ALGUMAS CONTRADIÇÕES QUE ENVOLVEM O ENSINO DA ESCRITA: UMA DISCUSSÃO COM PROFESSORES DO 5º E DO 6º ANO DO ENSINO FUNDAMENTAL

• Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues, Silvia Aparecida Medeiros
• Data de Publicação: 2014
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UEPG
• Texto Completo: http://tede2.uepg.br/jspui/handle/prefix/464
• topic: 5º e 6º anos do Ensino Fundamental; práticas linguísticas diversificadas; escrita; política linguística; formação de professores; 5th and 6th years of Elementary School; diversified linguistic practices; writing; language policy; teacher development; CNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA

This Masters dissertation had as its main aim to analyze some speech acts of teachers working with elementary school 5th and 6th years, more specifically those regarding the school practice of writing, besides seeking to create moments of reflection of these professionals on diversified linguistic practices, so that they can think about the theoretical and practical knowledge that permeates the teaching practice. This proposal was not born by chance; it originated from informal conversations with public school teachers, due to the researcher experience of over 20 years working with the early years of elementary school. Some authors have insisted on pointing out the extent to which the discussion about teaching writing and the homogenizing linguistic policies influence school. Among these are: FARACO (2007, 2008); BRITTO (1997, 2002, 2003, 2007 and 2009), PINTO (2012, 2014) and (RAJAGOPALAN 2003, 2004, 2011 and 2013). It was, therefore, observed how teachers working with the early and final years of elementary school, without any access to the language science research, develop teaching practices based on the reproduction of structures. Also, an issue to be taken into consideration is the lack of research on the transition between the 5th and 6th years of elementary school. In order to achieve that, such discussions had to be broadened in the school context. The methodology, based on qualitative research was the most suitable to this study with the development of action-research (THIOLLENT, 2009). Initially, interviews were carried out with teachers from a municipal school and some from a state school, and from the most relevant issues raised by the interviews a group of studies was organized. Later on, observation was carried out in these participants‟ classrooms. The data analysis revealed that the participants had no access to most of the knowledge discussed in the group of studies. As a result, it was possible to see that without knowing more deeply the discussions about language in general/mother tongue it is not possible to reflect on linguistic practices and, consequently, teaching practices. Finally, the conclusion highlighted that when the participants had access to the material collected during the interview, the group of studies and the observations, they developed a process of rethinking the way their work is conducted in the classroom, that is, when they looked into their own work they observed the necessity to organize it with other objectives, so that it can be improved and, consequently, improve their own students‟ actions. The participants also pointed out how difficult it is for them to know how to develop some differentiated work in the classroom. It was also possible to think about alternatives for the participant teachers to establish discussion networks to try and reevaluate heterogeneous linguistic practices, through permanent teacher development.