Los derechos humanos y el poder psiquiátrico en disputa : ¿Hacia una radicalización de la democracia?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pérez-Pérez, Beatriz
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Pujal i Llombart, Margot, Mora, Enrico
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista Direito e Práxis
Texto Completo: https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/revistaceaju/article/view/65459
Resumo: https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2022/65459i This article analyzes the type of power that is disputed in contemporary debates on human rights, mental health and equal recognition before the law (Art. 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: CRPD), where the most burning issue is the abolition of involuntary treatment and commitment. To do so, we intersect Foucault's and Agamben's perspectives on sovereign power and biopowers. We analyze the emergence of the psychiatric device as institution; legal medicine; biological determinism, and; line of thanatopolitical escape, the point of emergence of Nazi extermination. We connect this analysis with the emergence of human rights and UN regulations on "disability/mental illness" up to the CRPD. Among other things, we conclude that the authoritative interpretation of Art. 12 abolishes a state of exception to human rights, which is constitutive of modern democracy and of the emergence and deployment of the psychiatric device, whose competencies of sovereign power are in dispute. Keywords: Mental health; Human rights; Sovereign power; Foucault; Agamben.
id UERJ-2_9e19f5858649b61db6f876485c0118cc
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/65459
network_acronym_str UERJ-2
network_name_str Revista Direito e Práxis
repository_id_str
spelling Los derechos humanos y el poder psiquiátrico en disputa : ¿Hacia una radicalización de la democracia? Human rights and psychiatric power in dispute: Towards a radicalization of democracy?Salud mentalDerechos humanosPoder soberanoFoucaultAgamben / Mental healthHuman rightsSovereign powerAgamben.https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2022/65459i This article analyzes the type of power that is disputed in contemporary debates on human rights, mental health and equal recognition before the law (Art. 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: CRPD), where the most burning issue is the abolition of involuntary treatment and commitment. To do so, we intersect Foucault's and Agamben's perspectives on sovereign power and biopowers. We analyze the emergence of the psychiatric device as institution; legal medicine; biological determinism, and; line of thanatopolitical escape, the point of emergence of Nazi extermination. We connect this analysis with the emergence of human rights and UN regulations on "disability/mental illness" up to the CRPD. Among other things, we conclude that the authoritative interpretation of Art. 12 abolishes a state of exception to human rights, which is constitutive of modern democracy and of the emergence and deployment of the psychiatric device, whose competencies of sovereign power are in dispute. Keywords: Mental health; Human rights; Sovereign power; Foucault; Agamben.https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2022/65459e Este artículo analiza el tipo de poder que está en disputa en los debates contemporáneos sobre los derechos humanos, la salud mental y el igual reconocimiento ante la ley (Art. 12 de la Convención sobre los Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidad: CDPD), cuyo punto más candente es la abolición del tratamiento e internamiento involuntarios. Para ello, entrecruzamos las perspectivas de Foucault y Agamben sobre el poder soberano y los biopoderes. Analizamos la emergencia del dispositivo psiquiátrico como institución; medicina legal; determinismo biológico y; líniea de fuga tanatopolítica, punto de surgimiento del exterminio Nazi. Entroncamos este análisis con la emergencia de los derechos humanos y de las normativas de la ONU sobre “discapacidad/enfermedad mental” hasta la CDPD. Entre otros, concluimos que la interpretación autorizada del Art. 12 deroga un estado de excepción a los derechos humanos, que es constitutivo de la democracia moderna y de la emergencia y despliegue del dispositivo psiquiátrico, cuyas competencias de poder soberano están en disputa. Palabras clave: Salud mental; Derechos humanos; Poder soberano; Foucault; Agamben. Abstract This article analyzes the type of power that is disputed in contemporary debates on human rights, mental health and equal recognition before the law (Art. 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: CRPD), where the most burning issue is the abolition of involuntary treatment and commitment. To do so, we intersect Foucault's and Agamben's perspectives on sovereign power and biopowers. We analyze the emergence of the psychiatric device as institution; legal medicine; biological determinism, and; line of thanatopolitical escape, the point of emergence of Nazi extermination. We connect this analysis with the emergence of human rights and UN regulations on "disability/mental illness" up to the CRPD. Among other things, we conclude that the authoritative interpretation of Art. 12 abolishes a state of exception to human rights, which is constitutive of modern democracy and of the emergence and deployment of the psychiatric device, whose competencies of sovereign power are in dispute. Keywords: Mental health; Human rights; Sovereign power; Foucault; Agamben.Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro2024-04-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/revistaceaju/article/view/65459Direito e Práxis; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2024): REVISTA DIREITO E PRÁXIS; 1-34Direito e Práxis; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2024): REVISTA DIREITO E PRÁXIS; 1-34Revista Direito e Práxis; v. 15 n. 1 (2024): REVISTA DIREITO E PRÁXIS; 1-342179-8966reponame:Revista Direito e Práxisinstname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)instacron:UERJspaporenghttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/revistaceaju/article/view/65459/49558https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/revistaceaju/article/view/65459/49602https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/revistaceaju/article/view/65459/49559Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Direito e Práxishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPérez-Pérez, BeatrizPujal i Llombart, MargotMora, Enrico2024-05-02T18:28:45Zoai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/65459Revistahttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/revistaceaju/indexPUBhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/revistaceaju/oai||carolvestena@gmail.com|| jr-cunha@uol.com.br|| direitoepraxis@gmail.com2179-89662179-8966opendoar:2024-05-02T18:28:45Revista Direito e Práxis - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Los derechos humanos y el poder psiquiátrico en disputa : ¿Hacia una radicalización de la democracia?
Human rights and psychiatric power in dispute: Towards a radicalization of democracy?
title Los derechos humanos y el poder psiquiátrico en disputa : ¿Hacia una radicalización de la democracia?
spellingShingle Los derechos humanos y el poder psiquiátrico en disputa : ¿Hacia una radicalización de la democracia?
Pérez-Pérez, Beatriz
Salud mental
Derechos humanos
Poder soberano
Foucault
Agamben / Mental health
Human rights
Sovereign power
Agamben.
title_short Los derechos humanos y el poder psiquiátrico en disputa : ¿Hacia una radicalización de la democracia?
title_full Los derechos humanos y el poder psiquiátrico en disputa : ¿Hacia una radicalización de la democracia?
title_fullStr Los derechos humanos y el poder psiquiátrico en disputa : ¿Hacia una radicalización de la democracia?
title_full_unstemmed Los derechos humanos y el poder psiquiátrico en disputa : ¿Hacia una radicalización de la democracia?
title_sort Los derechos humanos y el poder psiquiátrico en disputa : ¿Hacia una radicalización de la democracia?
author Pérez-Pérez, Beatriz
author_facet Pérez-Pérez, Beatriz
Pujal i Llombart, Margot
Mora, Enrico
author_role author
author2 Pujal i Llombart, Margot
Mora, Enrico
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pérez-Pérez, Beatriz
Pujal i Llombart, Margot
Mora, Enrico
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Salud mental
Derechos humanos
Poder soberano
Foucault
Agamben / Mental health
Human rights
Sovereign power
Agamben.
topic Salud mental
Derechos humanos
Poder soberano
Foucault
Agamben / Mental health
Human rights
Sovereign power
Agamben.
description https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2022/65459i This article analyzes the type of power that is disputed in contemporary debates on human rights, mental health and equal recognition before the law (Art. 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: CRPD), where the most burning issue is the abolition of involuntary treatment and commitment. To do so, we intersect Foucault's and Agamben's perspectives on sovereign power and biopowers. We analyze the emergence of the psychiatric device as institution; legal medicine; biological determinism, and; line of thanatopolitical escape, the point of emergence of Nazi extermination. We connect this analysis with the emergence of human rights and UN regulations on "disability/mental illness" up to the CRPD. Among other things, we conclude that the authoritative interpretation of Art. 12 abolishes a state of exception to human rights, which is constitutive of modern democracy and of the emergence and deployment of the psychiatric device, whose competencies of sovereign power are in dispute. Keywords: Mental health; Human rights; Sovereign power; Foucault; Agamben.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-04-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/revistaceaju/article/view/65459
url https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/revistaceaju/article/view/65459
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
por
eng
language spa
por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/revistaceaju/article/view/65459/49558
https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/revistaceaju/article/view/65459/49602
https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/revistaceaju/article/view/65459/49559
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Direito e Práxis
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Direito e Práxis
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Direito e Práxis; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2024): REVISTA DIREITO E PRÁXIS; 1-34
Direito e Práxis; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2024): REVISTA DIREITO E PRÁXIS; 1-34
Revista Direito e Práxis; v. 15 n. 1 (2024): REVISTA DIREITO E PRÁXIS; 1-34
2179-8966
reponame:Revista Direito e Práxis
instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
instacron:UERJ
instname_str Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
instacron_str UERJ
institution UERJ
reponame_str Revista Direito e Práxis
collection Revista Direito e Práxis
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direito e Práxis - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||carolvestena@gmail.com|| jr-cunha@uol.com.br|| direitoepraxis@gmail.com
_version_ 1799318386493095936

Registros relacionados