Buffalo heifers behavior in feedlot using growth promoter or lead spheres introduced in the uterus - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v27i3.1212

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Araujo Marques, Jair
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Rus Barbosa, Orlando, Perehouskei Albuquerque, Karina, Negrão, João Alberto, Rocha Lobo Júnior, Adalfredo, Soares Domingues, Jefferson, Prado, Ivanor Nunes do
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/1212
Resumo: This experiment evaluated the effects of treatments simulating pregnancy (100 lead spheres in the uterus - LEA) and implanted growth promoter (GPR), compared to a control group (EMP) on feed intake behavior, rumination behavior, and water immersion behavior. Twenty Murrah buffaloes were used. After 84-day confinement, the heifers’ behavior was observed for five days. The feeding time was longer in GPR (1352.5min.) than in EMP (1120.2min.) and LEA (1128.1min.); the last two groups did not differ from each other. The rumination time was longer in GPR (2598.5min.) than in LEA (2169.7min.), and EMP had an intermediary time (2357.4min.). As for water immersion, the time was similar for EMP (1369.3min.) and LEA (1289.9min.) and longer in GPR (604.0min.). Implant utilization influenced feeding and rumination times
id UEM-7_83a87bfcab235b2115d9b762bfe5f944
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/1212
network_acronym_str UEM-7
network_name_str Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Buffalo heifers behavior in feedlot using growth promoter or lead spheres introduced in the uterus - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v27i3.1212Comportamento de novilhas bubalinas terminadas em confinamento usando promotor de crescimento ou esferas de chumbo no útero - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v27i3.1212alimentaçãobúfalasimersão em águaruminação5.04.03.00-1 Nutrição e Alimentação AnimalThis experiment evaluated the effects of treatments simulating pregnancy (100 lead spheres in the uterus - LEA) and implanted growth promoter (GPR), compared to a control group (EMP) on feed intake behavior, rumination behavior, and water immersion behavior. Twenty Murrah buffaloes were used. After 84-day confinement, the heifers’ behavior was observed for five days. The feeding time was longer in GPR (1352.5min.) than in EMP (1120.2min.) and LEA (1128.1min.); the last two groups did not differ from each other. The rumination time was longer in GPR (2598.5min.) than in LEA (2169.7min.), and EMP had an intermediary time (2357.4min.). As for water immersion, the time was similar for EMP (1369.3min.) and LEA (1289.9min.) and longer in GPR (604.0min.). Implant utilization influenced feeding and rumination timesAvaliou-se o efeito da simulação da prenhez (100 esferas de chumbo no útero – CHU) e uso de promotor de crescimento (PRC) em comparação às novilhas vazias (VAZ), sobre o comportamento ingestivo, ruminação e imersão em água. Foram utilizadas 20 búfalas Murrah. Foi observado o comportamento das novilhas por cinco dias, em confinamento de 84 dias. O tempo de alimentação foi maior para o PRC (1352,5min.) em relação ao VAZ (1120,2min.) e ao CHU (1128,1min.), que não diferiram entre si. O tempo de ruminação foi maior para os animais do PRC (2598,5min.) em relação ao CHU (2169,7min.), com o VAZ (2357,4min.) em posição intermediária. No que se refere ao tempo de imersão em água (IME), este foi semelhante entre VAZ (1369,3min.) e CHU (1289,9min.) e superior ao tratamento PRC (604,0min.). O implante influenciou positivamente o tempo de alimentação e ruminaçãoEditora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá2008-03-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/121210.4025/actascianimsci.v27i3.1212Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 27 No 3 (2005); 363-370Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 27 n. 3 (2005); 363-3701807-86721806-2636reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/1212/644de Araujo Marques, JairRus Barbosa, OrlandoPerehouskei Albuquerque, KarinaNegrão, João AlbertoRocha Lobo Júnior, AdalfredoSoares Domingues, JeffersonPrado, Ivanor Nunes doinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-05-17T13:03:21Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/1212Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSciPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/oaiactaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com1807-86721806-2636opendoar:2024-05-17T13:03:21Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Buffalo heifers behavior in feedlot using growth promoter or lead spheres introduced in the uterus - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v27i3.1212
Comportamento de novilhas bubalinas terminadas em confinamento usando promotor de crescimento ou esferas de chumbo no útero - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v27i3.1212
title Buffalo heifers behavior in feedlot using growth promoter or lead spheres introduced in the uterus - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v27i3.1212
spellingShingle Buffalo heifers behavior in feedlot using growth promoter or lead spheres introduced in the uterus - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v27i3.1212
de Araujo Marques, Jair
alimentação
búfalas
imersão em água
ruminação
5.04.03.00-1 Nutrição e Alimentação Animal
title_short Buffalo heifers behavior in feedlot using growth promoter or lead spheres introduced in the uterus - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v27i3.1212
title_full Buffalo heifers behavior in feedlot using growth promoter or lead spheres introduced in the uterus - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v27i3.1212
title_fullStr Buffalo heifers behavior in feedlot using growth promoter or lead spheres introduced in the uterus - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v27i3.1212
title_full_unstemmed Buffalo heifers behavior in feedlot using growth promoter or lead spheres introduced in the uterus - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v27i3.1212
title_sort Buffalo heifers behavior in feedlot using growth promoter or lead spheres introduced in the uterus - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v27i3.1212
author de Araujo Marques, Jair
author_facet de Araujo Marques, Jair
Rus Barbosa, Orlando
Perehouskei Albuquerque, Karina
Negrão, João Alberto
Rocha Lobo Júnior, Adalfredo
Soares Domingues, Jefferson
Prado, Ivanor Nunes do
author_role author
author2 Rus Barbosa, Orlando
Perehouskei Albuquerque, Karina
Negrão, João Alberto
Rocha Lobo Júnior, Adalfredo
Soares Domingues, Jefferson
Prado, Ivanor Nunes do
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Araujo Marques, Jair
Rus Barbosa, Orlando
Perehouskei Albuquerque, Karina
Negrão, João Alberto
Rocha Lobo Júnior, Adalfredo
Soares Domingues, Jefferson
Prado, Ivanor Nunes do
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv alimentação
búfalas
imersão em água
ruminação
5.04.03.00-1 Nutrição e Alimentação Animal
topic alimentação
búfalas
imersão em água
ruminação
5.04.03.00-1 Nutrição e Alimentação Animal
description This experiment evaluated the effects of treatments simulating pregnancy (100 lead spheres in the uterus - LEA) and implanted growth promoter (GPR), compared to a control group (EMP) on feed intake behavior, rumination behavior, and water immersion behavior. Twenty Murrah buffaloes were used. After 84-day confinement, the heifers’ behavior was observed for five days. The feeding time was longer in GPR (1352.5min.) than in EMP (1120.2min.) and LEA (1128.1min.); the last two groups did not differ from each other. The rumination time was longer in GPR (2598.5min.) than in LEA (2169.7min.), and EMP had an intermediary time (2357.4min.). As for water immersion, the time was similar for EMP (1369.3min.) and LEA (1289.9min.) and longer in GPR (604.0min.). Implant utilization influenced feeding and rumination times
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-03-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/1212
10.4025/actascianimsci.v27i3.1212
url https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/1212
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actascianimsci.v27i3.1212
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/1212/644
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 27 No 3 (2005); 363-370
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 27 n. 3 (2005); 363-370
1807-8672
1806-2636
reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
collection Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv actaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com
_version_ 1799315356887547904

Registros relacionados