Response from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars to aluminum content for the soil - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/746 |
Resumo: | Nine wheat cultivars were carried out under three different soil fertility conditions, without exchangeable aluminum nor fertilizer (I), with exchangeable aluminum but without fertilizer (II), and without exchangeable aluminum plus 250 kg ha-1 of 4-20-20 fertilizer formula (III) for 2001/2002 harvest. Plants' height, hectolitric weight and productivity were recorded. Significant differences were observed at 5% using the Tukey test, concluding that fertility treatments interfered on the evaluated parameters. For the first treatment, BRS 49 cultivar was recommended. For treatment II, IAPAR 53 cultivar presented better performance. As for the third treatment, CD 105 cultivar was recommended. OR 1 cultivar, on the other hand, was not recommended, since it presented the lowest productivity. Finally, results showed that treatment II presented better productivity than treatment I, probably because of its great percentage of organic matter, which, sometimes, can inhibit aluminum. Average productivity was recorded as the highest in treatment III. |
id |
UEM-5_9b03608d4b9ec6fe43bf4a1137d21e26 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/746 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-5 |
network_name_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Response from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars to aluminum content for the soil - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746Resposta de cultivares de trigo (Triticum aestivum L.) a teores de alumínio no solo - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746desenvolvimento de plantasfertilidade do solorendimento5.01.03.00-8 FitotecniaNine wheat cultivars were carried out under three different soil fertility conditions, without exchangeable aluminum nor fertilizer (I), with exchangeable aluminum but without fertilizer (II), and without exchangeable aluminum plus 250 kg ha-1 of 4-20-20 fertilizer formula (III) for 2001/2002 harvest. Plants' height, hectolitric weight and productivity were recorded. Significant differences were observed at 5% using the Tukey test, concluding that fertility treatments interfered on the evaluated parameters. For the first treatment, BRS 49 cultivar was recommended. For treatment II, IAPAR 53 cultivar presented better performance. As for the third treatment, CD 105 cultivar was recommended. OR 1 cultivar, on the other hand, was not recommended, since it presented the lowest productivity. Finally, results showed that treatment II presented better productivity than treatment I, probably because of its great percentage of organic matter, which, sometimes, can inhibit aluminum. Average productivity was recorded as the highest in treatment III.Nove cultivares de trigo, sob condições de fertilidade do solo - sem alumínio trocável e sem adubo (I), com alumínio trocável e sem adubo (II), sem alumínio trocável e adubação (III) com 250 kg ha-1 da fórmula 4-20-20 foram avaliadas na safra 2001/2002 em relação à estatura de plantas, peso do hectolitro e rendimento. Os resultados foram comparados pelo teste de Tukey a 5% de significância, concluindo-se que os tratamentos interferiram nos parâmetros avaliados. No tratamento I, apresentou desempenho melhor a cultivar BRS 49. No tratamento II, apresentou melhor desempenho a cultivar IAPAR 53 e no tratamento III, apresentou melhor desempenho a cultivar CD 105. A cultivar OR 1, porém, não apresentou desempenho satisfatório, apresentando menor rendimento em todos os tratamentos. O tratamento II apresentou maior rendimento que o I, justificado, possivelmente, pelo alto teor de matéria orgânica que, em determinadas situações, consegue complexar o alumínio. O rendimento médio foi mais elevado no tratamento III.Universidade Estadual de Maringá2008-02-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/74610.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 29 No 5 (2007): Special suplemment; 683-688Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 29 n. 5 (2007): Suplemento Especial; 683-6881807-86211679-9275reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/746/348Sordi, CindiaNóbrega, Lúcia Helena PereiraSmanhotto, Adrianainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-23T18:37:10Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/746Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgronPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/oaiactaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br1807-86211679-9275opendoar:2022-11-23T18:37:10Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Response from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars to aluminum content for the soil - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746 Resposta de cultivares de trigo (Triticum aestivum L.) a teores de alumínio no solo - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746 |
title |
Response from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars to aluminum content for the soil - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746 |
spellingShingle |
Response from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars to aluminum content for the soil - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746 Sordi, Cindia desenvolvimento de plantas fertilidade do solo rendimento 5.01.03.00-8 Fitotecnia |
title_short |
Response from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars to aluminum content for the soil - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746 |
title_full |
Response from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars to aluminum content for the soil - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746 |
title_fullStr |
Response from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars to aluminum content for the soil - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Response from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars to aluminum content for the soil - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746 |
title_sort |
Response from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars to aluminum content for the soil - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746 |
author |
Sordi, Cindia |
author_facet |
Sordi, Cindia Nóbrega, Lúcia Helena Pereira Smanhotto, Adriana |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nóbrega, Lúcia Helena Pereira Smanhotto, Adriana |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sordi, Cindia Nóbrega, Lúcia Helena Pereira Smanhotto, Adriana |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
desenvolvimento de plantas fertilidade do solo rendimento 5.01.03.00-8 Fitotecnia |
topic |
desenvolvimento de plantas fertilidade do solo rendimento 5.01.03.00-8 Fitotecnia |
description |
Nine wheat cultivars were carried out under three different soil fertility conditions, without exchangeable aluminum nor fertilizer (I), with exchangeable aluminum but without fertilizer (II), and without exchangeable aluminum plus 250 kg ha-1 of 4-20-20 fertilizer formula (III) for 2001/2002 harvest. Plants' height, hectolitric weight and productivity were recorded. Significant differences were observed at 5% using the Tukey test, concluding that fertility treatments interfered on the evaluated parameters. For the first treatment, BRS 49 cultivar was recommended. For treatment II, IAPAR 53 cultivar presented better performance. As for the third treatment, CD 105 cultivar was recommended. OR 1 cultivar, on the other hand, was not recommended, since it presented the lowest productivity. Finally, results showed that treatment II presented better productivity than treatment I, probably because of its great percentage of organic matter, which, sometimes, can inhibit aluminum. Average productivity was recorded as the highest in treatment III. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-02-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/746 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746 |
url |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/746 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actasciagron.v29i5.746 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/746/348 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 29 No 5 (2007): Special suplemment; 683-688 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 29 n. 5 (2007): Suplemento Especial; 683-688 1807-8621 1679-9275 reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
collection |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
actaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br |
_version_ |
1799305902734442496 |