THE AMBIGUITY OF LAW 14.443/2022: NEW PERSPECTIVE AND UNCONSTITUTIONALITY – A LOOK AT MATERNITY
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direito e Sexualidade |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revdirsex/article/view/52030 |
Resumo: | The present summary aims to analyze Law 9.263/1996, which deals with family planning, in particular, the alteration occurred by the enactment of Law 14.443/2022, with the revocation of §5° and modification of item I, of article 10, which previously determined that women needed to have the consent of their spouse, if they were married, a requirement that was no longer necessary after the new law came into force. In view of this, women have the possibility of undergoing the procedure even without their husband's consent, which represents a new and significant perspective for Brazilian law, in addition to the fact that the procedure can be performed from the age of 21 or two children. Despite the fact that innovation brings greater freedom to women to choose their lives, the main problem is found in item I, which still has unconstitutional characteristics, as it affronts the civil majority of eighteen years, as well as it does not justify the minimum number of children , considering an “ideal” family, combined with the idea of controlling female bodies with the imposition of a supposed maternal instinct, which “should” be present in all women. The method used is based on the analysis of laws and constitutional norms of freedom and dignity of the human person, together with bibliographical research. |
id |
UFBA-13_5b4c1ae8517fb160875a31086ee93685 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufba.br:article/52030 |
network_acronym_str |
UFBA-13 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direito e Sexualidade |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
THE AMBIGUITY OF LAW 14.443/2022: NEW PERSPECTIVE AND UNCONSTITUTIONALITY – A LOOK AT MATERNITYA INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE DAS LEIS 9.263/1996 E 14.443/2022: GÊNERO E BIOPOLÍTICAInconstitucionalidadeInovaçãoPlanejamento familiarFamily planning. Freedom. Innovation. Unconstitutionality.The present summary aims to analyze Law 9.263/1996, which deals with family planning, in particular, the alteration occurred by the enactment of Law 14.443/2022, with the revocation of §5° and modification of item I, of article 10, which previously determined that women needed to have the consent of their spouse, if they were married, a requirement that was no longer necessary after the new law came into force. In view of this, women have the possibility of undergoing the procedure even without their husband's consent, which represents a new and significant perspective for Brazilian law, in addition to the fact that the procedure can be performed from the age of 21 or two children. Despite the fact that innovation brings greater freedom to women to choose their lives, the main problem is found in item I, which still has unconstitutional characteristics, as it affronts the civil majority of eighteen years, as well as it does not justify the minimum number of children , considering an “ideal” family, combined with the idea of controlling female bodies with the imposition of a supposed maternal instinct, which “should” be present in all women. The method used is based on the analysis of laws and constitutional norms of freedom and dignity of the human person, together with bibliographical research.O presente artigo visa analisar a Lei nº 9.263/1996 e a Lei nº 14.443/2022 que tratam acerca do planejamento familiar, em especial, a alteração ocorrida no artigo 10 da lei primeira, a partir da alteração do inciso I e § 5º do referido artigo, o qual determinava anteriormente que as mulheres precisavam ter o consentimento do cônjuge, se casadas fossem, para esterilização voluntária, requisito que deixou de ser necessário a partir da vigência da nova Lei. Diante disso, as mulheres têm a possibilidade de se submeter ao procedimento mesmo sem o consentimento do marido, o que representa uma nova e significativa perspectiva para o direito brasileiro, além de que o procedimento pode ser realizado a partir dos 21 anos ou dois filhos. Em que pese, a inovação traga maior liberdade às mulheres de escolherem sobre suas vidas, a problemática principal encontra-se no inciso I que ainda detém características inconstitucionais, pois afronta a maioridade civil dos dezoito anos, bem como não justifica a quantidade mínima de filhos, na consideração de uma família “ideal”, aliada a ideia de controle dos corpos femininos com a imposição de um suposto instinto maternal, o qual “deveria” se fazer presente em todas as mulheres. O método utilizado se pauta na análise das leis e dos princípios constitucionais de liberdade e dignidade da pessoa humana, juntamente com pesquisa bibliográfica.Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)2023-07-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revdirsex/article/view/52030Revista Direito e Sexualidade; v. 4 n. 1 (2023) | Revista Direito e Sexualidade; 33-482675-3596reponame:Revista Direito e Sexualidadeinstname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)instacron:UFBAporhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revdirsex/article/view/52030/29226NacionalCopyright (c) 2023 amboshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCovalchuk, Gabriela Cristina Pinto Vieira, Lara BiancaMoritz Alfonzo, Natália2023-07-19T20:54:44Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufba.br:article/52030Revistahttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revdirsex/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revdirsex/oaigrupodireitoesexualidade@gmail.com ; nucleosibi@ufba.br2675-35962675-3596opendoar:2023-07-19T20:54:44Revista Direito e Sexualidade - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE AMBIGUITY OF LAW 14.443/2022: NEW PERSPECTIVE AND UNCONSTITUTIONALITY – A LOOK AT MATERNITY A INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE DAS LEIS 9.263/1996 E 14.443/2022: GÊNERO E BIOPOLÍTICA |
title |
THE AMBIGUITY OF LAW 14.443/2022: NEW PERSPECTIVE AND UNCONSTITUTIONALITY – A LOOK AT MATERNITY |
spellingShingle |
THE AMBIGUITY OF LAW 14.443/2022: NEW PERSPECTIVE AND UNCONSTITUTIONALITY – A LOOK AT MATERNITY Covalchuk, Gabriela Cristina Inconstitucionalidade Inovação Planejamento familiar Family planning. Freedom. Innovation. Unconstitutionality. |
title_short |
THE AMBIGUITY OF LAW 14.443/2022: NEW PERSPECTIVE AND UNCONSTITUTIONALITY – A LOOK AT MATERNITY |
title_full |
THE AMBIGUITY OF LAW 14.443/2022: NEW PERSPECTIVE AND UNCONSTITUTIONALITY – A LOOK AT MATERNITY |
title_fullStr |
THE AMBIGUITY OF LAW 14.443/2022: NEW PERSPECTIVE AND UNCONSTITUTIONALITY – A LOOK AT MATERNITY |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE AMBIGUITY OF LAW 14.443/2022: NEW PERSPECTIVE AND UNCONSTITUTIONALITY – A LOOK AT MATERNITY |
title_sort |
THE AMBIGUITY OF LAW 14.443/2022: NEW PERSPECTIVE AND UNCONSTITUTIONALITY – A LOOK AT MATERNITY |
author |
Covalchuk, Gabriela Cristina |
author_facet |
Covalchuk, Gabriela Cristina Pinto Vieira, Lara Bianca Moritz Alfonzo, Natália |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pinto Vieira, Lara Bianca Moritz Alfonzo, Natália |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Covalchuk, Gabriela Cristina Pinto Vieira, Lara Bianca Moritz Alfonzo, Natália |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Inconstitucionalidade Inovação Planejamento familiar Family planning. Freedom. Innovation. Unconstitutionality. |
topic |
Inconstitucionalidade Inovação Planejamento familiar Family planning. Freedom. Innovation. Unconstitutionality. |
description |
The present summary aims to analyze Law 9.263/1996, which deals with family planning, in particular, the alteration occurred by the enactment of Law 14.443/2022, with the revocation of §5° and modification of item I, of article 10, which previously determined that women needed to have the consent of their spouse, if they were married, a requirement that was no longer necessary after the new law came into force. In view of this, women have the possibility of undergoing the procedure even without their husband's consent, which represents a new and significant perspective for Brazilian law, in addition to the fact that the procedure can be performed from the age of 21 or two children. Despite the fact that innovation brings greater freedom to women to choose their lives, the main problem is found in item I, which still has unconstitutional characteristics, as it affronts the civil majority of eighteen years, as well as it does not justify the minimum number of children , considering an “ideal” family, combined with the idea of controlling female bodies with the imposition of a supposed maternal instinct, which “should” be present in all women. The method used is based on the analysis of laws and constitutional norms of freedom and dignity of the human person, together with bibliographical research. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-07-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revdirsex/article/view/52030 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revdirsex/article/view/52030 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revdirsex/article/view/52030/29226 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 ambos https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 ambos https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Nacional |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito e Sexualidade; v. 4 n. 1 (2023) | Revista Direito e Sexualidade; 33-48 2675-3596 reponame:Revista Direito e Sexualidade instname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) instacron:UFBA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) |
instacron_str |
UFBA |
institution |
UFBA |
reponame_str |
Revista Direito e Sexualidade |
collection |
Revista Direito e Sexualidade |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito e Sexualidade - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
grupodireitoesexualidade@gmail.com ; nucleosibi@ufba.br |
_version_ |
1797053934265696256 |