Information and the dialectic of human development
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | Informação & Informação |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/30787 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Information and the human being are two inseparable realities that can not exist without each other. On the one hand, to say "information" implies recognizing a human being who created it and, on the other hand, being before a human being presupposes the existence of information to form, communicate and live in society. This unity, information the human being, manifests itself as an ontological reality: the informational being. Faced with this interdependence arises the concern to analyze how the human information-development relationship appears philosophically from a holistic and dialectical perspective. Objective: The document seeks to explain and to understand the process by which the human being, seen as an informational goes through several stages in his dialectical process to reach his self-knowledge. Methodology: the dialectical method was adopted in this work, because it recognizes the interdependence of opposites without privileging or underestimating any of them and at the same time contemplates reality as something always dynamic. In addition, documentary research was used to identify authors and articles that analyzed the problem. Simultaneously, the hermeneutical method was used to interpret the texts consulted and to establish a dialogue with the proposals of the thinkers who served as theoretical references. The method of analysis and synthesis was another methodological tool adopted and, finally, the deductive method was useful to make the necessary logical inferences in order to obtain the duly substantiated. Conclusions. First, the notions of dialectic and information are analyzed and, in the second moment, these concepts are applied in the analysis of human development from the point of view of informational. Results: The study showed the need to use a dialectic other than Hegelian, because the contradictions are not solved in a superior synthesis, but in which the tension is permanently preserved. As a consequence, there is no direction or term of motion. It has been discovered that the moments of the dialectic: being in oneself, being outside oneself, being for oneself appear in the movement of the informational being as a subject that constructs ideal information, documents as objectification of information and reconstruction of information in its nature ideal when querying documents. Conclusions: it is concluded that information is an indispensable agent for the process of human formation, and in the informative-documentary sphere converge ontology, gnosiology, anthropology and social. |
id |
UEL-8_6c9ac03faca6c6203aa8a251644a92b9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30787 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-8 |
network_name_str |
Informação & Informação |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Information and the dialectic of human developmentPARTE II - Seminários e Colóquios em Ciência da Informação - La Información y la dialéctica del desarrollo del ser humanoA informação e a dialética do desenvolvimento humanoDialecticInformationDialectics of the Informational BeingDialécticaInformaciónDialéctica del Ser InformacionalDialéticaInformaçãoDialética do Ser InformacionalIntroduction: Information and the human being are two inseparable realities that can not exist without each other. On the one hand, to say "information" implies recognizing a human being who created it and, on the other hand, being before a human being presupposes the existence of information to form, communicate and live in society. This unity, information the human being, manifests itself as an ontological reality: the informational being. Faced with this interdependence arises the concern to analyze how the human information-development relationship appears philosophically from a holistic and dialectical perspective. Objective: The document seeks to explain and to understand the process by which the human being, seen as an informational goes through several stages in his dialectical process to reach his self-knowledge. Methodology: the dialectical method was adopted in this work, because it recognizes the interdependence of opposites without privileging or underestimating any of them and at the same time contemplates reality as something always dynamic. In addition, documentary research was used to identify authors and articles that analyzed the problem. Simultaneously, the hermeneutical method was used to interpret the texts consulted and to establish a dialogue with the proposals of the thinkers who served as theoretical references. The method of analysis and synthesis was another methodological tool adopted and, finally, the deductive method was useful to make the necessary logical inferences in order to obtain the duly substantiated. Conclusions. First, the notions of dialectic and information are analyzed and, in the second moment, these concepts are applied in the analysis of human development from the point of view of informational. Results: The study showed the need to use a dialectic other than Hegelian, because the contradictions are not solved in a superior synthesis, but in which the tension is permanently preserved. As a consequence, there is no direction or term of motion. It has been discovered that the moments of the dialectic: being in oneself, being outside oneself, being for oneself appear in the movement of the informational being as a subject that constructs ideal information, documents as objectification of information and reconstruction of information in its nature ideal when querying documents. Conclusions: it is concluded that information is an indispensable agent for the process of human formation, and in the informative-documentary sphere converge ontology, gnosiology, anthropology and social.Introducción: Información y ser humano son dos realidades inseparables que no pueden existir la una sin la otra. Por un lado, decir “información” implica reconocer un ser humano que la creó; y por otro lado, el estar frente a un ser humano presupone la existencia de informaciones gracias a las cuales se forma, se comunica y vive en sociedad. Dicha unidad: información-ser humano se manifiesta como una realidad ontológica: el ser informacional. Ante esa interdependencia surge la inquietud de analizar cómo aparece filosóficamente la relación información-desarrollo humano desde una óptica holística y dialéctica. Objetivo: El trabajo busca explicar y comprender el proceso por el cual el ser humano, visto como ser informacional, atraviesa diversas etapas en su devenir dialéctico hasta alcanzar su autoconocimiento. Metodología: Nuestro estudio empleó básicamente el método dialéctico, el cual reconoce la interdependencia de los opuestos sin privilegiar o menospreciar alguno de ellos, y contempla la realidad como algo siempre dinámico. Asimismo, se utilizó la investigación documental para identificar autores y trabajos que analizaron la problemática. Simultáneamente se recurrió al método hermenéutico para interpretar los textos consultados y establecer un diálogo con las propuestas de los pensadores que nos sirvieron de referentes teóricos. El método de análisis y síntesis fue otra herramienta metodológica de la que nos valimos y finalmente el método deductivo nos fue útil para realizar las inferencias lógicas necesarias para obtener nuestras conclusiones debidamente fundamentadas. En un inicio se analizan las nociones de dialéctica e información y en un segundo momento se aplican esos conceptos en el análisis del desarrollo humano desde el punto de vista de ser informacional. Resultados: El estudio nos mostró la necesidad de emplear una dialéctica distinta a la hegeliana donde no se resuelvan las contradicciones en una síntesis superior, sino donde se conserve la tensión de manera permanente. Como consecuencia de lo anterior, no existe una direccionalidad y término del movimiento. Se descubrió que los momentos de la dialéctica: ser en sí, ser fuera de sí, ser para sí, aparecen en el movimiento del ser informacional como sujeto que construye información ideal, documentos como objetivación de la información, reconstrucción de la información en su naturaleza ideal al consultar los documentos. Conclusiones: Se concluye que la información es un agente indispensable para el proceso de formación del ser del ser humano, y en la esfera informativo-documental convergen la ontología, la gnoseología, la antropología y lo social.Introdução: A informação e o ser humano são duas realidades inseparáveis que não podem existir uma sem a outra. Por um lado, dizer "informação" implica reconhecer um ser humano que a criou; e, por outro lado, estar diante de um ser humano pressupõe a existência de informações para se formar, comunicar e viver na sociedade. Esta unidade, a informação- o ser humano, manifesta-se como uma realidade ontológica: o ser informacional. Diante dessa interdependência surge a preocupação de analisar como aparece filosoficamente a relação informaçãodesenvolvimento humano a partir de uma perspectiva holística e dialética. Objetivo: o documento procura explicar e entender o processo pelo qual o ser humano, visto como um ser informativo, passa por vários estágios em seu processo dialético para atingir seu autoconhecimento. Metodologia: o método dialético foi adotado neste trabalho, até porque que reconhece a interdependência dos opostos sem privilegiar ou subestimar algum deles e, ao mesmo tempo, contempla a realidade como algo sempre dinâmico. Além disso, foi utilizada a pesquisa documental para identificar autores e artigos que analisaram o problema. Simultaneamente, o método hermenêutico foi usado para interpretar os textos consultados e para estabelecer um diálogo com as propostas dos pensadores que serviram como referências teóricas. O método de análise e síntese foi outra ferramenta metodológica adotada e, finalmente, o método dedutivo foi útil para fazer as inferências lógicas necessárias a fim de obter as conclusões devidamente fundamentadas. Primeiramente, as noções de dialética e informação são analisadas e, no segundo momento, esses conceitos são aplicados na análise do desenvolvimento humano desde o ponto de vista do ser informacional. Resultados: O estudo mostrou a necessidade de usar uma dialética diferente da hegeliana, devido a que as contradições não são resolvidas em uma síntese superior, mas no qual a tensão está permanentemente preservada. Como consequência, não existe direção nem termo de movimento. Descobriu-se que os momentos da dialética: estar em si mesmo, estar fora de si mesmo, ser para si mesmo aparecem no movimento do ser informacional como um sujeito que constrói informação ideal, documentos como objetivação de informação e reconstrução de informações em sua natureza ideal ao consultar documentos. Conclusões: conclui-se que a informação é um agente indispensável para o processo de formação do ser humano e, na esfera informativo-documental convergem a ontologia, gnosiologia, antropologia e o social.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2017-10-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/3078710.5433/1981-8920.2017v22n2p293Informação & Informação; v. 22 n. 2 (2017); 293-3191981-8920reponame:Informação & Informaçãoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELspahttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/30787/22010Copyright (c) 2021 Informação & Informaçãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRendón Rojas, Miguel Angel2021-06-09T23:20:01Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30787Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/indexPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/oai||infoeinfo@uel.br10.5433/1981-89201981-89201414-2139opendoar:2021-06-09T23:20:01Informação & Informação - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Information and the dialectic of human development PARTE II - Seminários e Colóquios em Ciência da Informação - La Información y la dialéctica del desarrollo del ser humano A informação e a dialética do desenvolvimento humano |
title |
Information and the dialectic of human development |
spellingShingle |
Information and the dialectic of human development Rendón Rojas, Miguel Angel Dialectic Information Dialectics of the Informational Being Dialéctica Información Dialéctica del Ser Informacional Dialética Informação Dialética do Ser Informacional |
title_short |
Information and the dialectic of human development |
title_full |
Information and the dialectic of human development |
title_fullStr |
Information and the dialectic of human development |
title_full_unstemmed |
Information and the dialectic of human development |
title_sort |
Information and the dialectic of human development |
author |
Rendón Rojas, Miguel Angel |
author_facet |
Rendón Rojas, Miguel Angel |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rendón Rojas, Miguel Angel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dialectic Information Dialectics of the Informational Being Dialéctica Información Dialéctica del Ser Informacional Dialética Informação Dialética do Ser Informacional |
topic |
Dialectic Information Dialectics of the Informational Being Dialéctica Información Dialéctica del Ser Informacional Dialética Informação Dialética do Ser Informacional |
description |
Introduction: Information and the human being are two inseparable realities that can not exist without each other. On the one hand, to say "information" implies recognizing a human being who created it and, on the other hand, being before a human being presupposes the existence of information to form, communicate and live in society. This unity, information the human being, manifests itself as an ontological reality: the informational being. Faced with this interdependence arises the concern to analyze how the human information-development relationship appears philosophically from a holistic and dialectical perspective. Objective: The document seeks to explain and to understand the process by which the human being, seen as an informational goes through several stages in his dialectical process to reach his self-knowledge. Methodology: the dialectical method was adopted in this work, because it recognizes the interdependence of opposites without privileging or underestimating any of them and at the same time contemplates reality as something always dynamic. In addition, documentary research was used to identify authors and articles that analyzed the problem. Simultaneously, the hermeneutical method was used to interpret the texts consulted and to establish a dialogue with the proposals of the thinkers who served as theoretical references. The method of analysis and synthesis was another methodological tool adopted and, finally, the deductive method was useful to make the necessary logical inferences in order to obtain the duly substantiated. Conclusions. First, the notions of dialectic and information are analyzed and, in the second moment, these concepts are applied in the analysis of human development from the point of view of informational. Results: The study showed the need to use a dialectic other than Hegelian, because the contradictions are not solved in a superior synthesis, but in which the tension is permanently preserved. As a consequence, there is no direction or term of motion. It has been discovered that the moments of the dialectic: being in oneself, being outside oneself, being for oneself appear in the movement of the informational being as a subject that constructs ideal information, documents as objectification of information and reconstruction of information in its nature ideal when querying documents. Conclusions: it is concluded that information is an indispensable agent for the process of human formation, and in the informative-documentary sphere converge ontology, gnosiology, anthropology and social. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-10-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/30787 10.5433/1981-8920.2017v22n2p293 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/30787 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1981-8920.2017v22n2p293 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/30787/22010 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Informação & Informação info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Informação & Informação |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Informação & Informação; v. 22 n. 2 (2017); 293-319 1981-8920 reponame:Informação & Informação instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Informação & Informação |
collection |
Informação & Informação |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Informação & Informação - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||infoeinfo@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799305985001521152 |