Resistência de três materiais retrobturadores frente à infiltração microbiana por Enterococcus faecalis

• Autor(a) principal: Ferreira, Marcio Salles
• Data de Publicação: 2011
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ
• Texto Completo: http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/14134
• topic: Dental Materials; Dental leakage; Enterococcus faecalis; Materiais dentários; Infiltração dentária; Enterococcus faecalis; Obturações (Odontologia); Infiltração dentária - Microbiologia; CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ODONTOLOGIA::ENDODONTIA

The objective of this study was to compare the apical sealing ability of three root-end filling materials in teeth submitted to the microbial leakage by Enterococcus faecalis. Besides analyzing the occurrence of the microbial leakage in relation to the variable time.For such, 45 incisiv permanent superior teeth extracted from humans were used, which were instrumented with ProTaper Universal® system (MAILLEFER) and filled by the Hybrid of Tagger compaction technique, with endodontic sealer: AH Plus® (DENTSPLY). The apices were resected with the removal of 3mm of the apical third and the root-end cavities prepared with ultrasonic tips. The samples were subdivided, randomly, in three groups with 15 teeth each, and two control groups. The materials used for the retrofilling were white MTA® (ANGELUS), Sealer26 (DENTSPLY), Palacos-R (HERAEUS KULZER). Devices were made for fixation of the teeth to the Eppendorf tubes. The filling samples were inoculated with strains of E. faecalis and incubated at 37°C, for a period of 30 days, for analysis of the presence of turbidity of Enterococosel medium. For the accomplishment of the statistical analysis the following tests were used: Quisquare by Yates correction, Fisher Exact Test and survival curve testing Mantel-Cox and the Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon. The results showed that all the groups in which the filling was accomplished and the subsequent retrofilling presented leakage. Comparing all the groups, it had significant difference between the Palacos-R and Sealer 26. But it did not have significant difference between the Palacos-R and the MTA and nor of the MTA with Sealer 26. In regard to only the root-end filling materials, Palacos-R obtained the smallest leakage, followed by white MTA® and Sealer26®.