Analysis of former mayor´s inclusion for administrative misconduct of public officials with delegated powers
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
| Outros Autores: | , |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | por |
| Título da fonte: | Scientia Iuris (Online) |
| DOI: | 10.5433/2178-8189.2016v20n3p45 |
| Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/22984 |
Resumo: | Administrative misconduct is the true "pathology" of Brazilian public life and must be tackled. However, this does not legitimize the State´s use of the Public Prosecutor´s Office, one of the State´s many institutions responsible for the defense of our society and, does not justify the counties prosecutors (art 127, §1 of the Constitution) misdeeds in municipal administrations, which can be penalized by State intervention. In addition, in regards to the special jurisdiction of the magistrates of the lower courts, a prerogative is granted to the mayor by the article 29, line X, of the Brazilian Constitution. Furthermore, the objective of this study is to contribute to the debate of "Administrative Misconduct"; to analyze State intervention to the detriment of the Municipality´s constitutional autonomy and its relation to the courts; and to relate to a former mayor that is facing criminal liability for administrative misconduct, which was committed by his agent with delegated powers that were extended via decree of administrative decentralization. This research was made possible with the use of literature (doctrine) and documents (jurisprudence); these methods helped elucidate and answer this study´s main question. |
| id |
UEL-6_d61d4029516f04c4520ad8ce4e2af6a7 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22984 |
| network_acronym_str |
UEL-6 |
| network_name_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
| spelling |
Analysis of former mayor´s inclusion for administrative misconduct of public officials with delegated powersAnálise da incursão de (ex) prefeito por ato de improbidade cometido por agente com competência delegadaAdministrative misconductMunicipal autonomyPrinciple of authority and privileged forumAdministrative decentralizationLack of solidarity criminal responsibilityImprobidade administrativaAutonomia municipalPrincípio da autoridade e foro privilegiadoDesconcentração administrativaInexistência de responsabilidade criminal solidáriaAdministrative misconduct is the true "pathology" of Brazilian public life and must be tackled. However, this does not legitimize the State´s use of the Public Prosecutor´s Office, one of the State´s many institutions responsible for the defense of our society and, does not justify the counties prosecutors (art 127, §1 of the Constitution) misdeeds in municipal administrations, which can be penalized by State intervention. In addition, in regards to the special jurisdiction of the magistrates of the lower courts, a prerogative is granted to the mayor by the article 29, line X, of the Brazilian Constitution. Furthermore, the objective of this study is to contribute to the debate of "Administrative Misconduct"; to analyze State intervention to the detriment of the Municipality´s constitutional autonomy and its relation to the courts; and to relate to a former mayor that is facing criminal liability for administrative misconduct, which was committed by his agent with delegated powers that were extended via decree of administrative decentralization. This research was made possible with the use of literature (doctrine) and documents (jurisprudence); these methods helped elucidate and answer this study´s main question.A Improbidade Administrativa é verdadeira “patologia” na vida pública brasileira, tendo de ser confrontada. O que, não obstante, não legitima ao Estado-membro, por meio do Ministério Público, que é órgão seu (ainda que o responsável pela defesa da sociedade) e, muito menos, dos promotores de justiça de comarcas interioranas (art. 127, §1°, da CF); a promover devassas nas administrações municipais, sob pena de incorrer em intervenção, o que se repudia. Igualmente, em relação aos Magistrados de primeira instância, tendo em vista a prerrogativa de foro privilegiado deferida, pela Constituição da República, em seu art. 29, X, ao Prefeito Municipal. Este trabalho, assim, tem por pretensão contribuir ao debate sobre a “Improbidade Administrativa”, a indevida intervenção estadual em desfavor da autonomia constitucional do Município e sua relação com o instituto do foro privilegiado, e principalmente acerca da incursão de (ex) prefeito municipal em responsabilização criminal solidária relativa a ato de improbidade administrativa cometido por agente a quem foi delegada competência estendida via decreto de desconcentração administrativa. Lançou-se mão de pesquisa bibliográfica (doutrina) e documental (jurisprudência) como método para elucidar essa questão, que está na ordem do dia.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2016-11-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/2298410.5433/2178-8189.2016v20n3p45Scientia Iuris; v. 20 n. 3 (2016); 45-712178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/22984/19975Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessReis, Jair Teixeira dosMendes, Yury Vieira Tupynambá de LélisVeloso, Matheus de Quadros2016-12-02T13:35:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22984Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2016-12-02T13:35:11Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of former mayor´s inclusion for administrative misconduct of public officials with delegated powers Análise da incursão de (ex) prefeito por ato de improbidade cometido por agente com competência delegada |
| title |
Analysis of former mayor´s inclusion for administrative misconduct of public officials with delegated powers |
| spellingShingle |
Analysis of former mayor´s inclusion for administrative misconduct of public officials with delegated powers Analysis of former mayor´s inclusion for administrative misconduct of public officials with delegated powers Reis, Jair Teixeira dos Administrative misconduct Municipal autonomy Principle of authority and privileged forum Administrative decentralization Lack of solidarity criminal responsibility Improbidade administrativa Autonomia municipal Princípio da autoridade e foro privilegiado Desconcentração administrativa Inexistência de responsabilidade criminal solidária Reis, Jair Teixeira dos Administrative misconduct Municipal autonomy Principle of authority and privileged forum Administrative decentralization Lack of solidarity criminal responsibility Improbidade administrativa Autonomia municipal Princípio da autoridade e foro privilegiado Desconcentração administrativa Inexistência de responsabilidade criminal solidária |
| title_short |
Analysis of former mayor´s inclusion for administrative misconduct of public officials with delegated powers |
| title_full |
Analysis of former mayor´s inclusion for administrative misconduct of public officials with delegated powers |
| title_fullStr |
Analysis of former mayor´s inclusion for administrative misconduct of public officials with delegated powers Analysis of former mayor´s inclusion for administrative misconduct of public officials with delegated powers |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of former mayor´s inclusion for administrative misconduct of public officials with delegated powers Analysis of former mayor´s inclusion for administrative misconduct of public officials with delegated powers |
| title_sort |
Analysis of former mayor´s inclusion for administrative misconduct of public officials with delegated powers |
| author |
Reis, Jair Teixeira dos |
| author_facet |
Reis, Jair Teixeira dos Reis, Jair Teixeira dos Mendes, Yury Vieira Tupynambá de Lélis Veloso, Matheus de Quadros Mendes, Yury Vieira Tupynambá de Lélis Veloso, Matheus de Quadros |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Mendes, Yury Vieira Tupynambá de Lélis Veloso, Matheus de Quadros |
| author2_role |
author author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Reis, Jair Teixeira dos Mendes, Yury Vieira Tupynambá de Lélis Veloso, Matheus de Quadros |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Administrative misconduct Municipal autonomy Principle of authority and privileged forum Administrative decentralization Lack of solidarity criminal responsibility Improbidade administrativa Autonomia municipal Princípio da autoridade e foro privilegiado Desconcentração administrativa Inexistência de responsabilidade criminal solidária |
| topic |
Administrative misconduct Municipal autonomy Principle of authority and privileged forum Administrative decentralization Lack of solidarity criminal responsibility Improbidade administrativa Autonomia municipal Princípio da autoridade e foro privilegiado Desconcentração administrativa Inexistência de responsabilidade criminal solidária |
| description |
Administrative misconduct is the true "pathology" of Brazilian public life and must be tackled. However, this does not legitimize the State´s use of the Public Prosecutor´s Office, one of the State´s many institutions responsible for the defense of our society and, does not justify the counties prosecutors (art 127, §1 of the Constitution) misdeeds in municipal administrations, which can be penalized by State intervention. In addition, in regards to the special jurisdiction of the magistrates of the lower courts, a prerogative is granted to the mayor by the article 29, line X, of the Brazilian Constitution. Furthermore, the objective of this study is to contribute to the debate of "Administrative Misconduct"; to analyze State intervention to the detriment of the Municipality´s constitutional autonomy and its relation to the courts; and to relate to a former mayor that is facing criminal liability for administrative misconduct, which was committed by his agent with delegated powers that were extended via decree of administrative decentralization. This research was made possible with the use of literature (doctrine) and documents (jurisprudence); these methods helped elucidate and answer this study´s main question. |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-11-29 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/22984 10.5433/2178-8189.2016v20n3p45 |
| url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/22984 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2178-8189.2016v20n3p45 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/22984/19975 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris; v. 20 n. 3 (2016); 45-71 2178-8189 1415-6490 reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
| instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
| instacron_str |
UEL |
| institution |
UEL |
| reponame_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
| collection |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistamdireito@uel.br |
| _version_ |
1822182691316957184 |
| dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5433/2178-8189.2016v20n3p45 |