Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release From Two Different Glass Ionomer Cement and a Novel Alkasite Restorative Material – An in Vitro Study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Singh, Harpreet
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Rashmi, Shashi, Pai, Swathi, Kini, Sandya
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/1066
Resumo: Objective: To compare the fluoride release from Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC),  Resin Modified GIC (RMGIC), and Cention N Alkasite Material. Material and Methods: Forty- five disc-shaped specimens of three different restorative materials (Conventional GIC, RMGIC, and Alkasite material) were made and divided into 3 groups (n=15). Fluoride release was evaluated at the end of Day 1, 7, 14, and Day 28 using fluoride ion-selective electrode. Intergroup and Intra-group analysis was done using One-way ANOVA with a Post-hoc test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Cention showed more fluoride release (in parts per million) than GIC and RMGIC at increased time duration. However, at the end of day 1, there was lesser fluoride release with Cention, as compared with the other groups. Conclusion: The new Alkasite restorative material showed promising results in terms of fluoride release and is better than GIC and RMGIC at increased time duration.
id UEPB-4_a0531665b03cf1f9161e192d4a8737f9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1066
network_acronym_str UEPB-4
network_name_str Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release From Two Different Glass Ionomer Cement and a Novel Alkasite Restorative Material – An in Vitro StudyDental MaterialsGlass Ionomer CementsFluoridesObjective: To compare the fluoride release from Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC),  Resin Modified GIC (RMGIC), and Cention N Alkasite Material. Material and Methods: Forty- five disc-shaped specimens of three different restorative materials (Conventional GIC, RMGIC, and Alkasite material) were made and divided into 3 groups (n=15). Fluoride release was evaluated at the end of Day 1, 7, 14, and Day 28 using fluoride ion-selective electrode. Intergroup and Intra-group analysis was done using One-way ANOVA with a Post-hoc test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Cention showed more fluoride release (in parts per million) than GIC and RMGIC at increased time duration. However, at the end of day 1, there was lesser fluoride release with Cention, as compared with the other groups. Conclusion: The new Alkasite restorative material showed promising results in terms of fluoride release and is better than GIC and RMGIC at increased time duration.EDUEPB - EDITORA DA UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DA PARAÍBA2022-03-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/1066Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada; Vol. 20 (2020); e5209 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada; v. 20 (2020); e5209 1983-46321519-0501reponame:Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)instacron:UEPBenghttps://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/1066/784Copyright (c) 2022 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integradahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSingh, Harpreet Rashmi, Shashi Pai, Swathi Kini, Sandya 2022-03-17T12:05:50Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1066Revistahttps://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/PUBhttps://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/oaipboci.editoria@gmail.com || alessandrouepb@gmail.com1983-46321519-0501opendoar:2022-03-17T12:05:50Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) - Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release From Two Different Glass Ionomer Cement and a Novel Alkasite Restorative Material – An in Vitro Study
title Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release From Two Different Glass Ionomer Cement and a Novel Alkasite Restorative Material – An in Vitro Study
spellingShingle Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release From Two Different Glass Ionomer Cement and a Novel Alkasite Restorative Material – An in Vitro Study
Singh, Harpreet
Dental Materials
Glass Ionomer Cements
Fluorides
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release From Two Different Glass Ionomer Cement and a Novel Alkasite Restorative Material – An in Vitro Study
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release From Two Different Glass Ionomer Cement and a Novel Alkasite Restorative Material – An in Vitro Study
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release From Two Different Glass Ionomer Cement and a Novel Alkasite Restorative Material – An in Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release From Two Different Glass Ionomer Cement and a Novel Alkasite Restorative Material – An in Vitro Study
title_sort Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release From Two Different Glass Ionomer Cement and a Novel Alkasite Restorative Material – An in Vitro Study
author Singh, Harpreet
author_facet Singh, Harpreet
Rashmi, Shashi
Pai, Swathi
Kini, Sandya
author_role author
author2 Rashmi, Shashi
Pai, Swathi
Kini, Sandya
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Singh, Harpreet
Rashmi, Shashi
Pai, Swathi
Kini, Sandya
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dental Materials
Glass Ionomer Cements
Fluorides
topic Dental Materials
Glass Ionomer Cements
Fluorides
description Objective: To compare the fluoride release from Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC),  Resin Modified GIC (RMGIC), and Cention N Alkasite Material. Material and Methods: Forty- five disc-shaped specimens of three different restorative materials (Conventional GIC, RMGIC, and Alkasite material) were made and divided into 3 groups (n=15). Fluoride release was evaluated at the end of Day 1, 7, 14, and Day 28 using fluoride ion-selective electrode. Intergroup and Intra-group analysis was done using One-way ANOVA with a Post-hoc test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Cention showed more fluoride release (in parts per million) than GIC and RMGIC at increased time duration. However, at the end of day 1, there was lesser fluoride release with Cention, as compared with the other groups. Conclusion: The new Alkasite restorative material showed promising results in terms of fluoride release and is better than GIC and RMGIC at increased time duration.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-03-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/1066
url https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/1066
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/1066/784
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUEPB - EDITORA DA UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DA PARAÍBA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUEPB - EDITORA DA UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DA PARAÍBA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada; Vol. 20 (2020); e5209
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada; v. 20 (2020); e5209
1983-4632
1519-0501
reponame:Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)
instacron:UEPB
instname_str Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)
instacron_str UEPB
institution UEPB
reponame_str Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online)
collection Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) - Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pboci.editoria@gmail.com || alessandrouepb@gmail.com
_version_ 1803387863304241152