Nutritive value of sorghum silage inoculated with lactic acid bacteria and enzymes

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues, Paulo Henrique Mazza
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Senatore, Ana Lúcia, Lucci, Carlos de Sousa, Andrade, Stefano Juliano Tavares de, Lima, Felix Ribeiro de, Melotti, Laércio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/2580
Resumo: Studies about microbial inoculation of sorghum silage are scarce. The objective of the experiment was to evaluate the effects of microbial inoculated sorghum silage in total digestibility in ovines. Eight male sheeps were assigned to a crossover design in two periods (8 animals/treatment). The treatments were: sorghum silage (28.9% DM and 7.7% CP, on average) control or microbial inoculated with Sill-All product (S. faecium, P. acidilactici, L. plantarum, amylases, hemicellulases and cellulases). Each period extended for twenty-one days, the last five used for feces and urine collection. Inoculated or control silages did not differ for total digestibility of DM (inoculated = 54.1% vs. control = 52.2%), CP (36.9% vs. 36.2%), FNE (56.7% vs. 53.9%), CF (55.8% vs. 53.7%), NDF (48.8% vs. 46.5%), ADF (48.1% vs. 44.3%), starch (93.1% vs. 93.3%), TDN (52.7% vs. 50.2%), N retention (–1.4 vs. –1.8g of N/animal/day) or DM intake (1.72% vs. 1.64% of BW), but inoculation tended (p=0.0522) to decrease digestibility of EE (66.8% vs. 69.6%).
id UEM-7_fd5af7b06cc93ec2449958fe48a0ea1c
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/2580
network_acronym_str UEM-7
network_name_str Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Nutritive value of sorghum silage inoculated with lactic acid bacteria and enzymesValor nutritivo da silagem de sorgo tratada com inoculantes enzimo-microbianosbactérias láticasdigestãoensilagemovinosSorghum bicolor5.04.00.00-2 ZootecniaStudies about microbial inoculation of sorghum silage are scarce. The objective of the experiment was to evaluate the effects of microbial inoculated sorghum silage in total digestibility in ovines. Eight male sheeps were assigned to a crossover design in two periods (8 animals/treatment). The treatments were: sorghum silage (28.9% DM and 7.7% CP, on average) control or microbial inoculated with Sill-All product (S. faecium, P. acidilactici, L. plantarum, amylases, hemicellulases and cellulases). Each period extended for twenty-one days, the last five used for feces and urine collection. Inoculated or control silages did not differ for total digestibility of DM (inoculated = 54.1% vs. control = 52.2%), CP (36.9% vs. 36.2%), FNE (56.7% vs. 53.9%), CF (55.8% vs. 53.7%), NDF (48.8% vs. 46.5%), ADF (48.1% vs. 44.3%), starch (93.1% vs. 93.3%), TDN (52.7% vs. 50.2%), N retention (–1.4 vs. –1.8g of N/animal/day) or DM intake (1.72% vs. 1.64% of BW), but inoculation tended (p=0.0522) to decrease digestibility of EE (66.8% vs. 69.6%).Estudos com inoculação microbiana da silagem de sorgo são escassos na literatura. O experimento teve o objetivo de avaliar os efeitos da inoculação microbiana e enzimática sobre o valor nutritivo da silagem de sorgo em ovinos. Distribuíu-se oito animais machos, castrados em um delineamento em "cross-over" com dois sub-períodos sucessivos (oito animais/tratamento). Os tratamentos corresponderam a silagem de sorgo (média de 28,9% de MS e 7,7% de PB) controle ou inoculada com o produto Sil-All (S. faecium, P. acidilactici, L. plantarum, amilase, hemicelulase e celulase) e cada sub-período experimental teve duração total de vinte e um dias, sendo os cinco últimos destinados à coleta de fezes e urina. Silagens inoculadas e controle não diferiram para a digestibilidade total da MS (inoculada = 54,1% vs. controle = 52,2%), PB (36,9% vs. 36,2%), ENN (56,7% vs. 53,9%), FB (55,8% vs. 53,7%), FDN (48,8% vs. 46,5%), FDA (48,1% vs. 44,3%), amido (93,1% vs. 93,3%), NDT (52,7% vs. 50,2%), retenção nitrogenada (–1,4 vs. –1,8 g de N/animal/dia) ou consumo de MS (1,72 vs. 1,64% do PV), mas a inoculação tendeu (P=0,0522) em diminuir a digestibilidade do EE (66,8% vs. 69,6%).Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá2008-04-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/258010.4025/actascianimsci.v24i0.2580Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 24 (2002); 1141-1145Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 24 (2002); 1141-11451807-86721806-2636reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/2580/1758Rodrigues, Paulo Henrique MazzaSenatore, Ana LúciaLucci, Carlos de SousaAndrade, Stefano Juliano Tavares deLima, Felix Ribeiro deMelotti, Laércioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-05-17T13:03:44Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/2580Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSciPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/oaiactaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com1807-86721806-2636opendoar:2024-05-17T13:03:44Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Nutritive value of sorghum silage inoculated with lactic acid bacteria and enzymes
Valor nutritivo da silagem de sorgo tratada com inoculantes enzimo-microbianos
title Nutritive value of sorghum silage inoculated with lactic acid bacteria and enzymes
spellingShingle Nutritive value of sorghum silage inoculated with lactic acid bacteria and enzymes
Rodrigues, Paulo Henrique Mazza
bactérias láticas
digestão
ensilagem
ovinos
Sorghum bicolor
5.04.00.00-2 Zootecnia
title_short Nutritive value of sorghum silage inoculated with lactic acid bacteria and enzymes
title_full Nutritive value of sorghum silage inoculated with lactic acid bacteria and enzymes
title_fullStr Nutritive value of sorghum silage inoculated with lactic acid bacteria and enzymes
title_full_unstemmed Nutritive value of sorghum silage inoculated with lactic acid bacteria and enzymes
title_sort Nutritive value of sorghum silage inoculated with lactic acid bacteria and enzymes
author Rodrigues, Paulo Henrique Mazza
author_facet Rodrigues, Paulo Henrique Mazza
Senatore, Ana Lúcia
Lucci, Carlos de Sousa
Andrade, Stefano Juliano Tavares de
Lima, Felix Ribeiro de
Melotti, Laércio
author_role author
author2 Senatore, Ana Lúcia
Lucci, Carlos de Sousa
Andrade, Stefano Juliano Tavares de
Lima, Felix Ribeiro de
Melotti, Laércio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodrigues, Paulo Henrique Mazza
Senatore, Ana Lúcia
Lucci, Carlos de Sousa
Andrade, Stefano Juliano Tavares de
Lima, Felix Ribeiro de
Melotti, Laércio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv bactérias láticas
digestão
ensilagem
ovinos
Sorghum bicolor
5.04.00.00-2 Zootecnia
topic bactérias láticas
digestão
ensilagem
ovinos
Sorghum bicolor
5.04.00.00-2 Zootecnia
description Studies about microbial inoculation of sorghum silage are scarce. The objective of the experiment was to evaluate the effects of microbial inoculated sorghum silage in total digestibility in ovines. Eight male sheeps were assigned to a crossover design in two periods (8 animals/treatment). The treatments were: sorghum silage (28.9% DM and 7.7% CP, on average) control or microbial inoculated with Sill-All product (S. faecium, P. acidilactici, L. plantarum, amylases, hemicellulases and cellulases). Each period extended for twenty-one days, the last five used for feces and urine collection. Inoculated or control silages did not differ for total digestibility of DM (inoculated = 54.1% vs. control = 52.2%), CP (36.9% vs. 36.2%), FNE (56.7% vs. 53.9%), CF (55.8% vs. 53.7%), NDF (48.8% vs. 46.5%), ADF (48.1% vs. 44.3%), starch (93.1% vs. 93.3%), TDN (52.7% vs. 50.2%), N retention (–1.4 vs. –1.8g of N/animal/day) or DM intake (1.72% vs. 1.64% of BW), but inoculation tended (p=0.0522) to decrease digestibility of EE (66.8% vs. 69.6%).
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-04-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/2580
10.4025/actascianimsci.v24i0.2580
url https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/2580
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actascianimsci.v24i0.2580
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/2580/1758
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 24 (2002); 1141-1145
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 24 (2002); 1141-1145
1807-8672
1806-2636
reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
collection Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv actaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com
_version_ 1799315358140596224