Nutritive value of sorghum silage inoculated with lactic acid bacteria and enzymes
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/2580 |
Resumo: | Studies about microbial inoculation of sorghum silage are scarce. The objective of the experiment was to evaluate the effects of microbial inoculated sorghum silage in total digestibility in ovines. Eight male sheeps were assigned to a crossover design in two periods (8 animals/treatment). The treatments were: sorghum silage (28.9% DM and 7.7% CP, on average) control or microbial inoculated with Sill-All product (S. faecium, P. acidilactici, L. plantarum, amylases, hemicellulases and cellulases). Each period extended for twenty-one days, the last five used for feces and urine collection. Inoculated or control silages did not differ for total digestibility of DM (inoculated = 54.1% vs. control = 52.2%), CP (36.9% vs. 36.2%), FNE (56.7% vs. 53.9%), CF (55.8% vs. 53.7%), NDF (48.8% vs. 46.5%), ADF (48.1% vs. 44.3%), starch (93.1% vs. 93.3%), TDN (52.7% vs. 50.2%), N retention (–1.4 vs. –1.8g of N/animal/day) or DM intake (1.72% vs. 1.64% of BW), but inoculation tended (p=0.0522) to decrease digestibility of EE (66.8% vs. 69.6%). |
id |
UEM-7_fd5af7b06cc93ec2449958fe48a0ea1c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/2580 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-7 |
network_name_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Nutritive value of sorghum silage inoculated with lactic acid bacteria and enzymesValor nutritivo da silagem de sorgo tratada com inoculantes enzimo-microbianosbactérias láticasdigestãoensilagemovinosSorghum bicolor5.04.00.00-2 ZootecniaStudies about microbial inoculation of sorghum silage are scarce. The objective of the experiment was to evaluate the effects of microbial inoculated sorghum silage in total digestibility in ovines. Eight male sheeps were assigned to a crossover design in two periods (8 animals/treatment). The treatments were: sorghum silage (28.9% DM and 7.7% CP, on average) control or microbial inoculated with Sill-All product (S. faecium, P. acidilactici, L. plantarum, amylases, hemicellulases and cellulases). Each period extended for twenty-one days, the last five used for feces and urine collection. Inoculated or control silages did not differ for total digestibility of DM (inoculated = 54.1% vs. control = 52.2%), CP (36.9% vs. 36.2%), FNE (56.7% vs. 53.9%), CF (55.8% vs. 53.7%), NDF (48.8% vs. 46.5%), ADF (48.1% vs. 44.3%), starch (93.1% vs. 93.3%), TDN (52.7% vs. 50.2%), N retention (–1.4 vs. –1.8g of N/animal/day) or DM intake (1.72% vs. 1.64% of BW), but inoculation tended (p=0.0522) to decrease digestibility of EE (66.8% vs. 69.6%).Estudos com inoculação microbiana da silagem de sorgo são escassos na literatura. O experimento teve o objetivo de avaliar os efeitos da inoculação microbiana e enzimática sobre o valor nutritivo da silagem de sorgo em ovinos. Distribuíu-se oito animais machos, castrados em um delineamento em "cross-over" com dois sub-períodos sucessivos (oito animais/tratamento). Os tratamentos corresponderam a silagem de sorgo (média de 28,9% de MS e 7,7% de PB) controle ou inoculada com o produto Sil-All (S. faecium, P. acidilactici, L. plantarum, amilase, hemicelulase e celulase) e cada sub-período experimental teve duração total de vinte e um dias, sendo os cinco últimos destinados à coleta de fezes e urina. Silagens inoculadas e controle não diferiram para a digestibilidade total da MS (inoculada = 54,1% vs. controle = 52,2%), PB (36,9% vs. 36,2%), ENN (56,7% vs. 53,9%), FB (55,8% vs. 53,7%), FDN (48,8% vs. 46,5%), FDA (48,1% vs. 44,3%), amido (93,1% vs. 93,3%), NDT (52,7% vs. 50,2%), retenção nitrogenada (–1,4 vs. –1,8 g de N/animal/dia) ou consumo de MS (1,72 vs. 1,64% do PV), mas a inoculação tendeu (P=0,0522) em diminuir a digestibilidade do EE (66,8% vs. 69,6%).Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá2008-04-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/258010.4025/actascianimsci.v24i0.2580Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 24 (2002); 1141-1145Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 24 (2002); 1141-11451807-86721806-2636reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/2580/1758Rodrigues, Paulo Henrique MazzaSenatore, Ana LúciaLucci, Carlos de SousaAndrade, Stefano Juliano Tavares deLima, Felix Ribeiro deMelotti, Laércioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-05-17T13:03:44Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/2580Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSciPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/oaiactaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com1807-86721806-2636opendoar:2024-05-17T13:03:44Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Nutritive value of sorghum silage inoculated with lactic acid bacteria and enzymes Valor nutritivo da silagem de sorgo tratada com inoculantes enzimo-microbianos |
title |
Nutritive value of sorghum silage inoculated with lactic acid bacteria and enzymes |
spellingShingle |
Nutritive value of sorghum silage inoculated with lactic acid bacteria and enzymes Rodrigues, Paulo Henrique Mazza bactérias láticas digestão ensilagem ovinos Sorghum bicolor 5.04.00.00-2 Zootecnia |
title_short |
Nutritive value of sorghum silage inoculated with lactic acid bacteria and enzymes |
title_full |
Nutritive value of sorghum silage inoculated with lactic acid bacteria and enzymes |
title_fullStr |
Nutritive value of sorghum silage inoculated with lactic acid bacteria and enzymes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Nutritive value of sorghum silage inoculated with lactic acid bacteria and enzymes |
title_sort |
Nutritive value of sorghum silage inoculated with lactic acid bacteria and enzymes |
author |
Rodrigues, Paulo Henrique Mazza |
author_facet |
Rodrigues, Paulo Henrique Mazza Senatore, Ana Lúcia Lucci, Carlos de Sousa Andrade, Stefano Juliano Tavares de Lima, Felix Ribeiro de Melotti, Laércio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Senatore, Ana Lúcia Lucci, Carlos de Sousa Andrade, Stefano Juliano Tavares de Lima, Felix Ribeiro de Melotti, Laércio |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues, Paulo Henrique Mazza Senatore, Ana Lúcia Lucci, Carlos de Sousa Andrade, Stefano Juliano Tavares de Lima, Felix Ribeiro de Melotti, Laércio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
bactérias láticas digestão ensilagem ovinos Sorghum bicolor 5.04.00.00-2 Zootecnia |
topic |
bactérias láticas digestão ensilagem ovinos Sorghum bicolor 5.04.00.00-2 Zootecnia |
description |
Studies about microbial inoculation of sorghum silage are scarce. The objective of the experiment was to evaluate the effects of microbial inoculated sorghum silage in total digestibility in ovines. Eight male sheeps were assigned to a crossover design in two periods (8 animals/treatment). The treatments were: sorghum silage (28.9% DM and 7.7% CP, on average) control or microbial inoculated with Sill-All product (S. faecium, P. acidilactici, L. plantarum, amylases, hemicellulases and cellulases). Each period extended for twenty-one days, the last five used for feces and urine collection. Inoculated or control silages did not differ for total digestibility of DM (inoculated = 54.1% vs. control = 52.2%), CP (36.9% vs. 36.2%), FNE (56.7% vs. 53.9%), CF (55.8% vs. 53.7%), NDF (48.8% vs. 46.5%), ADF (48.1% vs. 44.3%), starch (93.1% vs. 93.3%), TDN (52.7% vs. 50.2%), N retention (–1.4 vs. –1.8g of N/animal/day) or DM intake (1.72% vs. 1.64% of BW), but inoculation tended (p=0.0522) to decrease digestibility of EE (66.8% vs. 69.6%). |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-04-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/2580 10.4025/actascianimsci.v24i0.2580 |
url |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/2580 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actascianimsci.v24i0.2580 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/2580/1758 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 24 (2002); 1141-1145 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 24 (2002); 1141-1145 1807-8672 1806-2636 reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) |
collection |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
actaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799315358140596224 |