Evaluation of Higher Education in Brazil: discourses, practices and disputes
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Práxis Educativa (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/9905 |
Resumo: | This text analyzes the field of Higher Education, taking as the subject-object of investigation the evaluation policies, the positioning and the engagement of certain subjects in the formulation and implementation of the evaluation policies of Higher Education, which implies exploring relevant dimensions of the dispute and the structuring of the field of Higher Education in Brazil. The analysis explored documents and publications, as well as movements and positioning of the subjects in the field and in the state sphere. It is argued that the evaluation policies of Higher Education have been permeated by disputes expressed through the positioning of groups that are situated in the field and in the State apparatus - MEC, CONAES, INEP - that have been disputing the field since 1990. Two positions predominate in the field, the discourse and the model of contextual-participatory evaluation and the rational-objectivist. The scenario outlined in recent years allows to observe that the introduction of indexes by state agencies has promoted a turning point in the evaluation policy conduct, realigning it to a rational-objectivist perspective. Keywords: Higher Education. Evaluation policies. Field of Higher Education. Brazil. |
id |
UEPG-26_549b9b87c2830fff02c964dfe46d346f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:uepg.br:article/9905 |
network_acronym_str |
UEPG-26 |
network_name_str |
Práxis Educativa (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of Higher Education in Brazil: discourses, practices and disputesEvaluación de la Educación Superior en Brasil: discursos, prácticas y disputasAvaliação da Educação Superior no Brasil: discursos, práticas e disputasThis text analyzes the field of Higher Education, taking as the subject-object of investigation the evaluation policies, the positioning and the engagement of certain subjects in the formulation and implementation of the evaluation policies of Higher Education, which implies exploring relevant dimensions of the dispute and the structuring of the field of Higher Education in Brazil. The analysis explored documents and publications, as well as movements and positioning of the subjects in the field and in the state sphere. It is argued that the evaluation policies of Higher Education have been permeated by disputes expressed through the positioning of groups that are situated in the field and in the State apparatus - MEC, CONAES, INEP - that have been disputing the field since 1990. Two positions predominate in the field, the discourse and the model of contextual-participatory evaluation and the rational-objectivist. The scenario outlined in recent years allows to observe that the introduction of indexes by state agencies has promoted a turning point in the evaluation policy conduct, realigning it to a rational-objectivist perspective. Keywords: Higher Education. Evaluation policies. Field of Higher Education. Brazil.En este texto se analiza el campo de la Educación Superior, tomando como sujeto-objeto de investigación a las políticas de evaluación, el posicionamiento y el compromiso de determinados sujetos en la formulación y en la implementación de las políticas de evaluación de la Educación Superior, lo que implica explorar facetas relevantes de la disputa y de la estructuración del campo de la Educación Superior en Brasil. El análisis exploró documentos y publicaciones, así como movimientos y posicionamientos de los sujetos en el campo y en la esfera estatal. Se argumenta que las políticas de evaluación de la Educación Superior han sido permeadas por disputas expresas por medio del posicionamiento de grupos que se sitúan en el campo y en el aparato de Estado - MEC, CONAES, INEP - que disputan el campo desde 1990. Dos posicionamientos predominan en el campo, el discurso y el modelo de evaluación contextual-participativa y el racional-objetivista. El escenario delineado en los últimos años permite observar que la introducción de índices por parte de las agencias estatales promovió una viradana conducción de la política de evaluación, realizándola a la perspectiva racional-objetivista. Palabras clave: Educación Superior. Políticas de evaluación. Campo de la Educación Superior.Este texto analisa o campo da Educação Superior, tomando como sujeito-objeto de investigação as políticas de avaliação, o posicionamento e o engajamento de determinados sujeitos na formulação e na implementação das políticas de avaliação da Educação Superior, o que implica explorar facetas relevantes da disputa e da estruturação do campo da Educação Superior no Brasil. A análise explorou documentos e publicações, assim como movimentações e posicionamentos dos sujeitos no campo e na esfera estatal. Argumenta-se que as políticas de avaliação da Educação Superior têm sido permeadas por disputas expressas por meio do posicionamento de grupos que se situam no campo e no aparelho de Estado – MEC, CONAES, INEP – que disputam o campo desde 1990. Dois posicionamentos predominam no campo, o discurso e o modelo de avaliação contextual-participativo e o racional-objetivista. O cenário delineado nos últimos anos permite observar que a introdução de índices por parte das agências estatais promoveu uma virada na condução da política de avaliação, realinhando-a à perspectiva racional-objetivista. Palavras-chave: Educação Superior. Políticas de avaliação. Campo da Educação Superior. Brasil.Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa2017-08-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/990510.5212/PraxEduc.v.12i3.012Práxis Educativa; Vol. 12 No. 3 (2017); 909-928Práxis Educativa; Vol. 12 Núm. 3 (2017); 909-928Práxis Educativa; V. 12 N. 3 (2017); 909-928Práxis Educativa; v. 12 n. 3 (2017); 909-9281809-43091809-403110.5212/PraxEduc.v.12i3reponame:Práxis Educativa (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG)instacron:UEPGporhttps://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/9905/5900https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/9905/209209213059Copyright (c) 2017 Práxis Educativainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMacedo Gomes, AlfredoLeão da Silva, AssisBorba de Arruda, Ana Lúcia2020-04-14T19:23:31Zoai:uepg.br:article/9905Revistahttp://www.revistas2.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativaPUBhttps://revistas2.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/oaipraxiseducativa@uepg.br||praxiseducativa@uepg.br1809-43091809-4031opendoar:2020-04-14T19:23:31Práxis Educativa (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of Higher Education in Brazil: discourses, practices and disputes Evaluación de la Educación Superior en Brasil: discursos, prácticas y disputas Avaliação da Educação Superior no Brasil: discursos, práticas e disputas |
title |
Evaluation of Higher Education in Brazil: discourses, practices and disputes |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of Higher Education in Brazil: discourses, practices and disputes Macedo Gomes, Alfredo |
title_short |
Evaluation of Higher Education in Brazil: discourses, practices and disputes |
title_full |
Evaluation of Higher Education in Brazil: discourses, practices and disputes |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of Higher Education in Brazil: discourses, practices and disputes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of Higher Education in Brazil: discourses, practices and disputes |
title_sort |
Evaluation of Higher Education in Brazil: discourses, practices and disputes |
author |
Macedo Gomes, Alfredo |
author_facet |
Macedo Gomes, Alfredo Leão da Silva, Assis Borba de Arruda, Ana Lúcia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Leão da Silva, Assis Borba de Arruda, Ana Lúcia |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Macedo Gomes, Alfredo Leão da Silva, Assis Borba de Arruda, Ana Lúcia |
description |
This text analyzes the field of Higher Education, taking as the subject-object of investigation the evaluation policies, the positioning and the engagement of certain subjects in the formulation and implementation of the evaluation policies of Higher Education, which implies exploring relevant dimensions of the dispute and the structuring of the field of Higher Education in Brazil. The analysis explored documents and publications, as well as movements and positioning of the subjects in the field and in the state sphere. It is argued that the evaluation policies of Higher Education have been permeated by disputes expressed through the positioning of groups that are situated in the field and in the State apparatus - MEC, CONAES, INEP - that have been disputing the field since 1990. Two positions predominate in the field, the discourse and the model of contextual-participatory evaluation and the rational-objectivist. The scenario outlined in recent years allows to observe that the introduction of indexes by state agencies has promoted a turning point in the evaluation policy conduct, realigning it to a rational-objectivist perspective. Keywords: Higher Education. Evaluation policies. Field of Higher Education. Brazil. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-08-09 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/9905 10.5212/PraxEduc.v.12i3.012 |
url |
https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/9905 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5212/PraxEduc.v.12i3.012 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/9905/5900 https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/9905/209209213059 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Práxis Educativa info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Práxis Educativa |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Práxis Educativa; Vol. 12 No. 3 (2017); 909-928 Práxis Educativa; Vol. 12 Núm. 3 (2017); 909-928 Práxis Educativa; V. 12 N. 3 (2017); 909-928 Práxis Educativa; v. 12 n. 3 (2017); 909-928 1809-4309 1809-4031 10.5212/PraxEduc.v.12i3 reponame:Práxis Educativa (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG) instacron:UEPG |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG) |
instacron_str |
UEPG |
institution |
UEPG |
reponame_str |
Práxis Educativa (Online) |
collection |
Práxis Educativa (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Práxis Educativa (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
praxiseducativa@uepg.br||praxiseducativa@uepg.br |
_version_ |
1799317612577947648 |