The argumentation in the jury court: emotion and empathy of the defense lawyer in homicide cases

• Autor(a) principal: Silva, Karla Stéphany de Brito
• Data de Publicação: 2022
• Outros Autores: Rodrigues, Maria das Graças Soares
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: EID&A - Revista Eletrônica de Estudos Integrados em Discurso e Argumentação
• Texto Completo: http://periodicos.uesc.br/index.php/eidea/article/view/3530

The purpose of this work is to analyze the arguments present in the oral arguments of a lawyer who defends a homicidal defendant and its relationship with convincing the jurors. Thus, it is based on the new rhetoric of Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca (1996); Adam's (2011) argumentative sequence, in dialogue with theories of emotion, with Plantin (2011) and empathy with Rabatel (2013). In order to standardize the transcription of the corpus, it was passed to the norms of the Projeto da Norma Urbana Oral Culta (NURC). Data analysis points to the following results: the argumentative sequence followed the justification level; about the emotional argument, we note that it was marked by subjective lexemes. Finally, on the empathic argument, we found that: L1/E1 put himself in the place of the jurors, to avoid future regrets, and that of L1/E1 put himself in the place of the victim's mother.