Three objections from Alasdair MacIntyre applied to the multicultural debate
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
Texto Completo: | http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/980 |
Resumo: | According to Alasdair MacIntyre, there are three problems that pervade most contemporary political struggles and which have not been given sufficient attention: a) there is a conceptual incommensurability of the adverse arguments in the debates; b) the ongoing arguments represent impersonal rational arguments; c) the conceptually distinct premises of the used arguments have a great diversity of historical origins. From these three settings and their consequences, we will apply MacIntyre's critical reasoning to a specific set of conflicting arguments in the field of multiculturalism. Our aim is to explore the different conceptions and principles that underlie the positions seen and also to make a balance on the communitarian justification for a multicultural political model. |
id |
UFRB-4_de226f2772f90e65363d090290ae45d9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/980 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRB-4 |
network_name_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Three objections from Alasdair MacIntyre applied to the multicultural debateTrês objeções de Alasdair MacIntyre aplicadas ao debate multiculturalMulticulturalismo; Moralidade; Comunitarismo; Liberalismo.Multiculturalism; Morality; Communitarianism; Liberalism.According to Alasdair MacIntyre, there are three problems that pervade most contemporary political struggles and which have not been given sufficient attention: a) there is a conceptual incommensurability of the adverse arguments in the debates; b) the ongoing arguments represent impersonal rational arguments; c) the conceptually distinct premises of the used arguments have a great diversity of historical origins. From these three settings and their consequences, we will apply MacIntyre's critical reasoning to a specific set of conflicting arguments in the field of multiculturalism. Our aim is to explore the different conceptions and principles that underlie the positions seen and also to make a balance on the communitarian justification for a multicultural political model.Segundo Alasdair MacIntyre, existem três características problemáticas que perpassam grande parte das contendas morais e políticas contemporâneas e às quais não se têm dado atenção suficiente: a) existe uma incomensurabilidade conceitual dos argumentos adversários nos debates travados; b) as argumentações em curso se fazem passar por argumentações racionais impessoais; c) as premissas conceitualmente distintas dos argumentos usados têm uma grande diversidade de origens históricas. A partir dessas três colocações e das consequências delas advindas, vamos aplicar o raciocínio crítico de MacIntyre a um conjunto específico de argumentos em conflito no terreno do multiculturalismo. Nosso intuito com isso é explorar as diferentes concepções e princípios que estão na base das posições vistas e também realizar um pequeno balanço acerca da justificação comunitarista para um modelo político multicultural.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2018-12-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/98010.31977/grirfi.v18i2.980Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 18 n. 2 (2018); 217-2322178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/980/588Copyright (c) 2018 Willian Martiniinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMartini, Willian2020-06-30T18:14:23Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/980Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2020-06-30T18:14:23Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Three objections from Alasdair MacIntyre applied to the multicultural debate Três objeções de Alasdair MacIntyre aplicadas ao debate multicultural |
title |
Three objections from Alasdair MacIntyre applied to the multicultural debate |
spellingShingle |
Three objections from Alasdair MacIntyre applied to the multicultural debate Martini, Willian Multiculturalismo; Moralidade; Comunitarismo; Liberalismo. Multiculturalism; Morality; Communitarianism; Liberalism. |
title_short |
Three objections from Alasdair MacIntyre applied to the multicultural debate |
title_full |
Three objections from Alasdair MacIntyre applied to the multicultural debate |
title_fullStr |
Three objections from Alasdair MacIntyre applied to the multicultural debate |
title_full_unstemmed |
Three objections from Alasdair MacIntyre applied to the multicultural debate |
title_sort |
Three objections from Alasdair MacIntyre applied to the multicultural debate |
author |
Martini, Willian |
author_facet |
Martini, Willian |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Martini, Willian |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Multiculturalismo; Moralidade; Comunitarismo; Liberalismo. Multiculturalism; Morality; Communitarianism; Liberalism. |
topic |
Multiculturalismo; Moralidade; Comunitarismo; Liberalismo. Multiculturalism; Morality; Communitarianism; Liberalism. |
description |
According to Alasdair MacIntyre, there are three problems that pervade most contemporary political struggles and which have not been given sufficient attention: a) there is a conceptual incommensurability of the adverse arguments in the debates; b) the ongoing arguments represent impersonal rational arguments; c) the conceptually distinct premises of the used arguments have a great diversity of historical origins. From these three settings and their consequences, we will apply MacIntyre's critical reasoning to a specific set of conflicting arguments in the field of multiculturalism. Our aim is to explore the different conceptions and principles that underlie the positions seen and also to make a balance on the communitarian justification for a multicultural political model. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-Reviewed Evaluados por los pares Avaliados pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/980 10.31977/grirfi.v18i2.980 |
url |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/980 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.31977/grirfi.v18i2.980 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/980/588 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Willian Martini info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Willian Martini |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 18 n. 2 (2018); 217-232 2178-1036 reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) instacron:UFRB |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
instacron_str |
UFRB |
institution |
UFRB |
reponame_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
collection |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||griotrevista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1754732699542618112 |