the application of the principleof the social function of the contract to business contracts by thejurisprudence of the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro (TJRJ). The objective was to analyze, in light of the Brazilian legislationand doctrine on the subject, if the principle has been properlyinvoked by the mentioned court. For that, the metodology usedwas the analysis of concrete cases judged by the TJRJ from 2014to 2016 selected in accordance to the Division carried out bythe Research Group on the Social Funcion of the Contract in thePost Graduation Program in Law of the University of The Stateof Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), which were classified according to theuse of the principle in their respective reasonings. As a result,it was found that in only a significant minority of the cases, theprinciple of the social function of the business contract was usedwith na argumentative function. The conclusion of this workis that the definition of the scope of the principle of the socialfunction of the contract and its concret forms of application, andalso with regard specifically to the business contract, still need tobe adequately assimilated by the Judiciary.O presente trabalho relata a aplicação do princípio da função social do contrato a contratos empresariais pela jurisprudência do Tribunal de Justiça do Rio de Janeiro (TJRJ). O objetivo foi analisar, à luz da legislação e da doutrina brasileiras a respeito do tema, se o princípio tem sido invocado adequadamente pelo referido tribunal. Para tanto, foram selecionados casos concretos julgados pelo TJRJ nos anos de 2014 a 2016 conforme divisão realizada pelo Grupo de Pesquisa sobre a Função Social do Contrato no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), os quais foram classificados conforme a utilização do princípio em suas respectivas fundamentações. Como resultado, apurou-se que em apenas uma significativa minoria dos julgados, o princípio da função social do contrato empresarial foi utilizado com função argumentativa. A conclusão deste trabalho é que a definição do alcance do princípio da função social do contrato e as suas formas concretas de aplicação, inclusive no que diz respeito especificamente ao contrato empresarial, ainda precisam ser adequadamente assimiladas pelo Poder Judiciário.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2019-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/3654710.5433/2178-8189.2019v23n3p124Scientia Iuris; v. 23 n. 3 (2019); 107-1242178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/36547/48392Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSoares, Natália de MouraSant'Anna, Leonardo da Silva2023-01-26T16:53:30Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/36547Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-01-26T16:53:30Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The social function of business contracts: analysis of the TJRJ jurisprudence from 2014 to 2016
A função social dos contratos empresariais: análise de julgados do tjrj entre 2014 e 2016
title The social function of business contracts: analysis of the TJRJ jurisprudence from 2014 to 2016
spellingShingle The social function of business contracts: analysis of the TJRJ jurisprudence from 2014 to 2016
Soares, Natália de Moura
Função social
Contrato empresarial
TJRJ
Social function. Business contract. TJRJ.
title_short The social function of business contracts: analysis of the TJRJ jurisprudence from 2014 to 2016
title_full The social function of business contracts: analysis of the TJRJ jurisprudence from 2014 to 2016
title_fullStr The social function of business contracts: analysis of the TJRJ jurisprudence from 2014 to 2016
title_full_unstemmed The social function of business contracts: analysis of the TJRJ jurisprudence from 2014 to 2016
title_sort The social function of business contracts: analysis of the TJRJ jurisprudence from 2014 to 2016
author Soares, Natália de Moura
author_facet Soares, Natália de Moura
Sant'Anna, Leonardo da Silva
author_role author
author2 Sant'Anna, Leonardo da Silva
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Soares, Natália de Moura
Sant'Anna, Leonardo da Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Função social
Contrato empresarial
TJRJ
Social function. Business contract. TJRJ.
topic Função social
Contrato empresarial
TJRJ
Social function. Business contract. TJRJ.
description This paper reports on the application of the principleof the social function of the contract to business contracts by thejurisprudence of the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro (TJRJ). The objective was to analyze, in light of the Brazilian legislationand doctrine on the subject, if the principle has been properlyinvoked by the mentioned court. For that, the metodology usedwas the analysis of concrete cases judged by the TJRJ from 2014to 2016 selected in accordance to the Division carried out bythe Research Group on the Social Funcion of the Contract in thePost Graduation Program in Law of the University of The Stateof Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), which were classified according to theuse of the principle in their respective reasonings. As a result,it was found that in only a significant minority of the cases, theprinciple of the social function of the business contract was usedwith na argumentative function. The conclusion of this workis that the definition of the scope of the principle of the socialfunction of the contract and its concret forms of application, andalso with regard specifically to the business contract, still need tobe adequately assimilated by the Judiciary.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-11-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/36547
10.5433/2178-8189.2019v23n3p124
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/36547
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2019v23n3p124
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/36547/48392
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 23 n. 3 (2019); 107-124
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306015588483072

Registros relacionados