Judicial psychology: Characterization of practice and instruments used
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/10646 |
Resumo: | This study aimed to assess the formation profile and practice, as well as verification of the most instruments used by forensic psychologists and judicial. It is understood that this research will help further the understanding of the dynamics of work and possibilities for improvement. To this end, was designed a questionnaire consisting of 18 questions, 17 open and 1 closed. Despite the invitation to participate has been performed for many professionals, especially those active in forums in the state of São Paulo, the interviewed group was composed of eleven professionals, working in various areas relevant to the legal and forensic psychology, for over a year. The study showed that changes are necessary in the area about the low number of skilled professionals, as well as its recovery and further development of multidisciplinary research and also work, especially with regard to the relationship with the operators of law. As for future prospects, professionals are divided on the belief improvements. Some difficulties were encountered with regard to the search for specific articles on the practice of forensic psychology and judicial. Should be carried out more comprehensive research with other researchers' respondents. |
id |
UEL-9_b5c324e4b3e7fd3fe4e713de9ca39e99 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10646 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-9 |
network_name_str |
Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Judicial psychology: Characterization of practice and instruments usedPsicología jurídica: La caracterización de las prácticas y los instrumentos utilizadosPsicologia jurídica: Caracterização da prática e instrumentos utilizadosforensic psychologyprofessional profileforensic psychological examinationpsicologia forenseperfil profissionalperícia psicológica.This study aimed to assess the formation profile and practice, as well as verification of the most instruments used by forensic psychologists and judicial. It is understood that this research will help further the understanding of the dynamics of work and possibilities for improvement. To this end, was designed a questionnaire consisting of 18 questions, 17 open and 1 closed. Despite the invitation to participate has been performed for many professionals, especially those active in forums in the state of São Paulo, the interviewed group was composed of eleven professionals, working in various areas relevant to the legal and forensic psychology, for over a year. The study showed that changes are necessary in the area about the low number of skilled professionals, as well as its recovery and further development of multidisciplinary research and also work, especially with regard to the relationship with the operators of law. As for future prospects, professionals are divided on the belief improvements. Some difficulties were encountered with regard to the search for specific articles on the practice of forensic psychology and judicial. Should be carried out more comprehensive research with other researchers' respondents.Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar el perfil de la formación y la práctica, así como la verificación de los instrumentos más utilizados por los psicólogos forenses y legales. Se entiende que esta investigación ayude a avanzar en la comprensión de la dinámica de trabajo y posibilidades de mejora. Con este fin, se diseñó un cuestionario que consta de 18 preguntas, 17 abiertas y 1 cerrada. A pesar de la invitación a participar se ha realizado para muchos profesionales, especialmente aquellos que trabajan en los foros en el estado de Sao Paulo, el grupo de entrevistados fue de once profesionales que trabajan en diversos ámbitos de interés de la psicología jurídica y forense, durante más de un año. El estudio demostró que los cambios son necesarios en el área debido el escaso número de profesionales cualificados, así como la necesidad de valorización y desarrollo de la investigación multidisciplinar y de trabajo, especialmente con respecto a la relación con los operadores de la ley. En relación a las perspectivas de futuro, los profesionales están divididos sobre la creencia de mejoras. Algunas dificultades se han encontrado con respecto a la búsqueda de artículos específicos sobre la práctica de la psicología forense. Debe llevarse a cabo una investigación más amplia con más entrevistados.A pesquisa realizada neste trabalho objetivou levantar o perfil quanto à formação e à prática, bem como a verificação dos instrumentos mais utilizados pelos psicólogos forenses e jurídicos. Entende-se que esta pesquisa auxiliará ainda no entendimento da dinâmica do trabalho realizado e as possibilidades de melhoria. Para tal, foi elaborado um questionário composto por 18 questões, sendo 17 abertas e 1 fechada. Apesar do convite para participação ter sido realizado para diversos profissionais, principalmente aqueles atuantes em fóruns no estado de São Paulo, o grupo entrevistado foi composto por onze profissionais, atuantes nas diversas áreas competentes à psicologia jurídica e forense, há mais de um ano. A pesquisa apontou que há necessidade de mudanças na área quanto ao número baixo de profissionais especializados, bem como sua valorização e maior desenvolvimento de pesquisas e também trabalhos multidisciplinares, em especial no que diz respeito à articulação com os Operadores de Direito. Quanto às perspectivas futuras, os profissionais se dividem, na crença de melhorias. Algumas dificuldades foram encontradas no que diz respeito à busca de artigos específicos sobre a prática da psicologia jurídica e forense. Convém que sejam realizadas outras pesquisas com maior abrangência dos pesquisadores respondentes.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2011-04-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/1064610.5433/2236-6407.2011v2n1p56Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia; v. 2 n. 1 (2011); 56-712236-6407reponame:Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologiainstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/10646/9335Copyright (c) 2011 Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Marjorie Cristina Rocha daFontana, Elisandra2020-07-18T01:09:04Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10646Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eipPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/oai||revistaeip@uel.br2236-64072236-6407opendoar:2020-07-18T01:09:04Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Judicial psychology: Characterization of practice and instruments used Psicología jurídica: La caracterización de las prácticas y los instrumentos utilizados Psicologia jurídica: Caracterização da prática e instrumentos utilizados |
title |
Judicial psychology: Characterization of practice and instruments used |
spellingShingle |
Judicial psychology: Characterization of practice and instruments used Silva, Marjorie Cristina Rocha da forensic psychology professional profile forensic psychological examination psicologia forense perfil profissional perícia psicológica. |
title_short |
Judicial psychology: Characterization of practice and instruments used |
title_full |
Judicial psychology: Characterization of practice and instruments used |
title_fullStr |
Judicial psychology: Characterization of practice and instruments used |
title_full_unstemmed |
Judicial psychology: Characterization of practice and instruments used |
title_sort |
Judicial psychology: Characterization of practice and instruments used |
author |
Silva, Marjorie Cristina Rocha da |
author_facet |
Silva, Marjorie Cristina Rocha da Fontana, Elisandra |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fontana, Elisandra |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Marjorie Cristina Rocha da Fontana, Elisandra |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
forensic psychology professional profile forensic psychological examination psicologia forense perfil profissional perícia psicológica. |
topic |
forensic psychology professional profile forensic psychological examination psicologia forense perfil profissional perícia psicológica. |
description |
This study aimed to assess the formation profile and practice, as well as verification of the most instruments used by forensic psychologists and judicial. It is understood that this research will help further the understanding of the dynamics of work and possibilities for improvement. To this end, was designed a questionnaire consisting of 18 questions, 17 open and 1 closed. Despite the invitation to participate has been performed for many professionals, especially those active in forums in the state of São Paulo, the interviewed group was composed of eleven professionals, working in various areas relevant to the legal and forensic psychology, for over a year. The study showed that changes are necessary in the area about the low number of skilled professionals, as well as its recovery and further development of multidisciplinary research and also work, especially with regard to the relationship with the operators of law. As for future prospects, professionals are divided on the belief improvements. Some difficulties were encountered with regard to the search for specific articles on the practice of forensic psychology and judicial. Should be carried out more comprehensive research with other researchers' respondents. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-04-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/10646 10.5433/2236-6407.2011v2n1p56 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/10646 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2236-6407.2011v2n1p56 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/10646/9335 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2011 Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2011 Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia; v. 2 n. 1 (2011); 56-71 2236-6407 reponame:Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia |
collection |
Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistaeip@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306107668135936 |