Ethos and its apparent sincerity: the argumentative constitution of political discourse in presidential debates
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Traços de Linguagem |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unemat.br/index.php/tracos/article/view/11217 |
Resumo: | The objective of this work is to analyze the enunciative marks materialized in the political discourse, examining how the Subject of enunciation validates its ethos through argumentative strategies. For the development of the analysis, notions such as: subject, ethos, discourse and argumentation were explored. The theoretical budgets were based on Benveniste (2005; 2006) referring to the theory of enunciation; Ducrot (1987) about discursive laws; Orlandi (2009) does not touch the notion of subject and discourse; Maingueneau (2015) in the constitution of ethos. As for the methodology, in this work sixteen discursive sequences (SDs) from two televised political debates were followed, in which we sought to apply the mentioned theories. The results obtained allowed, through clutches, to glimpse the position of the enunciation subject within the analyzed discourse, how he constitutes and reconstitutes his ethos in order to validate his utterances. In addition, the argumentative strategies that the enunciation subjects used to show a sincere ethos were explained. |
id |
UEMT-1_74a49741754a06f458e80434e496106f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11217 |
network_acronym_str |
UEMT-1 |
network_name_str |
Traços de Linguagem |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Ethos and its apparent sincerity: the argumentative constitution of political discourse in presidential debatesO ethos e sua aparente sinceridade: a constituição argumentativa do discurso político em debate presidencialSujeito de enunciaçãoEthosDiscursoSubject of enunciationEthosDiscourseThe objective of this work is to analyze the enunciative marks materialized in the political discourse, examining how the Subject of enunciation validates its ethos through argumentative strategies. For the development of the analysis, notions such as: subject, ethos, discourse and argumentation were explored. The theoretical budgets were based on Benveniste (2005; 2006) referring to the theory of enunciation; Ducrot (1987) about discursive laws; Orlandi (2009) does not touch the notion of subject and discourse; Maingueneau (2015) in the constitution of ethos. As for the methodology, in this work sixteen discursive sequences (SDs) from two televised political debates were followed, in which we sought to apply the mentioned theories. The results obtained allowed, through clutches, to glimpse the position of the enunciation subject within the analyzed discourse, how he constitutes and reconstitutes his ethos in order to validate his utterances. In addition, the argumentative strategies that the enunciation subjects used to show a sincere ethos were explained.O objetivo deste trabalho é analisar as marcas enunciativas materializadas no discurso político, examinando como o Sujeito de enunciação valida seu ethos através de estratégias argumentativas. Para desenvolvimento da análise, foram exploradas noções como: sujeito, ethos, discurso e argumentação. Os pressupostos teóricos foram fundamentados em Benveniste (2005; 2006) referente a teoria da enunciação; Ducrot (1987) a cerca das leis discursivas; Orlandi (2009) no tocante a noção de sujeito e discurso; Maingueneau (2015) na constituição do ethos. Quanto à metodologia, neste trabalho foram analisadas dezesseis sequências discursivas (SDs) oriundas de dois debates políticos televisionados, em que se buscou aplicar as teorias mencionadas. Os resultados obtidos permitiram através de embreagens, vislumbrar a posição do sujeito de enunciação dentro do discurso analisado, como ele constitui e reconstitui seu ethos afim de validar seus enunciados. Além disso foram explicadas as estratégias argumentativas que os sujeitos de enunciação utilizaram para mostrarem um ethos sincero.Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso2022-11-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unemat.br/index.php/tracos/article/view/11217Traços de Linguagem - Revista de Estudos Linguísticos; v. 6 n. 2 (2022)2594-9063reponame:Traços de Linguageminstname:Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso (UNEMAT)instacron:UEMTporhttps://periodicos.unemat.br/index.php/tracos/article/view/11217/7968Copyright (c) 2023 José Magno de Sousa Vieirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVieira, José Magno de Sousa2024-06-07T16:41:16Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11217Revistahttps://periodicos.unemat.br/index.php/tracos/PUBhttps://periodicos.unemat.br/index.php/tracos/oairevista.tracos@unemat.br2594-90632594-9063opendoar:2024-06-07T16:41:16Traços de Linguagem - Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso (UNEMAT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ethos and its apparent sincerity: the argumentative constitution of political discourse in presidential debates O ethos e sua aparente sinceridade: a constituição argumentativa do discurso político em debate presidencial |
title |
Ethos and its apparent sincerity: the argumentative constitution of political discourse in presidential debates |
spellingShingle |
Ethos and its apparent sincerity: the argumentative constitution of political discourse in presidential debates Vieira, José Magno de Sousa Sujeito de enunciação Ethos Discurso Subject of enunciation Ethos Discourse |
title_short |
Ethos and its apparent sincerity: the argumentative constitution of political discourse in presidential debates |
title_full |
Ethos and its apparent sincerity: the argumentative constitution of political discourse in presidential debates |
title_fullStr |
Ethos and its apparent sincerity: the argumentative constitution of political discourse in presidential debates |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ethos and its apparent sincerity: the argumentative constitution of political discourse in presidential debates |
title_sort |
Ethos and its apparent sincerity: the argumentative constitution of political discourse in presidential debates |
author |
Vieira, José Magno de Sousa |
author_facet |
Vieira, José Magno de Sousa |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vieira, José Magno de Sousa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sujeito de enunciação Ethos Discurso Subject of enunciation Ethos Discourse |
topic |
Sujeito de enunciação Ethos Discurso Subject of enunciation Ethos Discourse |
description |
The objective of this work is to analyze the enunciative marks materialized in the political discourse, examining how the Subject of enunciation validates its ethos through argumentative strategies. For the development of the analysis, notions such as: subject, ethos, discourse and argumentation were explored. The theoretical budgets were based on Benveniste (2005; 2006) referring to the theory of enunciation; Ducrot (1987) about discursive laws; Orlandi (2009) does not touch the notion of subject and discourse; Maingueneau (2015) in the constitution of ethos. As for the methodology, in this work sixteen discursive sequences (SDs) from two televised political debates were followed, in which we sought to apply the mentioned theories. The results obtained allowed, through clutches, to glimpse the position of the enunciation subject within the analyzed discourse, how he constitutes and reconstitutes his ethos in order to validate his utterances. In addition, the argumentative strategies that the enunciation subjects used to show a sincere ethos were explained. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-11-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unemat.br/index.php/tracos/article/view/11217 |
url |
https://periodicos.unemat.br/index.php/tracos/article/view/11217 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unemat.br/index.php/tracos/article/view/11217/7968 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 José Magno de Sousa Vieira https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 José Magno de Sousa Vieira https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Traços de Linguagem - Revista de Estudos Linguísticos; v. 6 n. 2 (2022) 2594-9063 reponame:Traços de Linguagem instname:Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso (UNEMAT) instacron:UEMT |
instname_str |
Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso (UNEMAT) |
instacron_str |
UEMT |
institution |
UEMT |
reponame_str |
Traços de Linguagem |
collection |
Traços de Linguagem |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Traços de Linguagem - Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso (UNEMAT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista.tracos@unemat.br |
_version_ |
1808848016473325568 |