Research Ethics in Humanities and Social Sciences: between the norm and its application
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Práxis Educativa (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/21203 |
Resumo: | In this article, it is discussed the importance of identifying and respecting the ethical specificities of research in Human and Social Sciences, in order to point out the relevance of the ethical education for the researcher and the adequate guidelines for these investigations. It is identified that the National Commission for Research Ethics (CONEP) continues with the positivist hegemony, represented by the vast biomedical majority, which results in contradictory guidelines on the use of the Resolution no. 510/2016, in terms of the composition of Research Ethics Committees and the ethical appreciation of research projects. From the experience as a member of CONEP, the publicly available material is analyzed, produced by CONEP and several contradictory guidelines with the Resolution no. 510/2016 are identified. It is important to defend it in its text and work towards an ethical review system in which there is the appreciation of the contextualized experience, with the objective of revealing the “top to bottom” logic and overcoming the hegemony that a single definition of research and of ethics “serves” for all areas. Keywords: Ethics. Humanities and Social Sciences. National Commission for Research Ethics (CONEP). |
id |
UEPG-26_87f3190232800869525ae909799a3e0e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:uepg.br:article/21203 |
network_acronym_str |
UEPG-26 |
network_name_str |
Práxis Educativa (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Research Ethics in Humanities and Social Sciences: between the norm and its applicationLa ética en las investigaciones en Ciencias Humanas y Sociales: entre la norma y su aplicaciónÉtica nas pesquisas em Ciências Humanas e Sociais: entre a norma e sua aplicaçãoIn this article, it is discussed the importance of identifying and respecting the ethical specificities of research in Human and Social Sciences, in order to point out the relevance of the ethical education for the researcher and the adequate guidelines for these investigations. It is identified that the National Commission for Research Ethics (CONEP) continues with the positivist hegemony, represented by the vast biomedical majority, which results in contradictory guidelines on the use of the Resolution no. 510/2016, in terms of the composition of Research Ethics Committees and the ethical appreciation of research projects. From the experience as a member of CONEP, the publicly available material is analyzed, produced by CONEP and several contradictory guidelines with the Resolution no. 510/2016 are identified. It is important to defend it in its text and work towards an ethical review system in which there is the appreciation of the contextualized experience, with the objective of revealing the “top to bottom” logic and overcoming the hegemony that a single definition of research and of ethics “serves” for all areas. Keywords: Ethics. Humanities and Social Sciences. National Commission for Research Ethics (CONEP).En este artículo se discute la importancia de identificar y respetar las especificidades éticas de las investigaciones en Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, con la intención de señalar la relevancia de la formación ética del investigador y de normas adecuadas para estas investigaciones. Se identifica que la Comisión Nacional de Ética de Investigación (CONEP) continúa con la hegemonía positivista, representada por la amplia mayoría biomédica, lo que resulta en orientaciones contradictorias sobre la utilización de la Resolución No 510/2016, en cuanto a la composición de los Comités de Ética en Investigación y de la evaluación ética de los proyectos de investigación. A partir de la vivencia como miembro de la CONEP, se analiza el material disponible públicamente producido por la CONEP y se identifican varias orientaciones contradictorias con la Resolución No 510/2016. Es importante defenderla en su texto y trabajar hacia un sistema de revisión ética en que haya valorización de la experiencia contextualizada, con el objetivo de invertir la lógica “de arriba hacia abajo” y superar la hegemonía de que una única definición de investigación y de ética “sirve” para todas las áreas. Palabras clave: Ética. Ciencias Humanas y Sociales. Comisión Nacional de Ética en Investigación (CONEP).Neste artigo, discute-se a importância de identificar e de respeitar as especificidades éticas das pesquisas em Ciências Humanas e Sociais, no intuito de apontar a relevância da formação ética do pesquisador e de normas adequadas para essas pesquisas. Identifica-se que a Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa (Conep) continua com a hegemonia positivista, representada pela ampla maioria biomédica, o que resulta em orientações contraditórias sobre a utilização da Resolução No 510/2016, em termos de composição dos Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa e da apreciação ética dos projetos de pesquisa. A partir da vivência como membro da Conep, analisa-se o material publicamente disponível, produzido pela Conep, e identificam-se várias orientações contraditórias com a Resolução No 510/2016. É importante defendê-la em seu texto e trabalhar para um sistema de revisão ética em que haja a valorização da experiência contextualizada, com o objetivo de inverter a lógica “de cima para baixo” e superar a hegemonia de que uma única definição de pesquisa e de ética “serve” para todas as áreas. Palavras-chave: Ética. Ciências Humanas e Sociais. Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa (Conep).Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa2023-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/2120310.5212/PraxEduc.v.18.21203.010Práxis Educativa; Vol. 18 (2023): Publicação contínua; 1-18Práxis Educativa; Vol. 18 (2023): Publicação contínua; 1-18Práxis Educativa; V. 18 (2023): Publicação contínua; 1-18Práxis Educativa; v. 18 (2023): Publicação contínua; 1-181809-43091809-4031reponame:Práxis Educativa (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG)instacron:UEPGporhttps://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/21203/209209217108https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/21203/209209217337Copyright (c) 2022 Práxis Educativahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGuerriero , Iara Coelho Zito2024-01-12T15:57:24Zoai:uepg.br:article/21203Revistahttp://www.revistas2.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativaPUBhttps://revistas2.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/oaipraxiseducativa@uepg.br||praxiseducativa@uepg.br1809-43091809-4031opendoar:2024-01-12T15:57:24Práxis Educativa (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Research Ethics in Humanities and Social Sciences: between the norm and its application La ética en las investigaciones en Ciencias Humanas y Sociales: entre la norma y su aplicación Ética nas pesquisas em Ciências Humanas e Sociais: entre a norma e sua aplicação |
title |
Research Ethics in Humanities and Social Sciences: between the norm and its application |
spellingShingle |
Research Ethics in Humanities and Social Sciences: between the norm and its application Guerriero , Iara Coelho Zito |
title_short |
Research Ethics in Humanities and Social Sciences: between the norm and its application |
title_full |
Research Ethics in Humanities and Social Sciences: between the norm and its application |
title_fullStr |
Research Ethics in Humanities and Social Sciences: between the norm and its application |
title_full_unstemmed |
Research Ethics in Humanities and Social Sciences: between the norm and its application |
title_sort |
Research Ethics in Humanities and Social Sciences: between the norm and its application |
author |
Guerriero , Iara Coelho Zito |
author_facet |
Guerriero , Iara Coelho Zito |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Guerriero , Iara Coelho Zito |
description |
In this article, it is discussed the importance of identifying and respecting the ethical specificities of research in Human and Social Sciences, in order to point out the relevance of the ethical education for the researcher and the adequate guidelines for these investigations. It is identified that the National Commission for Research Ethics (CONEP) continues with the positivist hegemony, represented by the vast biomedical majority, which results in contradictory guidelines on the use of the Resolution no. 510/2016, in terms of the composition of Research Ethics Committees and the ethical appreciation of research projects. From the experience as a member of CONEP, the publicly available material is analyzed, produced by CONEP and several contradictory guidelines with the Resolution no. 510/2016 are identified. It is important to defend it in its text and work towards an ethical review system in which there is the appreciation of the contextualized experience, with the objective of revealing the “top to bottom” logic and overcoming the hegemony that a single definition of research and of ethics “serves” for all areas. Keywords: Ethics. Humanities and Social Sciences. National Commission for Research Ethics (CONEP). |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/21203 10.5212/PraxEduc.v.18.21203.010 |
url |
https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/21203 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5212/PraxEduc.v.18.21203.010 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/21203/209209217108 https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/21203/209209217337 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Práxis Educativa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Práxis Educativa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Práxis Educativa; Vol. 18 (2023): Publicação contínua; 1-18 Práxis Educativa; Vol. 18 (2023): Publicação contínua; 1-18 Práxis Educativa; V. 18 (2023): Publicação contínua; 1-18 Práxis Educativa; v. 18 (2023): Publicação contínua; 1-18 1809-4309 1809-4031 reponame:Práxis Educativa (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG) instacron:UEPG |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG) |
instacron_str |
UEPG |
institution |
UEPG |
reponame_str |
Práxis Educativa (Online) |
collection |
Práxis Educativa (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Práxis Educativa (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
praxiseducativa@uepg.br||praxiseducativa@uepg.br |
_version_ |
1799317615865233408 |