INFRINGEMENT OF THE COLLEGIALITY AND JUDICIAL SUSTAINABILITY IN THE HIGHER COURT OF JUSTICE: UNCONSTITUTIONALITY BY REPEATED ADDICTIVE PRACTICE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gomes, Magno Federici
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Santos, Janaina Ferreira da Silva, Torres Manrique, Jorge Isaac
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
Texto Completo: https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/61651
Resumo: Respect for the principle of collegiality by the Higher Court of Justice is the object of this paper. Regarding the outcome of the appeals against the monocratic decisions handed down in the Higher Court of Justice, a documentary theoretical research was developed, based on quantitative empirical to a lesser degree, by the inductive method. It was found that the Higher Court of Justice prevents the material review of monocratic decisions by the collegiate body, aiming to increase the speed of judgments, which is an unconstitutional practice. It was identified conflict between the principles of reasonable duration of the process and collegiality, solved by the postulate of proportionality.
id UERJ-17_baa0f01dfa2b34152fde500caddb6669
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/61651
network_acronym_str UERJ-17
network_name_str Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
repository_id_str
spelling INFRINGEMENT OF THE COLLEGIALITY AND JUDICIAL SUSTAINABILITY IN THE HIGHER COURT OF JUSTICE: UNCONSTITUTIONALITY BY REPEATED ADDICTIVE PRACTICEA VIOLAÇÃO DA COLEGIALIDADE E DA SUSTENTABILIDADE JUDICIAL NO SUPERIOR TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA: INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE POR PRÁTICA VICIADA REITERADASuperior Tribunal de Justiçaprincípio da colegialidadedecisão monocráticaprincípio da razoável duração do processoinconstitucionalidadeAcesso à jurisdiçãoPrincípio da colegialidade recursalHigher Court of Justiceprinciple of collegialitymonocratic decisionprinciple of reasonable duration of the processunconstitutionalityRespect for the principle of collegiality by the Higher Court of Justice is the object of this paper. Regarding the outcome of the appeals against the monocratic decisions handed down in the Higher Court of Justice, a documentary theoretical research was developed, based on quantitative empirical to a lesser degree, by the inductive method. It was found that the Higher Court of Justice prevents the material review of monocratic decisions by the collegiate body, aiming to increase the speed of judgments, which is an unconstitutional practice. It was identified conflict between the principles of reasonable duration of the process and collegiality, solved by the postulate of proportionality.O respeito ao princípio da colegialidade pelo Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) é o objeto deste artigo. Acerca do resultado do julgamento dos recursos interpostos contra as decisões monocráticas proferidas no STJ, elaborou-se uma pesquisa teórico documental, com base empírica quantitativa em menor grau, pelo método indutivo. Constatou-se que o STJ inviabiliza a revisão material das decisões monocráticas pelo órgão colegiado, objetivando aumentar a celeridade dos julgamentos, o que é uma prática inconstitucional. Identificou-se conflito entre os princípios da razoável duração do processo e da colegialidade, que foi solucionado pelo postulado da proporcionalidade. Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro / Rio de Janeiro State University2021-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos ParesIndutivoapplication/pdfhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/6165110.12957/redp.2022.61651Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual; v. 23 n. 1 (2022): REVISTA ELETRÔNICA DE DIREITO PROCESSUAL VOLUME 23 NÚMERO 11982-7636reponame:Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processualinstname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)instacron:UERJporhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/61651/40723Copyright (c) 2021 Magno Federici Gomes, Janaina Ferreira da Silva Santos, Jorge Isaac Torres Manriqueinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGomes, Magno FedericiSantos, Janaina Ferreira da SilvaTorres Manrique, Jorge Isaac2022-07-05T03:47:16Zoai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/61651Revistahttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redpPUBhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/oai||sr3depext@gmail.com|| fhrevistaprocessual@gmail.com||humbertodalla@gmail.com1982-76361982-7636opendoar:2022-07-05T03:47:16Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv INFRINGEMENT OF THE COLLEGIALITY AND JUDICIAL SUSTAINABILITY IN THE HIGHER COURT OF JUSTICE: UNCONSTITUTIONALITY BY REPEATED ADDICTIVE PRACTICE
A VIOLAÇÃO DA COLEGIALIDADE E DA SUSTENTABILIDADE JUDICIAL NO SUPERIOR TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA: INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE POR PRÁTICA VICIADA REITERADA
title INFRINGEMENT OF THE COLLEGIALITY AND JUDICIAL SUSTAINABILITY IN THE HIGHER COURT OF JUSTICE: UNCONSTITUTIONALITY BY REPEATED ADDICTIVE PRACTICE
spellingShingle INFRINGEMENT OF THE COLLEGIALITY AND JUDICIAL SUSTAINABILITY IN THE HIGHER COURT OF JUSTICE: UNCONSTITUTIONALITY BY REPEATED ADDICTIVE PRACTICE
Gomes, Magno Federici
Superior Tribunal de Justiça
princípio da colegialidade
decisão monocrática
princípio da razoável duração do processo
inconstitucionalidade
Acesso à jurisdição
Princípio da colegialidade recursal
Higher Court of Justice
principle of collegiality
monocratic decision
principle of reasonable duration of the process
unconstitutionality
title_short INFRINGEMENT OF THE COLLEGIALITY AND JUDICIAL SUSTAINABILITY IN THE HIGHER COURT OF JUSTICE: UNCONSTITUTIONALITY BY REPEATED ADDICTIVE PRACTICE
title_full INFRINGEMENT OF THE COLLEGIALITY AND JUDICIAL SUSTAINABILITY IN THE HIGHER COURT OF JUSTICE: UNCONSTITUTIONALITY BY REPEATED ADDICTIVE PRACTICE
title_fullStr INFRINGEMENT OF THE COLLEGIALITY AND JUDICIAL SUSTAINABILITY IN THE HIGHER COURT OF JUSTICE: UNCONSTITUTIONALITY BY REPEATED ADDICTIVE PRACTICE
title_full_unstemmed INFRINGEMENT OF THE COLLEGIALITY AND JUDICIAL SUSTAINABILITY IN THE HIGHER COURT OF JUSTICE: UNCONSTITUTIONALITY BY REPEATED ADDICTIVE PRACTICE
title_sort INFRINGEMENT OF THE COLLEGIALITY AND JUDICIAL SUSTAINABILITY IN THE HIGHER COURT OF JUSTICE: UNCONSTITUTIONALITY BY REPEATED ADDICTIVE PRACTICE
author Gomes, Magno Federici
author_facet Gomes, Magno Federici
Santos, Janaina Ferreira da Silva
Torres Manrique, Jorge Isaac
author_role author
author2 Santos, Janaina Ferreira da Silva
Torres Manrique, Jorge Isaac
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gomes, Magno Federici
Santos, Janaina Ferreira da Silva
Torres Manrique, Jorge Isaac
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Superior Tribunal de Justiça
princípio da colegialidade
decisão monocrática
princípio da razoável duração do processo
inconstitucionalidade
Acesso à jurisdição
Princípio da colegialidade recursal
Higher Court of Justice
principle of collegiality
monocratic decision
principle of reasonable duration of the process
unconstitutionality
topic Superior Tribunal de Justiça
princípio da colegialidade
decisão monocrática
princípio da razoável duração do processo
inconstitucionalidade
Acesso à jurisdição
Princípio da colegialidade recursal
Higher Court of Justice
principle of collegiality
monocratic decision
principle of reasonable duration of the process
unconstitutionality
description Respect for the principle of collegiality by the Higher Court of Justice is the object of this paper. Regarding the outcome of the appeals against the monocratic decisions handed down in the Higher Court of Justice, a documentary theoretical research was developed, based on quantitative empirical to a lesser degree, by the inductive method. It was found that the Higher Court of Justice prevents the material review of monocratic decisions by the collegiate body, aiming to increase the speed of judgments, which is an unconstitutional practice. It was identified conflict between the principles of reasonable duration of the process and collegiality, solved by the postulate of proportionality.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
Indutivo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/61651
10.12957/redp.2022.61651
url https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/61651
identifier_str_mv 10.12957/redp.2022.61651
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/61651/40723
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro / Rio de Janeiro State University
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro / Rio de Janeiro State University
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual; v. 23 n. 1 (2022): REVISTA ELETRÔNICA DE DIREITO PROCESSUAL VOLUME 23 NÚMERO 1
1982-7636
reponame:Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
instacron:UERJ
instname_str Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
instacron_str UERJ
institution UERJ
reponame_str Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
collection Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sr3depext@gmail.com|| fhrevistaprocessual@gmail.com||humbertodalla@gmail.com
_version_ 1799317666884747264

Registros relacionados