Psychological testing: Survey of the motives by which they have received unfavorable report according to the consulting commission

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Freitas, Fernanda Andrade de
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Cantalice, Lucicleide
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/10648
Resumo: This survey had the objective of identify the motives, according to the resolution of the Federal Council of Psychology – FCP no. 002/2003, why the psychological tests had received unfavorable report. The relation is available in the Federal Council of Psychology site. Fifty-nine (59) Reports of the rejected tests were printed and analyzed by two judges trough categories established. Overall, the results revealed that in 2003 there were more tests submitted to assessment and the publishing house with more rejected tests was Center Editor of Applied Psychology – CEPA and (45,7%) of the psychological tests had problems due to the theoretical justification and to the construct definition. A minority (5,1%) had presented studies of validity and efficiency (13,6%), but the majority had presented normative studies (67,8%) even they were not totally adequate. The data were discussed in means of positive impacts that the regulation had produced in the area.
id UEL-9_cdaa6b05282c3aec4e462da6f109ff7f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10648
network_acronym_str UEL-9
network_name_str Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia
repository_id_str
spelling Psychological testing: Survey of the motives by which they have received unfavorable report according to the consulting commissionTestes psicológicos: Estudio de las razones segundo recibió un dictamen desfavorable de la comisión consultivaTestes psicológicos: Levantamento dos motivos pelos quais receberam parecer desfavorável segundo a comissão consultivacareer guidancepsychological testsscientific researchavaliação psicológicatestes psicológicosmedidaspsicologiaThis survey had the objective of identify the motives, according to the resolution of the Federal Council of Psychology – FCP no. 002/2003, why the psychological tests had received unfavorable report. The relation is available in the Federal Council of Psychology site. Fifty-nine (59) Reports of the rejected tests were printed and analyzed by two judges trough categories established. Overall, the results revealed that in 2003 there were more tests submitted to assessment and the publishing house with more rejected tests was Center Editor of Applied Psychology – CEPA and (45,7%) of the psychological tests had problems due to the theoretical justification and to the construct definition. A minority (5,1%) had presented studies of validity and efficiency (13,6%), but the majority had presented normative studies (67,8%) even they were not totally adequate. The data were discussed in means of positive impacts that the regulation had produced in the area.Este estudio tuve el objetivo de identificar los motivos, segundo la resolución del Consejo Federal de Sicología – CFS – no. 002/2003, pelos cuales los testes psicológicos recibieran Parecer desfavorable. La relación está disponible en el site del Consejo Federal de Sicología. Cincuenta e nueve (59) pareceres de los testes reprobados fueran impresos y analizados por dos jueces por categorías establecidas. De modo general, los resultados rebelaran que el ano de 2003 a contado con más testes sometidos á la avaluación e la editora con más testes reprobados fue lo Centro Editor de Psicología Aplicada – CEPA e (45,7%) de los testes psicológicos tenia problemas cuanto la fundamentación teórica e la definición del constructor. Una minoría (5,1%) presentaba estudios de validad y de precisión (13,6%), mas la mayoría presentaba estudios normativos (67,8%) aunque non estuviesen totalmente adecuados. Los dados fueran discutidos en termos de los impactos positivos que la reglamentación engendró en la área.Este estudo teve como objetivo identificar os motivos, segundo a resolução do Conselho Federal de Psicologia - CFP n.º 002/2003, pelos quais os testes psicológicos receberam Parecer desfavorável. A relação está disponível no site do Conselho Federal de Psicologia. Cinquenta e nove (59) pareceres dos testes reprovados foram impressos e analisados por dois juízes por meio de categorias estabelecidas. De modo geral, os resultados revelaram que o ano de 2003 contou com mais testes submetidos à avaliação e a editora, com mais testes reprovados, foi a Centro Editor de Psicologia Aplicada – CEPA e (45,7%) dos testes psicológicos tinha problemas quanto à fundamentação teórica e à definição de construto. Uma minoria (5,1%) apresentava estudos de validade e de precisão (13,6%), mas a maioria apresentou estudos normativos (67,8%), ainda que não estivessem totalmente adequados. Os dados foram discutidos em termos dos impactos positivos que a regulamentação gerou na área.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2011-04-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/1064810.5433/2236-6407.2011v2n1p88Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia; v. 2 n. 1 (2011); 88-1022236-6407reponame:Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologiainstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/10648/9337Copyright (c) 2011 Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFreitas, Fernanda Andrade deCantalice, Lucicleide2020-07-18T01:09:16Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10648Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eipPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/oai||revistaeip@uel.br2236-64072236-6407opendoar:2020-07-18T01:09:16Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Psychological testing: Survey of the motives by which they have received unfavorable report according to the consulting commission
Testes psicológicos: Estudio de las razones segundo recibió un dictamen desfavorable de la comisión consultiva
Testes psicológicos: Levantamento dos motivos pelos quais receberam parecer desfavorável segundo a comissão consultiva
title Psychological testing: Survey of the motives by which they have received unfavorable report according to the consulting commission
spellingShingle Psychological testing: Survey of the motives by which they have received unfavorable report according to the consulting commission
Freitas, Fernanda Andrade de
career guidance
psychological tests
scientific research
avaliação psicológica
testes psicológicos
medidas
psicologia
title_short Psychological testing: Survey of the motives by which they have received unfavorable report according to the consulting commission
title_full Psychological testing: Survey of the motives by which they have received unfavorable report according to the consulting commission
title_fullStr Psychological testing: Survey of the motives by which they have received unfavorable report according to the consulting commission
title_full_unstemmed Psychological testing: Survey of the motives by which they have received unfavorable report according to the consulting commission
title_sort Psychological testing: Survey of the motives by which they have received unfavorable report according to the consulting commission
author Freitas, Fernanda Andrade de
author_facet Freitas, Fernanda Andrade de
Cantalice, Lucicleide
author_role author
author2 Cantalice, Lucicleide
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Freitas, Fernanda Andrade de
Cantalice, Lucicleide
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv career guidance
psychological tests
scientific research
avaliação psicológica
testes psicológicos
medidas
psicologia
topic career guidance
psychological tests
scientific research
avaliação psicológica
testes psicológicos
medidas
psicologia
description This survey had the objective of identify the motives, according to the resolution of the Federal Council of Psychology – FCP no. 002/2003, why the psychological tests had received unfavorable report. The relation is available in the Federal Council of Psychology site. Fifty-nine (59) Reports of the rejected tests were printed and analyzed by two judges trough categories established. Overall, the results revealed that in 2003 there were more tests submitted to assessment and the publishing house with more rejected tests was Center Editor of Applied Psychology – CEPA and (45,7%) of the psychological tests had problems due to the theoretical justification and to the construct definition. A minority (5,1%) had presented studies of validity and efficiency (13,6%), but the majority had presented normative studies (67,8%) even they were not totally adequate. The data were discussed in means of positive impacts that the regulation had produced in the area.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-04-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/10648
10.5433/2236-6407.2011v2n1p88
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/10648
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2236-6407.2011v2n1p88
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/10648/9337
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2011 Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2011 Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia; v. 2 n. 1 (2011); 88-102
2236-6407
reponame:Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia
collection Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistaeip@uel.br
_version_ 1799306107672330240

Registros relacionados