Protected Areas in the Amazon: forest management, conflict and social participation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/33206 |
Resumo: | Problems of environmental degradation worldwidehave generated different environmental policies, especially in protected areas. In the state of Amazonas, Brazil, about 50% of the territory is under the order of protected area, including 27% Indigenous Reserves and 23% of state and federal managementreserves. However, many of the conflicts generated over time in these reserves aredue to the limited participation of social subjects in the planning and implementation of various activities in the process of territorial and environmental management. The analysis of territorial disputes arising from forest management in reserves in the state of Amazonas should be based on management plans. It can be inferred that the demarcation process and institutionalization of the protected areas are generating territorial disputes, but along the deployment of the politics and governance, these differences are reduced to the minimum by means of the social participation of stakeholders. The authoritative processes in the delimitation of these areas have been characterized by endogenous planning practices and land use in protected areas with the participation of social subjects, evidencing favorable results of this policy for the state of Amazonas mainly forcultural and environmental preservation. |
id |
UEM-3_4295958244d5d49d4d6cbc973afa56c6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/33206 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-3 |
network_name_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Protected Areas in the Amazon: forest management, conflict and social participationenvironmental conservationbiosociodiversityterritory.Problems of environmental degradation worldwidehave generated different environmental policies, especially in protected areas. In the state of Amazonas, Brazil, about 50% of the territory is under the order of protected area, including 27% Indigenous Reserves and 23% of state and federal managementreserves. However, many of the conflicts generated over time in these reserves aredue to the limited participation of social subjects in the planning and implementation of various activities in the process of territorial and environmental management. The analysis of territorial disputes arising from forest management in reserves in the state of Amazonas should be based on management plans. It can be inferred that the demarcation process and institutionalization of the protected areas are generating territorial disputes, but along the deployment of the politics and governance, these differences are reduced to the minimum by means of the social participation of stakeholders. The authoritative processes in the delimitation of these areas have been characterized by endogenous planning practices and land use in protected areas with the participation of social subjects, evidencing favorable results of this policy for the state of Amazonas mainly forcultural and environmental preservation. Universidade Estadual De Maringá2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/3320610.4025/actascihumansoc.v39i1.33206Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; Vol 39 No 1 (2017); 63-70Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; v. 39 n. 1 (2017); 63-701807-86561679-7361reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/33206/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/33206/751375145081http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/33206/751375145082Copyright (c) 2017 Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciencesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRezende, Marília Gabriela GondimCanalez, Geise de GoésFraxe, Therezinha de Jesus Pinto2017-05-15T10:26:33Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/33206Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/indexPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/oai||actahuman@uem.br1807-86561679-7361opendoar:2017-05-15T10:26:33Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Protected Areas in the Amazon: forest management, conflict and social participation |
title |
Protected Areas in the Amazon: forest management, conflict and social participation |
spellingShingle |
Protected Areas in the Amazon: forest management, conflict and social participation Rezende, Marília Gabriela Gondim environmental conservation biosociodiversity territory. |
title_short |
Protected Areas in the Amazon: forest management, conflict and social participation |
title_full |
Protected Areas in the Amazon: forest management, conflict and social participation |
title_fullStr |
Protected Areas in the Amazon: forest management, conflict and social participation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Protected Areas in the Amazon: forest management, conflict and social participation |
title_sort |
Protected Areas in the Amazon: forest management, conflict and social participation |
author |
Rezende, Marília Gabriela Gondim |
author_facet |
Rezende, Marília Gabriela Gondim Canalez, Geise de Goés Fraxe, Therezinha de Jesus Pinto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Canalez, Geise de Goés Fraxe, Therezinha de Jesus Pinto |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rezende, Marília Gabriela Gondim Canalez, Geise de Goés Fraxe, Therezinha de Jesus Pinto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
environmental conservation biosociodiversity territory. |
topic |
environmental conservation biosociodiversity territory. |
description |
Problems of environmental degradation worldwidehave generated different environmental policies, especially in protected areas. In the state of Amazonas, Brazil, about 50% of the territory is under the order of protected area, including 27% Indigenous Reserves and 23% of state and federal managementreserves. However, many of the conflicts generated over time in these reserves aredue to the limited participation of social subjects in the planning and implementation of various activities in the process of territorial and environmental management. The analysis of territorial disputes arising from forest management in reserves in the state of Amazonas should be based on management plans. It can be inferred that the demarcation process and institutionalization of the protected areas are generating territorial disputes, but along the deployment of the politics and governance, these differences are reduced to the minimum by means of the social participation of stakeholders. The authoritative processes in the delimitation of these areas have been characterized by endogenous planning practices and land use in protected areas with the participation of social subjects, evidencing favorable results of this policy for the state of Amazonas mainly forcultural and environmental preservation. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/33206 10.4025/actascihumansoc.v39i1.33206 |
url |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/33206 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actascihumansoc.v39i1.33206 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/33206/pdf http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/33206/751375145081 http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/33206/751375145082 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual De Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual De Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; Vol 39 No 1 (2017); 63-70 Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; v. 39 n. 1 (2017); 63-70 1807-8656 1679-7361 reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) |
collection |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||actahuman@uem.br |
_version_ |
1799317508955570176 |