Postmodern rendition of myth in Ashbery's ‘Syringa’
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/56365 |
Resumo: | Postmodern poetry revisits the traditions and subjects myth and history to drastic experimentations. The present paper reacts to Ashbery's postmodern rendition of the myth of Orpheus in his poem ‘Syringa’ (Ashbery, 1985). He dismantles and opposes the myth of Orpheus and Eurydice and disrupts its totalitarian voice. The main concerns of the paper are to investigate what linguistic potentials Ashbery deploys in his experimentation, how these potentials help him appropriate and then subvert the mythical subtext, and what the consequences of this subversion could be. He disturbs the myth of Orpheus by drawing on the potentials of constructed oppositions. These potentials help Ashbery deconstruct the mythical narrative and adapt it to his postmodern tastes. The theoretical framework comprises Leslie Jeffries's notion of constructed opposition. The methodology is analytic and interpretive; it conducts a close reading of the poem which situates the poem at the intersecting nodes of myth, poetry, and language. The poem is argued to have relied heavily on the oppositions that Ashbery sets up between his text and its mythical subtext. The paper concludes negation and shifts of verb-tenses are the main structural triggers of opposition along with semantic triggers. |
id |
UEM-2_744269eca6bd01e822811001804b7b7f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/56365 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-2 |
network_name_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Postmodern rendition of myth in Ashbery's ‘Syringa’Interpretação pós-moderna do mito na ‘Syringa’ de Ashbery Ashbery; opposition; myth; Orpheus; ‘Syringa’; postmodernAshbery; oposição; mito; Orfeu; ‘Syringa’; pós-moderno.Postmodern poetry revisits the traditions and subjects myth and history to drastic experimentations. The present paper reacts to Ashbery's postmodern rendition of the myth of Orpheus in his poem ‘Syringa’ (Ashbery, 1985). He dismantles and opposes the myth of Orpheus and Eurydice and disrupts its totalitarian voice. The main concerns of the paper are to investigate what linguistic potentials Ashbery deploys in his experimentation, how these potentials help him appropriate and then subvert the mythical subtext, and what the consequences of this subversion could be. He disturbs the myth of Orpheus by drawing on the potentials of constructed oppositions. These potentials help Ashbery deconstruct the mythical narrative and adapt it to his postmodern tastes. The theoretical framework comprises Leslie Jeffries's notion of constructed opposition. The methodology is analytic and interpretive; it conducts a close reading of the poem which situates the poem at the intersecting nodes of myth, poetry, and language. The poem is argued to have relied heavily on the oppositions that Ashbery sets up between his text and its mythical subtext. The paper concludes negation and shifts of verb-tenses are the main structural triggers of opposition along with semantic triggers.A poesia pós-moderna revisita as tradições e sujeita o mito e a história a experimentações drásticas. O presente artigo reage à versão pós-moderna de Ashbery do mito de Orfeu em seu poema ‘Syringa’ (Ashbery, 1985). Ele desmonta e se opõe ao mito de Orfeu e Eurídice e perturba sua voz totalitária. As principais preocupações do artigo são investigar quais potenciais linguísticos Ashbery utiliza em sua experimentação, como esses potenciais o ajudam a se apropriar e subverter o subtexto mítico e quais poderiam ser as consequências dessa subversão. Ele perturba o mito de Orfeu recorrendo aos potenciais das oposições construídas. Esses potenciais ajudam Ashbery a desconstruir a narrativa mítica e adaptá-la aos seus gostos pós-modernos. O quadro teórico compreende a noção de Leslie Jeffries de oposição construída. A metodologia é analítica e interpretativa; ela realiza uma leitura atenta do poema, que o situa nos nós de intersecção do mito, da poesia e da linguagem. Argumenta-se que o poema se baseou fortemente nas oposições que Ashbery estabelece entre seu texto e seu subtexto mítico. O artigo conclui que a negação e as mudanças de tempos verbais são os principais gatilhos estruturais de oposição, juntamente com os gatilhos semânticos.Universidade Estadual De Maringá2022-03-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/5636510.4025/actascilangcult.v44i1.56365Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture; Vol 44 No 1 (2022): Jan.-June; e56365Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture; v. 44 n. 1 (2022): Jan.-June; e563651983-46831983-4675reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/56365/751375153862Copyright (c) 2022 Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culturehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFarsi, RoghayehNowroozi, Sima 2022-04-01T17:46:08Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/56365Revistahttp://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCultPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/oai||actalan@uem.br1983-46831983-4675opendoar:2022-04-01T17:46:08Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Postmodern rendition of myth in Ashbery's ‘Syringa’ Interpretação pós-moderna do mito na ‘Syringa’ de Ashbery |
title |
Postmodern rendition of myth in Ashbery's ‘Syringa’ |
spellingShingle |
Postmodern rendition of myth in Ashbery's ‘Syringa’ Farsi, Roghayeh Ashbery; opposition; myth; Orpheus; ‘Syringa’; postmodern Ashbery; oposição; mito; Orfeu; ‘Syringa’; pós-moderno. |
title_short |
Postmodern rendition of myth in Ashbery's ‘Syringa’ |
title_full |
Postmodern rendition of myth in Ashbery's ‘Syringa’ |
title_fullStr |
Postmodern rendition of myth in Ashbery's ‘Syringa’ |
title_full_unstemmed |
Postmodern rendition of myth in Ashbery's ‘Syringa’ |
title_sort |
Postmodern rendition of myth in Ashbery's ‘Syringa’ |
author |
Farsi, Roghayeh |
author_facet |
Farsi, Roghayeh Nowroozi, Sima |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nowroozi, Sima |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Farsi, Roghayeh Nowroozi, Sima |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ashbery; opposition; myth; Orpheus; ‘Syringa’; postmodern Ashbery; oposição; mito; Orfeu; ‘Syringa’; pós-moderno. |
topic |
Ashbery; opposition; myth; Orpheus; ‘Syringa’; postmodern Ashbery; oposição; mito; Orfeu; ‘Syringa’; pós-moderno. |
description |
Postmodern poetry revisits the traditions and subjects myth and history to drastic experimentations. The present paper reacts to Ashbery's postmodern rendition of the myth of Orpheus in his poem ‘Syringa’ (Ashbery, 1985). He dismantles and opposes the myth of Orpheus and Eurydice and disrupts its totalitarian voice. The main concerns of the paper are to investigate what linguistic potentials Ashbery deploys in his experimentation, how these potentials help him appropriate and then subvert the mythical subtext, and what the consequences of this subversion could be. He disturbs the myth of Orpheus by drawing on the potentials of constructed oppositions. These potentials help Ashbery deconstruct the mythical narrative and adapt it to his postmodern tastes. The theoretical framework comprises Leslie Jeffries's notion of constructed opposition. The methodology is analytic and interpretive; it conducts a close reading of the poem which situates the poem at the intersecting nodes of myth, poetry, and language. The poem is argued to have relied heavily on the oppositions that Ashbery sets up between his text and its mythical subtext. The paper concludes negation and shifts of verb-tenses are the main structural triggers of opposition along with semantic triggers. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-14 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/56365 10.4025/actascilangcult.v44i1.56365 |
url |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/56365 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actascilangcult.v44i1.56365 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciLangCult/article/view/56365/751375153862 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual De Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual De Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture; Vol 44 No 1 (2022): Jan.-June; e56365 Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture; v. 44 n. 1 (2022): Jan.-June; e56365 1983-4683 1983-4675 reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online) |
collection |
Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||actalan@uem.br |
_version_ |
1799317466911866880 |