Repetitions to failure increase pectoralis major activation with similar neuromuscular fatigue in trained men
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Journal of Physical Education (Maringá) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/53432 |
Resumo: | Resistance training protocols performed to muscle failure (MF) have been employed in an attempt to maximize activation and neuromuscular fatigue. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the surface electromyography amplitude (EMGRMS) and frequency (EMGFREQ) of the pectoralis major between protocols performed to MF and non muscle failure (NMF). Seven trained men performed three sets at 60% of a repetition maximum, with a 3 min rest period and a 6s repetition duration. MF protocol was performing with maximum number of repetitions in all sets, while in NMF protocol subjects performed 6 repetitions in 3 sets. For data analysis two two-way repeated measures ANOVAs (Protocol x Repetition) were used and when necessary, Bonferroni post hoc was performed. The EMGRMS was higher in the protocol MF compare to NMF, but there was no difference in EMGFREQ between protocols. Although there were no significant differences in the frequency domain between protocols, perform repetitions to MF was a determining factor to generate higher amplitude of the electromyography signal. Thus, perform repetitions to MF could be considered an effective strategy to increase muscle activation in trained individuals, however, with similar neuromuscular fatigue. |
id |
UEM-9_a70e3e5e36a8dd6b235a36efab96bc8d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/53432 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-9 |
network_name_str |
Journal of Physical Education (Maringá) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Repetitions to failure increase pectoralis major activation with similar neuromuscular fatigue in trained menRepetições até a falha aumentam a ativação do peitoral maior com similar fadiga neuromuscular em homens treinadosamplitudeelectromyographyfrequencymuscle failurestrength trainingamplitudeeletromiografiafrequênciafalha musculartreinamento de forçaResistance training protocols performed to muscle failure (MF) have been employed in an attempt to maximize activation and neuromuscular fatigue. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the surface electromyography amplitude (EMGRMS) and frequency (EMGFREQ) of the pectoralis major between protocols performed to MF and non muscle failure (NMF). Seven trained men performed three sets at 60% of a repetition maximum, with a 3 min rest period and a 6s repetition duration. MF protocol was performing with maximum number of repetitions in all sets, while in NMF protocol subjects performed 6 repetitions in 3 sets. For data analysis two two-way repeated measures ANOVAs (Protocol x Repetition) were used and when necessary, Bonferroni post hoc was performed. The EMGRMS was higher in the protocol MF compare to NMF, but there was no difference in EMGFREQ between protocols. Although there were no significant differences in the frequency domain between protocols, perform repetitions to MF was a determining factor to generate higher amplitude of the electromyography signal. Thus, perform repetitions to MF could be considered an effective strategy to increase muscle activation in trained individuals, however, with similar neuromuscular fatigue.Protocolos de treinamento realizados até a falha muscular (FM) têm sido realizados na tentativa de maximizar a ativação e a fadiga neuromuscular. Portanto, o objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a amplitude do sinal eletromiografico (EMGRMS) e a frequência (EMGFREQ) do peitoral maior entre os protocolos realizados até a FM e sem falha muscular (SFM). Sete homens treinados realizaram três séries com 60% de uma repetição máxima, com um período de descanso de 3 min e uma duração da repetição de 6s. O protocolo FM foi realizado com o número máximo de repetições em todas as séries, enquanto no protocolo SFM os indivíduos realizaram 6 repetições em 3 séries. Para análise dos dados, foram utilizadas duas ANOVAs two-way com medidas repetidas (Protocolo x Repetição) e, quando necessário, foi realizado o post hoc de Bonferroni. Como resultado, a EMGRMS foi maior no protocolo FM comparado ao SFM, mas não houve diferença na EMGFREQ entre os protocolos. Embora não houvesse diferenças significativas no domínio da frequência entre os protocolos, a realização de repetições até a FM foi um fator determinante para gerar maior amplitude do sinal eletromiográfico. Assim, a realização de repetições até a FM pode ser considerada uma estratégia eficaz para aumentar a ativação muscular em indivíduos treinados, porém com fadiga neuromuscular semelhante.Department of Physical Education - State University of Maringá (UEM), Maringá-PR, Brazil2020-11-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/5343210.4025/jphyseduc.v32i1.3214Journal of Physical Education; Vol 32 No 1 (2021): Journal of Physical Education; e-3214Journal of Physical Education; Vol. 32 Núm. 1 (2021): Journal of Physical Education; e-3214Journal of Physical Education; v. 32 n. 1 (2021): Journal of Physical Education; e-32142448-2455reponame:Journal of Physical Education (Maringá)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/53432/751375150994Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Physical Educationhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGomes, Mateus CamargosLacerda, Lucas TúlioGurgel Simões, MarinaRibeiro Diniz, Rodrigo CésarHeleno Chagas, MauroLima, Fernando Vitor2021-10-25T13:02:04Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/53432Revistahttp://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revdef@uem.br2448-24552448-2455opendoar:2021-10-25T13:02:04Journal of Physical Education (Maringá) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Repetitions to failure increase pectoralis major activation with similar neuromuscular fatigue in trained men Repetições até a falha aumentam a ativação do peitoral maior com similar fadiga neuromuscular em homens treinados |
title |
Repetitions to failure increase pectoralis major activation with similar neuromuscular fatigue in trained men |
spellingShingle |
Repetitions to failure increase pectoralis major activation with similar neuromuscular fatigue in trained men Gomes, Mateus Camargos amplitude electromyography frequency muscle failure strength training amplitude eletromiografia frequência falha muscular treinamento de força |
title_short |
Repetitions to failure increase pectoralis major activation with similar neuromuscular fatigue in trained men |
title_full |
Repetitions to failure increase pectoralis major activation with similar neuromuscular fatigue in trained men |
title_fullStr |
Repetitions to failure increase pectoralis major activation with similar neuromuscular fatigue in trained men |
title_full_unstemmed |
Repetitions to failure increase pectoralis major activation with similar neuromuscular fatigue in trained men |
title_sort |
Repetitions to failure increase pectoralis major activation with similar neuromuscular fatigue in trained men |
author |
Gomes, Mateus Camargos |
author_facet |
Gomes, Mateus Camargos Lacerda, Lucas Túlio Gurgel Simões, Marina Ribeiro Diniz, Rodrigo César Heleno Chagas, Mauro Lima, Fernando Vitor |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lacerda, Lucas Túlio Gurgel Simões, Marina Ribeiro Diniz, Rodrigo César Heleno Chagas, Mauro Lima, Fernando Vitor |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gomes, Mateus Camargos Lacerda, Lucas Túlio Gurgel Simões, Marina Ribeiro Diniz, Rodrigo César Heleno Chagas, Mauro Lima, Fernando Vitor |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
amplitude electromyography frequency muscle failure strength training amplitude eletromiografia frequência falha muscular treinamento de força |
topic |
amplitude electromyography frequency muscle failure strength training amplitude eletromiografia frequência falha muscular treinamento de força |
description |
Resistance training protocols performed to muscle failure (MF) have been employed in an attempt to maximize activation and neuromuscular fatigue. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the surface electromyography amplitude (EMGRMS) and frequency (EMGFREQ) of the pectoralis major between protocols performed to MF and non muscle failure (NMF). Seven trained men performed three sets at 60% of a repetition maximum, with a 3 min rest period and a 6s repetition duration. MF protocol was performing with maximum number of repetitions in all sets, while in NMF protocol subjects performed 6 repetitions in 3 sets. For data analysis two two-way repeated measures ANOVAs (Protocol x Repetition) were used and when necessary, Bonferroni post hoc was performed. The EMGRMS was higher in the protocol MF compare to NMF, but there was no difference in EMGFREQ between protocols. Although there were no significant differences in the frequency domain between protocols, perform repetitions to MF was a determining factor to generate higher amplitude of the electromyography signal. Thus, perform repetitions to MF could be considered an effective strategy to increase muscle activation in trained individuals, however, with similar neuromuscular fatigue. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-11-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/53432 10.4025/jphyseduc.v32i1.3214 |
url |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/53432 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/jphyseduc.v32i1.3214 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/53432/751375150994 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Physical Education https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Physical Education https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Department of Physical Education - State University of Maringá (UEM), Maringá-PR, Brazil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Department of Physical Education - State University of Maringá (UEM), Maringá-PR, Brazil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Physical Education; Vol 32 No 1 (2021): Journal of Physical Education; e-3214 Journal of Physical Education; Vol. 32 Núm. 1 (2021): Journal of Physical Education; e-3214 Journal of Physical Education; v. 32 n. 1 (2021): Journal of Physical Education; e-3214 2448-2455 reponame:Journal of Physical Education (Maringá) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Journal of Physical Education (Maringá) |
collection |
Journal of Physical Education (Maringá) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Physical Education (Maringá) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revdef@uem.br |
_version_ |
1754732546231369728 |