The compulsory double degree of jusrisdiction in improbity actions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Alex Matoso
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Lages, Cintia Garabini
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/39621
Resumo: The purpose of this paper is to discuss – in the light of due constitutional process and the theory of the constitutional model of the procedure – the validity of the submission of rulings of inadmissibility in actions of administrative improbity to the double degree of compulsory jurisdiction, especially taking into account that, in the absence of an express rule determining the necessary review in such cases, the submission is made by force of application by analogy of the provisions of article 19 of Law 4.717/65 (Law of Class Actions) or by the subsidiary application of article 496 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This exploratory research will adopt as procedures the bibliographical review and the documentary analysis (of ruled cases), being the method of inference the inductive one. It seeks to validate the negative hypothesis for the necessary review, either because the analogy is inapplicable, or because the review itself lacks constitutional protection
id UEL-6_c9ffc94065af682b71b7492dea07e32c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/39621
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The compulsory double degree of jusrisdiction in improbity actionsO duplo grau obrigatório das decisões de improcedência em ações de improbidadeImprobityReview RequiredDue processImprobidadeReexame NecessárioDevido Processo Legal.The purpose of this paper is to discuss – in the light of due constitutional process and the theory of the constitutional model of the procedure – the validity of the submission of rulings of inadmissibility in actions of administrative improbity to the double degree of compulsory jurisdiction, especially taking into account that, in the absence of an express rule determining the necessary review in such cases, the submission is made by force of application by analogy of the provisions of article 19 of Law 4.717/65 (Law of Class Actions) or by the subsidiary application of article 496 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This exploratory research will adopt as procedures the bibliographical review and the documentary analysis (of ruled cases), being the method of inference the inductive one. It seeks to validate the negative hypothesis for the necessary review, either because the analogy is inapplicable, or because the review itself lacks constitutional protectionO presente artigo tem como propósito discutir, à luz do devido processo constitucional e da teoria do modelo constitucional do processo, a validade da submissão de sentenças de improcedência proferidas em ações de improbidade administrativa ao duplo grau de jurisdição obrigatório, especialmente levando-se em conta que, à falta de norma expressa determinante do reexame necessário em tais casos, a submissão tem sido feita à força de aplicação por analogia do disposto no art. 19 da Lei 4.717/65 (Lei da Ação Popular) ou da aplicação subsidiária do art. 496 do CPC. A presente pesquisa, do tipo exploratória, adotará como procedimentos a revisão bibliográfica e a análise documental (julgados), sendo o método de inferência o indutivo. Busca-se validar a hipótese negativa para o reexame necessário, seja porque inaplicável a analogia, seja porque o próprio reexame necessário carece de amparo constitucional.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2020-03-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/3962110.5433/2178-8189.2020v24n1p165Scientia Iuris; v. 24 n. 1 (2020); 165-1852178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/39621/26951Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Alex MatosoLages, Cintia Garabini2023-01-26T22:29:51Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/39621Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-01-26T22:29:51Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The compulsory double degree of jusrisdiction in improbity actions
O duplo grau obrigatório das decisões de improcedência em ações de improbidade
title The compulsory double degree of jusrisdiction in improbity actions
spellingShingle The compulsory double degree of jusrisdiction in improbity actions
Silva, Alex Matoso
Improbity
Review Required
Due process
Improbidade
Reexame Necessário
Devido Processo Legal.
title_short The compulsory double degree of jusrisdiction in improbity actions
title_full The compulsory double degree of jusrisdiction in improbity actions
title_fullStr The compulsory double degree of jusrisdiction in improbity actions
title_full_unstemmed The compulsory double degree of jusrisdiction in improbity actions
title_sort The compulsory double degree of jusrisdiction in improbity actions
author Silva, Alex Matoso
author_facet Silva, Alex Matoso
Lages, Cintia Garabini
author_role author
author2 Lages, Cintia Garabini
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Alex Matoso
Lages, Cintia Garabini
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Improbity
Review Required
Due process
Improbidade
Reexame Necessário
Devido Processo Legal.
topic Improbity
Review Required
Due process
Improbidade
Reexame Necessário
Devido Processo Legal.
description The purpose of this paper is to discuss – in the light of due constitutional process and the theory of the constitutional model of the procedure – the validity of the submission of rulings of inadmissibility in actions of administrative improbity to the double degree of compulsory jurisdiction, especially taking into account that, in the absence of an express rule determining the necessary review in such cases, the submission is made by force of application by analogy of the provisions of article 19 of Law 4.717/65 (Law of Class Actions) or by the subsidiary application of article 496 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This exploratory research will adopt as procedures the bibliographical review and the documentary analysis (of ruled cases), being the method of inference the inductive one. It seeks to validate the negative hypothesis for the necessary review, either because the analogy is inapplicable, or because the review itself lacks constitutional protection
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-03-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/39621
10.5433/2178-8189.2020v24n1p165
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/39621
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2020v24n1p165
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/39621/26951
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 24 n. 1 (2020); 165-185
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306015646154752

Registros relacionados