In vitro rhizogenesis response of stem apexes of ‘Tainung 01’ papaya tree in different times of permanence in induction and regeneration media - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Schmildt, Edílson Romais
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Amaral, José Augusto Teixeira do, Schmildt, Omar, Coelho, Ruimário Inácio, Rabello, Wanderson Souza, Martins Filho, Sebastião
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/863
Resumo: The objective of this work was to evaluate the in vitro rhizogenesis response of stem apexes of young plants of 'Tainung 01' papaya tree in different times of permanence in induction and regeneration media. The induction medium was MS, supplemented with organic complements constituted of sucrose, myo-inositol, thiamin, pyridoxine, nicotinic acid and AIB. The regeneration medium differed from the induction medium because it does not have AIB. The treatments consisted of variable times of permanence of the explants in the induction and regeneration media (induction/regeneration): 0/25; 5/20; 10/15; 15/10; 20/5 and 25/0 days. The experimental design was completely randomized, with six treatments and four repetitions, with each experimental unit represented by five test tubes. The maximum rooting and the maximum length of the largest leaf were obtained around 16 days after the branches were incubated in the induction medium. For the variables ‘number of roots’ and ‘larger prolongation of the branches’, the maximum results were obtained after approximately 15 days in the induction medium. Therefore, this work concludes that, for good rooting pattern, the permanence of the branches in medium of induction for a period of 15 to 16 days is essential.
id UEM-5_e1e618b676db479bc00918c0fb444407
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/863
network_acronym_str UEM-5
network_name_str Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling In vitro rhizogenesis response of stem apexes of ‘Tainung 01’ papaya tree in different times of permanence in induction and regeneration media - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863Resposta rizogênica in vitro de ápices caulinares de mamoeiro ‘Tainung 01’ em diferentes tempos de permanência em meios de indução e regeneração - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863Carica papayaauxinmicropropagationtissue cultureCarica papayaauxinamicropropagaçãocultura de tecidosThe objective of this work was to evaluate the in vitro rhizogenesis response of stem apexes of young plants of 'Tainung 01' papaya tree in different times of permanence in induction and regeneration media. The induction medium was MS, supplemented with organic complements constituted of sucrose, myo-inositol, thiamin, pyridoxine, nicotinic acid and AIB. The regeneration medium differed from the induction medium because it does not have AIB. The treatments consisted of variable times of permanence of the explants in the induction and regeneration media (induction/regeneration): 0/25; 5/20; 10/15; 15/10; 20/5 and 25/0 days. The experimental design was completely randomized, with six treatments and four repetitions, with each experimental unit represented by five test tubes. The maximum rooting and the maximum length of the largest leaf were obtained around 16 days after the branches were incubated in the induction medium. For the variables ‘number of roots’ and ‘larger prolongation of the branches’, the maximum results were obtained after approximately 15 days in the induction medium. Therefore, this work concludes that, for good rooting pattern, the permanence of the branches in medium of induction for a period of 15 to 16 days is essential.Este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar a resposta rizogênica in vitro de ápices caulinares de plantas jovens de mamoeiro ‘Tainung 01’, em diferentes tempos de permanência em meios de indução e regeneração. O meio de indução empregado foi o MS, suplementado com complementos orgânicos constituídos de sacarose, mio-inositol, tiamina, piridoxina, ácido nicotínico, além de AIB. O meio de regeneração diferiu do meio de indução por ser desprovido de AIB. Os tratamentos consistiram em tempos variáveis de permanência dos explantes nos meios de indução e de regeneração (indução/regeneração): 0/25; 5/20; 10/15; 15/10; 20/5 e 25/0 dias. O delineamento experimental foi inteiramente casualisado, com seis tratamentos e quatro repetições, e cada unidade experimental foi representada por cinco tubos de ensaio. O modelo utilizado para explicar o percentual de enraizamento e o comprimento da maior folha, em função do tempo de permanência dos ramos no meio de indução, apresentou pontos máximos em torno de 16 dias. Para as variáveis número de raízes e maior alongamento dos ramos, foram obtidas maiores respostas aos 15 dias, aproximadamente. Conclui-se que, para um bom padrão de enraizamento, é imprescindível a permanência dos ramos em meio de indução em um período de 15 a 16 dias.Universidade Estadual de Maringá2009-08-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/86310.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 31 No 4 (2009); 695-700Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 31 n. 4 (2009); 695-7001807-86211679-9275reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/863/863Schmildt, Edílson RomaisAmaral, José Augusto Teixeira doSchmildt, OmarCoelho, Ruimário InácioRabello, Wanderson SouzaMartins Filho, Sebastiãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-23T18:37:14Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/863Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgronPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/oaiactaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br1807-86211679-9275opendoar:2022-11-23T18:37:14Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv In vitro rhizogenesis response of stem apexes of ‘Tainung 01’ papaya tree in different times of permanence in induction and regeneration media - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863
Resposta rizogênica in vitro de ápices caulinares de mamoeiro ‘Tainung 01’ em diferentes tempos de permanência em meios de indução e regeneração - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863
title In vitro rhizogenesis response of stem apexes of ‘Tainung 01’ papaya tree in different times of permanence in induction and regeneration media - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863
spellingShingle In vitro rhizogenesis response of stem apexes of ‘Tainung 01’ papaya tree in different times of permanence in induction and regeneration media - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863
Schmildt, Edílson Romais
Carica papaya
auxin
micropropagation
tissue culture
Carica papaya
auxina
micropropagação
cultura de tecidos
title_short In vitro rhizogenesis response of stem apexes of ‘Tainung 01’ papaya tree in different times of permanence in induction and regeneration media - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863
title_full In vitro rhizogenesis response of stem apexes of ‘Tainung 01’ papaya tree in different times of permanence in induction and regeneration media - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863
title_fullStr In vitro rhizogenesis response of stem apexes of ‘Tainung 01’ papaya tree in different times of permanence in induction and regeneration media - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863
title_full_unstemmed In vitro rhizogenesis response of stem apexes of ‘Tainung 01’ papaya tree in different times of permanence in induction and regeneration media - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863
title_sort In vitro rhizogenesis response of stem apexes of ‘Tainung 01’ papaya tree in different times of permanence in induction and regeneration media - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863
author Schmildt, Edílson Romais
author_facet Schmildt, Edílson Romais
Amaral, José Augusto Teixeira do
Schmildt, Omar
Coelho, Ruimário Inácio
Rabello, Wanderson Souza
Martins Filho, Sebastião
author_role author
author2 Amaral, José Augusto Teixeira do
Schmildt, Omar
Coelho, Ruimário Inácio
Rabello, Wanderson Souza
Martins Filho, Sebastião
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Schmildt, Edílson Romais
Amaral, José Augusto Teixeira do
Schmildt, Omar
Coelho, Ruimário Inácio
Rabello, Wanderson Souza
Martins Filho, Sebastião
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Carica papaya
auxin
micropropagation
tissue culture
Carica papaya
auxina
micropropagação
cultura de tecidos
topic Carica papaya
auxin
micropropagation
tissue culture
Carica papaya
auxina
micropropagação
cultura de tecidos
description The objective of this work was to evaluate the in vitro rhizogenesis response of stem apexes of young plants of 'Tainung 01' papaya tree in different times of permanence in induction and regeneration media. The induction medium was MS, supplemented with organic complements constituted of sucrose, myo-inositol, thiamin, pyridoxine, nicotinic acid and AIB. The regeneration medium differed from the induction medium because it does not have AIB. The treatments consisted of variable times of permanence of the explants in the induction and regeneration media (induction/regeneration): 0/25; 5/20; 10/15; 15/10; 20/5 and 25/0 days. The experimental design was completely randomized, with six treatments and four repetitions, with each experimental unit represented by five test tubes. The maximum rooting and the maximum length of the largest leaf were obtained around 16 days after the branches were incubated in the induction medium. For the variables ‘number of roots’ and ‘larger prolongation of the branches’, the maximum results were obtained after approximately 15 days in the induction medium. Therefore, this work concludes that, for good rooting pattern, the permanence of the branches in medium of induction for a period of 15 to 16 days is essential.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-08-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/863
10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863
url http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/863
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/863/863
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 31 No 4 (2009); 695-700
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 31 n. 4 (2009); 695-700
1807-8621
1679-9275
reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
collection Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv actaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br
_version_ 1799305902810988544