Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release From Two Different Glass Ionomer Cement and a Novel Alkasite Restorative Material – An in Vitro Study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/1066 |
Resumo: | Objective: To compare the fluoride release from Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC), Resin Modified GIC (RMGIC), and Cention N Alkasite Material. Material and Methods: Forty- five disc-shaped specimens of three different restorative materials (Conventional GIC, RMGIC, and Alkasite material) were made and divided into 3 groups (n=15). Fluoride release was evaluated at the end of Day 1, 7, 14, and Day 28 using fluoride ion-selective electrode. Intergroup and Intra-group analysis was done using One-way ANOVA with a Post-hoc test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Cention showed more fluoride release (in parts per million) than GIC and RMGIC at increased time duration. However, at the end of day 1, there was lesser fluoride release with Cention, as compared with the other groups. Conclusion: The new Alkasite restorative material showed promising results in terms of fluoride release and is better than GIC and RMGIC at increased time duration. |
id |
UEPB-4_a0531665b03cf1f9161e192d4a8737f9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1066 |
network_acronym_str |
UEPB-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release From Two Different Glass Ionomer Cement and a Novel Alkasite Restorative Material – An in Vitro StudyDental MaterialsGlass Ionomer CementsFluoridesObjective: To compare the fluoride release from Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC), Resin Modified GIC (RMGIC), and Cention N Alkasite Material. Material and Methods: Forty- five disc-shaped specimens of three different restorative materials (Conventional GIC, RMGIC, and Alkasite material) were made and divided into 3 groups (n=15). Fluoride release was evaluated at the end of Day 1, 7, 14, and Day 28 using fluoride ion-selective electrode. Intergroup and Intra-group analysis was done using One-way ANOVA with a Post-hoc test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Cention showed more fluoride release (in parts per million) than GIC and RMGIC at increased time duration. However, at the end of day 1, there was lesser fluoride release with Cention, as compared with the other groups. Conclusion: The new Alkasite restorative material showed promising results in terms of fluoride release and is better than GIC and RMGIC at increased time duration.EDUEPB - EDITORA DA UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DA PARAÍBA2022-03-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/1066Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada; Vol. 20 (2020); e5209 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada; v. 20 (2020); e5209 1983-46321519-0501reponame:Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)instacron:UEPBenghttps://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/1066/784Copyright (c) 2022 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integradahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSingh, Harpreet Rashmi, Shashi Pai, Swathi Kini, Sandya 2022-03-17T12:05:50Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1066Revistahttps://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/PUBhttps://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/oaipboci.editoria@gmail.com || alessandrouepb@gmail.com1983-46321519-0501opendoar:2022-03-17T12:05:50Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) - Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release From Two Different Glass Ionomer Cement and a Novel Alkasite Restorative Material – An in Vitro Study |
title |
Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release From Two Different Glass Ionomer Cement and a Novel Alkasite Restorative Material – An in Vitro Study |
spellingShingle |
Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release From Two Different Glass Ionomer Cement and a Novel Alkasite Restorative Material – An in Vitro Study Singh, Harpreet Dental Materials Glass Ionomer Cements Fluorides |
title_short |
Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release From Two Different Glass Ionomer Cement and a Novel Alkasite Restorative Material – An in Vitro Study |
title_full |
Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release From Two Different Glass Ionomer Cement and a Novel Alkasite Restorative Material – An in Vitro Study |
title_fullStr |
Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release From Two Different Glass Ionomer Cement and a Novel Alkasite Restorative Material – An in Vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release From Two Different Glass Ionomer Cement and a Novel Alkasite Restorative Material – An in Vitro Study |
title_sort |
Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release From Two Different Glass Ionomer Cement and a Novel Alkasite Restorative Material – An in Vitro Study |
author |
Singh, Harpreet |
author_facet |
Singh, Harpreet Rashmi, Shashi Pai, Swathi Kini, Sandya |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rashmi, Shashi Pai, Swathi Kini, Sandya |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Singh, Harpreet Rashmi, Shashi Pai, Swathi Kini, Sandya |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dental Materials Glass Ionomer Cements Fluorides |
topic |
Dental Materials Glass Ionomer Cements Fluorides |
description |
Objective: To compare the fluoride release from Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC), Resin Modified GIC (RMGIC), and Cention N Alkasite Material. Material and Methods: Forty- five disc-shaped specimens of three different restorative materials (Conventional GIC, RMGIC, and Alkasite material) were made and divided into 3 groups (n=15). Fluoride release was evaluated at the end of Day 1, 7, 14, and Day 28 using fluoride ion-selective electrode. Intergroup and Intra-group analysis was done using One-way ANOVA with a Post-hoc test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Cention showed more fluoride release (in parts per million) than GIC and RMGIC at increased time duration. However, at the end of day 1, there was lesser fluoride release with Cention, as compared with the other groups. Conclusion: The new Alkasite restorative material showed promising results in terms of fluoride release and is better than GIC and RMGIC at increased time duration. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/1066 |
url |
https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/1066 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/1066/784 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUEPB - EDITORA DA UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DA PARAÍBA |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUEPB - EDITORA DA UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DA PARAÍBA |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada; Vol. 20 (2020); e5209 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada; v. 20 (2020); e5209 1983-4632 1519-0501 reponame:Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB) instacron:UEPB |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB) |
instacron_str |
UEPB |
institution |
UEPB |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) - Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pboci.editoria@gmail.com || alessandrouepb@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387863304241152 |