REFLECTIONS ON PARTICIPATORY MODEL OF BRAZILIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Iuris (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/14003 |
Resumo: | This research paper examines the notion of statusactivus processualis and the possibility of its exercise in ascenario marked by jurisdictional dualism proceduralism versussubstantialism. To this end, we study briefly the main featuresof the theories and proceduralist substantialist in order to designthe process as an indispensable body of participation andinclusion of substantial parts. It was used for the developmentof this research, the inductive method, operated by the techniquesof operational concepts and literature. |
id |
UEL-6_ce3bfcedaba7a7593cf37df3ad897888 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14003 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-6 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
REFLECTIONS ON PARTICIPATORY MODEL OF BRAZILIAN JUDICIAL PROCESSReflexões sobre o modelo participativo de Processo Jurisdicional BrasileiroStatus activus processualisProceduralismSubstantialism.Processo jurisdicionalParticipaçãoProcedimentalismoSubstancialismoStatus activus processualis.This research paper examines the notion of statusactivus processualis and the possibility of its exercise in ascenario marked by jurisdictional dualism proceduralism versussubstantialism. To this end, we study briefly the main featuresof the theories and proceduralist substantialist in order to designthe process as an indispensable body of participation andinclusion of substantial parts. It was used for the developmentof this research, the inductive method, operated by the techniquesof operational concepts and literature.O presente artigo científico tece algumas consideraçõessobre o modelo participativo de processo jurisdicional brasileiro,comungando, para tanto, a noção de status activus processualise a possibilidade do seu exercício em um cenário jurisdicionalmarcado pelo dualismo procedimentalismo versussubstancialismo. Para tanto, estuda-se de forma sucinta asprincipais características das teorias procedimentalista esubstancialista no intuito de conceber o processo como umainstância irrenunciável de participação e inclusão substancialdas partes. Utilizou-se, para o desenvolvimento desta presentepesquisa, o método indutivo, operacionalizado pelas técnicasde conceitos operacionais e da pesquisa bibliográfica.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2012-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/1400310.5433/2178-8189.2012v16n2p69Scientia Iuris; v. 16 n. 2 (2012); 69-822178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/14003/11815Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRicardo Staffen, MárcioManoel Abreu, Pedro2012-12-31T13:48:54Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14003Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2012-12-31T13:48:54Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
REFLECTIONS ON PARTICIPATORY MODEL OF BRAZILIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS Reflexões sobre o modelo participativo de Processo Jurisdicional Brasileiro |
title |
REFLECTIONS ON PARTICIPATORY MODEL OF BRAZILIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS |
spellingShingle |
REFLECTIONS ON PARTICIPATORY MODEL OF BRAZILIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS Ricardo Staffen, Márcio Status activus processualis Proceduralism Substantialism. Processo jurisdicional Participação Procedimentalismo Substancialismo Status activus processualis. |
title_short |
REFLECTIONS ON PARTICIPATORY MODEL OF BRAZILIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS |
title_full |
REFLECTIONS ON PARTICIPATORY MODEL OF BRAZILIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS |
title_fullStr |
REFLECTIONS ON PARTICIPATORY MODEL OF BRAZILIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS |
title_full_unstemmed |
REFLECTIONS ON PARTICIPATORY MODEL OF BRAZILIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS |
title_sort |
REFLECTIONS ON PARTICIPATORY MODEL OF BRAZILIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS |
author |
Ricardo Staffen, Márcio |
author_facet |
Ricardo Staffen, Márcio Manoel Abreu, Pedro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Manoel Abreu, Pedro |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ricardo Staffen, Márcio Manoel Abreu, Pedro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Status activus processualis Proceduralism Substantialism. Processo jurisdicional Participação Procedimentalismo Substancialismo Status activus processualis. |
topic |
Status activus processualis Proceduralism Substantialism. Processo jurisdicional Participação Procedimentalismo Substancialismo Status activus processualis. |
description |
This research paper examines the notion of statusactivus processualis and the possibility of its exercise in ascenario marked by jurisdictional dualism proceduralism versussubstantialism. To this end, we study briefly the main featuresof the theories and proceduralist substantialist in order to designthe process as an indispensable body of participation andinclusion of substantial parts. It was used for the developmentof this research, the inductive method, operated by the techniquesof operational concepts and literature. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-12-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/14003 10.5433/2178-8189.2012v16n2p69 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/14003 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2178-8189.2012v16n2p69 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/14003/11815 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris; v. 16 n. 2 (2012); 69-82 2178-8189 1415-6490 reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistamdireito@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306014327046144 |