THE AMBIGUITY OF LAW 14.443/2022: NEW PERSPECTIVE AND UNCONSTITUTIONALITY – A LOOK AT MATERNITY

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Covalchuk, Gabriela Cristina
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Pinto Vieira, Lara Bianca, Moritz Alfonzo, Natália
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Direito e Sexualidade
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revdirsex/article/view/52030
Resumo: The present summary aims to analyze Law 9.263/1996, which deals with family planning, in particular, the alteration occurred by the enactment of Law 14.443/2022, with the revocation of §5° and modification of item I, of article 10, which previously determined that women needed to have the consent of their spouse, if they were married, a requirement that was no longer necessary after the new law came into force. In view of this, women have the possibility of undergoing the procedure even without their husband's consent, which represents a new and significant perspective for Brazilian law, in addition to the fact that the procedure can be performed from the age of 21 or two children. Despite the fact that innovation brings greater freedom to women to choose their lives, the main problem is found in item I, which still has unconstitutional characteristics, as it affronts the civil majority of eighteen years, as well as it does not justify the minimum number of children , considering an “ideal” family, combined with the idea of ​​controlling female bodies with the imposition of a supposed maternal instinct, which “should” be present in all women. The method used is based on the analysis of laws and constitutional norms of freedom and dignity of the human person, together with bibliographical research.
id UFBA-13_5b4c1ae8517fb160875a31086ee93685
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufba.br:article/52030
network_acronym_str UFBA-13
network_name_str Revista Direito e Sexualidade
repository_id_str
spelling THE AMBIGUITY OF LAW 14.443/2022: NEW PERSPECTIVE AND UNCONSTITUTIONALITY – A LOOK AT MATERNITYA INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE DAS LEIS 9.263/1996 E 14.443/2022: GÊNERO E BIOPOLÍTICAInconstitucionalidadeInovaçãoPlanejamento familiarFamily planning. Freedom. Innovation. Unconstitutionality.The present summary aims to analyze Law 9.263/1996, which deals with family planning, in particular, the alteration occurred by the enactment of Law 14.443/2022, with the revocation of §5° and modification of item I, of article 10, which previously determined that women needed to have the consent of their spouse, if they were married, a requirement that was no longer necessary after the new law came into force. In view of this, women have the possibility of undergoing the procedure even without their husband's consent, which represents a new and significant perspective for Brazilian law, in addition to the fact that the procedure can be performed from the age of 21 or two children. Despite the fact that innovation brings greater freedom to women to choose their lives, the main problem is found in item I, which still has unconstitutional characteristics, as it affronts the civil majority of eighteen years, as well as it does not justify the minimum number of children , considering an “ideal” family, combined with the idea of ​​controlling female bodies with the imposition of a supposed maternal instinct, which “should” be present in all women. The method used is based on the analysis of laws and constitutional norms of freedom and dignity of the human person, together with bibliographical research.O presente artigo visa analisar a Lei nº 9.263/1996 e a Lei nº 14.443/2022 que tratam acerca do planejamento familiar, em especial, a alteração ocorrida no artigo 10 da lei primeira, a partir da alteração do inciso I e § 5º do referido artigo, o qual determinava anteriormente que as mulheres precisavam ter o consentimento do cônjuge, se casadas fossem, para esterilização voluntária, requisito que deixou de ser necessário a partir da vigência da nova Lei. Diante disso, as mulheres têm a possibilidade de se submeter ao procedimento mesmo sem o consentimento do marido, o que representa uma nova e significativa perspectiva para o direito brasileiro, além de que o procedimento pode ser realizado a partir dos 21 anos ou dois filhos. Em que pese, a inovação traga maior liberdade às mulheres de escolherem sobre suas vidas, a problemática principal encontra-se no inciso I que ainda detém características inconstitucionais, pois afronta a maioridade civil dos dezoito anos, bem como não justifica a quantidade mínima de filhos, na consideração de uma família “ideal”, aliada a ideia de controle dos corpos femininos com a imposição de um suposto instinto maternal, o qual “deveria” se fazer presente em todas as mulheres. O método utilizado se pauta na análise das leis e dos princípios constitucionais de liberdade e dignidade da pessoa humana, juntamente com pesquisa bibliográfica.Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)2023-07-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revdirsex/article/view/52030Revista Direito e Sexualidade; v. 4 n. 1 (2023) | Revista Direito e Sexualidade; 33-482675-3596reponame:Revista Direito e Sexualidadeinstname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)instacron:UFBAporhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revdirsex/article/view/52030/29226NacionalCopyright (c) 2023 amboshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCovalchuk, Gabriela Cristina Pinto Vieira, Lara BiancaMoritz Alfonzo, Natália2023-07-19T20:54:44Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufba.br:article/52030Revistahttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revdirsex/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revdirsex/oaigrupodireitoesexualidade@gmail.com ; nucleosibi@ufba.br2675-35962675-3596opendoar:2023-07-19T20:54:44Revista Direito e Sexualidade - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE AMBIGUITY OF LAW 14.443/2022: NEW PERSPECTIVE AND UNCONSTITUTIONALITY – A LOOK AT MATERNITY
A INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE DAS LEIS 9.263/1996 E 14.443/2022: GÊNERO E BIOPOLÍTICA
title THE AMBIGUITY OF LAW 14.443/2022: NEW PERSPECTIVE AND UNCONSTITUTIONALITY – A LOOK AT MATERNITY
spellingShingle THE AMBIGUITY OF LAW 14.443/2022: NEW PERSPECTIVE AND UNCONSTITUTIONALITY – A LOOK AT MATERNITY
Covalchuk, Gabriela Cristina
Inconstitucionalidade
Inovação
Planejamento familiar
Family planning. Freedom. Innovation. Unconstitutionality.
title_short THE AMBIGUITY OF LAW 14.443/2022: NEW PERSPECTIVE AND UNCONSTITUTIONALITY – A LOOK AT MATERNITY
title_full THE AMBIGUITY OF LAW 14.443/2022: NEW PERSPECTIVE AND UNCONSTITUTIONALITY – A LOOK AT MATERNITY
title_fullStr THE AMBIGUITY OF LAW 14.443/2022: NEW PERSPECTIVE AND UNCONSTITUTIONALITY – A LOOK AT MATERNITY
title_full_unstemmed THE AMBIGUITY OF LAW 14.443/2022: NEW PERSPECTIVE AND UNCONSTITUTIONALITY – A LOOK AT MATERNITY
title_sort THE AMBIGUITY OF LAW 14.443/2022: NEW PERSPECTIVE AND UNCONSTITUTIONALITY – A LOOK AT MATERNITY
author Covalchuk, Gabriela Cristina
author_facet Covalchuk, Gabriela Cristina
Pinto Vieira, Lara Bianca
Moritz Alfonzo, Natália
author_role author
author2 Pinto Vieira, Lara Bianca
Moritz Alfonzo, Natália
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Covalchuk, Gabriela Cristina
Pinto Vieira, Lara Bianca
Moritz Alfonzo, Natália
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Inconstitucionalidade
Inovação
Planejamento familiar
Family planning. Freedom. Innovation. Unconstitutionality.
topic Inconstitucionalidade
Inovação
Planejamento familiar
Family planning. Freedom. Innovation. Unconstitutionality.
description The present summary aims to analyze Law 9.263/1996, which deals with family planning, in particular, the alteration occurred by the enactment of Law 14.443/2022, with the revocation of §5° and modification of item I, of article 10, which previously determined that women needed to have the consent of their spouse, if they were married, a requirement that was no longer necessary after the new law came into force. In view of this, women have the possibility of undergoing the procedure even without their husband's consent, which represents a new and significant perspective for Brazilian law, in addition to the fact that the procedure can be performed from the age of 21 or two children. Despite the fact that innovation brings greater freedom to women to choose their lives, the main problem is found in item I, which still has unconstitutional characteristics, as it affronts the civil majority of eighteen years, as well as it does not justify the minimum number of children , considering an “ideal” family, combined with the idea of ​​controlling female bodies with the imposition of a supposed maternal instinct, which “should” be present in all women. The method used is based on the analysis of laws and constitutional norms of freedom and dignity of the human person, together with bibliographical research.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revdirsex/article/view/52030
url https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revdirsex/article/view/52030
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revdirsex/article/view/52030/29226
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 ambos
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 ambos
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Nacional
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Direito e Sexualidade; v. 4 n. 1 (2023) | Revista Direito e Sexualidade; 33-48
2675-3596
reponame:Revista Direito e Sexualidade
instname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
instacron:UFBA
instname_str Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
instacron_str UFBA
institution UFBA
reponame_str Revista Direito e Sexualidade
collection Revista Direito e Sexualidade
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direito e Sexualidade - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv grupodireitoesexualidade@gmail.com ; nucleosibi@ufba.br
_version_ 1797053934265696256