National Policy for Technical Assistance and Rural Extension (Pnater): a cycle that ends?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Emancipação (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/emancipacao/article/view/20283 |
Resumo: | Pnater represented an effort to resume a national agenda of rural extension. Due been conceived in a participatory way, Pnater’s scope directs to a clear and consistent counter-hegemonic perspective that the Brazilian State would have to implement. The hypothesis that guides the analyzes and reflections presented in this article is that structural and circumstantial factors of the Brazilian State systematically prevented Pnater from fulfilling its ambitious objectives. Based on the policy cycle framework, this article presents a systematization and reflections on the Pnater cycle based on secondary data. The conclusions point out that the counter-hegemonic innovations proposed by Pnater were gradually being disregarded or placed in the background, culminating with the end of the cycle started in 2004. The article points to the need for a progressive reframing of Pnater intending to gain greater social legitimacy. |
id |
UEPG-30_f17748a774ad9042bfc35abb41910082 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:uepg.br:article/20283 |
network_acronym_str |
UEPG-30 |
network_name_str |
Emancipação (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
National Policy for Technical Assistance and Rural Extension (Pnater): a cycle that ends?Política Nacional de Assistência Técnica e Extensão Rural (Pnater): fim de um ciclo? extensão rural, política pública, agroecologia, implementação, desmantelamentorural extension, public policy, agroecology, implementation, dismantlingPnater represented an effort to resume a national agenda of rural extension. Due been conceived in a participatory way, Pnater’s scope directs to a clear and consistent counter-hegemonic perspective that the Brazilian State would have to implement. The hypothesis that guides the analyzes and reflections presented in this article is that structural and circumstantial factors of the Brazilian State systematically prevented Pnater from fulfilling its ambitious objectives. Based on the policy cycle framework, this article presents a systematization and reflections on the Pnater cycle based on secondary data. The conclusions point out that the counter-hegemonic innovations proposed by Pnater were gradually being disregarded or placed in the background, culminating with the end of the cycle started in 2004. The article points to the need for a progressive reframing of Pnater intending to gain greater social legitimacy.A Pnater representou um esforço do Estado brasileiro em retomar uma agenda nacional de extensão rural. Concebida de forma participativa, seu escopo direciona para uma explícita e consistente perspectiva contra-hegemônica que o Estado brasileiro teria que implementar. A hipótese que norteia as análises e reflexões apresentadas neste artigo é que fatores estruturais e conjunturais do Estado brasileiro sistematicamente impediram que a Pnater cumprisse seus ambiciosos objetivos. A partir do referencial de ciclo de políticas, o artigo apresenta uma sistematização do ciclo da Pnater a partir de dados secundários. Conclui-se que as inovações contra-hegemônicas propostas pela Pnater foram sendo paulatinamente desconsideradas ou colocadas em segundo plano. O artigo aponta para a necessidade de um reenquadramento progressista da Pnater com vistas a galgar maior legitimidade junto à sociedade em geral.Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa2022-11-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/emancipacao/article/view/2028310.5212/Emancipacao.v.22.2220283.002Emancipação; v. 22 n. especial (2022): Dossiê: Reconfigurações e alternativas para as políticas e os processos de Assistência Técnica e Extensão Rural; 1-201982-7814reponame:Emancipação (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG)instacron:UEPGporhttps://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/emancipacao/article/view/20283/209209217024Copyright (c) 2022 Emancipaçãohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBorsatto, Ricardo SerraThomson, Carolina RiosRiga, Helena LelliBergamasco, Sonia Maria Pessoa Pereira 2023-03-22T17:43:34Zoai:uepg.br:article/20283Revistahttps://www.revistas2.uepg.br/index.php/emancipacaoPUBhttps://www.revistas2.uepg.br/index.php/emancipacao/oaiemancipacao@uepg.br||revistaemancipacao@yahoo.com.br1982-78141519-7611opendoar:2023-03-22T17:43:34Emancipação (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
National Policy for Technical Assistance and Rural Extension (Pnater): a cycle that ends? Política Nacional de Assistência Técnica e Extensão Rural (Pnater): fim de um ciclo? |
title |
National Policy for Technical Assistance and Rural Extension (Pnater): a cycle that ends? |
spellingShingle |
National Policy for Technical Assistance and Rural Extension (Pnater): a cycle that ends? Borsatto, Ricardo Serra extensão rural, política pública, agroecologia, implementação, desmantelamento rural extension, public policy, agroecology, implementation, dismantling |
title_short |
National Policy for Technical Assistance and Rural Extension (Pnater): a cycle that ends? |
title_full |
National Policy for Technical Assistance and Rural Extension (Pnater): a cycle that ends? |
title_fullStr |
National Policy for Technical Assistance and Rural Extension (Pnater): a cycle that ends? |
title_full_unstemmed |
National Policy for Technical Assistance and Rural Extension (Pnater): a cycle that ends? |
title_sort |
National Policy for Technical Assistance and Rural Extension (Pnater): a cycle that ends? |
author |
Borsatto, Ricardo Serra |
author_facet |
Borsatto, Ricardo Serra Thomson, Carolina Rios Riga, Helena Lelli Bergamasco, Sonia Maria Pessoa Pereira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Thomson, Carolina Rios Riga, Helena Lelli Bergamasco, Sonia Maria Pessoa Pereira |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Borsatto, Ricardo Serra Thomson, Carolina Rios Riga, Helena Lelli Bergamasco, Sonia Maria Pessoa Pereira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
extensão rural, política pública, agroecologia, implementação, desmantelamento rural extension, public policy, agroecology, implementation, dismantling |
topic |
extensão rural, política pública, agroecologia, implementação, desmantelamento rural extension, public policy, agroecology, implementation, dismantling |
description |
Pnater represented an effort to resume a national agenda of rural extension. Due been conceived in a participatory way, Pnater’s scope directs to a clear and consistent counter-hegemonic perspective that the Brazilian State would have to implement. The hypothesis that guides the analyzes and reflections presented in this article is that structural and circumstantial factors of the Brazilian State systematically prevented Pnater from fulfilling its ambitious objectives. Based on the policy cycle framework, this article presents a systematization and reflections on the Pnater cycle based on secondary data. The conclusions point out that the counter-hegemonic innovations proposed by Pnater were gradually being disregarded or placed in the background, culminating with the end of the cycle started in 2004. The article points to the need for a progressive reframing of Pnater intending to gain greater social legitimacy. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-11-03 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/emancipacao/article/view/20283 10.5212/Emancipacao.v.22.2220283.002 |
url |
https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/emancipacao/article/view/20283 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5212/Emancipacao.v.22.2220283.002 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/emancipacao/article/view/20283/209209217024 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Emancipação https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Emancipação https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Emancipação; v. 22 n. especial (2022): Dossiê: Reconfigurações e alternativas para as políticas e os processos de Assistência Técnica e Extensão Rural; 1-20 1982-7814 reponame:Emancipação (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG) instacron:UEPG |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG) |
instacron_str |
UEPG |
institution |
UEPG |
reponame_str |
Emancipação (Online) |
collection |
Emancipação (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Emancipação (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
emancipacao@uepg.br||revistaemancipacao@yahoo.com.br |
_version_ |
1797220440100306944 |