In vitro rhizogenesis response of stem apexes of ‘Tainung 01’ papaya tree in different times of permanence in induction and regeneration media - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/863 |
Resumo: | The objective of this work was to evaluate the in vitro rhizogenesis response of stem apexes of young plants of 'Tainung 01' papaya tree in different times of permanence in induction and regeneration media. The induction medium was MS, supplemented with organic complements constituted of sucrose, myo-inositol, thiamin, pyridoxine, nicotinic acid and AIB. The regeneration medium differed from the induction medium because it does not have AIB. The treatments consisted of variable times of permanence of the explants in the induction and regeneration media (induction/regeneration): 0/25; 5/20; 10/15; 15/10; 20/5 and 25/0 days. The experimental design was completely randomized, with six treatments and four repetitions, with each experimental unit represented by five test tubes. The maximum rooting and the maximum length of the largest leaf were obtained around 16 days after the branches were incubated in the induction medium. For the variables ‘number of roots’ and ‘larger prolongation of the branches’, the maximum results were obtained after approximately 15 days in the induction medium. Therefore, this work concludes that, for good rooting pattern, the permanence of the branches in medium of induction for a period of 15 to 16 days is essential. |
id |
UEM-5_e1e618b676db479bc00918c0fb444407 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/863 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-5 |
network_name_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
In vitro rhizogenesis response of stem apexes of ‘Tainung 01’ papaya tree in different times of permanence in induction and regeneration media - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863Resposta rizogênica in vitro de ápices caulinares de mamoeiro ‘Tainung 01’ em diferentes tempos de permanência em meios de indução e regeneração - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863Carica papayaauxinmicropropagationtissue cultureCarica papayaauxinamicropropagaçãocultura de tecidosThe objective of this work was to evaluate the in vitro rhizogenesis response of stem apexes of young plants of 'Tainung 01' papaya tree in different times of permanence in induction and regeneration media. The induction medium was MS, supplemented with organic complements constituted of sucrose, myo-inositol, thiamin, pyridoxine, nicotinic acid and AIB. The regeneration medium differed from the induction medium because it does not have AIB. The treatments consisted of variable times of permanence of the explants in the induction and regeneration media (induction/regeneration): 0/25; 5/20; 10/15; 15/10; 20/5 and 25/0 days. The experimental design was completely randomized, with six treatments and four repetitions, with each experimental unit represented by five test tubes. The maximum rooting and the maximum length of the largest leaf were obtained around 16 days after the branches were incubated in the induction medium. For the variables ‘number of roots’ and ‘larger prolongation of the branches’, the maximum results were obtained after approximately 15 days in the induction medium. Therefore, this work concludes that, for good rooting pattern, the permanence of the branches in medium of induction for a period of 15 to 16 days is essential.Este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar a resposta rizogênica in vitro de ápices caulinares de plantas jovens de mamoeiro ‘Tainung 01’, em diferentes tempos de permanência em meios de indução e regeneração. O meio de indução empregado foi o MS, suplementado com complementos orgânicos constituídos de sacarose, mio-inositol, tiamina, piridoxina, ácido nicotínico, além de AIB. O meio de regeneração diferiu do meio de indução por ser desprovido de AIB. Os tratamentos consistiram em tempos variáveis de permanência dos explantes nos meios de indução e de regeneração (indução/regeneração): 0/25; 5/20; 10/15; 15/10; 20/5 e 25/0 dias. O delineamento experimental foi inteiramente casualisado, com seis tratamentos e quatro repetições, e cada unidade experimental foi representada por cinco tubos de ensaio. O modelo utilizado para explicar o percentual de enraizamento e o comprimento da maior folha, em função do tempo de permanência dos ramos no meio de indução, apresentou pontos máximos em torno de 16 dias. Para as variáveis número de raízes e maior alongamento dos ramos, foram obtidas maiores respostas aos 15 dias, aproximadamente. Conclui-se que, para um bom padrão de enraizamento, é imprescindível a permanência dos ramos em meio de indução em um período de 15 a 16 dias.Universidade Estadual de Maringá2009-08-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/86310.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 31 No 4 (2009); 695-700Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 31 n. 4 (2009); 695-7001807-86211679-9275reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/863/863Schmildt, Edílson RomaisAmaral, José Augusto Teixeira doSchmildt, OmarCoelho, Ruimário InácioRabello, Wanderson SouzaMartins Filho, Sebastiãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-23T18:37:14Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/863Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgronPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/oaiactaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br1807-86211679-9275opendoar:2022-11-23T18:37:14Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
In vitro rhizogenesis response of stem apexes of ‘Tainung 01’ papaya tree in different times of permanence in induction and regeneration media - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863 Resposta rizogênica in vitro de ápices caulinares de mamoeiro ‘Tainung 01’ em diferentes tempos de permanência em meios de indução e regeneração - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863 |
title |
In vitro rhizogenesis response of stem apexes of ‘Tainung 01’ papaya tree in different times of permanence in induction and regeneration media - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863 |
spellingShingle |
In vitro rhizogenesis response of stem apexes of ‘Tainung 01’ papaya tree in different times of permanence in induction and regeneration media - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863 Schmildt, Edílson Romais Carica papaya auxin micropropagation tissue culture Carica papaya auxina micropropagação cultura de tecidos |
title_short |
In vitro rhizogenesis response of stem apexes of ‘Tainung 01’ papaya tree in different times of permanence in induction and regeneration media - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863 |
title_full |
In vitro rhizogenesis response of stem apexes of ‘Tainung 01’ papaya tree in different times of permanence in induction and regeneration media - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863 |
title_fullStr |
In vitro rhizogenesis response of stem apexes of ‘Tainung 01’ papaya tree in different times of permanence in induction and regeneration media - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863 |
title_full_unstemmed |
In vitro rhizogenesis response of stem apexes of ‘Tainung 01’ papaya tree in different times of permanence in induction and regeneration media - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863 |
title_sort |
In vitro rhizogenesis response of stem apexes of ‘Tainung 01’ papaya tree in different times of permanence in induction and regeneration media - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863 |
author |
Schmildt, Edílson Romais |
author_facet |
Schmildt, Edílson Romais Amaral, José Augusto Teixeira do Schmildt, Omar Coelho, Ruimário Inácio Rabello, Wanderson Souza Martins Filho, Sebastião |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Amaral, José Augusto Teixeira do Schmildt, Omar Coelho, Ruimário Inácio Rabello, Wanderson Souza Martins Filho, Sebastião |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Schmildt, Edílson Romais Amaral, José Augusto Teixeira do Schmildt, Omar Coelho, Ruimário Inácio Rabello, Wanderson Souza Martins Filho, Sebastião |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Carica papaya auxin micropropagation tissue culture Carica papaya auxina micropropagação cultura de tecidos |
topic |
Carica papaya auxin micropropagation tissue culture Carica papaya auxina micropropagação cultura de tecidos |
description |
The objective of this work was to evaluate the in vitro rhizogenesis response of stem apexes of young plants of 'Tainung 01' papaya tree in different times of permanence in induction and regeneration media. The induction medium was MS, supplemented with organic complements constituted of sucrose, myo-inositol, thiamin, pyridoxine, nicotinic acid and AIB. The regeneration medium differed from the induction medium because it does not have AIB. The treatments consisted of variable times of permanence of the explants in the induction and regeneration media (induction/regeneration): 0/25; 5/20; 10/15; 15/10; 20/5 and 25/0 days. The experimental design was completely randomized, with six treatments and four repetitions, with each experimental unit represented by five test tubes. The maximum rooting and the maximum length of the largest leaf were obtained around 16 days after the branches were incubated in the induction medium. For the variables ‘number of roots’ and ‘larger prolongation of the branches’, the maximum results were obtained after approximately 15 days in the induction medium. Therefore, this work concludes that, for good rooting pattern, the permanence of the branches in medium of induction for a period of 15 to 16 days is essential. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-08-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/863 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863 |
url |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/863 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.863 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/863/863 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 31 No 4 (2009); 695-700 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 31 n. 4 (2009); 695-700 1807-8621 1679-9275 reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
collection |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
actaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br |
_version_ |
1799305902810988544 |