Liberalism and the limits of justice

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Rafael Antônio
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/33758
Resumo: This review aims to present Michael Sandel’s book Liberalism and the limits of justice, which belongs to the context of communitarian criticism to the liberalism of John Rawls. Thus, the main arguments raised by Sandel against a defense by Rawls of the priority of the just in relation to the good were outlined.
id UEL-6_e8d377ac56b65a2e8fb4515f1981cfc1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33758
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Liberalism and the limits of justiceO liberalismo e os limites da justiçaCommunitarianismLiberalismJustice.ComunitarismoLiberalismoJustiça.This review aims to present Michael Sandel’s book Liberalism and the limits of justice, which belongs to the context of communitarian criticism to the liberalism of John Rawls. Thus, the main arguments raised by Sandel against a defense by Rawls of the priority of the just in relation to the good were outlined.A presente resenha tem por finalidade apresentar a obra O Liberalismo e os limites da justiça, de Michael Sandel, que se insere no contexto da crítica comunitarista ao liberalismo deontológico de John Raws. Desse modo delineou-se os principais argumentos levantados por Sandel contra a tese defendia por Rawls da prioridade do justo em relação ao bom.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2018-07-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/3375810.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n2p338Scientia Iuris; v. 22 n. 2 (2018); 338-3412178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/33758/23935Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, Rafael Antônio2023-01-17T18:15:16Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33758Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-01-17T18:15:16Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Liberalism and the limits of justice
O liberalismo e os limites da justiça
title Liberalism and the limits of justice
spellingShingle Liberalism and the limits of justice
Costa, Rafael Antônio
Communitarianism
Liberalism
Justice.
Comunitarismo
Liberalismo
Justiça.
title_short Liberalism and the limits of justice
title_full Liberalism and the limits of justice
title_fullStr Liberalism and the limits of justice
title_full_unstemmed Liberalism and the limits of justice
title_sort Liberalism and the limits of justice
author Costa, Rafael Antônio
author_facet Costa, Rafael Antônio
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Rafael Antônio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Communitarianism
Liberalism
Justice.
Comunitarismo
Liberalismo
Justiça.
topic Communitarianism
Liberalism
Justice.
Comunitarismo
Liberalismo
Justiça.
description This review aims to present Michael Sandel’s book Liberalism and the limits of justice, which belongs to the context of communitarian criticism to the liberalism of John Rawls. Thus, the main arguments raised by Sandel against a defense by Rawls of the priority of the just in relation to the good were outlined.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-07-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/33758
10.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n2p338
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/33758
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n2p338
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/33758/23935
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 22 n. 2 (2018); 338-341
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306015519277056

Registros relacionados