Whistleblowing: a challenge for brazilian law

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gantois, Simone Menezes
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Sant'anna, Leonardo da Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44622
Resumo: The objetive of this article was to analyze whistleblowing and whistleblower, their rules in Brazil and in comparative law. Therefore, we sought to establish the definition of structurals concepts on the subject, understand the importance of its role in the investigation and conviction of those guilty of crimes related to corruption and thus demonstrate the need to standardize protective measures in order to neutralize the vulnerabilities who is exposed. The inductive method was used through the analysis of legal documents and scientific articles written by Brazilians and foreigners. In the end, after analyzing the Brazilian situation on the subject, the development of Integrity Programs was suggested as a palliative and it was concluded that the whistleblower, with the guarantees that a legal protective system must ensure, must be seen as an institutional investment, because, from an economic point of view, the cost of these guarantees is less than the cost of not doing so.
id UEL-6_d170a1d76dbe13ac40b7444624d8c95b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/44622
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Whistleblowing: a challenge for brazilian lawWhistleblowing: um desafio para o direito brasileiroCorrupção. Denunciante. Proteção do denunciante. Anticorrupção. Anticorrupção empresarial.Corruption. Whistleblowing. Whistleblower protection. Anticorruption. Bussiness anticorruption.The objetive of this article was to analyze whistleblowing and whistleblower, their rules in Brazil and in comparative law. Therefore, we sought to establish the definition of structurals concepts on the subject, understand the importance of its role in the investigation and conviction of those guilty of crimes related to corruption and thus demonstrate the need to standardize protective measures in order to neutralize the vulnerabilities who is exposed. The inductive method was used through the analysis of legal documents and scientific articles written by Brazilians and foreigners. In the end, after analyzing the Brazilian situation on the subject, the development of Integrity Programs was suggested as a palliative and it was concluded that the whistleblower, with the guarantees that a legal protective system must ensure, must be seen as an institutional investment, because, from an economic point of view, the cost of these guarantees is less than the cost of not doing so.O objetivo desse artigo foi fazer uma análise do whistleblowing e do whistleblower, seu regramento no Brasil e no direito comparado. Para tanto, buscou-se estabelecer a definição de conceitos estruturantes sobre o tema, compreender a importância do seu papel na investigação, apuração e condenação dos culpados por delitos relacionados à corrupção e com isso demonstrar a necessidade da normatização de medidas protetivas com vistas a neutralizar as vulnerabilidades as quais está exposto. Utilizou-se o método de pesquisa indutivo através da análise de documentos legais e artigos científicos escritos por brasileiros e estrangeiros. Ao final, após a análise da situação brasileira sobre o tema, foi sugerido o desenvolvimento de Programas de Integridade como paliativo e conclui-se que o whistleblower, com as garantias que um sistema protetivo legal deve lhe assegurar deve ser visto como um investimento institucional, porque, do ponto de vista econômico, o custo dessas garantias é menor do que o custo de não o fazê-lo.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2023-03-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4462210.5433/2178-8189.2023v27n1p129Scientia Iuris; v. 27 n. 1 (2023); 129-1482178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44622/48840Copyright (c) 2023 Scientia Iurishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGantois, Simone MenezesSant'anna, Leonardo da Silva2023-04-28T14:16:30Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/44622Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-04-28T14:16:30Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Whistleblowing: a challenge for brazilian law
Whistleblowing: um desafio para o direito brasileiro
title Whistleblowing: a challenge for brazilian law
spellingShingle Whistleblowing: a challenge for brazilian law
Gantois, Simone Menezes
Corrupção. Denunciante. Proteção do denunciante. Anticorrupção. Anticorrupção empresarial.
Corruption. Whistleblowing. Whistleblower protection. Anticorruption. Bussiness anticorruption.
title_short Whistleblowing: a challenge for brazilian law
title_full Whistleblowing: a challenge for brazilian law
title_fullStr Whistleblowing: a challenge for brazilian law
title_full_unstemmed Whistleblowing: a challenge for brazilian law
title_sort Whistleblowing: a challenge for brazilian law
author Gantois, Simone Menezes
author_facet Gantois, Simone Menezes
Sant'anna, Leonardo da Silva
author_role author
author2 Sant'anna, Leonardo da Silva
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gantois, Simone Menezes
Sant'anna, Leonardo da Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Corrupção. Denunciante. Proteção do denunciante. Anticorrupção. Anticorrupção empresarial.
Corruption. Whistleblowing. Whistleblower protection. Anticorruption. Bussiness anticorruption.
topic Corrupção. Denunciante. Proteção do denunciante. Anticorrupção. Anticorrupção empresarial.
Corruption. Whistleblowing. Whistleblower protection. Anticorruption. Bussiness anticorruption.
description The objetive of this article was to analyze whistleblowing and whistleblower, their rules in Brazil and in comparative law. Therefore, we sought to establish the definition of structurals concepts on the subject, understand the importance of its role in the investigation and conviction of those guilty of crimes related to corruption and thus demonstrate the need to standardize protective measures in order to neutralize the vulnerabilities who is exposed. The inductive method was used through the analysis of legal documents and scientific articles written by Brazilians and foreigners. In the end, after analyzing the Brazilian situation on the subject, the development of Integrity Programs was suggested as a palliative and it was concluded that the whistleblower, with the guarantees that a legal protective system must ensure, must be seen as an institutional investment, because, from an economic point of view, the cost of these guarantees is less than the cost of not doing so.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-03-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44622
10.5433/2178-8189.2023v27n1p129
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44622
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2023v27n1p129
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44622/48840
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Scientia Iuris
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Scientia Iuris
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 27 n. 1 (2023); 129-148
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306016236503040