Double-chamber syringe versus classic syringes for peripheral intravenous drug administration and catheter flushing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Parreira, Pedro
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Sousa, Liliana B., Marques, Inês A., Santos-Costa, Paulo, Braga, Luciene M., Cruz, Arménio, Salgueiro-Oliveira, Anabela
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/90493
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3887-1
Resumo: Background:The prevention of catheter-related complications is nowadays an important topic of research.Flushing catheters is considered an important clinical procedure in preventing malfunction and several complications such as phlebitis or infection. Considering the latest guidelines of the Infusion Nurses Society, theflushing should be carried out both pre- and post-drug administration, requiring different syringes (with associated overall increased times of preparation/administration of intravenous medication by nurses, and also increasing theneed for manipulation of the venous catheter).Methods/design:A multi-centre, two-arm randomised controlled trial with partially blinded outcome assessment of 146 adult patients. After eligibility analysis and informed consent, participants will receive usual intravenous administration drugs with flushing procedures, with a double-chamber syringe (arm A) or with classic syringes (armB). The outcomes assessment will be performed on a daily basis by an unblinded ward team, with the same procedures in both groups. Some main outcomes, such as phlebitis and infiltration, will also be evaluated by nurses from a blinded research team and registered once a day. Discussion:The study outlined in this protocol will provide valuable insight regarding the effectiveness and safety of this new medical device. The development of this medical device (dual-chamber syringe, for drug and flushsolution) seems to be an important step to facilitate nurses’adoption of good clinical practices in intravenous procedures, reducing catheter manipulations. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT04046770. Registered 13 August 2019.
id RCAP_f26ae1c8a969dc94b9357d9f873a1f54
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/90493
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Double-chamber syringe versus classic syringes for peripheral intravenous drug administration and catheter flushing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trialStudy ProtocolDouble-chamber syringeclinical researchEffectivenessSafetyBackground:The prevention of catheter-related complications is nowadays an important topic of research.Flushing catheters is considered an important clinical procedure in preventing malfunction and several complications such as phlebitis or infection. Considering the latest guidelines of the Infusion Nurses Society, theflushing should be carried out both pre- and post-drug administration, requiring different syringes (with associated overall increased times of preparation/administration of intravenous medication by nurses, and also increasing theneed for manipulation of the venous catheter).Methods/design:A multi-centre, two-arm randomised controlled trial with partially blinded outcome assessment of 146 adult patients. After eligibility analysis and informed consent, participants will receive usual intravenous administration drugs with flushing procedures, with a double-chamber syringe (arm A) or with classic syringes (armB). The outcomes assessment will be performed on a daily basis by an unblinded ward team, with the same procedures in both groups. Some main outcomes, such as phlebitis and infiltration, will also be evaluated by nurses from a blinded research team and registered once a day. Discussion:The study outlined in this protocol will provide valuable insight regarding the effectiveness and safety of this new medical device. The development of this medical device (dual-chamber syringe, for drug and flushsolution) seems to be an important step to facilitate nurses’adoption of good clinical practices in intravenous procedures, reducing catheter manipulations. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT04046770. Registered 13 August 2019.This project was supported by the Research & Technological Development Incentive System (SI I&DT Co-Promotion; project reference POCI-01-0247-FEDER-017604).BMC2020-01-14info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/90493http://hdl.handle.net/10316/90493https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3887-1eng1745-6215https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s13063-019-3887-1Parreira, PedroSousa, Liliana B.Marques, Inês A.Santos-Costa, PauloBraga, Luciene M.Cruz, ArménioSalgueiro-Oliveira, Anabelainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-05-25T04:58:50Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/90493Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:10:37.081323Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Double-chamber syringe versus classic syringes for peripheral intravenous drug administration and catheter flushing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Study Protocol
title Double-chamber syringe versus classic syringes for peripheral intravenous drug administration and catheter flushing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
spellingShingle Double-chamber syringe versus classic syringes for peripheral intravenous drug administration and catheter flushing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Parreira, Pedro
Double-chamber syringe
clinical research
Effectiveness
Safety
title_short Double-chamber syringe versus classic syringes for peripheral intravenous drug administration and catheter flushing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full Double-chamber syringe versus classic syringes for peripheral intravenous drug administration and catheter flushing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Double-chamber syringe versus classic syringes for peripheral intravenous drug administration and catheter flushing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Double-chamber syringe versus classic syringes for peripheral intravenous drug administration and catheter flushing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort Double-chamber syringe versus classic syringes for peripheral intravenous drug administration and catheter flushing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
author Parreira, Pedro
author_facet Parreira, Pedro
Sousa, Liliana B.
Marques, Inês A.
Santos-Costa, Paulo
Braga, Luciene M.
Cruz, Arménio
Salgueiro-Oliveira, Anabela
author_role author
author2 Sousa, Liliana B.
Marques, Inês A.
Santos-Costa, Paulo
Braga, Luciene M.
Cruz, Arménio
Salgueiro-Oliveira, Anabela
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Parreira, Pedro
Sousa, Liliana B.
Marques, Inês A.
Santos-Costa, Paulo
Braga, Luciene M.
Cruz, Arménio
Salgueiro-Oliveira, Anabela
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Double-chamber syringe
clinical research
Effectiveness
Safety
topic Double-chamber syringe
clinical research
Effectiveness
Safety
description Background:The prevention of catheter-related complications is nowadays an important topic of research.Flushing catheters is considered an important clinical procedure in preventing malfunction and several complications such as phlebitis or infection. Considering the latest guidelines of the Infusion Nurses Society, theflushing should be carried out both pre- and post-drug administration, requiring different syringes (with associated overall increased times of preparation/administration of intravenous medication by nurses, and also increasing theneed for manipulation of the venous catheter).Methods/design:A multi-centre, two-arm randomised controlled trial with partially blinded outcome assessment of 146 adult patients. After eligibility analysis and informed consent, participants will receive usual intravenous administration drugs with flushing procedures, with a double-chamber syringe (arm A) or with classic syringes (armB). The outcomes assessment will be performed on a daily basis by an unblinded ward team, with the same procedures in both groups. Some main outcomes, such as phlebitis and infiltration, will also be evaluated by nurses from a blinded research team and registered once a day. Discussion:The study outlined in this protocol will provide valuable insight regarding the effectiveness and safety of this new medical device. The development of this medical device (dual-chamber syringe, for drug and flushsolution) seems to be an important step to facilitate nurses’adoption of good clinical practices in intravenous procedures, reducing catheter manipulations. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT04046770. Registered 13 August 2019.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-14
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/90493
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/90493
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3887-1
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/90493
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3887-1
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1745-6215
https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s13063-019-3887-1
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv BMC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv BMC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134000413933568