Chemical composition of sorghum genotypes silages
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
| Outros Autores: | , , , , |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | eng |
| Título da fonte: | Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) |
| Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/31810 |
Resumo: | The objective was to select sorghum genotypes for silage production using its chemical characteristics. The experiment was carried out in the facilities of Embrapa Maize and Sorghum in Sete Lagoas, state of Minas Gerais, to evaluate the agronomic characteristics, and nutritional quality of silage of twelve sorghum genotypes. We used a randomized block design with three replications. In relation to the production of green matter, the genotypes SF15 Volumax and BR610 stood out (52.07; 48.00 and 41.87 ton ha-1). Regarding pH, genotypes 1015339, 1015347, 1016007, SF15, BRS655, Volumax and BR610 averaged 3.68. All genotypes were similar considering the nutritional value, ammonia nitrogen and water activity. The genotypes SF15, Volumax and BRS610 showed the highest productivity per area, representing the best options for silage production. |
| id |
UEM-7_f855588ec6e38972259e97c59d298136 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/31810 |
| network_acronym_str |
UEM-7 |
| network_name_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Chemical composition of sorghum genotypes silagespreserved foodseasonalitygenotypes and production The objective was to select sorghum genotypes for silage production using its chemical characteristics. The experiment was carried out in the facilities of Embrapa Maize and Sorghum in Sete Lagoas, state of Minas Gerais, to evaluate the agronomic characteristics, and nutritional quality of silage of twelve sorghum genotypes. We used a randomized block design with three replications. In relation to the production of green matter, the genotypes SF15 Volumax and BR610 stood out (52.07; 48.00 and 41.87 ton ha-1). Regarding pH, genotypes 1015339, 1015347, 1016007, SF15, BRS655, Volumax and BR610 averaged 3.68. All genotypes were similar considering the nutritional value, ammonia nitrogen and water activity. The genotypes SF15, Volumax and BRS610 showed the highest productivity per area, representing the best options for silage production. Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá2016-11-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa de Campoapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/3181010.4025/actascianimsci.v38i4.31810Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 38 No 4 (2016); 369-373Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 38 n. 4 (2016); 369-3731807-86721806-2636reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/31810/pdfCopyright (c) 2016 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciencesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoura, Marielly Maria AlmeidaPires, Daniel Ananias de AssisRodrigues, José Avelino SantosSales, Eleuza Clarete Junqueira deCosta, Renê FerreiraTolentino, Daniella Cangussú2022-02-20T21:50:13Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/31810Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSciPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/oaiactaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com1807-86721806-2636opendoar:2022-02-20T21:50:13Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Chemical composition of sorghum genotypes silages |
| title |
Chemical composition of sorghum genotypes silages |
| spellingShingle |
Chemical composition of sorghum genotypes silages Moura, Marielly Maria Almeida preserved food seasonality genotypes and production |
| title_short |
Chemical composition of sorghum genotypes silages |
| title_full |
Chemical composition of sorghum genotypes silages |
| title_fullStr |
Chemical composition of sorghum genotypes silages |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Chemical composition of sorghum genotypes silages |
| title_sort |
Chemical composition of sorghum genotypes silages |
| author |
Moura, Marielly Maria Almeida |
| author_facet |
Moura, Marielly Maria Almeida Pires, Daniel Ananias de Assis Rodrigues, José Avelino Santos Sales, Eleuza Clarete Junqueira de Costa, Renê Ferreira Tolentino, Daniella Cangussú |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Pires, Daniel Ananias de Assis Rodrigues, José Avelino Santos Sales, Eleuza Clarete Junqueira de Costa, Renê Ferreira Tolentino, Daniella Cangussú |
| author2_role |
author author author author author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Moura, Marielly Maria Almeida Pires, Daniel Ananias de Assis Rodrigues, José Avelino Santos Sales, Eleuza Clarete Junqueira de Costa, Renê Ferreira Tolentino, Daniella Cangussú |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
preserved food seasonality genotypes and production |
| topic |
preserved food seasonality genotypes and production |
| description |
The objective was to select sorghum genotypes for silage production using its chemical characteristics. The experiment was carried out in the facilities of Embrapa Maize and Sorghum in Sete Lagoas, state of Minas Gerais, to evaluate the agronomic characteristics, and nutritional quality of silage of twelve sorghum genotypes. We used a randomized block design with three replications. In relation to the production of green matter, the genotypes SF15 Volumax and BR610 stood out (52.07; 48.00 and 41.87 ton ha-1). Regarding pH, genotypes 1015339, 1015347, 1016007, SF15, BRS655, Volumax and BR610 averaged 3.68. All genotypes were similar considering the nutritional value, ammonia nitrogen and water activity. The genotypes SF15, Volumax and BRS610 showed the highest productivity per area, representing the best options for silage production. |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-11-07 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa de Campo |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/31810 10.4025/actascianimsci.v38i4.31810 |
| url |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/31810 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actascianimsci.v38i4.31810 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/31810/pdf |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 38 No 4 (2016); 369-373 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 38 n. 4 (2016); 369-373 1807-8672 1806-2636 reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
| instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
| instacron_str |
UEM |
| institution |
UEM |
| reponame_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) |
| collection |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
actaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com |
| _version_ |
1799315361745600512 |