Urban sustainability assessment methodologies: A comparative analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Albuquerque, Paula Cruz de
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Lima, Filipe Augusto Xavier, Cruz, Marcos Paulo Mesquita da, Reis, Rubens de Oliveira dos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista Geotemas
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.apps.uern.br/index.php/GEOTemas/article/view/4999
Resumo: The objective of this study is to comparatively analyze the main urban sustainability assessment methodologies available for use at global, national, regional and local levels, offering subsidies so that municipal managers can choose the most appropriate tool for the situation of the municipality to which they are linked. The methodological procedure is qualitative, exploratory, descriptive and explanatory. A bibliographic and documental survey was carried out through which the main methodologies for assessing urban sustainability currently available were listed and presented. The information collected was presented and described in tables. Seven of the most relevant and currently available measuring instruments for urban sustainability were found to be applied at the global, national, regional, and municipal levels. Furthermore, it was observed that the differences among these tools are significant, and that the character of the data survey (qualitative or quantitative), the themes or indicators contemplated and the scope of these tools may vary.
id UERN-4_c34f387cefc574b7bb12a2243dec37cd
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.periodicos.apps.uern.br:article/4999
network_acronym_str UERN-4
network_name_str Revista Geotemas
repository_id_str
spelling Urban sustainability assessment methodologies: A comparative analysisMetodologías de evaluación de la sostenibilidad urbana: un análisis comparativeMETODOLOGIAS DE AVALIAÇÃO DA SUSTENTABILIDADE URBANA: UMA ANÁLISE COMPARATIVADesarrollo sosteniblePolíticas públicasGerencia municipalDesenvolvimento sustentávelGestão MunicipalPolíticas públicasSustainable developmentPublic policyMunicipal managementThe objective of this study is to comparatively analyze the main urban sustainability assessment methodologies available for use at global, national, regional and local levels, offering subsidies so that municipal managers can choose the most appropriate tool for the situation of the municipality to which they are linked. The methodological procedure is qualitative, exploratory, descriptive and explanatory. A bibliographic and documental survey was carried out through which the main methodologies for assessing urban sustainability currently available were listed and presented. The information collected was presented and described in tables. Seven of the most relevant and currently available measuring instruments for urban sustainability were found to be applied at the global, national, regional, and municipal levels. Furthermore, it was observed that the differences among these tools are significant, and that the character of the data survey (qualitative or quantitative), the themes or indicators contemplated and the scope of these tools may vary.El objetivo de este estudio es analizar comparativamente las principales metodologías de evaluación de la sostenibilidad urbana disponibles para su uso a nivel mundial, nacional, regional y local, ofreciendo subvenciones para que los gestores municipales puedan elegir la herramienta más adecuada a la situación de la población. municipio cuando están vinculados. El procedimiento metodológico es cualitativo, exploratorio, descriptivo y explicativo. Se realizó un levantamiento bibliográfico y documental a través del cual se enumeraron y presentaron las principales metodologías de evaluación de la sostenibilidad urbana disponibles actualmente. La información recopilada se presentó y describió en tablas. Se verificó la existencia de los siete instrumentos más relevantes y actualmente disponibles para medir la sustentabilidad urbana, siendo aplicados a nivel mundial, nacional, regional y municipal. Además, se observó que las diferencias entre estas herramientas son significativas, pudiendo variar el carácter de los datos recopilados (cualitativos o cuantitativos), los temas o indicadores contemplados y el alcance de estas herramientas.O objetivo deste estudo é analisar comparativamente as principais metodologias de avaliação da sustentabilidade urbana disponíveis para utilização em âmbito global, nacional, regional e local, oferecendo subsídios para que os gestores municipais possam escolher a ferramenta mais adequada para a situação do município ao qual estão vinculados. O procedimento metodológico é qualitativo, de caráter exploratório, descritivo e explicativo. Realizou-se um levantamento bibliográfico e documental por meio dos quais fossem listadas e apresentadas as principais metodologias de avaliação da sustentabilidade urbana disponíveis atualmente. As informações coletadas foram apresentadas e descritas em quadros. Verificou-se a existência de sete instrumentos de mensuração da sustentabilidade urbana mais relevantes e disponíveis, atualmente, sendo aplicados em nível mundial, nacional, regional e municipal. Ademais, observou-se que as diferenças entre essas ferramentas são significativas, podendo variar o caráter dos dados levantados (qualitativo ou quantitativo), os temas ou indicadores contemplados e a abrangência dessas ferramentas. Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte (UERN)2023-10-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer reviewed Revisado por paresAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.apps.uern.br/index.php/GEOTemas/article/view/499910.33237/2236-255X.2023.4999Journal Geotemas; Vol. 13 (2023): Geotemas Journal; e02324Revista Geotemas; Vol. 13 (2023): Revista Geotemas; e02324Revista Geotemas; v. 13 (2023): Revista Geotemas; e023242236-255Xreponame:Revista Geotemasinstname:Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte (UERN)instacron:UERNporenghttps://periodicos.apps.uern.br/index.php/GEOTemas/article/view/4999/3952https://periodicos.apps.uern.br/index.php/GEOTemas/article/view/4999/3953Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Geotemashttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlbuquerque, Paula Cruz de Lima, Filipe Augusto Xavier Cruz, Marcos Paulo Mesquita daReis, Rubens de Oliveira dos 2024-02-22T18:44:03Zoai:ojs2.periodicos.apps.uern.br:article/4999Revistahttp://periodicos.apps.uern.br/index.php/GEOTemas/indexPUBhttp://periodicos.apps.uern.br/index.php/GEOTemas/oaigeotemas@uern.br||josielguedes@yahoo.com.br2236-255X2236-255Xopendoar:2024-02-22T18:44:03Revista Geotemas - Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte (UERN)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Urban sustainability assessment methodologies: A comparative analysis
Metodologías de evaluación de la sostenibilidad urbana: un análisis comparative
METODOLOGIAS DE AVALIAÇÃO DA SUSTENTABILIDADE URBANA: UMA ANÁLISE COMPARATIVA
title Urban sustainability assessment methodologies: A comparative analysis
spellingShingle Urban sustainability assessment methodologies: A comparative analysis
Albuquerque, Paula Cruz de
Desarrollo sostenible
Políticas públicas
Gerencia municipal
Desenvolvimento sustentável
Gestão Municipal
Políticas públicas
Sustainable development
Public policy
Municipal management
title_short Urban sustainability assessment methodologies: A comparative analysis
title_full Urban sustainability assessment methodologies: A comparative analysis
title_fullStr Urban sustainability assessment methodologies: A comparative analysis
title_full_unstemmed Urban sustainability assessment methodologies: A comparative analysis
title_sort Urban sustainability assessment methodologies: A comparative analysis
author Albuquerque, Paula Cruz de
author_facet Albuquerque, Paula Cruz de
Lima, Filipe Augusto Xavier
Cruz, Marcos Paulo Mesquita da
Reis, Rubens de Oliveira dos
author_role author
author2 Lima, Filipe Augusto Xavier
Cruz, Marcos Paulo Mesquita da
Reis, Rubens de Oliveira dos
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Albuquerque, Paula Cruz de
Lima, Filipe Augusto Xavier
Cruz, Marcos Paulo Mesquita da
Reis, Rubens de Oliveira dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Desarrollo sostenible
Políticas públicas
Gerencia municipal
Desenvolvimento sustentável
Gestão Municipal
Políticas públicas
Sustainable development
Public policy
Municipal management
topic Desarrollo sostenible
Políticas públicas
Gerencia municipal
Desenvolvimento sustentável
Gestão Municipal
Políticas públicas
Sustainable development
Public policy
Municipal management
description The objective of this study is to comparatively analyze the main urban sustainability assessment methodologies available for use at global, national, regional and local levels, offering subsidies so that municipal managers can choose the most appropriate tool for the situation of the municipality to which they are linked. The methodological procedure is qualitative, exploratory, descriptive and explanatory. A bibliographic and documental survey was carried out through which the main methodologies for assessing urban sustainability currently available were listed and presented. The information collected was presented and described in tables. Seven of the most relevant and currently available measuring instruments for urban sustainability were found to be applied at the global, national, regional, and municipal levels. Furthermore, it was observed that the differences among these tools are significant, and that the character of the data survey (qualitative or quantitative), the themes or indicators contemplated and the scope of these tools may vary.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-10-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer reviewed
Revisado por pares
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.apps.uern.br/index.php/GEOTemas/article/view/4999
10.33237/2236-255X.2023.4999
url https://periodicos.apps.uern.br/index.php/GEOTemas/article/view/4999
identifier_str_mv 10.33237/2236-255X.2023.4999
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.apps.uern.br/index.php/GEOTemas/article/view/4999/3952
https://periodicos.apps.uern.br/index.php/GEOTemas/article/view/4999/3953
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Geotemas
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Geotemas
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte (UERN)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte (UERN)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal Geotemas; Vol. 13 (2023): Geotemas Journal; e02324
Revista Geotemas; Vol. 13 (2023): Revista Geotemas; e02324
Revista Geotemas; v. 13 (2023): Revista Geotemas; e02324
2236-255X
reponame:Revista Geotemas
instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte (UERN)
instacron:UERN
instname_str Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte (UERN)
instacron_str UERN
institution UERN
reponame_str Revista Geotemas
collection Revista Geotemas
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Geotemas - Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte (UERN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv geotemas@uern.br||josielguedes@yahoo.com.br
_version_ 1805033581739769856

Registros relacionados