Whistleblowing: a challenge for brazilian law
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Iuris (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44622 |
Resumo: | The objetive of this article was to analyze whistleblowing and whistleblower, their rules in Brazil and in comparative law. Therefore, we sought to establish the definition of structurals concepts on the subject, understand the importance of its role in the investigation and conviction of those guilty of crimes related to corruption and thus demonstrate the need to standardize protective measures in order to neutralize the vulnerabilities who is exposed. The inductive method was used through the analysis of legal documents and scientific articles written by Brazilians and foreigners. In the end, after analyzing the Brazilian situation on the subject, the development of Integrity Programs was suggested as a palliative and it was concluded that the whistleblower, with the guarantees that a legal protective system must ensure, must be seen as an institutional investment, because, from an economic point of view, the cost of these guarantees is less than the cost of not doing so. |
id |
UEL-6_d170a1d76dbe13ac40b7444624d8c95b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/44622 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-6 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Whistleblowing: a challenge for brazilian lawWhistleblowing: um desafio para o direito brasileiroCorrupção. Denunciante. Proteção do denunciante. Anticorrupção. Anticorrupção empresarial.Corruption. Whistleblowing. Whistleblower protection. Anticorruption. Bussiness anticorruption.The objetive of this article was to analyze whistleblowing and whistleblower, their rules in Brazil and in comparative law. Therefore, we sought to establish the definition of structurals concepts on the subject, understand the importance of its role in the investigation and conviction of those guilty of crimes related to corruption and thus demonstrate the need to standardize protective measures in order to neutralize the vulnerabilities who is exposed. The inductive method was used through the analysis of legal documents and scientific articles written by Brazilians and foreigners. In the end, after analyzing the Brazilian situation on the subject, the development of Integrity Programs was suggested as a palliative and it was concluded that the whistleblower, with the guarantees that a legal protective system must ensure, must be seen as an institutional investment, because, from an economic point of view, the cost of these guarantees is less than the cost of not doing so.O objetivo desse artigo foi fazer uma análise do whistleblowing e do whistleblower, seu regramento no Brasil e no direito comparado. Para tanto, buscou-se estabelecer a definição de conceitos estruturantes sobre o tema, compreender a importância do seu papel na investigação, apuração e condenação dos culpados por delitos relacionados à corrupção e com isso demonstrar a necessidade da normatização de medidas protetivas com vistas a neutralizar as vulnerabilidades as quais está exposto. Utilizou-se o método de pesquisa indutivo através da análise de documentos legais e artigos científicos escritos por brasileiros e estrangeiros. Ao final, após a análise da situação brasileira sobre o tema, foi sugerido o desenvolvimento de Programas de Integridade como paliativo e conclui-se que o whistleblower, com as garantias que um sistema protetivo legal deve lhe assegurar deve ser visto como um investimento institucional, porque, do ponto de vista econômico, o custo dessas garantias é menor do que o custo de não o fazê-lo.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2023-03-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4462210.5433/2178-8189.2023v27n1p129Scientia Iuris; v. 27 n. 1 (2023); 129-1482178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44622/48840Copyright (c) 2023 Scientia Iurishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGantois, Simone MenezesSant'anna, Leonardo da Silva2023-04-28T14:16:30Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/44622Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-04-28T14:16:30Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Whistleblowing: a challenge for brazilian law Whistleblowing: um desafio para o direito brasileiro |
title |
Whistleblowing: a challenge for brazilian law |
spellingShingle |
Whistleblowing: a challenge for brazilian law Gantois, Simone Menezes Corrupção. Denunciante. Proteção do denunciante. Anticorrupção. Anticorrupção empresarial. Corruption. Whistleblowing. Whistleblower protection. Anticorruption. Bussiness anticorruption. |
title_short |
Whistleblowing: a challenge for brazilian law |
title_full |
Whistleblowing: a challenge for brazilian law |
title_fullStr |
Whistleblowing: a challenge for brazilian law |
title_full_unstemmed |
Whistleblowing: a challenge for brazilian law |
title_sort |
Whistleblowing: a challenge for brazilian law |
author |
Gantois, Simone Menezes |
author_facet |
Gantois, Simone Menezes Sant'anna, Leonardo da Silva |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sant'anna, Leonardo da Silva |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gantois, Simone Menezes Sant'anna, Leonardo da Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Corrupção. Denunciante. Proteção do denunciante. Anticorrupção. Anticorrupção empresarial. Corruption. Whistleblowing. Whistleblower protection. Anticorruption. Bussiness anticorruption. |
topic |
Corrupção. Denunciante. Proteção do denunciante. Anticorrupção. Anticorrupção empresarial. Corruption. Whistleblowing. Whistleblower protection. Anticorruption. Bussiness anticorruption. |
description |
The objetive of this article was to analyze whistleblowing and whistleblower, their rules in Brazil and in comparative law. Therefore, we sought to establish the definition of structurals concepts on the subject, understand the importance of its role in the investigation and conviction of those guilty of crimes related to corruption and thus demonstrate the need to standardize protective measures in order to neutralize the vulnerabilities who is exposed. The inductive method was used through the analysis of legal documents and scientific articles written by Brazilians and foreigners. In the end, after analyzing the Brazilian situation on the subject, the development of Integrity Programs was suggested as a palliative and it was concluded that the whistleblower, with the guarantees that a legal protective system must ensure, must be seen as an institutional investment, because, from an economic point of view, the cost of these guarantees is less than the cost of not doing so. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-03-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44622 10.5433/2178-8189.2023v27n1p129 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44622 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2178-8189.2023v27n1p129 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44622/48840 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Scientia Iuris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Scientia Iuris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris; v. 27 n. 1 (2023); 129-148 2178-8189 1415-6490 reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistamdireito@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306016236503040 |