A comparative experimental investigation of reinforced-concrete pipes under three-edge-bearing test: Spigot and Pocket and Ogee Joint pipes

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Jefferson Lins da
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: El Debs, Mounir Khalil, Kataoka, Marcela Novischi
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/30860
Resumo:  An experiment on the behavior of two types of circular reinforced concrete pipes under three-edge-bearing test is analyzed and discussed. Current study compares the strength of spigot-pocket (SPP) and ogee joint pipes (OJP). In the experimental analyses thirty-two pipes, nominal diameter 800 and 1200 mm, divided into two series of 16 pipes each, were tested. Each series was composed of 12 spigot-pocket pipes (SPP) and 4 ogee joint pipes (OJP). Experimental results of the loading versus displacement curves indicated that pipes behave similarly to a circular ring, since the OJP presented maximum loads 12 and 4% higher than those obtained for SPP respectively for nominal diameters 800 and 1200 mm. Pocket influenced load cracking, with 6.4 and 33% higher for SPP when compared to OJP for nominal diameters 800 and 1200 mm, respectively. Further, the presence of the pocket increased the pipe´s stiffness. 
id UEM-6_e6f0df4d7d3f787fc416c0b5295a5d4e
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/30860
network_acronym_str UEM-6
network_name_str Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling A comparative experimental investigation of reinforced-concrete pipes under three-edge-bearing test: Spigot and Pocket and Ogee Joint pipesnominal diametercircular ringload crackingstiffness.Engenharia Civil An experiment on the behavior of two types of circular reinforced concrete pipes under three-edge-bearing test is analyzed and discussed. Current study compares the strength of spigot-pocket (SPP) and ogee joint pipes (OJP). In the experimental analyses thirty-two pipes, nominal diameter 800 and 1200 mm, divided into two series of 16 pipes each, were tested. Each series was composed of 12 spigot-pocket pipes (SPP) and 4 ogee joint pipes (OJP). Experimental results of the loading versus displacement curves indicated that pipes behave similarly to a circular ring, since the OJP presented maximum loads 12 and 4% higher than those obtained for SPP respectively for nominal diameters 800 and 1200 mm. Pocket influenced load cracking, with 6.4 and 33% higher for SPP when compared to OJP for nominal diameters 800 and 1200 mm, respectively. Further, the presence of the pocket increased the pipe´s stiffness. Universidade Estadual De Maringá2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionexperimental studyapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/3086010.4025/actascitechnol.v40i1.30860Acta Scientiarum. Technology; Vol 40 (2018): Publicação Contínua; e30860Acta Scientiarum. Technology; v. 40 (2018): Publicação Contínua; e308601806-25631807-8664reponame:Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/30860/pdfCopyright (c) 2017 Acta Scientiarum. Technologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Jefferson Lins daEl Debs, Mounir KhalilKataoka, Marcela Novischi2019-07-17T11:53:47Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/30860Revistahttps://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/indexPUBhttps://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/oai||actatech@uem.br1807-86641806-2563opendoar:2019-07-17T11:53:47Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparative experimental investigation of reinforced-concrete pipes under three-edge-bearing test: Spigot and Pocket and Ogee Joint pipes
title A comparative experimental investigation of reinforced-concrete pipes under three-edge-bearing test: Spigot and Pocket and Ogee Joint pipes
spellingShingle A comparative experimental investigation of reinforced-concrete pipes under three-edge-bearing test: Spigot and Pocket and Ogee Joint pipes
Silva, Jefferson Lins da
nominal diameter
circular ring
load cracking
stiffness.
Engenharia Civil
title_short A comparative experimental investigation of reinforced-concrete pipes under three-edge-bearing test: Spigot and Pocket and Ogee Joint pipes
title_full A comparative experimental investigation of reinforced-concrete pipes under three-edge-bearing test: Spigot and Pocket and Ogee Joint pipes
title_fullStr A comparative experimental investigation of reinforced-concrete pipes under three-edge-bearing test: Spigot and Pocket and Ogee Joint pipes
title_full_unstemmed A comparative experimental investigation of reinforced-concrete pipes under three-edge-bearing test: Spigot and Pocket and Ogee Joint pipes
title_sort A comparative experimental investigation of reinforced-concrete pipes under three-edge-bearing test: Spigot and Pocket and Ogee Joint pipes
author Silva, Jefferson Lins da
author_facet Silva, Jefferson Lins da
El Debs, Mounir Khalil
Kataoka, Marcela Novischi
author_role author
author2 El Debs, Mounir Khalil
Kataoka, Marcela Novischi
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Jefferson Lins da
El Debs, Mounir Khalil
Kataoka, Marcela Novischi
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv nominal diameter
circular ring
load cracking
stiffness.
Engenharia Civil
topic nominal diameter
circular ring
load cracking
stiffness.
Engenharia Civil
description  An experiment on the behavior of two types of circular reinforced concrete pipes under three-edge-bearing test is analyzed and discussed. Current study compares the strength of spigot-pocket (SPP) and ogee joint pipes (OJP). In the experimental analyses thirty-two pipes, nominal diameter 800 and 1200 mm, divided into two series of 16 pipes each, were tested. Each series was composed of 12 spigot-pocket pipes (SPP) and 4 ogee joint pipes (OJP). Experimental results of the loading versus displacement curves indicated that pipes behave similarly to a circular ring, since the OJP presented maximum loads 12 and 4% higher than those obtained for SPP respectively for nominal diameters 800 and 1200 mm. Pocket influenced load cracking, with 6.4 and 33% higher for SPP when compared to OJP for nominal diameters 800 and 1200 mm, respectively. Further, the presence of the pocket increased the pipe´s stiffness. 
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
experimental study
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/30860
10.4025/actascitechnol.v40i1.30860
url http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/30860
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actascitechnol.v40i1.30860
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/30860/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Acta Scientiarum. Technology
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Acta Scientiarum. Technology
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual De Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual De Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Technology; Vol 40 (2018): Publicação Contínua; e30860
Acta Scientiarum. Technology; v. 40 (2018): Publicação Contínua; e30860
1806-2563
1807-8664
reponame:Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online)
collection Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||actatech@uem.br
_version_ 1799315336370061312

Registros relacionados