Economic rights, society and the brazillian supreme court: observing the court's abstract judicial review performance
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Iuris (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/38738 |
Resumo: | This paper examines the role of Brazil’s Supreme Court from an abstract judicial review because it helps to protect economic rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil of 1988. From an empirical examination of court judgments regarding economic rights, it is possible to understand the decision-making-process, as well as some sociological contributions that serve as a starting point for an important reflection between court and society. This study address two main questions: (i) What authorizes (unelected) Brazilian judges to implement economic policies that are necessary for the effective enjoyment of fundamental rights? (ii) Moreover, in practice, are courts institutionally capable of dealing with the complex technical and political issues that permeate this theme? The first question deals with the issue of the legitimacy of judges; and the second question highlights internal questions about the structure and operation of Brazilian courts. Finally, considering Brazil as a nation, this paper indicates the difficulties of the Brazilian Supreme Court in managing legal uncertainties that may impact the economy, sometimes causing even greater social turmoil and, at the same time, reveals the need for openness of the legal system in regards to innovation and cooperation between the many social institutions of law. |
id |
UEL-6_eb3eee0c11e4d0b9290cc3d2a3d0a707 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/38738 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-6 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Economic rights, society and the brazillian supreme court: observing the court's abstract judicial review performanceDireitos econômicos, sociedade e o supremo tribunal federal: observando a atuação da corte no controle abstratoEconomic RightsSupreme Federal CourtSociology of LawDecisionDireitos EconômicosSupremo Tribunal FederalSociologia do DireitoDecisãoThis paper examines the role of Brazil’s Supreme Court from an abstract judicial review because it helps to protect economic rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil of 1988. From an empirical examination of court judgments regarding economic rights, it is possible to understand the decision-making-process, as well as some sociological contributions that serve as a starting point for an important reflection between court and society. This study address two main questions: (i) What authorizes (unelected) Brazilian judges to implement economic policies that are necessary for the effective enjoyment of fundamental rights? (ii) Moreover, in practice, are courts institutionally capable of dealing with the complex technical and political issues that permeate this theme? The first question deals with the issue of the legitimacy of judges; and the second question highlights internal questions about the structure and operation of Brazilian courts. Finally, considering Brazil as a nation, this paper indicates the difficulties of the Brazilian Supreme Court in managing legal uncertainties that may impact the economy, sometimes causing even greater social turmoil and, at the same time, reveals the need for openness of the legal system in regards to innovation and cooperation between the many social institutions of law.Este texto examina a atuação do Supremo Tribunal Federal no controle abstrato de normas no ordenamento em relação à proteção dos direitos econômicos previstos na Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. Por meio da apresentação de uma amostra de julgamentos da corte sobre a matéria, observa-se a operação decisória do tribunal, bem como são delimitados alguns aportes sociológicos que servem como ponto de partida para a reflexão sobre a relação entre o tribunal e a sociedade. Questiona-se: (i) O que autoriza juízes (não eleitos) a implementar políticas econômicas que são necessariamente premissas para um efetivo gozo dos direitos fundamentais? (ii) Afinal, na prática, tribunais são institucionalmente capazes de lidar com as complexas questões técnicas e políticas que permeiam este tema? Na primeira indagação, discute-se a legitimidade dos juízes; na segunda, são trazidas a lume questões internas sobre a estrutura e a operação dos tribunais. No final, considerando o caso brasileiro, o texto indica as dificuldades de o Supremo Tribunal Federal gerir as incertezas jurídicas da economia, que, por vezes, acarreta maior turbulência social e, simultaneamente, revela a necessidade de uma maior abertura para a inovação e a cooperação entre as organizações sociais do direitoUniversidade Estadual de Londrina2020-03-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/3873810.5433/2178-8189.2020v24n1p99Scientia Iuris; v. 24 n. 1 (2020); 99-1232178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/38738/26948Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarros, Marco Antonio Loschiavo Leme de2023-01-26T22:29:51Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/38738Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-01-26T22:29:51Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Economic rights, society and the brazillian supreme court: observing the court's abstract judicial review performance Direitos econômicos, sociedade e o supremo tribunal federal: observando a atuação da corte no controle abstrato |
title |
Economic rights, society and the brazillian supreme court: observing the court's abstract judicial review performance |
spellingShingle |
Economic rights, society and the brazillian supreme court: observing the court's abstract judicial review performance Barros, Marco Antonio Loschiavo Leme de Economic Rights Supreme Federal Court Sociology of Law Decision Direitos Econômicos Supremo Tribunal Federal Sociologia do Direito Decisão |
title_short |
Economic rights, society and the brazillian supreme court: observing the court's abstract judicial review performance |
title_full |
Economic rights, society and the brazillian supreme court: observing the court's abstract judicial review performance |
title_fullStr |
Economic rights, society and the brazillian supreme court: observing the court's abstract judicial review performance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Economic rights, society and the brazillian supreme court: observing the court's abstract judicial review performance |
title_sort |
Economic rights, society and the brazillian supreme court: observing the court's abstract judicial review performance |
author |
Barros, Marco Antonio Loschiavo Leme de |
author_facet |
Barros, Marco Antonio Loschiavo Leme de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Barros, Marco Antonio Loschiavo Leme de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Economic Rights Supreme Federal Court Sociology of Law Decision Direitos Econômicos Supremo Tribunal Federal Sociologia do Direito Decisão |
topic |
Economic Rights Supreme Federal Court Sociology of Law Decision Direitos Econômicos Supremo Tribunal Federal Sociologia do Direito Decisão |
description |
This paper examines the role of Brazil’s Supreme Court from an abstract judicial review because it helps to protect economic rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil of 1988. From an empirical examination of court judgments regarding economic rights, it is possible to understand the decision-making-process, as well as some sociological contributions that serve as a starting point for an important reflection between court and society. This study address two main questions: (i) What authorizes (unelected) Brazilian judges to implement economic policies that are necessary for the effective enjoyment of fundamental rights? (ii) Moreover, in practice, are courts institutionally capable of dealing with the complex technical and political issues that permeate this theme? The first question deals with the issue of the legitimacy of judges; and the second question highlights internal questions about the structure and operation of Brazilian courts. Finally, considering Brazil as a nation, this paper indicates the difficulties of the Brazilian Supreme Court in managing legal uncertainties that may impact the economy, sometimes causing even greater social turmoil and, at the same time, reveals the need for openness of the legal system in regards to innovation and cooperation between the many social institutions of law. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-03-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/38738 10.5433/2178-8189.2020v24n1p99 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/38738 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2178-8189.2020v24n1p99 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/38738/26948 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris; v. 24 n. 1 (2020); 99-123 2178-8189 1415-6490 reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistamdireito@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306015628328960 |