Processing yield of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): head cut types and two weight classes
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/2926 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study was to evaluate the best type of head cut of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) resulting in better fillet processing yields. The experiment was carried out at the Pisciculture Station of UEM/Codapar, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil. One hundred and twenty specimens were slaughtered, head cut, eviscerated, and had their fin, skin and fillet removed. The fillet processing was undertaken by a single person. Plotting was completely randomized by a 2x3 factorial scheme. Treatments consisted of two weight categories ( W1=250-400g and W2=401-550g) and three types of head cut (C1=oblique, OB; C2=Contour, CO, and C3=strainght, ST), with 20 replicates. Each fish was considered an experimental unit. Mean values of yield were expressed in relation to fish body weight. There was an influence of head cut types and weight categories on the dressed out and fillet yield. The yields in W2 (OB=50.42%, 35.27%; CO=50.70%, 35.18% and ST=48.50%, 33.82%) were higher (p < 0.05) than in W1 (OB=47.35%, 32.64%; CO=47.65%, 31.86% and ST=40.79, 27.72%) for dressed out and fillet respectively. In lower weight classes (W1), the yields of dressed out and fillet were influenced (p < 0.05) by the type of head cut, where ST had lower yield compared with OB and CO. The yields of carcass without head (61.91%), ventral abdominal muscles (2.85%), deep hipaxial muscles (4.72%) in W2 were higher (p < 0.05) than those in W1 (57.13%; 2.45% and 3.75%) respectively as for the characteristics analyzed. Furthermore, weight category had no influence on percentage of skin and other residues, except for percentage of head (p < 0.01). As for head percentage, W1 was significantly higher (30.67%) and W2 was significantly lower (27.07%). On the other hand, the yield and by-product percentages were influenced (p < 0.05) by head cut type, with CO showing better yields for carcass without head (62.47%) and ventral abdominal muscle (4.33%) and skin percentage (5.99%); and lower head percentage (24.79%) when compared with OB and ST. There was no influence of the head cut on deep hipaxial muscle ((OB=4.01; CO=4.36% and ST=4.03%). The results suggest that, under these conditions of filleting, fish with 400g body weight or more are the most recommendable for slaughter, and CO and OB are indicated to improve dressed out and fillet yield in tilapia. |
id |
UEM-7_cf37825bc5624ee8cd2b93a844169e6c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/2926 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-7 |
network_name_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Processing yield of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): head cut types and two weight classesRendimento do processamento da tilápia-do-nilo (Oreochromis niloticus): tipos de corte da cabeça em duas categorias de pesorendimento de carcaçarendimento de filéresíduos de filetagemprocessamento de peixedecapitação5.04.00.00-2 ZootecniaThe aim of this study was to evaluate the best type of head cut of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) resulting in better fillet processing yields. The experiment was carried out at the Pisciculture Station of UEM/Codapar, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil. One hundred and twenty specimens were slaughtered, head cut, eviscerated, and had their fin, skin and fillet removed. The fillet processing was undertaken by a single person. Plotting was completely randomized by a 2x3 factorial scheme. Treatments consisted of two weight categories ( W1=250-400g and W2=401-550g) and three types of head cut (C1=oblique, OB; C2=Contour, CO, and C3=strainght, ST), with 20 replicates. Each fish was considered an experimental unit. Mean values of yield were expressed in relation to fish body weight. There was an influence of head cut types and weight categories on the dressed out and fillet yield. The yields in W2 (OB=50.42%, 35.27%; CO=50.70%, 35.18% and ST=48.50%, 33.82%) were higher (p < 0.05) than in W1 (OB=47.35%, 32.64%; CO=47.65%, 31.86% and ST=40.79, 27.72%) for dressed out and fillet respectively. In lower weight classes (W1), the yields of dressed out and fillet were influenced (p < 0.05) by the type of head cut, where ST had lower yield compared with OB and CO. The yields of carcass without head (61.91%), ventral abdominal muscles (2.85%), deep hipaxial muscles (4.72%) in W2 were higher (p < 0.05) than those in W1 (57.13%; 2.45% and 3.75%) respectively as for the characteristics analyzed. Furthermore, weight category had no influence on percentage of skin and other residues, except for percentage of head (p < 0.01). As for head percentage, W1 was significantly higher (30.67%) and W2 was significantly lower (27.07%). On the other hand, the yield and by-product percentages were influenced (p < 0.05) by head cut type, with CO showing better yields for carcass without head (62.47%) and ventral abdominal muscle (4.33%) and skin percentage (5.99%); and lower head percentage (24.79%) when compared with OB and ST. There was no influence of the head cut on deep hipaxial muscle ((OB=4.01; CO=4.36% and ST=4.03%). The results suggest that, under these conditions of filleting, fish with 400g body weight or more are the most recommendable for slaughter, and CO and OB are indicated to improve dressed out and fillet yield in tilapia.O objetivo do presente estudo foi avaliar o melhor tipo de corte de cabeça para decapitação da tilápia-do-nilo (Oreochromis niloticus), que resulte em melhores rendimentos de filetagem. O experimento foi conduzido na Estação de Piscicultura da UEM/Codapar, Maringá, PR. Foram abatidos 120 exemplares cortadas as cabeças, eviscerados, removidas as nadadeiras, pele e filés. O processo de filetagem foi realizado por uma única pessoa. O delineamento foi inteiramente casualizado, em esquema fatorial 2x3. Os tratamentos foram: duas categorias de peso (P1= 250-400 g e P2= 401-550 g) e três tipos de corte de cabeça (C1=oblíquo, OB; C2=contornado, CO e C3=reto, RE), com 20 repetições. Cada peixe foi considerado a unidade experimental. Os valores médios de rendimento foram expressos em relação ao peso corporal do peixe. Houve influência do tipo de corte e categoria de peso sobre o rendimento do tronco limpo e filé. Os rendimentos em P2 (OB=50,42%, 35,27%; CO=50,70%, 35,18% e RE=48,50%, 33,82%) foram superiores (p < 0,05) aos de P1 (OB=47,35%, 32,64%; CO=47,65%, 31,86% e RE=40,79, 27,72%) para tronco e filé, respectivamente. Dentro da menor categoria de peso (P1), os rendimentos de tronco e filé foram influenciados (p < 0,05) pelo tipo de corte da cabeça, em que RE apresentou menor rendimento comparado ao OB e CO. Os rendimentos de carcaça sem cabeça (61,91%), músculo abdominal ventral (2,85%), músculo hipaxial profundo (4,72%) em P2 foram superiores (p < 0,05) aos de P1 (57,13%; 2,45% e 3,75%), respectivamente para as características analisadas. Além disso, a categoria de peso não influenciou a percentagem de pele e outros resíduos, exceto a da cabeça (p < 0,01). Para percentagem de cabeça o P1 foi significativamente superior (30,67%) e inferior para P2 (27,07%). Por outro lado, o rendimento e percentagem de subprodutos foram influenciados (p < 0,05) pelo tipo de corte de cabeça, com CO mostrando melhores rendimentos para carcaça sem cabeça (62,47%) e músculo abdominal ventral (4,33%) e porcentagem de pele (5,99%); e menores percentagens de cabeça (24,79%) em comparação ao OB e RE. Não houve influência do corte no músculo hipaxial profundo (OB=4,01%, CO=4,36% e RE=4,03%). Os resultados sugerem que, nestas condições de filetagem, os peixes acima de 400 g de peso corporal são os mais indicados para serem abatidos, utilizando-se o corte contornado e oblíquo para obtenção dos melhores rendimentos de filé e tronco limpo para tilápia.Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá2008-05-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/292610.4025/actascianimsci.v22i0.2926Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 22 (2000); 701-706Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 22 (2000); 701-7061807-86721806-2636reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/2926/2197Souza, Maria Luiza Rodrigues deMarengoni, Nilton GarciaPinto, Adriana AparecidaCaçador, Walangiery da Costainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-05-17T13:03:51Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/2926Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSciPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/oaiactaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com1807-86721806-2636opendoar:2024-05-17T13:03:51Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Processing yield of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): head cut types and two weight classes Rendimento do processamento da tilápia-do-nilo (Oreochromis niloticus): tipos de corte da cabeça em duas categorias de peso |
title |
Processing yield of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): head cut types and two weight classes |
spellingShingle |
Processing yield of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): head cut types and two weight classes Souza, Maria Luiza Rodrigues de rendimento de carcaça rendimento de filé resíduos de filetagem processamento de peixe decapitação 5.04.00.00-2 Zootecnia |
title_short |
Processing yield of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): head cut types and two weight classes |
title_full |
Processing yield of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): head cut types and two weight classes |
title_fullStr |
Processing yield of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): head cut types and two weight classes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Processing yield of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): head cut types and two weight classes |
title_sort |
Processing yield of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): head cut types and two weight classes |
author |
Souza, Maria Luiza Rodrigues de |
author_facet |
Souza, Maria Luiza Rodrigues de Marengoni, Nilton Garcia Pinto, Adriana Aparecida Caçador, Walangiery da Costa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Marengoni, Nilton Garcia Pinto, Adriana Aparecida Caçador, Walangiery da Costa |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza, Maria Luiza Rodrigues de Marengoni, Nilton Garcia Pinto, Adriana Aparecida Caçador, Walangiery da Costa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
rendimento de carcaça rendimento de filé resíduos de filetagem processamento de peixe decapitação 5.04.00.00-2 Zootecnia |
topic |
rendimento de carcaça rendimento de filé resíduos de filetagem processamento de peixe decapitação 5.04.00.00-2 Zootecnia |
description |
The aim of this study was to evaluate the best type of head cut of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) resulting in better fillet processing yields. The experiment was carried out at the Pisciculture Station of UEM/Codapar, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil. One hundred and twenty specimens were slaughtered, head cut, eviscerated, and had their fin, skin and fillet removed. The fillet processing was undertaken by a single person. Plotting was completely randomized by a 2x3 factorial scheme. Treatments consisted of two weight categories ( W1=250-400g and W2=401-550g) and three types of head cut (C1=oblique, OB; C2=Contour, CO, and C3=strainght, ST), with 20 replicates. Each fish was considered an experimental unit. Mean values of yield were expressed in relation to fish body weight. There was an influence of head cut types and weight categories on the dressed out and fillet yield. The yields in W2 (OB=50.42%, 35.27%; CO=50.70%, 35.18% and ST=48.50%, 33.82%) were higher (p < 0.05) than in W1 (OB=47.35%, 32.64%; CO=47.65%, 31.86% and ST=40.79, 27.72%) for dressed out and fillet respectively. In lower weight classes (W1), the yields of dressed out and fillet were influenced (p < 0.05) by the type of head cut, where ST had lower yield compared with OB and CO. The yields of carcass without head (61.91%), ventral abdominal muscles (2.85%), deep hipaxial muscles (4.72%) in W2 were higher (p < 0.05) than those in W1 (57.13%; 2.45% and 3.75%) respectively as for the characteristics analyzed. Furthermore, weight category had no influence on percentage of skin and other residues, except for percentage of head (p < 0.01). As for head percentage, W1 was significantly higher (30.67%) and W2 was significantly lower (27.07%). On the other hand, the yield and by-product percentages were influenced (p < 0.05) by head cut type, with CO showing better yields for carcass without head (62.47%) and ventral abdominal muscle (4.33%) and skin percentage (5.99%); and lower head percentage (24.79%) when compared with OB and ST. There was no influence of the head cut on deep hipaxial muscle ((OB=4.01; CO=4.36% and ST=4.03%). The results suggest that, under these conditions of filleting, fish with 400g body weight or more are the most recommendable for slaughter, and CO and OB are indicated to improve dressed out and fillet yield in tilapia. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-05-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/2926 10.4025/actascianimsci.v22i0.2926 |
url |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/2926 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actascianimsci.v22i0.2926 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/2926/2197 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 22 (2000); 701-706 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 22 (2000); 701-706 1807-8672 1806-2636 reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) |
collection |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
actaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799315358636572672 |