Levedura Spray dry (álcool e cervejaria) na alimentação de suínos

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Poveda Parra, Angela Rocio
Data de Publicação: 2009
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (RI-UEM)
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.uem.br:8080/jspui/handle/1/1581
Resumo: Six experiments were carried out to determine the nutritional values, the effects of spray dry yeast inclusion in starting, growing and finishing pigs on the performance and economic viability. The Experiment I, digestibility assays was carried out with fifteen barrow pigs, whit initial weight of 20.98 ± 7.46 kg allotted in a completely randomized design. The evaluated feeds were two spray dry yeast (sugar cane yeast- SCYSD and brewers + sugar cane yeast- BYSD). The values, as fed basis, of digestible energy (DE kcal/kg) obtained for SCYSD and BYSD, were 2.788 and 3.455 kcal/kg and metabolizable energy (ME kcal/kg) were 2.761 and 3.289, respectively. The Experiment II was carried out using 50 piglets, initial weight of 14.60 ± 1.28 kg allotted in a completely randomized design, with five treatments, five replicates and two pigs per experimental unit. The treatments consisted of five diets with increasing levels (0%, 5%, 10%, 15% and 20%) of BYSD. The inclusion of BYSD propitiated worsening the feed: gain (F:G). The Experiment III were used using 80 piglets, with initial weight of 15.16 ± 1.36 kg allotted in a completely randomized design in 5 x 2 factorial scheme, with five inclusion levels (0%, 5%, 10%, 15% and 20%) of BYSD and two physical forms of diets (meal and pellet) with, four replicates and two pigs per experimental unit. There were no interaction among the inclusion levels of BYSD and physical form. Also, no effects of inclusion levels of BYSD were observed on performance. The Experiment IV, a digestibility assays were carried out with fifteen barrow pigs, with initial weight of 55.83 ± 6.36 kg allotted in a completely randomized design. The evaluated feeds were the sames of experiment I the values, as fed xiii basis, of DE obtained for SCYSD and BYSD, were 3.496 and 3.901 kcal/kg and ME (kcal/kg) were 3.475 and 3.862, respectively. In the experiment V an ileal digestibility assays was carried out to determine the coefficient apparent and true ileal digestibility and digestible amino acids were out using three pigs with initial weight of 46.3± 2.12 kg, previously submitted to the surgery for simple T canula implantation. The treatments consisted of one diet without protein and two diets of SCYSD and BYSD, being the only protein source. The values of digestible amino acids of SCYSD and BYSD (lysine: 2.66 and 2,64; methionine+cistine: 1.11and 1,03 and threonine: 1.95 and 1,92, respectively) were used in the diet of experiment six. The values of digestible essential amino acids for SCYSD were used for amino acid composition of meals. In the Experiment VI were used 40 pigs (barrow and gilts), with initial weighing of 34.39 ± 7.57 kg in growing phase and 77.47± 6.28 kg in finishing phase, respectively allotted in a completely randomized design, with five treatments, four replicates and two pigs per experimental unit. The five inclusion levels (0%, 5%, 10%, 15% and 20%) of SCYSD were evaluated. In the growing phase, the inclusion of SCYSD propitiated worsening the daily weight gain (DWG) and fed:gain ratio (F:G). The DWG and the F:G presented difference among 20% levels of inclusion when compared with 0%. The finishing phase, presented a quadratic effect being 3.32% the better inclusion level. The DFI presented difference among levels 15% and 20% of inclusion when compared with 0%. There was a linear reduction of DWG, F:G, slaughter weight, hot carcass weight (HCW), cold carcass yield and ham weight according to SCYSD inclusion. The DWG, F:G and HCW presented differences between level 20% when compared to level 0%. The results suggest the inclusion level of 20% of BYSD in nursery piglets in form meal our pellet, without impairing performance, however, in growing and finishing phase the inclusion level of sugar cane yeast harm performance. However the economic feasibility of spray dry yeast utilization will depend on feedstuffs prices.
id UEM-10_a128381eb9394a76f309e3a1b343895c
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:1/1581
network_acronym_str UEM-10
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (RI-UEM)
repository_id_str
spelling Levedura Spray dry (álcool e cervejaria) na alimentação de suínosAlimentação de suínosAminoácidos digestíveisLeveduraCânula ilealDigestibilidadeAlimento proteicoPeletizaçãoSubprodutoValor nutritivoBrasil.Feeding pigsDigestible amino acidsYeastIleal cannulaDigestibilityProtein foodPelletingBy-productNutritional valueBrazil.Ciências AgráriasZootecniaSix experiments were carried out to determine the nutritional values, the effects of spray dry yeast inclusion in starting, growing and finishing pigs on the performance and economic viability. The Experiment I, digestibility assays was carried out with fifteen barrow pigs, whit initial weight of 20.98 ± 7.46 kg allotted in a completely randomized design. The evaluated feeds were two spray dry yeast (sugar cane yeast- SCYSD and brewers + sugar cane yeast- BYSD). The values, as fed basis, of digestible energy (DE kcal/kg) obtained for SCYSD and BYSD, were 2.788 and 3.455 kcal/kg and metabolizable energy (ME kcal/kg) were 2.761 and 3.289, respectively. The Experiment II was carried out using 50 piglets, initial weight of 14.60 ± 1.28 kg allotted in a completely randomized design, with five treatments, five replicates and two pigs per experimental unit. The treatments consisted of five diets with increasing levels (0%, 5%, 10%, 15% and 20%) of BYSD. The inclusion of BYSD propitiated worsening the feed: gain (F:G). The Experiment III were used using 80 piglets, with initial weight of 15.16 ± 1.36 kg allotted in a completely randomized design in 5 x 2 factorial scheme, with five inclusion levels (0%, 5%, 10%, 15% and 20%) of BYSD and two physical forms of diets (meal and pellet) with, four replicates and two pigs per experimental unit. There were no interaction among the inclusion levels of BYSD and physical form. Also, no effects of inclusion levels of BYSD were observed on performance. The Experiment IV, a digestibility assays were carried out with fifteen barrow pigs, with initial weight of 55.83 ± 6.36 kg allotted in a completely randomized design. The evaluated feeds were the sames of experiment I the values, as fed xiii basis, of DE obtained for SCYSD and BYSD, were 3.496 and 3.901 kcal/kg and ME (kcal/kg) were 3.475 and 3.862, respectively. In the experiment V an ileal digestibility assays was carried out to determine the coefficient apparent and true ileal digestibility and digestible amino acids were out using three pigs with initial weight of 46.3± 2.12 kg, previously submitted to the surgery for simple T canula implantation. The treatments consisted of one diet without protein and two diets of SCYSD and BYSD, being the only protein source. The values of digestible amino acids of SCYSD and BYSD (lysine: 2.66 and 2,64; methionine+cistine: 1.11and 1,03 and threonine: 1.95 and 1,92, respectively) were used in the diet of experiment six. The values of digestible essential amino acids for SCYSD were used for amino acid composition of meals. In the Experiment VI were used 40 pigs (barrow and gilts), with initial weighing of 34.39 ± 7.57 kg in growing phase and 77.47± 6.28 kg in finishing phase, respectively allotted in a completely randomized design, with five treatments, four replicates and two pigs per experimental unit. The five inclusion levels (0%, 5%, 10%, 15% and 20%) of SCYSD were evaluated. In the growing phase, the inclusion of SCYSD propitiated worsening the daily weight gain (DWG) and fed:gain ratio (F:G). The DWG and the F:G presented difference among 20% levels of inclusion when compared with 0%. The finishing phase, presented a quadratic effect being 3.32% the better inclusion level. The DFI presented difference among levels 15% and 20% of inclusion when compared with 0%. There was a linear reduction of DWG, F:G, slaughter weight, hot carcass weight (HCW), cold carcass yield and ham weight according to SCYSD inclusion. The DWG, F:G and HCW presented differences between level 20% when compared to level 0%. The results suggest the inclusion level of 20% of BYSD in nursery piglets in form meal our pellet, without impairing performance, however, in growing and finishing phase the inclusion level of sugar cane yeast harm performance. However the economic feasibility of spray dry yeast utilization will depend on feedstuffs prices.Foram conduzidos seis experimentos para verificar o valor nutricional e o efeito da inclusão das leveduras spray dry em rações para suínos na fase inicial, crescimento e terminação, sobre o desempenho e a viabilidade econômica. No Experimento I foi conduzido um ensaio de digestibilidade total utilizando 15 leitões híbridos comerciais, com 20,98 ± 7,46 kg de PV, distribuídos em delineamento inteiramente casualizado. Os alimentos estudados foram duas leveduras spray dry (levedura de cana-de-açúcar ? LEV35 e levedura de cerveja + cana-de-açúcar- LEV40). Os valores de energia digestível (ED kcal/kg) na matéria natural para LEV35 e LEV40, foram 2.788 e 3.455 e de energia metabolizável (EM kcal/kg) foram 2.761 e 3.289, respectivamente. No Experimento II foram utilizados 50 leitões, com peso inicial de 14,60 ± 1,28 kg, distribuídos em delineamento inteiramente casualizado, com cinco tratamentos, cinco repetições e dois animais por unidade experimental. Os tratamentos consistiram de cinco níveis de inclusão (0%, 5%, 10%, 15% e 20%) da LEV40. A inclusão da LEV40 propiciou piora linear da conversão alimentar (CA). No Experimento III foram utilizados 80 leitões, com peso inicial de 15,16 ± 1,36 kg, distribuídos em delineamento inteiramente casualizado em esquema fatorial 5 x 2, com cinco níveis de inclusão de LEV40 e duas formas de ração (farelada ou peletizada), com quatro repetições e dois animais por unidade experimental. Não foi observada interação entre os níveis de inclusão da LEV40 na dieta e a forma da ração (farelada e peletizada). No Experimento IV foi conduzido um ensaio de digestibilidade total xi utilizando 15 suínos mestiços, com 55,83 ± 6,36 kg de PV, distribuídos em um delineamento inteiramente casualizado. Os alimentos estudados foram os mesmos alimentos do experimento I. Os valores de energia digestível (ED kcal/kg) para LEV35 e LEV40, foram 3.496 e 3.901 e de energia metabolizável (EM kcal/kg) foram 3.475 e 3.862, respectivamente. No Experimento V foi conduzido um ensaio para determinar os coeficientes de digestibilidade ileal aparente e verdadeira e aminoácidos digestíveis, utilizando três suínos com 46,3 ± 2,12 kg de PV. Os tratamentos consistiram de uma dieta isenta de proteína e duas dietas com LEV35 e LEV40 como única fonte de proteína. Os valores de aminoácidos digestíveis essenciais da LEV35 e LEV40 (lisina: 2,66 e 2,64%; metionina+cistina: 1,11 e 1,03% e treonina: 1,95 e 1,92%, respectivamente) foram utilizados na formulação das rações do Experimento VI. No Experimento VI foram utilizados 40 suínos (20 machos e 20 fêmeas), com peso inicial de 34,39 ± 7,57 kg na fase de crescimento e de 62,45 ± 13,08 kg na fase de terminação, distribuídos em um delineamento inteiramente casualizado com cinco tratamentos, quatro repetições e dois animais por unidade experimental. Foram avaliados cinco níveis de inclusão (0%, 5%, 10%, 15% e 20%) da LEV35. Na fase de crescimento, a inclusão da LEV35 propiciou piora no ganho diário de peso (GDP) e na conversão alimentar (CA). O GDP e a CA apresentaram diferença entre o último nível de inclusão (20%) comparado com o nível 0%. Na fase de terminação, houve efeito quadrático para o consumo diário de ração (CDR), sendo o melhor nível obtido com 3,32% de inclusão. O CDR foi diferente nos níveis 15% e 20% de inclusão quando comparados com o nível 0%. Foi observada redução linear para o GDP, CA, peso de abate, peso de carcaça quente (PCQ), rendimento de carcaça fria e peso de pernil. O GDP, CA e PCQ apresentaram diferença do último nível de inclusão (20%) comparado com o nível 0%. Os resultados sugerem a inclusão de até 20% da LEV40 na fase inicial na forma farelada ou peletizada sem prejudicar o desempenho, porém para a fase de crescimento e terminação a inclusão de níveis crescentes da LEV35 prejudica o desempenho. A viabilidade econômica da utilização das leveduras spray dry vai depender da relação de preços entre os ingredientes.xiii, 53, [54] fUniversidade Estadual de MaringáBrasilPrograma de Pós-Graduação em ZootecniaUEMMaringá, PRCentro de Ciências AgráriasIvan MoreiraAlice Eiko Murakami - UEMTatiana Carlesso dos Santos - UEMCaio Abércio da Silva - UELDiovani Paiano - UDESCPoveda Parra, Angela Rocio2018-04-06T17:13:40Z2018-04-06T17:13:40Z2009info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesishttp://repositorio.uem.br:8080/jspui/handle/1/1581porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (RI-UEM)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEM2018-04-06T17:13:40Zoai:localhost:1/1581Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.uem.br:8080/oai/requestopendoar:2024-04-23T14:54:32.979511Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (RI-UEM) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Levedura Spray dry (álcool e cervejaria) na alimentação de suínos
title Levedura Spray dry (álcool e cervejaria) na alimentação de suínos
spellingShingle Levedura Spray dry (álcool e cervejaria) na alimentação de suínos
Poveda Parra, Angela Rocio
Alimentação de suínos
Aminoácidos digestíveis
Levedura
Cânula ileal
Digestibilidade
Alimento proteico
Peletização
Subproduto
Valor nutritivo
Brasil.
Feeding pigs
Digestible amino acids
Yeast
Ileal cannula
Digestibility
Protein food
Pelleting
By-product
Nutritional value
Brazil.
Ciências Agrárias
Zootecnia
title_short Levedura Spray dry (álcool e cervejaria) na alimentação de suínos
title_full Levedura Spray dry (álcool e cervejaria) na alimentação de suínos
title_fullStr Levedura Spray dry (álcool e cervejaria) na alimentação de suínos
title_full_unstemmed Levedura Spray dry (álcool e cervejaria) na alimentação de suínos
title_sort Levedura Spray dry (álcool e cervejaria) na alimentação de suínos
author Poveda Parra, Angela Rocio
author_facet Poveda Parra, Angela Rocio
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Ivan Moreira
Alice Eiko Murakami - UEM
Tatiana Carlesso dos Santos - UEM
Caio Abércio da Silva - UEL
Diovani Paiano - UDESC
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Poveda Parra, Angela Rocio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Alimentação de suínos
Aminoácidos digestíveis
Levedura
Cânula ileal
Digestibilidade
Alimento proteico
Peletização
Subproduto
Valor nutritivo
Brasil.
Feeding pigs
Digestible amino acids
Yeast
Ileal cannula
Digestibility
Protein food
Pelleting
By-product
Nutritional value
Brazil.
Ciências Agrárias
Zootecnia
topic Alimentação de suínos
Aminoácidos digestíveis
Levedura
Cânula ileal
Digestibilidade
Alimento proteico
Peletização
Subproduto
Valor nutritivo
Brasil.
Feeding pigs
Digestible amino acids
Yeast
Ileal cannula
Digestibility
Protein food
Pelleting
By-product
Nutritional value
Brazil.
Ciências Agrárias
Zootecnia
description Six experiments were carried out to determine the nutritional values, the effects of spray dry yeast inclusion in starting, growing and finishing pigs on the performance and economic viability. The Experiment I, digestibility assays was carried out with fifteen barrow pigs, whit initial weight of 20.98 ± 7.46 kg allotted in a completely randomized design. The evaluated feeds were two spray dry yeast (sugar cane yeast- SCYSD and brewers + sugar cane yeast- BYSD). The values, as fed basis, of digestible energy (DE kcal/kg) obtained for SCYSD and BYSD, were 2.788 and 3.455 kcal/kg and metabolizable energy (ME kcal/kg) were 2.761 and 3.289, respectively. The Experiment II was carried out using 50 piglets, initial weight of 14.60 ± 1.28 kg allotted in a completely randomized design, with five treatments, five replicates and two pigs per experimental unit. The treatments consisted of five diets with increasing levels (0%, 5%, 10%, 15% and 20%) of BYSD. The inclusion of BYSD propitiated worsening the feed: gain (F:G). The Experiment III were used using 80 piglets, with initial weight of 15.16 ± 1.36 kg allotted in a completely randomized design in 5 x 2 factorial scheme, with five inclusion levels (0%, 5%, 10%, 15% and 20%) of BYSD and two physical forms of diets (meal and pellet) with, four replicates and two pigs per experimental unit. There were no interaction among the inclusion levels of BYSD and physical form. Also, no effects of inclusion levels of BYSD were observed on performance. The Experiment IV, a digestibility assays were carried out with fifteen barrow pigs, with initial weight of 55.83 ± 6.36 kg allotted in a completely randomized design. The evaluated feeds were the sames of experiment I the values, as fed xiii basis, of DE obtained for SCYSD and BYSD, were 3.496 and 3.901 kcal/kg and ME (kcal/kg) were 3.475 and 3.862, respectively. In the experiment V an ileal digestibility assays was carried out to determine the coefficient apparent and true ileal digestibility and digestible amino acids were out using three pigs with initial weight of 46.3± 2.12 kg, previously submitted to the surgery for simple T canula implantation. The treatments consisted of one diet without protein and two diets of SCYSD and BYSD, being the only protein source. The values of digestible amino acids of SCYSD and BYSD (lysine: 2.66 and 2,64; methionine+cistine: 1.11and 1,03 and threonine: 1.95 and 1,92, respectively) were used in the diet of experiment six. The values of digestible essential amino acids for SCYSD were used for amino acid composition of meals. In the Experiment VI were used 40 pigs (barrow and gilts), with initial weighing of 34.39 ± 7.57 kg in growing phase and 77.47± 6.28 kg in finishing phase, respectively allotted in a completely randomized design, with five treatments, four replicates and two pigs per experimental unit. The five inclusion levels (0%, 5%, 10%, 15% and 20%) of SCYSD were evaluated. In the growing phase, the inclusion of SCYSD propitiated worsening the daily weight gain (DWG) and fed:gain ratio (F:G). The DWG and the F:G presented difference among 20% levels of inclusion when compared with 0%. The finishing phase, presented a quadratic effect being 3.32% the better inclusion level. The DFI presented difference among levels 15% and 20% of inclusion when compared with 0%. There was a linear reduction of DWG, F:G, slaughter weight, hot carcass weight (HCW), cold carcass yield and ham weight according to SCYSD inclusion. The DWG, F:G and HCW presented differences between level 20% when compared to level 0%. The results suggest the inclusion level of 20% of BYSD in nursery piglets in form meal our pellet, without impairing performance, however, in growing and finishing phase the inclusion level of sugar cane yeast harm performance. However the economic feasibility of spray dry yeast utilization will depend on feedstuffs prices.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009
2018-04-06T17:13:40Z
2018-04-06T17:13:40Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.uem.br:8080/jspui/handle/1/1581
url http://repositorio.uem.br:8080/jspui/handle/1/1581
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
Brasil
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia
UEM
Maringá, PR
Centro de Ciências Agrárias
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
Brasil
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia
UEM
Maringá, PR
Centro de Ciências Agrárias
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (RI-UEM)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (RI-UEM)
collection Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (RI-UEM)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (RI-UEM) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801841388297388032