Protected Areas in the Amazon: forest management, conflict and social participation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rezende, Marília Gabriela Gondim
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Canalez, Geise de Goés, Fraxe, Therezinha de Jesus Pinto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/33206
Resumo: Problems of environmental degradation worldwidehave generated different environmental policies, especially in protected areas. In the state of Amazonas, Brazil, about 50% of the territory is under the order of protected area, including 27% Indigenous Reserves and 23% of state and federal managementreserves. However, many of the conflicts generated over time in these reserves aredue to the limited participation of social subjects in the planning and implementation of various activities in the process of territorial and environmental management. The analysis of territorial disputes arising from forest management in reserves in the state of Amazonas should be based on management plans. It can be inferred that the demarcation process and institutionalization of the protected areas are generating territorial disputes, but along the deployment of the politics and governance, these differences are reduced to the minimum by means of the social participation of stakeholders. The authoritative processes in the delimitation of these areas have been characterized by endogenous planning practices and land use in protected areas with the participation of social subjects, evidencing favorable results of this policy for the state of Amazonas mainly forcultural and environmental preservation.   
id UEM-3_4295958244d5d49d4d6cbc973afa56c6
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/33206
network_acronym_str UEM-3
network_name_str Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Protected Areas in the Amazon: forest management, conflict and social participationenvironmental conservationbiosociodiversityterritory.Problems of environmental degradation worldwidehave generated different environmental policies, especially in protected areas. In the state of Amazonas, Brazil, about 50% of the territory is under the order of protected area, including 27% Indigenous Reserves and 23% of state and federal managementreserves. However, many of the conflicts generated over time in these reserves aredue to the limited participation of social subjects in the planning and implementation of various activities in the process of territorial and environmental management. The analysis of territorial disputes arising from forest management in reserves in the state of Amazonas should be based on management plans. It can be inferred that the demarcation process and institutionalization of the protected areas are generating territorial disputes, but along the deployment of the politics and governance, these differences are reduced to the minimum by means of the social participation of stakeholders. The authoritative processes in the delimitation of these areas have been characterized by endogenous planning practices and land use in protected areas with the participation of social subjects, evidencing favorable results of this policy for the state of Amazonas mainly forcultural and environmental preservation.   Universidade Estadual De Maringá2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/3320610.4025/actascihumansoc.v39i1.33206Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; Vol 39 No 1 (2017); 63-70Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; v. 39 n. 1 (2017); 63-701807-86561679-7361reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/33206/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/33206/751375145081http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/33206/751375145082Copyright (c) 2017 Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciencesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRezende, Marília Gabriela GondimCanalez, Geise de GoésFraxe, Therezinha de Jesus Pinto2017-05-15T10:26:33Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/33206Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/indexPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/oai||actahuman@uem.br1807-86561679-7361opendoar:2017-05-15T10:26:33Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Protected Areas in the Amazon: forest management, conflict and social participation
title Protected Areas in the Amazon: forest management, conflict and social participation
spellingShingle Protected Areas in the Amazon: forest management, conflict and social participation
Rezende, Marília Gabriela Gondim
environmental conservation
biosociodiversity
territory.
title_short Protected Areas in the Amazon: forest management, conflict and social participation
title_full Protected Areas in the Amazon: forest management, conflict and social participation
title_fullStr Protected Areas in the Amazon: forest management, conflict and social participation
title_full_unstemmed Protected Areas in the Amazon: forest management, conflict and social participation
title_sort Protected Areas in the Amazon: forest management, conflict and social participation
author Rezende, Marília Gabriela Gondim
author_facet Rezende, Marília Gabriela Gondim
Canalez, Geise de Goés
Fraxe, Therezinha de Jesus Pinto
author_role author
author2 Canalez, Geise de Goés
Fraxe, Therezinha de Jesus Pinto
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rezende, Marília Gabriela Gondim
Canalez, Geise de Goés
Fraxe, Therezinha de Jesus Pinto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv environmental conservation
biosociodiversity
territory.
topic environmental conservation
biosociodiversity
territory.
description Problems of environmental degradation worldwidehave generated different environmental policies, especially in protected areas. In the state of Amazonas, Brazil, about 50% of the territory is under the order of protected area, including 27% Indigenous Reserves and 23% of state and federal managementreserves. However, many of the conflicts generated over time in these reserves aredue to the limited participation of social subjects in the planning and implementation of various activities in the process of territorial and environmental management. The analysis of territorial disputes arising from forest management in reserves in the state of Amazonas should be based on management plans. It can be inferred that the demarcation process and institutionalization of the protected areas are generating territorial disputes, but along the deployment of the politics and governance, these differences are reduced to the minimum by means of the social participation of stakeholders. The authoritative processes in the delimitation of these areas have been characterized by endogenous planning practices and land use in protected areas with the participation of social subjects, evidencing favorable results of this policy for the state of Amazonas mainly forcultural and environmental preservation.   
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/33206
10.4025/actascihumansoc.v39i1.33206
url http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/33206
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actascihumansoc.v39i1.33206
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/33206/pdf
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/33206/751375145081
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/33206/751375145082
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual De Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual De Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; Vol 39 No 1 (2017); 63-70
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; v. 39 n. 1 (2017); 63-70
1807-8656
1679-7361
reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)
collection Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||actahuman@uem.br
_version_ 1799317508955570176