To get – is it the equivalent to Brazilian Portuguese’s “coisar”?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Traços de Linguagem |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unemat.br/index.php/tracos/article/view/6574 |
Resumo: | This article is part of the theoretical model called Theory of Predicative and Enunciative Operations (TOPE), proposed by the French linguist Antoine Culioli (1990). Our goal is to analyze, under Culioli's perspective, the use of the get, one of the most complex verbs in the English language due to its extraordinary polysemy. This feature seriously confuses students and non-native speakers and they often cannot identify the meaning of this verb, as we could empirically observe in our classes and also in consultations with online doubt sites. Based on the Culiolian concepts of notion and notional domain (1985), we also seek to establish a dialogue between the enunciation and the teaching of structures, fields considered antagonistic, in order to find an alternative to teaching guided by mechanistic practices, which we identify as predominant in our schools. To support this discussion, we will use instances of get extracted from a broad variety of sources like the dictionaries Cambridge, Longman and McMillan, lines from songs, film dialogues, our dissertation and examples of our own creation. |
id |
UEMT-1_50043c9a7ee72a588dd2c5b93b8ff473 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/6574 |
network_acronym_str |
UEMT-1 |
network_name_str |
Traços de Linguagem |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
To get – is it the equivalent to Brazilian Portuguese’s “coisar”?To get – O verbo “coisar” da língua inglesa? A enunciação respondeGetTheory of Enunciative and Predicatice OperationsNotionNotional DomainForeign Language TeachingGetTeoria das Operações Predicativas e EnunciativasNoçãoDomínio NocionalEnsino de Língua EstrangeiraThis article is part of the theoretical model called Theory of Predicative and Enunciative Operations (TOPE), proposed by the French linguist Antoine Culioli (1990). Our goal is to analyze, under Culioli's perspective, the use of the get, one of the most complex verbs in the English language due to its extraordinary polysemy. This feature seriously confuses students and non-native speakers and they often cannot identify the meaning of this verb, as we could empirically observe in our classes and also in consultations with online doubt sites. Based on the Culiolian concepts of notion and notional domain (1985), we also seek to establish a dialogue between the enunciation and the teaching of structures, fields considered antagonistic, in order to find an alternative to teaching guided by mechanistic practices, which we identify as predominant in our schools. To support this discussion, we will use instances of get extracted from a broad variety of sources like the dictionaries Cambridge, Longman and McMillan, lines from songs, film dialogues, our dissertation and examples of our own creation.Este artigo se insere no modelo teórico denominado Teoria das Operações Predicativas e Enunciativas (TOPE), proposto pelo linguista francês Antoine Culioli (1990). Nossa meta é analisar, sob a ótica culioliana, o uso da marca get, um dos verbos mais complexos da língua inglesa devido a sua extraordinária polissemia. Esta característica confunde seriamente alunos e falantes não nativos e eles frequentemente não conseguem entender o sentido deste verbo, conforme pudemos observar, empiricamente, em nossas aulas e em consultas a sites de dúvidas online. Baseados nos conceitos de noção e domínio nocional (CULIOLI, 1985), buscamos também estabelecer um diálogo entre a enunciação e o ensino de estruturas, campos considerados antagônicos, a fim de encontrarmos uma alternativa para o ensino pautado por práticas mecanicistas, o qual identificamos como predominante em nossas escolas. Para apoiar esta discussão, usaremos ocorrências de get extraídas de fontes variadas como os dicionários Cambridge, Longman e MacMillan, letras de canções, diálogos de filmes, nossa dissertação de mestrado e, ainda, exemplos de nossa própria autoria.Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso2022-10-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unemat.br/index.php/tracos/article/view/6574Traços de Linguagem - Revista de Estudos Linguísticos; v. 5 n. 2 (2021): A atividade de linguagem e sua articulação com as línguas naturais2594-9063reponame:Traços de Linguageminstname:Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso (UNEMAT)instacron:UEMTporhttps://periodicos.unemat.br/index.php/tracos/article/view/6574/4837Copyright (c) 2022 Traços de Linguagem - Revista de Estudos Linguísticoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFrança, João Daniel Passarelli2023-06-25T00:09:43Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/6574Revistahttps://periodicos.unemat.br/index.php/tracos/PUBhttps://periodicos.unemat.br/index.php/tracos/oairevista.tracos@unemat.br2594-90632594-9063opendoar:2023-06-25T00:09:43Traços de Linguagem - Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso (UNEMAT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
To get – is it the equivalent to Brazilian Portuguese’s “coisar”? To get – O verbo “coisar” da língua inglesa? A enunciação responde |
title |
To get – is it the equivalent to Brazilian Portuguese’s “coisar”? |
spellingShingle |
To get – is it the equivalent to Brazilian Portuguese’s “coisar”? França, João Daniel Passarelli Get Theory of Enunciative and Predicatice Operations Notion Notional Domain Foreign Language Teaching Get Teoria das Operações Predicativas e Enunciativas Noção Domínio Nocional Ensino de Língua Estrangeira |
title_short |
To get – is it the equivalent to Brazilian Portuguese’s “coisar”? |
title_full |
To get – is it the equivalent to Brazilian Portuguese’s “coisar”? |
title_fullStr |
To get – is it the equivalent to Brazilian Portuguese’s “coisar”? |
title_full_unstemmed |
To get – is it the equivalent to Brazilian Portuguese’s “coisar”? |
title_sort |
To get – is it the equivalent to Brazilian Portuguese’s “coisar”? |
author |
França, João Daniel Passarelli |
author_facet |
França, João Daniel Passarelli |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
França, João Daniel Passarelli |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Get Theory of Enunciative and Predicatice Operations Notion Notional Domain Foreign Language Teaching Get Teoria das Operações Predicativas e Enunciativas Noção Domínio Nocional Ensino de Língua Estrangeira |
topic |
Get Theory of Enunciative and Predicatice Operations Notion Notional Domain Foreign Language Teaching Get Teoria das Operações Predicativas e Enunciativas Noção Domínio Nocional Ensino de Língua Estrangeira |
description |
This article is part of the theoretical model called Theory of Predicative and Enunciative Operations (TOPE), proposed by the French linguist Antoine Culioli (1990). Our goal is to analyze, under Culioli's perspective, the use of the get, one of the most complex verbs in the English language due to its extraordinary polysemy. This feature seriously confuses students and non-native speakers and they often cannot identify the meaning of this verb, as we could empirically observe in our classes and also in consultations with online doubt sites. Based on the Culiolian concepts of notion and notional domain (1985), we also seek to establish a dialogue between the enunciation and the teaching of structures, fields considered antagonistic, in order to find an alternative to teaching guided by mechanistic practices, which we identify as predominant in our schools. To support this discussion, we will use instances of get extracted from a broad variety of sources like the dictionaries Cambridge, Longman and McMillan, lines from songs, film dialogues, our dissertation and examples of our own creation. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-10-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unemat.br/index.php/tracos/article/view/6574 |
url |
https://periodicos.unemat.br/index.php/tracos/article/view/6574 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unemat.br/index.php/tracos/article/view/6574/4837 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Traços de Linguagem - Revista de Estudos Linguísticos https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Traços de Linguagem - Revista de Estudos Linguísticos https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Traços de Linguagem - Revista de Estudos Linguísticos; v. 5 n. 2 (2021): A atividade de linguagem e sua articulação com as línguas naturais 2594-9063 reponame:Traços de Linguagem instname:Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso (UNEMAT) instacron:UEMT |
instname_str |
Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso (UNEMAT) |
instacron_str |
UEMT |
institution |
UEMT |
reponame_str |
Traços de Linguagem |
collection |
Traços de Linguagem |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Traços de Linguagem - Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso (UNEMAT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista.tracos@unemat.br |
_version_ |
1808848016309747712 |