Postmodern rendition of myth in Ashbery's ‘Syringa’

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Farsi, Roghayeh
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Nowroozi, Sima
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/56365
Resumo: Postmodern poetry revisits the traditions and subjects myth and history to drastic experimentations. The present paper reacts to Ashbery's postmodern rendition of the myth of Orpheus in his poem ‘Syringa’ (Ashbery, 1985). He dismantles and opposes the myth of Orpheus and Eurydice and disrupts its totalitarian voice. The main concerns of the paper are to investigate what linguistic potentials Ashbery deploys in his experimentation, how these potentials help him appropriate and then subvert the mythical subtext, and what the consequences of this subversion could be. He disturbs the myth of Orpheus by drawing on the potentials of constructed oppositions. These potentials help Ashbery deconstruct the mythical narrative and adapt it to his postmodern tastes. The theoretical framework comprises Leslie Jeffries's notion of constructed opposition. The methodology is analytic and interpretive; it conducts a close reading of the poem which situates the poem at the intersecting nodes of myth, poetry, and language. The poem is argued to have relied heavily on the oppositions that Ashbery sets up between his text and its mythical subtext. The paper concludes negation and shifts of verb-tenses are the main structural triggers of opposition along with semantic triggers.
id UEM-2_744269eca6bd01e822811001804b7b7f
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/56365
network_acronym_str UEM-2
network_name_str Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Postmodern rendition of myth in Ashbery's ‘Syringa’Interpretação pós-moderna do mito na ‘Syringa’ de Ashbery Ashbery; opposition; myth; Orpheus; ‘Syringa’; postmodernAshbery; oposição; mito; Orfeu; ‘Syringa’; pós-moderno.Postmodern poetry revisits the traditions and subjects myth and history to drastic experimentations. The present paper reacts to Ashbery's postmodern rendition of the myth of Orpheus in his poem ‘Syringa’ (Ashbery, 1985). He dismantles and opposes the myth of Orpheus and Eurydice and disrupts its totalitarian voice. The main concerns of the paper are to investigate what linguistic potentials Ashbery deploys in his experimentation, how these potentials help him appropriate and then subvert the mythical subtext, and what the consequences of this subversion could be. He disturbs the myth of Orpheus by drawing on the potentials of constructed oppositions. These potentials help Ashbery deconstruct the mythical narrative and adapt it to his postmodern tastes. The theoretical framework comprises Leslie Jeffries's notion of constructed opposition. The methodology is analytic and interpretive; it conducts a close reading of the poem which situates the poem at the intersecting nodes of myth, poetry, and language. The poem is argued to have relied heavily on the oppositions that Ashbery sets up between his text and its mythical subtext. The paper concludes negation and shifts of verb-tenses are the main structural triggers of opposition along with semantic triggers.A poesia pós-moderna revisita as tradições e sujeita o mito e a história a experimentações drásticas. O presente artigo reage à versão pós-moderna de Ashbery do mito de Orfeu em seu poema ‘Syringa’ (Ashbery, 1985). Ele desmonta e se opõe ao mito de Orfeu e Eurídice e perturba sua voz totalitária. As principais preocupações do artigo são investigar quais potenciais linguísticos Ashbery utiliza em sua experimentação, como esses potenciais o ajudam a se apropriar e subverter o subtexto mítico e quais poderiam ser as consequências dessa subversão. Ele perturba o mito de Orfeu recorrendo aos potenciais das oposições construídas. Esses potenciais ajudam Ashbery a desconstruir a narrativa mítica e adaptá-la aos seus gostos pós-modernos. O quadro teórico compreende a noção de Leslie Jeffries de oposição construída. A metodologia é analítica e interpretativa; ela realiza uma leitura atenta do poema, que o situa nos nós de intersecção do mito, da poesia e da linguagem. Argumenta-se que o poema se baseou fortemente nas oposições que Ashbery estabelece entre seu texto e seu subtexto mítico. O artigo conclui que a negação e as mudanças de tempos verbais são os principais gatilhos estruturais de oposição, juntamente com os gatilhos semânticos.Universidade Estadual De Maringá2022-03-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/5636510.4025/actascilangcult.v44i1.56365Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture; Vol 44 No 1 (2022): Jan.-June; e56365Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture; v. 44 n. 1 (2022): Jan.-June; e563651983-46831983-4675reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/56365/751375153862Copyright (c) 2022 Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culturehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFarsi, RoghayehNowroozi, Sima 2022-04-01T17:46:08Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/56365Revistahttp://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCultPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/oai||actalan@uem.br1983-46831983-4675opendoar:2022-04-01T17:46:08Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Postmodern rendition of myth in Ashbery's ‘Syringa’
Interpretação pós-moderna do mito na ‘Syringa’ de Ashbery
title Postmodern rendition of myth in Ashbery's ‘Syringa’
spellingShingle Postmodern rendition of myth in Ashbery's ‘Syringa’
Farsi, Roghayeh
Ashbery; opposition; myth; Orpheus; ‘Syringa’; postmodern
Ashbery; oposição; mito; Orfeu; ‘Syringa’; pós-moderno.
title_short Postmodern rendition of myth in Ashbery's ‘Syringa’
title_full Postmodern rendition of myth in Ashbery's ‘Syringa’
title_fullStr Postmodern rendition of myth in Ashbery's ‘Syringa’
title_full_unstemmed Postmodern rendition of myth in Ashbery's ‘Syringa’
title_sort Postmodern rendition of myth in Ashbery's ‘Syringa’
author Farsi, Roghayeh
author_facet Farsi, Roghayeh
Nowroozi, Sima
author_role author
author2 Nowroozi, Sima
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Farsi, Roghayeh
Nowroozi, Sima
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ashbery; opposition; myth; Orpheus; ‘Syringa’; postmodern
Ashbery; oposição; mito; Orfeu; ‘Syringa’; pós-moderno.
topic Ashbery; opposition; myth; Orpheus; ‘Syringa’; postmodern
Ashbery; oposição; mito; Orfeu; ‘Syringa’; pós-moderno.
description Postmodern poetry revisits the traditions and subjects myth and history to drastic experimentations. The present paper reacts to Ashbery's postmodern rendition of the myth of Orpheus in his poem ‘Syringa’ (Ashbery, 1985). He dismantles and opposes the myth of Orpheus and Eurydice and disrupts its totalitarian voice. The main concerns of the paper are to investigate what linguistic potentials Ashbery deploys in his experimentation, how these potentials help him appropriate and then subvert the mythical subtext, and what the consequences of this subversion could be. He disturbs the myth of Orpheus by drawing on the potentials of constructed oppositions. These potentials help Ashbery deconstruct the mythical narrative and adapt it to his postmodern tastes. The theoretical framework comprises Leslie Jeffries's notion of constructed opposition. The methodology is analytic and interpretive; it conducts a close reading of the poem which situates the poem at the intersecting nodes of myth, poetry, and language. The poem is argued to have relied heavily on the oppositions that Ashbery sets up between his text and its mythical subtext. The paper concludes negation and shifts of verb-tenses are the main structural triggers of opposition along with semantic triggers.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-03-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/56365
10.4025/actascilangcult.v44i1.56365
url http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/56365
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actascilangcult.v44i1.56365
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/56365/751375153862
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual De Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual De Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture; Vol 44 No 1 (2022): Jan.-June; e56365
Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture; v. 44 n. 1 (2022): Jan.-June; e56365
1983-4683
1983-4675
reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online)
collection Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||actalan@uem.br
_version_ 1799317466911866880