The deep search of knowledge: George Chapman's glosses in The Shadow of Night (1594)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silvares, Lavinia
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/32208
Resumo: This paper addresses the glosses of the first edition of George Chapman's philosophical elegy, The Shadow of Night (1594), as a specific and common practice of prescriptive work, produced by Renaissance authors following the ancient tradition of the auctoris interpretatio. Assuming the gloss as an exposition and scrutiny of the places of poetic invention and elocution, Chapman puts himself in the position of both annotator and authorizer of his text, defining a particular legibility for the poem within the learned circles of the English court of Shakespeare’s time. Considering the view of the glossarial practice as an emulation of the ancient scholium work of ‘exposing the difficulties’ of a literary text and thus legitimizing it as fit to enter the proper tradition, this paper discusses, 1. the implications of Chapman's glosses for the poem's immediate reception; 2. the importance of authorized role models (Servius, Macrobius, Cornutus) for the glossarial practice; and 3. the idea that a text does not possess a congenital clearness of its own, but can only be understood through the continuous process of a specific glossarial assessment.  
id UEM-2_3f62736409fe6ec87d5fe5556730dfcf
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/32208
network_acronym_str UEM-2
network_name_str Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The deep search of knowledge: George Chapman's glosses in The Shadow of Night (1594)poeticsrhetoricElizabethan poetrytheory of styles.LiteraturaThis paper addresses the glosses of the first edition of George Chapman's philosophical elegy, The Shadow of Night (1594), as a specific and common practice of prescriptive work, produced by Renaissance authors following the ancient tradition of the auctoris interpretatio. Assuming the gloss as an exposition and scrutiny of the places of poetic invention and elocution, Chapman puts himself in the position of both annotator and authorizer of his text, defining a particular legibility for the poem within the learned circles of the English court of Shakespeare’s time. Considering the view of the glossarial practice as an emulation of the ancient scholium work of ‘exposing the difficulties’ of a literary text and thus legitimizing it as fit to enter the proper tradition, this paper discusses, 1. the implications of Chapman's glosses for the poem's immediate reception; 2. the importance of authorized role models (Servius, Macrobius, Cornutus) for the glossarial practice; and 3. the idea that a text does not possess a congenital clearness of its own, but can only be understood through the continuous process of a specific glossarial assessment.  Universidade Estadual De Maringá2017-07-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTeoria poética; Estudos Retóricos; História Literáriaapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/3220810.4025/actascilangcult.v39i3.32208Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture; Vol 39 No 3 (2017); 321-327Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture; v. 39 n. 3 (2017); 321-3271983-46831983-4675reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/32208/pdfCopyright (c) 2017 Acta Scientiarum. Language and Cultureinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilvares, Lavinia2022-02-17T22:23:35Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/32208Revistahttp://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCultPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/oai||actalan@uem.br1983-46831983-4675opendoar:2022-02-17T22:23:35Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The deep search of knowledge: George Chapman's glosses in The Shadow of Night (1594)
title The deep search of knowledge: George Chapman's glosses in The Shadow of Night (1594)
spellingShingle The deep search of knowledge: George Chapman's glosses in The Shadow of Night (1594)
Silvares, Lavinia
poetics
rhetoric
Elizabethan poetry
theory of styles.
Literatura
title_short The deep search of knowledge: George Chapman's glosses in The Shadow of Night (1594)
title_full The deep search of knowledge: George Chapman's glosses in The Shadow of Night (1594)
title_fullStr The deep search of knowledge: George Chapman's glosses in The Shadow of Night (1594)
title_full_unstemmed The deep search of knowledge: George Chapman's glosses in The Shadow of Night (1594)
title_sort The deep search of knowledge: George Chapman's glosses in The Shadow of Night (1594)
author Silvares, Lavinia
author_facet Silvares, Lavinia
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silvares, Lavinia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv poetics
rhetoric
Elizabethan poetry
theory of styles.
Literatura
topic poetics
rhetoric
Elizabethan poetry
theory of styles.
Literatura
description This paper addresses the glosses of the first edition of George Chapman's philosophical elegy, The Shadow of Night (1594), as a specific and common practice of prescriptive work, produced by Renaissance authors following the ancient tradition of the auctoris interpretatio. Assuming the gloss as an exposition and scrutiny of the places of poetic invention and elocution, Chapman puts himself in the position of both annotator and authorizer of his text, defining a particular legibility for the poem within the learned circles of the English court of Shakespeare’s time. Considering the view of the glossarial practice as an emulation of the ancient scholium work of ‘exposing the difficulties’ of a literary text and thus legitimizing it as fit to enter the proper tradition, this paper discusses, 1. the implications of Chapman's glosses for the poem's immediate reception; 2. the importance of authorized role models (Servius, Macrobius, Cornutus) for the glossarial practice; and 3. the idea that a text does not possess a congenital clearness of its own, but can only be understood through the continuous process of a specific glossarial assessment.  
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-07-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Teoria poética; Estudos Retóricos; História Literária
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/32208
10.4025/actascilangcult.v39i3.32208
url http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/32208
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actascilangcult.v39i3.32208
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/32208/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual De Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual De Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture; Vol 39 No 3 (2017); 321-327
Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture; v. 39 n. 3 (2017); 321-327
1983-4683
1983-4675
reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online)
collection Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||actalan@uem.br
_version_ 1799317466134872064