Repetitions to failure increase pectoralis major activation with similar neuromuscular fatigue in trained men

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gomes, Mateus Camargos
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Lacerda, Lucas Túlio, Gurgel Simões, Marina, Ribeiro Diniz, Rodrigo César, Heleno Chagas, Mauro, Lima, Fernando Vitor
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of Physical Education (Maringá)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/53432
Resumo: Resistance training protocols performed to muscle failure (MF) have been employed in an attempt to maximize activation and neuromuscular fatigue. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the surface electromyography amplitude (EMGRMS) and frequency (EMGFREQ) of the pectoralis major between protocols performed to MF and non muscle failure (NMF). Seven trained men performed three sets at 60% of a repetition maximum, with a 3 min rest period and a 6s repetition duration. MF protocol was performing with maximum number of repetitions in all sets, while in NMF protocol subjects performed 6 repetitions in 3 sets. For data analysis two two-way repeated measures ANOVAs (Protocol x Repetition) were used and when necessary, Bonferroni post hoc was performed. The EMGRMS was higher in the protocol MF compare to NMF, but there was no difference in EMGFREQ between protocols. Although there were no significant differences in the frequency domain between protocols, perform repetitions to MF was a determining factor to generate higher amplitude of the electromyography signal. Thus, perform repetitions to MF could be considered an effective strategy to increase muscle activation in trained individuals, however, with similar neuromuscular fatigue.
id UEM-9_a70e3e5e36a8dd6b235a36efab96bc8d
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/53432
network_acronym_str UEM-9
network_name_str Journal of Physical Education (Maringá)
repository_id_str
spelling Repetitions to failure increase pectoralis major activation with similar neuromuscular fatigue in trained menRepetições até a falha aumentam a ativação do peitoral maior com similar fadiga neuromuscular em homens treinadosamplitudeelectromyographyfrequencymuscle failurestrength trainingamplitudeeletromiografiafrequênciafalha musculartreinamento de forçaResistance training protocols performed to muscle failure (MF) have been employed in an attempt to maximize activation and neuromuscular fatigue. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the surface electromyography amplitude (EMGRMS) and frequency (EMGFREQ) of the pectoralis major between protocols performed to MF and non muscle failure (NMF). Seven trained men performed three sets at 60% of a repetition maximum, with a 3 min rest period and a 6s repetition duration. MF protocol was performing with maximum number of repetitions in all sets, while in NMF protocol subjects performed 6 repetitions in 3 sets. For data analysis two two-way repeated measures ANOVAs (Protocol x Repetition) were used and when necessary, Bonferroni post hoc was performed. The EMGRMS was higher in the protocol MF compare to NMF, but there was no difference in EMGFREQ between protocols. Although there were no significant differences in the frequency domain between protocols, perform repetitions to MF was a determining factor to generate higher amplitude of the electromyography signal. Thus, perform repetitions to MF could be considered an effective strategy to increase muscle activation in trained individuals, however, with similar neuromuscular fatigue.Protocolos de treinamento realizados até a falha muscular (FM) têm sido realizados na tentativa de maximizar a ativação e a fadiga neuromuscular. Portanto, o objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a amplitude do sinal eletromiografico (EMGRMS) e a frequência (EMGFREQ) do peitoral maior entre os protocolos realizados até a FM e sem falha muscular (SFM). Sete homens treinados realizaram três séries com 60% de uma repetição máxima, com um período de descanso de 3 min e uma duração da repetição de 6s. O protocolo FM foi realizado com o número máximo de repetições em todas as séries, enquanto no protocolo SFM os indivíduos realizaram 6 repetições em 3 séries. Para análise dos dados, foram utilizadas duas ANOVAs two-way com medidas repetidas (Protocolo x Repetição) e, quando necessário, foi realizado o post hoc de Bonferroni. Como resultado, a EMGRMS foi maior no protocolo FM comparado ao SFM, mas não houve diferença na EMGFREQ entre os protocolos. Embora não houvesse diferenças significativas no domínio da frequência entre os protocolos, a realização de repetições até a FM foi um fator determinante para gerar maior amplitude do sinal eletromiográfico. Assim, a realização de repetições até a FM pode ser considerada uma estratégia eficaz para aumentar a ativação muscular em indivíduos treinados, porém com fadiga neuromuscular semelhante.Department of Physical Education - State University of Maringá (UEM), Maringá-PR, Brazil2020-11-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/5343210.4025/jphyseduc.v32i1.3214Journal of Physical Education; Vol 32 No 1 (2021): Journal of Physical Education; e-3214Journal of Physical Education; Vol. 32 Núm. 1 (2021): Journal of Physical Education; e-3214Journal of Physical Education; v. 32 n. 1 (2021): Journal of Physical Education; e-32142448-2455reponame:Journal of Physical Education (Maringá)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/53432/751375150994Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Physical Educationhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGomes, Mateus CamargosLacerda, Lucas TúlioGurgel Simões, MarinaRibeiro Diniz, Rodrigo CésarHeleno Chagas, MauroLima, Fernando Vitor2021-10-25T13:02:04Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/53432Revistahttp://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revdef@uem.br2448-24552448-2455opendoar:2021-10-25T13:02:04Journal of Physical Education (Maringá) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Repetitions to failure increase pectoralis major activation with similar neuromuscular fatigue in trained men
Repetições até a falha aumentam a ativação do peitoral maior com similar fadiga neuromuscular em homens treinados
title Repetitions to failure increase pectoralis major activation with similar neuromuscular fatigue in trained men
spellingShingle Repetitions to failure increase pectoralis major activation with similar neuromuscular fatigue in trained men
Gomes, Mateus Camargos
amplitude
electromyography
frequency
muscle failure
strength training
amplitude
eletromiografia
frequência
falha muscular
treinamento de força
title_short Repetitions to failure increase pectoralis major activation with similar neuromuscular fatigue in trained men
title_full Repetitions to failure increase pectoralis major activation with similar neuromuscular fatigue in trained men
title_fullStr Repetitions to failure increase pectoralis major activation with similar neuromuscular fatigue in trained men
title_full_unstemmed Repetitions to failure increase pectoralis major activation with similar neuromuscular fatigue in trained men
title_sort Repetitions to failure increase pectoralis major activation with similar neuromuscular fatigue in trained men
author Gomes, Mateus Camargos
author_facet Gomes, Mateus Camargos
Lacerda, Lucas Túlio
Gurgel Simões, Marina
Ribeiro Diniz, Rodrigo César
Heleno Chagas, Mauro
Lima, Fernando Vitor
author_role author
author2 Lacerda, Lucas Túlio
Gurgel Simões, Marina
Ribeiro Diniz, Rodrigo César
Heleno Chagas, Mauro
Lima, Fernando Vitor
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gomes, Mateus Camargos
Lacerda, Lucas Túlio
Gurgel Simões, Marina
Ribeiro Diniz, Rodrigo César
Heleno Chagas, Mauro
Lima, Fernando Vitor
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv amplitude
electromyography
frequency
muscle failure
strength training
amplitude
eletromiografia
frequência
falha muscular
treinamento de força
topic amplitude
electromyography
frequency
muscle failure
strength training
amplitude
eletromiografia
frequência
falha muscular
treinamento de força
description Resistance training protocols performed to muscle failure (MF) have been employed in an attempt to maximize activation and neuromuscular fatigue. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the surface electromyography amplitude (EMGRMS) and frequency (EMGFREQ) of the pectoralis major between protocols performed to MF and non muscle failure (NMF). Seven trained men performed three sets at 60% of a repetition maximum, with a 3 min rest period and a 6s repetition duration. MF protocol was performing with maximum number of repetitions in all sets, while in NMF protocol subjects performed 6 repetitions in 3 sets. For data analysis two two-way repeated measures ANOVAs (Protocol x Repetition) were used and when necessary, Bonferroni post hoc was performed. The EMGRMS was higher in the protocol MF compare to NMF, but there was no difference in EMGFREQ between protocols. Although there were no significant differences in the frequency domain between protocols, perform repetitions to MF was a determining factor to generate higher amplitude of the electromyography signal. Thus, perform repetitions to MF could be considered an effective strategy to increase muscle activation in trained individuals, however, with similar neuromuscular fatigue.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/53432
10.4025/jphyseduc.v32i1.3214
url https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/53432
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/jphyseduc.v32i1.3214
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/53432/751375150994
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Physical Education
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Physical Education
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Department of Physical Education - State University of Maringá (UEM), Maringá-PR, Brazil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Department of Physical Education - State University of Maringá (UEM), Maringá-PR, Brazil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Physical Education; Vol 32 No 1 (2021): Journal of Physical Education; e-3214
Journal of Physical Education; Vol. 32 Núm. 1 (2021): Journal of Physical Education; e-3214
Journal of Physical Education; v. 32 n. 1 (2021): Journal of Physical Education; e-3214
2448-2455
reponame:Journal of Physical Education (Maringá)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Journal of Physical Education (Maringá)
collection Journal of Physical Education (Maringá)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of Physical Education (Maringá) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revdef@uem.br
_version_ 1754732546231369728