REQUIREMENT OF SPOUSAL CONSENT FOR THE USE OF NON-SURGICAL CONTRACEPTIVE METHOD: : INSTITUTIONALIZED SEXUAL VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direito e Sexualidade |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revdirsex/article/view/50905 |
Resumo: | This article, extracted from ongoing research, aims to analyze the requirement of conjugal consent for the use of a non-surgical contraceptive method in women as sexual and institutionalized violence. Such analysis is anchored in the qualitative and descriptive approach and uses the deductive method. The results suggest that the requirement of article 10, §5º, of Law 9.263/96, for cases of sterilization during the conjugal society, is not consistent with the use of a non-surgical contraceptive method, affronting the woman's self-determination in relation to her own body and legitimizes form of domestic and family violence against women, according to article 7, III, of Law 11.340/06, by preventing the choice of contraceptive method. In this sense, the conditioning imposed by health plans and professionals in the area clashes with the perspectives of freedom and non-interference by the state in the constitution of the family by reproducing a patriarchal culture that objectifies the woman's body, violating her reproductive and personality rights provided for in International Treaties and internal norms and, above all, in the face of the exclusion of the procreative purpose of marriage, arising from the conceptual evolution of the family and the emancipation of women. |
id |
UFBA-13_5322e91f9c2c5ab0fe2be22b89f58e1a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufba.br:article/50905 |
network_acronym_str |
UFBA-13 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direito e Sexualidade |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
REQUIREMENT OF SPOUSAL CONSENT FOR THE USE OF NON-SURGICAL CONTRACEPTIVE METHOD: : INSTITUTIONALIZED SEXUAL VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMENREQUISITO DEL CONSENTIMIENTO CONYUGE PARA EL USO DE MÉTODO ANTICONCEPTIVO NO QUIRÚRGICO: : VIOLENCIA SEXUAL INSTITUCIONALIZADA CONTRA LA MUJEREXIGÊNCIA DE CONSENTIMENTO CONJUGAL PARA USO DE MÉTODO CONTRACEPTIVO NÃO CIRÚRGICO: VIOLÊNCIA SEXUAL INSTITUCIONALIZADA CONTRA A MULHERCorpo FemininoDireitos ReprodutivosLiberdade da mulherViolência doméstica e familiarCidadania femininaFeminine body; Reproductive Rights; Woman's freedom; Domestic and family violence; female citizenship.This article, extracted from ongoing research, aims to analyze the requirement of conjugal consent for the use of a non-surgical contraceptive method in women as sexual and institutionalized violence. Such analysis is anchored in the qualitative and descriptive approach and uses the deductive method. The results suggest that the requirement of article 10, §5º, of Law 9.263/96, for cases of sterilization during the conjugal society, is not consistent with the use of a non-surgical contraceptive method, affronting the woman's self-determination in relation to her own body and legitimizes form of domestic and family violence against women, according to article 7, III, of Law 11.340/06, by preventing the choice of contraceptive method. In this sense, the conditioning imposed by health plans and professionals in the area clashes with the perspectives of freedom and non-interference by the state in the constitution of the family by reproducing a patriarchal culture that objectifies the woman's body, violating her reproductive and personality rights provided for in International Treaties and internal norms and, above all, in the face of the exclusion of the procreative purpose of marriage, arising from the conceptual evolution of the family and the emancipation of women.Este artículo, extraído de una investigación en curso, tiene como objetivo analizar la exigencia del consentimiento conyugal para el uso de un método anticonceptivo no quirúrgico en mujeres como violencia sexual e institucionalizada. Dicho análisis está anclado en el enfoque cualitativo y descriptivo y utiliza el método deductivo. Los resultados sugieren que la exigencia del artículo 10, §5º, de la Ley 9.263/96, para los casos de esterilización durante la sociedad conyugal, no es compatible con el uso de un método anticonceptivo no quirúrgico, afrentando la autodeterminación de la mujer en relación a su propio cuerpo y legitima una forma de violencia doméstica y familiar contra la mujer, según el artículo 7, III, de la Ley 11.340/06, al impedir la elección del método anticonceptivo. En ese sentido, el condicionamiento impuesto por los planes y profesionales de salud del área choca con las perspectivas de libertad y no injerencia del Estado en la constitución de la familia al reproducir una cultura patriarcal que cosifica el cuerpo de la mujer, vulnerando sus derechos reproductivos y de personalidad. derechos previstos en los Tratados Internacionales y normas internas y, sobre todo, frente a la exclusión de la finalidad procreadora del matrimonio, derivada de la evolución conceptual de la familia y la emancipación de la mujer. Este artigo, extraído de pesquisa em andamento, objetiva analisar a exigência de consentimento conjugal para uso de método contraceptivo não cirúrgico na mulher enquanto violência sexual e institucionalizada. Tal análise ancora-se na abordagem qualitativa e descritiva e utiliza o método dedutivo. Os resultados sugerem que a exigência do artigo 10, §5º, da Lei 9.263 (BRASIL, 1996), para casos de esterilização durante a sociedade conjugal, não se coaduna ao uso de método contraceptivo não cirúrgico afrontando autodeterminação da mulher em relação ao seu próprio corpo e legitima forma de violência doméstica e familiar contra a mulher, consoante artigo 7º, III, da Lei 11.340 (BRASIL, 2006), ao impedir escolha de método anticoncepcional. Neste sentido, o condicionamento imposto pelos planos de saúde e profissionais da área destoa das perspectivas de liberdade e não interferência estatal na constituição da família ao reproduzir cultura patriarcal que objetifica o corpo da mulher, violando seus direitos reprodutivos e de personalidade previstos em Tratados Internacionais e normas internas e, sobretudo, frente à exclusão da finalidade procriativa do casamento, oriunda da evolução conceitual de família e da emancipação da mulher.Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)2022-12-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revdirsex/article/view/5090510.9771/revdirsex.v3i2.50905Revista Direito e Sexualidade; v. 3 n. 2 (2022) | Revista Direito e Sexualidade; 1-192675-3596reponame:Revista Direito e Sexualidadeinstname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)instacron:UFBAporhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revdirsex/article/view/50905/27951BrasilCopyright (c) 2022 amboshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAraújo, Bruna Conceiçao Ximenes de Wenceslau, Maurinice Evaristo2023-01-19T19:42:52Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufba.br:article/50905Revistahttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revdirsex/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revdirsex/oaigrupodireitoesexualidade@gmail.com ; nucleosibi@ufba.br2675-35962675-3596opendoar:2023-01-19T19:42:52Revista Direito e Sexualidade - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
REQUIREMENT OF SPOUSAL CONSENT FOR THE USE OF NON-SURGICAL CONTRACEPTIVE METHOD: : INSTITUTIONALIZED SEXUAL VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN REQUISITO DEL CONSENTIMIENTO CONYUGE PARA EL USO DE MÉTODO ANTICONCEPTIVO NO QUIRÚRGICO: : VIOLENCIA SEXUAL INSTITUCIONALIZADA CONTRA LA MUJER EXIGÊNCIA DE CONSENTIMENTO CONJUGAL PARA USO DE MÉTODO CONTRACEPTIVO NÃO CIRÚRGICO: VIOLÊNCIA SEXUAL INSTITUCIONALIZADA CONTRA A MULHER |
title |
REQUIREMENT OF SPOUSAL CONSENT FOR THE USE OF NON-SURGICAL CONTRACEPTIVE METHOD: : INSTITUTIONALIZED SEXUAL VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN |
spellingShingle |
REQUIREMENT OF SPOUSAL CONSENT FOR THE USE OF NON-SURGICAL CONTRACEPTIVE METHOD: : INSTITUTIONALIZED SEXUAL VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN Araújo, Bruna Conceiçao Ximenes de Corpo Feminino Direitos Reprodutivos Liberdade da mulher Violência doméstica e familiar Cidadania feminina Feminine body; Reproductive Rights; Woman's freedom; Domestic and family violence; female citizenship. |
title_short |
REQUIREMENT OF SPOUSAL CONSENT FOR THE USE OF NON-SURGICAL CONTRACEPTIVE METHOD: : INSTITUTIONALIZED SEXUAL VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN |
title_full |
REQUIREMENT OF SPOUSAL CONSENT FOR THE USE OF NON-SURGICAL CONTRACEPTIVE METHOD: : INSTITUTIONALIZED SEXUAL VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN |
title_fullStr |
REQUIREMENT OF SPOUSAL CONSENT FOR THE USE OF NON-SURGICAL CONTRACEPTIVE METHOD: : INSTITUTIONALIZED SEXUAL VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN |
title_full_unstemmed |
REQUIREMENT OF SPOUSAL CONSENT FOR THE USE OF NON-SURGICAL CONTRACEPTIVE METHOD: : INSTITUTIONALIZED SEXUAL VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN |
title_sort |
REQUIREMENT OF SPOUSAL CONSENT FOR THE USE OF NON-SURGICAL CONTRACEPTIVE METHOD: : INSTITUTIONALIZED SEXUAL VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN |
author |
Araújo, Bruna Conceiçao Ximenes de |
author_facet |
Araújo, Bruna Conceiçao Ximenes de Wenceslau, Maurinice Evaristo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Wenceslau, Maurinice Evaristo |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Araújo, Bruna Conceiçao Ximenes de Wenceslau, Maurinice Evaristo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Corpo Feminino Direitos Reprodutivos Liberdade da mulher Violência doméstica e familiar Cidadania feminina Feminine body; Reproductive Rights; Woman's freedom; Domestic and family violence; female citizenship. |
topic |
Corpo Feminino Direitos Reprodutivos Liberdade da mulher Violência doméstica e familiar Cidadania feminina Feminine body; Reproductive Rights; Woman's freedom; Domestic and family violence; female citizenship. |
description |
This article, extracted from ongoing research, aims to analyze the requirement of conjugal consent for the use of a non-surgical contraceptive method in women as sexual and institutionalized violence. Such analysis is anchored in the qualitative and descriptive approach and uses the deductive method. The results suggest that the requirement of article 10, §5º, of Law 9.263/96, for cases of sterilization during the conjugal society, is not consistent with the use of a non-surgical contraceptive method, affronting the woman's self-determination in relation to her own body and legitimizes form of domestic and family violence against women, according to article 7, III, of Law 11.340/06, by preventing the choice of contraceptive method. In this sense, the conditioning imposed by health plans and professionals in the area clashes with the perspectives of freedom and non-interference by the state in the constitution of the family by reproducing a patriarchal culture that objectifies the woman's body, violating her reproductive and personality rights provided for in International Treaties and internal norms and, above all, in the face of the exclusion of the procreative purpose of marriage, arising from the conceptual evolution of the family and the emancipation of women. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revdirsex/article/view/50905 10.9771/revdirsex.v3i2.50905 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revdirsex/article/view/50905 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.9771/revdirsex.v3i2.50905 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revdirsex/article/view/50905/27951 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 ambos https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 ambos https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito e Sexualidade; v. 3 n. 2 (2022) | Revista Direito e Sexualidade; 1-19 2675-3596 reponame:Revista Direito e Sexualidade instname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) instacron:UFBA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) |
instacron_str |
UFBA |
institution |
UFBA |
reponame_str |
Revista Direito e Sexualidade |
collection |
Revista Direito e Sexualidade |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito e Sexualidade - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
grupodireitoesexualidade@gmail.com ; nucleosibi@ufba.br |
_version_ |
1797053934255210496 |