Yield and approximate composition of in natura and pre-cooked rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) (Wallbaum) fillets of different weight
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/2588 |
Resumo: | The aim of this work was to evaluate the weight classes (CP) and processing form (FP) effects on rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss (Wallbaum) (Salmoniformes, Salmonidae) yield and approximate composition. The assays were carried out in a completely randomized factorial design. The analyzed variables were weight classes (CP1=300 up to 345g; CP2= 350 up to 395g and CP3= 400 up to 445g) and processing form (FP1= iin natura fillet and FP2= pre-cooked fillet). The CP and FP showed significant effect on fillet yield, but they didn’t show interaction effect (p > 0.05). The CP2 class showed higher fillet yield (44.81%) than CP1 (41.70%) and CP3 (42.81%). Regarding the processing form, the yield of in natura fillet (44.51%) was higher (p < 0.01) than pre-cooked fillet (41.70%), probably due to the skin percentage in pre-cooked fillet (8.31%), higher than in natura fillet (6.16%) with p < 0.01, as well as to the moisture loss during the processing. Nevertheless, the skin percentage did not differ (p > 0.05) among the analyzed CP. The approximate composition in the CP showed significant effect (p < 0.05) only on the moisture contents in the fillets (CP1= 73.25%, CP2= 72.19% e CP3= 73.03%). The FP analysis of in natura fillets showed higher values (p < 0.01) for moisture (73.69%) and lipids (6.56%) than pre-cooked fillets (71.95% and 5.53%, respectively). Significant effects that (p < 0.01) of the interaction between CP and FP were observed only for moisture contents. The highest moisture content was observed in in natura fillets from classes CP1 (74.86%) and CP3 (73.90%), although no difference was observed in the pre-cooked class. The contents of crude protein (19.05%) and ash (1.16%) were lower (p < 0.01) than in the pre-cooked fillet (21.79% and 1.35%, respectively). |
id |
UEM-7_181496639fb516a6c444d982c6264d24 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/2588 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-7 |
network_name_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Yield and approximate composition of in natura and pre-cooked rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) (Wallbaum) fillets of different weightRendimento e composição centesimal de filés in natura e pré-cozido em truta arco-íris, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Wallbaum)rendimentocomposição centesimalpeso corporalprocessamento do filé5.04.00.00-2 ZootecniaThe aim of this work was to evaluate the weight classes (CP) and processing form (FP) effects on rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss (Wallbaum) (Salmoniformes, Salmonidae) yield and approximate composition. The assays were carried out in a completely randomized factorial design. The analyzed variables were weight classes (CP1=300 up to 345g; CP2= 350 up to 395g and CP3= 400 up to 445g) and processing form (FP1= iin natura fillet and FP2= pre-cooked fillet). The CP and FP showed significant effect on fillet yield, but they didn’t show interaction effect (p > 0.05). The CP2 class showed higher fillet yield (44.81%) than CP1 (41.70%) and CP3 (42.81%). Regarding the processing form, the yield of in natura fillet (44.51%) was higher (p < 0.01) than pre-cooked fillet (41.70%), probably due to the skin percentage in pre-cooked fillet (8.31%), higher than in natura fillet (6.16%) with p < 0.01, as well as to the moisture loss during the processing. Nevertheless, the skin percentage did not differ (p > 0.05) among the analyzed CP. The approximate composition in the CP showed significant effect (p < 0.05) only on the moisture contents in the fillets (CP1= 73.25%, CP2= 72.19% e CP3= 73.03%). The FP analysis of in natura fillets showed higher values (p < 0.01) for moisture (73.69%) and lipids (6.56%) than pre-cooked fillets (71.95% and 5.53%, respectively). Significant effects that (p < 0.01) of the interaction between CP and FP were observed only for moisture contents. The highest moisture content was observed in in natura fillets from classes CP1 (74.86%) and CP3 (73.90%), although no difference was observed in the pre-cooked class. The contents of crude protein (19.05%) and ash (1.16%) were lower (p < 0.01) than in the pre-cooked fillet (21.79% and 1.35%, respectively).Com o objetivo de avaliar o efeito da classe de peso (CP) e forma de processamento (FP) da truta arco-íris, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Wallbaum) (Salmoniformes, Salmonidae) sobre o rendimento e a composição centesimal dos filés, foi realizado o experimento em um delineamento inteiramente casualizado, em um esquema fatorial 3x2 (três classes de peso, CP1= 300 a 345g, CP2= 350 a 395g e CP3= 400 a 445g e duas formas de processamento, FP1 = filé in natura, e FP2= filé pré-cozido). As CP e FP tiveram influência significativa sobre o rendimento de filés, porém, não houve interação (p > 0,05) entre esses parâmetros. A classe CP2 apresentou maior rendimento de filé (44,81%) em relação à CP1 (41,70%) e CP3 (42,81%). Quanto às formas de processamento, o rendimento dos filés in natura (44,51%) foi superior (p < 0,01) aos filés pré-cozidos (41,70%), provavelmente em função da porcentagem de pele dos filés pré-cozidos (8,31%) serem superiores (p < 0,01) aos in natura (6,16%), assim como a perda de umidade no processamento. Entretanto, a porcentagem de pele não diferiu (p > 0,05) entre as CP analisadas. A composição centesimal nas CP apresentou efeito (p < 0,05) apenas para os teores de umidade dos filés (CP1= 73,25%, CP2= 72,19% e CP3= 73,03%). Para FP os filés in natura apresentaram valores superiores (p < 0,01) para umidade (73,69%) e lipídios (6,56%) em relação aos pré-cozidos (71,95% e 5,53%, respectivamente). Foram observados efeitos significativos (p < 0,01) para interação entre CP e FP apenas para os teores de umidade. O maior teor de umidade foi observado no filé in natura nas categorias CP1 (74,86%) e CP3 (73,90%), apesar de não ter diferido do pré-cozido na categoria CP2 (72,06%). Os teores de proteína bruta (19,05%) e cinzas (1,16%) foram inferiores (p < 0,01) aos pré-cozidos (21,79% e 1,35%, respectivamente).Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá2008-04-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/258810.4025/actascianimsci.v24i0.2588Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 24 (2002); 1191-1195Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 24 (2002); 1191-11951807-86721806-2636reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/2588/1764Macedo-Viegas, Elisabete MariaSouza, Maria Luiza Rodrigues deZuanon, Jener A. S.Faria, Regina Helena Sant'Ana deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-05-17T13:03:44Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/2588Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSciPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/oaiactaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com1807-86721806-2636opendoar:2024-05-17T13:03:44Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Yield and approximate composition of in natura and pre-cooked rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) (Wallbaum) fillets of different weight Rendimento e composição centesimal de filés in natura e pré-cozido em truta arco-íris, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Wallbaum) |
title |
Yield and approximate composition of in natura and pre-cooked rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) (Wallbaum) fillets of different weight |
spellingShingle |
Yield and approximate composition of in natura and pre-cooked rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) (Wallbaum) fillets of different weight Macedo-Viegas, Elisabete Maria rendimento composição centesimal peso corporal processamento do filé 5.04.00.00-2 Zootecnia |
title_short |
Yield and approximate composition of in natura and pre-cooked rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) (Wallbaum) fillets of different weight |
title_full |
Yield and approximate composition of in natura and pre-cooked rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) (Wallbaum) fillets of different weight |
title_fullStr |
Yield and approximate composition of in natura and pre-cooked rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) (Wallbaum) fillets of different weight |
title_full_unstemmed |
Yield and approximate composition of in natura and pre-cooked rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) (Wallbaum) fillets of different weight |
title_sort |
Yield and approximate composition of in natura and pre-cooked rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) (Wallbaum) fillets of different weight |
author |
Macedo-Viegas, Elisabete Maria |
author_facet |
Macedo-Viegas, Elisabete Maria Souza, Maria Luiza Rodrigues de Zuanon, Jener A. S. Faria, Regina Helena Sant'Ana de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Souza, Maria Luiza Rodrigues de Zuanon, Jener A. S. Faria, Regina Helena Sant'Ana de |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Macedo-Viegas, Elisabete Maria Souza, Maria Luiza Rodrigues de Zuanon, Jener A. S. Faria, Regina Helena Sant'Ana de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
rendimento composição centesimal peso corporal processamento do filé 5.04.00.00-2 Zootecnia |
topic |
rendimento composição centesimal peso corporal processamento do filé 5.04.00.00-2 Zootecnia |
description |
The aim of this work was to evaluate the weight classes (CP) and processing form (FP) effects on rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss (Wallbaum) (Salmoniformes, Salmonidae) yield and approximate composition. The assays were carried out in a completely randomized factorial design. The analyzed variables were weight classes (CP1=300 up to 345g; CP2= 350 up to 395g and CP3= 400 up to 445g) and processing form (FP1= iin natura fillet and FP2= pre-cooked fillet). The CP and FP showed significant effect on fillet yield, but they didn’t show interaction effect (p > 0.05). The CP2 class showed higher fillet yield (44.81%) than CP1 (41.70%) and CP3 (42.81%). Regarding the processing form, the yield of in natura fillet (44.51%) was higher (p < 0.01) than pre-cooked fillet (41.70%), probably due to the skin percentage in pre-cooked fillet (8.31%), higher than in natura fillet (6.16%) with p < 0.01, as well as to the moisture loss during the processing. Nevertheless, the skin percentage did not differ (p > 0.05) among the analyzed CP. The approximate composition in the CP showed significant effect (p < 0.05) only on the moisture contents in the fillets (CP1= 73.25%, CP2= 72.19% e CP3= 73.03%). The FP analysis of in natura fillets showed higher values (p < 0.01) for moisture (73.69%) and lipids (6.56%) than pre-cooked fillets (71.95% and 5.53%, respectively). Significant effects that (p < 0.01) of the interaction between CP and FP were observed only for moisture contents. The highest moisture content was observed in in natura fillets from classes CP1 (74.86%) and CP3 (73.90%), although no difference was observed in the pre-cooked class. The contents of crude protein (19.05%) and ash (1.16%) were lower (p < 0.01) than in the pre-cooked fillet (21.79% and 1.35%, respectively). |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-04-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/2588 10.4025/actascianimsci.v24i0.2588 |
url |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/2588 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actascianimsci.v24i0.2588 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/2588/1764 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 24 (2002); 1191-1195 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 24 (2002); 1191-1195 1807-8672 1806-2636 reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) |
collection |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
actaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799315358153179136 |