Response from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars to aluminum content for the soil - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sordi, Cindia
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Nóbrega, Lúcia Helena Pereira, Smanhotto, Adriana
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/746
Resumo: Nine wheat cultivars were carried out under three different soil fertility conditions, without exchangeable aluminum nor fertilizer (I), with exchangeable aluminum but without fertilizer (II), and without exchangeable aluminum plus 250 kg ha-1 of 4-20-20 fertilizer formula (III) for 2001/2002 harvest. Plants' height, hectolitric weight and productivity were recorded. Significant differences were observed at 5% using the Tukey test, concluding that fertility treatments interfered on the evaluated parameters. For the first treatment, BRS 49 cultivar was recommended. For treatment II, IAPAR 53 cultivar presented better performance. As for the third treatment, CD 105 cultivar was recommended. OR 1 cultivar, on the other hand, was not recommended, since it presented the lowest productivity. Finally, results showed that treatment II presented better productivity than treatment I, probably because of its great percentage of organic matter, which, sometimes, can inhibit aluminum. Average productivity was recorded as the highest in treatment III.
id UEM-5_9b03608d4b9ec6fe43bf4a1137d21e26
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/746
network_acronym_str UEM-5
network_name_str Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Response from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars to aluminum content for the soil - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746Resposta de cultivares de trigo (Triticum aestivum L.) a teores de alumínio no solo - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746desenvolvimento de plantasfertilidade do solorendimento5.01.03.00-8 FitotecniaNine wheat cultivars were carried out under three different soil fertility conditions, without exchangeable aluminum nor fertilizer (I), with exchangeable aluminum but without fertilizer (II), and without exchangeable aluminum plus 250 kg ha-1 of 4-20-20 fertilizer formula (III) for 2001/2002 harvest. Plants' height, hectolitric weight and productivity were recorded. Significant differences were observed at 5% using the Tukey test, concluding that fertility treatments interfered on the evaluated parameters. For the first treatment, BRS 49 cultivar was recommended. For treatment II, IAPAR 53 cultivar presented better performance. As for the third treatment, CD 105 cultivar was recommended. OR 1 cultivar, on the other hand, was not recommended, since it presented the lowest productivity. Finally, results showed that treatment II presented better productivity than treatment I, probably because of its great percentage of organic matter, which, sometimes, can inhibit aluminum. Average productivity was recorded as the highest in treatment III.Nove cultivares de trigo, sob condições de fertilidade do solo - sem alumínio trocável e sem adubo (I), com alumínio trocável e sem adubo (II), sem alumínio trocável e adubação (III) com 250 kg ha-1 da fórmula 4-20-20 foram avaliadas na safra 2001/2002 em relação à estatura de plantas, peso do hectolitro e rendimento. Os resultados foram comparados pelo teste de Tukey a 5% de significância, concluindo-se que os tratamentos interferiram nos parâmetros avaliados. No tratamento I, apresentou desempenho melhor a cultivar BRS 49. No tratamento II, apresentou melhor desempenho a cultivar IAPAR 53 e no tratamento III, apresentou melhor desempenho a cultivar CD 105. A cultivar OR 1, porém, não apresentou desempenho satisfatório, apresentando menor rendimento em todos os tratamentos. O tratamento II apresentou maior rendimento que o I, justificado, possivelmente, pelo alto teor de matéria orgânica que, em determinadas situações, consegue complexar o alumínio. O rendimento médio foi mais elevado no tratamento III.Universidade Estadual de Maringá2008-02-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/74610.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 29 No 5 (2007): Special suplemment; 683-688Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 29 n. 5 (2007): Suplemento Especial; 683-6881807-86211679-9275reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/746/348Sordi, CindiaNóbrega, Lúcia Helena PereiraSmanhotto, Adrianainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-23T18:37:10Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/746Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgronPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/oaiactaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br1807-86211679-9275opendoar:2022-11-23T18:37:10Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Response from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars to aluminum content for the soil - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746
Resposta de cultivares de trigo (Triticum aestivum L.) a teores de alumínio no solo - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746
title Response from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars to aluminum content for the soil - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746
spellingShingle Response from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars to aluminum content for the soil - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746
Sordi, Cindia
desenvolvimento de plantas
fertilidade do solo
rendimento
5.01.03.00-8 Fitotecnia
title_short Response from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars to aluminum content for the soil - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746
title_full Response from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars to aluminum content for the soil - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746
title_fullStr Response from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars to aluminum content for the soil - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746
title_full_unstemmed Response from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars to aluminum content for the soil - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746
title_sort Response from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars to aluminum content for the soil - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746
author Sordi, Cindia
author_facet Sordi, Cindia
Nóbrega, Lúcia Helena Pereira
Smanhotto, Adriana
author_role author
author2 Nóbrega, Lúcia Helena Pereira
Smanhotto, Adriana
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sordi, Cindia
Nóbrega, Lúcia Helena Pereira
Smanhotto, Adriana
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv desenvolvimento de plantas
fertilidade do solo
rendimento
5.01.03.00-8 Fitotecnia
topic desenvolvimento de plantas
fertilidade do solo
rendimento
5.01.03.00-8 Fitotecnia
description Nine wheat cultivars were carried out under three different soil fertility conditions, without exchangeable aluminum nor fertilizer (I), with exchangeable aluminum but without fertilizer (II), and without exchangeable aluminum plus 250 kg ha-1 of 4-20-20 fertilizer formula (III) for 2001/2002 harvest. Plants' height, hectolitric weight and productivity were recorded. Significant differences were observed at 5% using the Tukey test, concluding that fertility treatments interfered on the evaluated parameters. For the first treatment, BRS 49 cultivar was recommended. For treatment II, IAPAR 53 cultivar presented better performance. As for the third treatment, CD 105 cultivar was recommended. OR 1 cultivar, on the other hand, was not recommended, since it presented the lowest productivity. Finally, results showed that treatment II presented better productivity than treatment I, probably because of its great percentage of organic matter, which, sometimes, can inhibit aluminum. Average productivity was recorded as the highest in treatment III.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-02-12
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/746
10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746
url http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/746
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/746/348
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 29 No 5 (2007): Special suplemment; 683-688
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 29 n. 5 (2007): Suplemento Especial; 683-688
1807-8621
1679-9275
reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
collection Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv actaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br
_version_ 1799305902734442496